Prosecutors clear Florida officer in violent arrest of Black man at traffic stop
A video of the traffic stop showed officer D. Bowers punching William McNeil Jr., 22, who recorded the clip. Other officers were shown throwing McNeil on the ground and surrounding him during the traffic stop.
The video of the Feb. 19 arrest sparked outrage online after it began making the rounds on social media in July, which resulted in the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office launching an internal probe into the incident.
In the report by the State Attorney's Office, published on Wednesday, prosecutors said that Bowers 'conducted a lawful traffic stop and gave McNeil 12 individual lawful commands, which McNeil refused to obey.'
Story continues below advertisement
McNeil 'created a dangerous situation for himself and law enforcement,' the report from prosecutors added.
'The State Attorney's Office has reviewed this matter to determine whether any of Officer Bowers' actions constitute a crime. We conclude they do not,' the report added.
The video was released on July 20 by McNeil's lawyers, Ben Crump and Harry Daniels.
1:58
Black man punched in face by police during traffic stop in Jacksonville
An officer smashed the driver's side window, ordered McNeil to exit the car and hit him in his face. Another officer pulled him from the vehicle and threw him to the ground as other deputies surrounded him.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The footage from the arrest shows that seconds before being dragged outside of his car, McNeil had his hands up and did not appear to be resisting as he asked, 'What is your reason?' He had been pulled over and accused of not having his headlights on, even though it was daytime, his lawyers alleged.
Story continues below advertisement
During a news briefing in July, Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters said the cellphone camera footage from inside the car 'does not comprehensively capture the circumstances surrounding the incident.'
'Part of that stems from the distance and perspective of the recording cell phone camera,' the sheriff said in a statement, adding that the video did not capture events that occurred before officers decided to arrest McNeil.
Waters said cameras 'can only capture what can be seen and heard.'
'So much context and depth are absent from recorded footage because a camera simply cannot capture what is known to the people depicted in it,' he added.
McNeil was arrested and charged with resisting arrest, marijuana possession, driving with a suspended licence, not wearing a seatbelt and not using headlights in bad weather.
Bowers had said McNeil was reaching toward an area where there was a knife. McNeil's lawyers said their client was never combative.
McNeil's lawyers criticized the decision not to pursue criminal charges and called on the U.S. Justice Department to investigate.
Civil rights group Black Lives Matter also condemned the decision not to pursue charges and said the viral video showed police brutality.
In a statement released to ABC News after the report clearing Bowers was published, McNeil's lawyers called it 'little more than an attempt to justify the actions of Officer Bowers and his fellow officers after the fact.'
Story continues below advertisement
'Frankly, we expected nothing less especially after Sheriff Waters announced their conclusions more than three weeks before the report was issued,' the statement said. 'Since they are unwilling to seek justice, we will have to request that the U.S. Department of Justice investigate this incident and the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office.'
— with files from Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
22 minutes ago
- Global News
Amber alert issued for missing 8-month-old Brampton, Ont. boy
An Amber Alert has been issued for a missing eight-month-old boy who police say was last seen in Brampton, Ont. The alert, issued just after 6 p.m. on Thursday, was requested by Peel Regional Police, who said they were looking for the toddler and a 40-year-old man. Zaid Rahman, the young child, is described as around one foot tall with black hair. Police said his background was Middle Eastern. The suspect is 40-year-old Shahzaib Memon, the alert said. He is described as five feet, nine inches and around 120 pounds. Police said he was also Middle Eastern. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The alert also asked people to look out for a suspect vehicle. It was described as a Nissan Rogue with the licence plate CZLM113. Anyone with information or who sees the vehicle, the toddler or the suspect is asked to contact 911. Story continues below advertisement View image in full screen The suspect (left) and the missing child in images released by police.
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Search of Manitoba landfill for women's remains cost $18M, less than expected: Kinew
The Manitoba government says the landfill search that succeeded in finding the remains of two slain First Nations women cost $18 million, with $2 million more expected in the coming weeks to clear the site and move equipment. The total is far below previous estimates, which ran as high as $184 million. Premier Wab Kinew says the search was done in a safe and fiscally responsible manner but, more importantly, it brought Marcedes Myran and Morgan Harris home. Harris, Myran and two other First Nations women were killed in 2022 by Jeremy Skibicki, who was given a life sentence last year on four counts of first-degree murder. The remains of Harris and Myran were found at the Prairie Green landfill, a private operation north of Winnipeg. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Search efforts have begun to shift to the Brady Road landfill in Winnipeg, where the remains of Ashlee Shingoose are believed to be. Story continues below advertisement The remains of Rebecca Contois were found there in 2022. Police rejected calls that year to search the Prairie Green landfill, citing safety concerns. A feasibility study done in conjunction with the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs the following year warned there were risks due to exposure to toxic chemicals and asbestos but said a search would be doable. The report estimated a search could take up to three years and cost as much as $184 million with no guarantee of success. The Progressive Conservative government at the time rejected calls for a search and later touted its refusal in election campaign ads that were widely criticized. A followup feasibility study lowered the expected cost to $90 million. Kinew promised a search before winning the 2023 election, and his NDP government later partnered with the federal government to jointly commit $40 million. An environmental licence was issued that laid out guidelines for dealing with cancer-causing asbestos and other material. The search got underway in December 2024, and the remains of Harris and Myran were found within a few months. Kinew was not made available for an interview Thursday. His office issued a prepared statement. 'We told the people of Manitoba that we would search the landfill and we would do so in a fiscally responsible way and we delivered on that by completing the search
Global News
an hour ago
- Global News
Crown will not seek appeal of world junior sexual assault acquittal
Crown prosecutors will not file a notice of appeal in the high-profile world junior sexual assault trial after five men were acquitted last month, Global News has learned. The Crown had 30 days to notify the Court of Appeal for Ontario if it would seek a challenge of Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia's July 24 acquittal of Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dube and Callan Foote. Several lawyers involved in the case told Global News they received confirmation Thursday that the Crown will not be appealing the verdict. A spokesperson for the appeal court also told Global News it has not received a notice of appeal. The Crown's right to appeal is more restricted than someone found guilty of a crime, the Ontario government's website indicates. To appeal an acquittal, the Crown must show there was a significant error of law that had a substantial impact on the acquittal, it said. Story continues below advertisement The men, who were each charged with sexual assault in January 2024, were acquitted by Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia last month following a trial that began in late April in London, Ont. McLeod was also found not guilty of being party to the offence of sexual assault. In her July 24 ruling, Carroccia said the Crown couldn't 'meet its onus' on any of the charges before her. The five men were accused of engaging in non-consensual group sex with a then-20-year-old woman in June 2018. 'In this case, I have found actual consent not vitiated by fear. I do not find the evidence of E.M. to be either credible or reliable,' said Carroccia of the female complainant, known as E.M. in court documents as her identity is protected under a standard publication ban. 'With respect to the charges before this court, having found that I cannot rely upon the evidence of E.M. and then considering the evidence in this trial on the whole, I conclude the Crown can not meet its onus on any of the counts before me.' 5:01 Morality highlighted after Hockey Canada trial Court heard the team was in London for events marking its gold-medal performance at that year's world junior hockey championship, and that the complainant was out with friends when they met at a downtown bar on June 18, 2018. Story continues below advertisement After being with McLeod and his teammates at the bar, E.M. would go on to have consensual sex with McLeod in his room in the early morning hours of June 19. Court heard that E.M., who testified she was drunk and not of clear mind, was in the washroom after she had sex with McLeod and came out to a group of men in the room allegedly invited by McLeod in a group chat. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy It was then that the Crown alleged several sexual acts took place without E.M.'s consent. Defence lawyers suggested E.M. wasn't as drunk as she said she was, wanted a 'wild night' with the players, was 'egging' them on to have sex with her and accused her of having a 'clear agenda' at the trial. When reading out her analysis, Carroccia said there were 'troubling aspects' regarding E.M.'s evidence. On several occasions, she referred to it as 'her truth' and not 'the truth,' which Carroccia said, 'seemingly blurs the line between what she believes to be true and what is objectively true.' 'Although the slogan, 'Believe the victim,' has become popularized as of late, it has no place in a criminal trial. To approach a trial with the assumption that the complainant is telling the truth is the equivalent of imposing a presumption of guilt on the person accused of sexual assault and then placing the burden on him to prove his innocence,' she said. Story continues below advertisement 'That is antithetical to the fundamental principles of justice enshrined in our constitution and the values underlying our free and democratic society.' 3:56 Why the judge acquitted all 5 former Hockey Canada players in sex assault trial Karen Bellehumeur, E.M.'s lawyer, told reporters July 24 her client was 'very disappointed' with the judge's assessment of her honesty and credibility, but felt it was 'important to see the process through to the end, even if it meant opening yourself up to intense scrutiny and unjustified criticism.' The Crown's goal throughout the proceeding was to see a fair trial for everyone involved, Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham said that day. Yet defence lawyers struck a different tone, with some calling the decision a 'resounding vindication' and the Crown's case a 'hopeless prosecution' brought forward due to public pressure. What's in store for the men's futures is unclear; majority were playing in the NHL when they were charged. The league said shortly after the verdict they were 'ineligible' to play while it reviewed Carroccia's ruling. Story continues below advertisement The National Hockey League Players' Association said ruling the players ineligible while the NHL further evaluates is inconsistent with the league and players' union's collective bargaining agreement.
