logo
Planned water reserve intended to ease shortages in the Panama Canal fuels river protest

Planned water reserve intended to ease shortages in the Panama Canal fuels river protest

Independent16-05-2025

Dozens of boats carrying around 200 people, mostly farmers waving Panamanian flags, traveled along the country's central Indio River on Friday to protest a planned reservoir in the Panama Canal intended to solve water shortages in the waterway that have threatened international trade flow.
The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) says building the reservoir is the best way to provide an additional water source for over 2 million people in Panama City and to ensure the canal operates efficiently in the coming decades.
The canal, which needs around 189 million liters (50 million gallons) of freshwater for each ship crossing, faced severe water shortages in 2023 due to lack of rain, forcing authorities to cut crossings by 20% and delay traffic. The proposed reservoir, which would take four years and $1.6 billion to build, could allow 12 to 13 more ship crossings per day and support new water treatment facilities being built, authorities say.
But protesters say building the reservoir using the Indio River, in the canal's watershed, would also force 2,000 people to be relocated from their homes because their communities would be flooded. Other areas downstream could also be affected by reduced river flow.
Iris Gallardo, a teacher from the Guasimo community and a member of the 'No to Reservoirs' movement, was among the group of mostly farmers waving Panamanian flags. She told the Associated Press they held the boat protest to show their rejection of the project and forced relocations.
'We are demanding that the multipurpose reservoir proposed by the ACP not be built without consulting and getting permission from the affected communities,' Gallardo said.
Instead, protestors suggest using the nearby Bayano Lake, located east of the capital. Authorities dismissed that idea due to logistical, legal challenges and cost, and said that such a project would displace 200,000 people – far more than the current plan. They said the project would also offer jobs to communities and that the resettlement plan is being developed with the community.
Former Panama Canal administrator Jorge Luis Quijano said opponents of the project don't understand how serious the water problem is.
'The only way to have water is to store it,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

El Salvador passes fiscal overhaul key to IMF deal
El Salvador passes fiscal overhaul key to IMF deal

Reuters

time2 days ago

  • Reuters

El Salvador passes fiscal overhaul key to IMF deal

SAN SALVADOR, June 10 (Reuters) - El Salvador's Congress on Tuesday passed a fiscal sustainability law aimed at strengthening public finances by tamping down on debt and boosting fiscal transparency, key to the nation's agreement with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The law, which passed by a vote of 59-1, establishes a fiscal rule that sets medium- and long-term debt targets, a medium-term fiscal framework, and an annual budget prepared and approved in accordance with the law. It also mandates the publication of fiscal data and medium-term projections. "Fiscal management is being made transparent, with a projection to reduce debt to up to 70% of GDP over a five-year medium term," ruling party lawmaker Christian Guevara of the Nuevas Ideas party said. "This is a new effort to project a new fiscal ceiling," he added. In May, the IMF reached an agreement with El Salvador to disburse around $120 million after the first review of its $1.4 billion, 40-month program. Further disbursements were dependent on the fiscal overhaul's passing. "Fiscal consolidation will continue this year through cuts in the wage bill and current spending restraint, and plans are being developed to reform the civil service and the pension systems to underpin the adjustment beyond this year," the IMF said at the time. "This will be supported by the new fiscal sustainability law."

Protesters and police clash in eastern Panama
Protesters and police clash in eastern Panama

The Independent

time7 days ago

  • The Independent

Protesters and police clash in eastern Panama

Authorities and protesters were injured Wednesday in eastern Panama when border police tried to open a highway blocked in an Indigenous community as part of monthlong demonstrations against changes to the country's social security system. Border police in riot gear launched tear gas and fired rubber-coated metal balls to disperse balaclava-wearing protesters firing rocks from slingshots and throwing Molotov cocktails. The National Border Service said in a statement that three of its members were taken for medical treatment. Among the protesters, at least one man's back and arm were studded with a constellation of wounds from pellets fired by police and another appeared to suffer a serious injury to one eye. An Associated Press journalist saw at least one home burned when police fired a tear gas canister onto its thatch roof. The roadway was covered in felled trees. A resident who requested anonymity because they feared retaliation, said they feared one protester was going to lose his eye after being struck in the melee. The small community is in the Darien, the remote province that borders Colombia and that has seen hundreds of thousands of migrants pass through until the flow effectively stopped earlier this year. Protests have persisted in parts of Panama for a month and a half. They've covered a range of issues including the changes to social security and opposition to a security agreement giving U.S. soldiers and contractors access to some facilities in Panama. President José Raúl Mulino has said he will not reverse the social security changes, nor will he allow protesters to obstruct roads. __

Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal
Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal

The Independent

time7 days ago

  • The Independent

Immigrant rights groups sue to invalidate Trump administration's El Salvador prison deal

A coalition of immigrant rights groups on Thursday sued to invalidate the Trump administration's deal to house detainees in a notorious prison in El Salvador, saying the arrangement to move migrant detainees outside the reach of U.S. courts violates the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C., notes that the administration has argued that those sent to El Salvador are beyond the reach of U.S. courts and no longer have access to due process rights or other U.S. constitutional guarantees. The deal, the plaintiffs allege, 'is contrary to law. And it was entered into without any legal basis.' The administration has sent hundreds of migrants to El Salvador, including some it accuses of being members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua. The administration in March agreed to pay $6 million for El Salvador to house 300 migrants. President Donald Trump has said he'd like to eventually send U.S. citizen criminals to the Salvadoran prison, though that'd likely be unconstitutional. The lawsuit notes that the State Department has reported that inmates in El Salvador's prisons may be subject to 'harsh and life-threatening' conditions, torture and lack access to reliable food, water and medical care. The prisons are run by the government of El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, who once called himself 'the world's coolest dictator' and has posted images of detainees sent from the U.S. getting marched into his centerpiece prison, the Terrorism Confinement Center, known as CECOT. The State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In one notorious case cited in the lawsuit, the Trump administration has not returned Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man it deported to El Salvador in violation of a judge's order, saying the man is no longer in its custody. That was the administration's argument when another judge ordered it to halt deportations under an 18th century wartime act — that the deportees were on a plane to El Salvador and outside the legal reach of federal judges. The suit was filed by Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, Immigrant Equality, the California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice and Democracy Forward, which is co-counsel in a separate lawsuit over the initial flights to El Salvador. Thursday's lawsuit says the deal violates the Administrative Procedures Act, which prevents agencies like the State Department, which reached the deal with El Salvador, from undertaking unconstitutional or otherwise illegal acts. In addition to violating the constitution, the suit notes that housing prisoners in El Salvador violates the First Step Act, a law requiring federal prisons to try to house inmates close to home. That law was signed by Trump in 2018.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store