Juniper Networks collaborates with Google Cloud on comprehensive solution
Juniper Networks, a leader in secure, AI-Native Networking, announced its collaboration with Google Cloud to accelerate new enterprise campus and branch deployments and optimise user experiences.
With just a few clicks in the Google Cloud Marketplace, customers can subscribe to Google's Cloud WAN solution alongside Juniper Mist wired, wireless, NAC, firewalls and secure SD-WAN solutions. Unveiled today at Google Cloud Next 25, the solution is designed to simply, securely and reliably connect users to critical applications and AI workloads whether on the internet, across clouds or within data centres.
'At Google Cloud, we're committed to providing our customers with the most advanced and innovative networking solutions. Our expanded collaboration with Juniper Networks and the integration of its AI-native networking capabilities with Google's Cloud WAN represent a significant step forward', said Muninder Singh Sambi, VP/GM, Networking, Google Cloud. 'By combining the power of Google Cloud's global infrastructure with Juniper's expertise in AI for networking, we're empowering enterprises to build more agile, secure and automated networks that can meet the demands of today's dynamic business environment'.
AIOps key to GenAI application growth
As the cloud expands and GenAI applications grow, reliable connectivity, enhanced application performance and low latency are paramount. Businesses are turning to cloud-based network services to meet these demands. However, many face challenges with operational complexity, high costs, security gaps and inconsistent application performance. Assuring the best user experience through AI-native operations (AIOps) is essential to overcoming these challenges and maximising efficiency.
Powered by Juniper's Mist AI-Native Networking platform, Google's Cloud WAN, a new solution from Google Cloud, delivers a fully managed, reliable and secure enterprise backbone for branch transformation. Mist is purpose-built to leverage AIOps for optimised campus and branch experiences, assuring that connections are reliable, measurable and secure for every device, user, application and asset.
'Mist has become synonymous with AI and cloud-native operations that optimise user experiences while minimising operator costs', said Sujai Hajela, EVP, Campus and Branch, Juniper Networks. 'Juniper's AI-Native Networking Platform is a perfect complement to Google's Cloud WAN solution, enabling enterprises to overcome campus and branch management complexity and optimise application performance through low latency connectivity, self-driving automation and proactive insights'.
Google's Cloud WAN delivers high-performance connections for campus and branch
The campus and branch services on Google's Cloud WAN driven by Mist provide a single, secure and high-performance connection point for all branch traffic. A variety of wired, wireless, NAC and WAN services can be hosted on Google Cloud Platform, enabling businesses to eliminate on-premises hardware, dramatically simplifying branch operations and reducing operational costs. By natively integrating Juniper and other strategic partners with Google Cloud, Google's Cloud WAN solution enhances agility, enabling rapid deployment of new branches and services, while improving security through consistent policies and cloud-delivered threat protection.
Image Credit: Juniper Networks
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
16 hours ago
- Zawya
Is AI the culprit in new wave of tech job losses?
Thousands of Africans are among tech workers who have lost their jobs this year, as hundreds of companies move to trim their workforce — an upheaval many have blamed on the rapid rise of artificial intelligence (AI). Last week, global software giant Microsoft announced retrenchment of three percent of its workforce – about 6,000 employees – across the globe, describing it as a move to optimise resources. But Microsoft is not alone. So far in 2025, at least 75,463 tech workers have been laid off globally, as 317 companies announce redundancies, according to tech talent consultancy and tracker TrueUp. Other major firms that have let go of staff this year include Google, TikTok, Amazon, Chegg, Electronic Arts, Meta, Intel, Canva, Hewlett-Packard (HP), AutoDesk and eBay, among others. While none of these companies has explicitly cited AI automation as the cause of their layoffs, many observers have pointed to the technology's rapid proliferation as the underlying threat – one that could jeopardise millions of jobs across the world. Yet experts in the industry view the concern differently, dismissing it as an overreaction to a shifting digital landscape.'AI cannot replace a developer. But an AI-proficient developer can replace another developer who has refused to embrace AI,' said Caleb Nyoiro, director of Zone 01 Kisumu, a training centre for tech workers.'I think it is now cliché to say that AI is replacing developers. Developers with AI proficiency will get more jobs and more money. That is the reality. It is only those who have shown no interest in learning AI that will lose their jobs.'Indeed, several studies suggest that AI is ultimately poised to create more jobs than it will eliminate – particularly in fields that demand higher-order thinking and innovation. A 2023 report by the World Economic Forum, for instance, projected that jobs requiring critical thinking, complex problem-solving and creativity are more likely to be enhanced than replaced by AI. Read: AI may not take your job anytime soon, says MITThese include roles such as software developers, engineers, and mathematicians, where AI is expected to augment about 80 percent of tasks, without fully taking over. Still, the impact will not be entirely painless. Data firm Statista estimated that 83 million jobs could be lost to AI between 2023 and 2027, while the technology is expected to create only 69 million new ones during the same period. Yet surprisingly, most professionals are not alarmed. A study published last month by the Pew Research Centre found that while 56 percent of Americans are 'extremely or very concerned' about AI-related job losses, only 25 percent of AI experts share that concern. The same study revealed that experts are far more optimistic than the public about the opportunities presented by AI. While they do worry about issues such as misinformation and digital impersonation, they express far less anxiety about AI-triggered job displacement. Even global financial institutions have dismissed blanket job displacements by AI. A January 2024 discussion paper by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) suggested that AI would widen income inequality – not because of massive job losses, but due to growing income gaps between workers who can adopt and use AI and those who can't. © Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
Channel Post MEA
18 hours ago
- Channel Post MEA
Organizations Leveraging Existing Data Management Platforms To Develop GenAI AppS
Gartner predicts that organizations will develop 80% of Generative AI (GenAI) business applications on their existing data management platforms by 2028. This approach will reduce the complexity and time required to deliver these applications by 50%. During the Gartner Data & Analytics Summit taking place in Mumbai this week, Prasad Pore, Sr Director Analyst at Gartner, said, 'Building GenAI business applications today involves integrating large language models (LLMs) with an organization's internal data and adopting rapidly evolving technologies like vector search, metadata management, prompt design and embedding. However, without a unified management approach, adopting these scattered technologies leads to longer delivery times and potential sunk costs for organizations.' As organizations aim to develop GenAI-centric solutions, data management platforms must evolve to integrate new capabilities or services for GenAI development, ensuring AI readiness and successful implementation. Enhancing GenAI Application Deployment With RAG Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is becoming a cornerstone for deploying GenAI applications, providing implementation flexibility, enhanced explainability and composability with LLMs. By integrating data from both traditional and non-traditional sources as context, RAG enriches the LLM to support downstream GenAI systems. 'Most LLMs are trained on publicly available data and are not highly effective on their own at solving specific business challenges,' said Pore. 'However, when these LLMs are combined with business-owned datasets using the RAG architectural pattern, their accuracy is significantly enhanced. Semantics, particularly metadata, play a crucial role in this process. Data catalogs can help capture this semantic information, enriching knowledge bases and ensuring the right context and traceability for data used in RAG solutions.' To effectively navigate the complexities of GenAI application deployment, enterprises should consider these key recommendations: Evolve Data Management Platforms: Evaluate whether current data management platforms can be transformed into a RAG-as-a-service platform, replacing stand-alone document/data stores as the knowledge source for business GenAI applications. Evaluate whether current data management platforms can be transformed into a RAG-as-a-service platform, replacing stand-alone document/data stores as the knowledge source for business GenAI applications. Prioritize RAG Technologies: Evaluate and integrate RAG technologies such as vector search, graph and chunking, from existing data management solutions or their ecosystem partners when building GenAI applications. These options are more resilient to technological disruptions and compatible with organizational data. Evaluate and integrate RAG technologies such as vector search, graph and chunking, from existing data management solutions or their ecosystem partners when building GenAI applications. These options are more resilient to technological disruptions and compatible with organizational data. Leverage Metadata for Protection: Enterprises should leverage not only technical metadata, but also operational metadata generated at runtime in data management platforms. This approach helps protect GenAI applications from malicious use, privacy issues and intellectual property leaks. 0 0
Campaign ME
20 hours ago
- Campaign ME
Brand versus performance? Is this really the fight?
Our industry loves a good debate. And over the past decade, we have been having one – around brand and performance. You either build emotional connections, or you drive measurable action. You either play the long game, or you deliver this quarter's numbers. Pick a side. We have been pushed into silos, particularly since measuring the business impact of digital ad investments became a mainstream approach in marketing. This shift gave rise to new structures within marketing functions – structures where on one side we have the brand team, armed with storytelling, culture and creativity. On the other, we have the performance team, armed with dashboards, attribution models and media efficiency targets. Different teams. Different budgets. Different KPIs. Often working in isolation, or worse, at odds with one another. This divide has led to ineffective decisions. Performance marketing wins favour because it is easier to measure and appears more efficient. Brand marketing often gets deprioritised because its impact takes longer to surface. But in truth, neither works in isolation. And both are incomplete without the other. At its core, marketing is becoming more fragmented, and measurement is becoming more difficult. Over the last few years, we have seen a shift: from measuring everything to measuring what is measurable. And that shift risks missing what truly matters. Here is my view. All marketing is performance Because what matters to the businesses we work with is growth. If it does not move the needle in leads, conversions, sales, profit or customers, then it does not matter. It might look great. It might even win an award. But if it does not deliver outcomes, it does not sustain for the longer term. The marketing world is evolving as fast as the technology behind it. CMOs are rewriting the growth playbook in real time. Retail media is exploding – new, closed ecosystems are emerging not just globally but also in our region. Budgets are shifting beyond Meta and Google for certain industries where the conversion cycle is relatively longer. Creators are emerging as scalable media channels. Large language model (LLM)-optimised search engine optimisation (SEO) is gaining traction. Search is being redefined, with inbound traffic from ChatGPT, Perplexity and others increasing month over month. We are moving from a search-driven world to an intent-first, moment-driven ecosystem. It is time to rethink everything. Modern marketing is transitioning from brand-versus-performance to marketing performance, and from the age of channels into the age of outcomes. The lines between brand and performance will blur. Not because one will replace the other, but because both must integrate to drive sustainable momentum. What happens to creative in a brand-meets-performance ecosystem? Real marketing power emerges when brand fuels performance storytelling, and creativity is held accountable to business outcomes. I believe the industries poised for growth will be those that embrace performance storytelling –where personalisation is no longer optional, but essential. Why does brand versus performance matter now more than ever? This shift demands that we stop thinking in silos of 'brand' versus 'performance' ownership. I have sat in meetings where marketing was reduced to a cost line, and I have watched marketers defend million-dollar brand campaigns with metrics like reach, impressions and video views. It is not their fault. That is what the industry has rewarded. But chief financial officers do not buy into narratives. They buy into outcomes. That is where our narrative, 'Always Relevant' comes in. It is not just a line we use at Platformance. It is how we operate. Instead of chasing awareness for awareness' sake, we look at moments that matter. What are people searching for, talking about, buying into today? Not as a campaign cycle. As a living, breathing ecosystem. And when relevance is the goal, brand and performance have to work together. Not as separate campaigns, but as part of the same motion. Your brand generates demand. Your performance activity captures the demand. When the two are in sync, marketing starts delivering like a growth engine. The reality? Most companies do not need more ads. They need more alignment – between the creative and the commercial. That does not mean you ditch brand entirely for sales-led tactics. It means you build a brand that sells. And a performance engine that does not forget the power of advocacy. One of the best campaigns I have seen recently in the month of Ramadan did not shout out with a multi-million dollar marketing drive. But it landed because the product, the message, the channel and the timing were all built around a single truth: relevance beats noise. So we need to move beyond the question of 'what does the brand stand for?' and ask something more direct: 'what does the brand do for the business?' That is the future of marketing I believe in. And if we get it right, we will stop debating about 'brand-versus-performance' entirely. Because the customer does not care which team made the ad. They just care it works. By Waseem Afzal, Founder, Platformance
