logo
Will pan-African air travel ever truly take off?

Will pan-African air travel ever truly take off?

The Guardian09-04-2025

Hello and welcome to The Long Wave. This week, I dig into one of my biggest travelling bugbears. Why is it so circuitous, expensive, time-consuming and exhausting to travel within Africa?
Here are some of the routes that are available for travel within Africa. Buckle up. The shortest option from Johannesburg to Dakar is 14 and a half hours over two stops through Gabon and Togo. If you would prefer fewer stops, you have the option of leaving Africa altogether – flying to Istanbul and returning to the continent, which takes a 'quick' 26 hours and five minutes. Port Sudan to Kampala, a mere 1,860 miles away, is a nine-hour flight via Addis Ababa. And if you want to hop over from sub-Saharan Africa to north Africa, you are likely to end up in Paris or Amsterdam, which I have done, and felt that sailing around the Cape of Good Hope might have made more sense. And cost less. The minimum you'll pay for such trips is US $1,000 return.
Few carriers – and no cheap ones
Part of the problem is that there are only a few large airlines on the continent. Kenya Airways, Ethiopian Airlines and EgyptAir dominate Africa, and travellers are subject to those carriers' regional concentration, decisions on which direct routes to service, and the prices they can set, given the lack of competition.
The result is that European airlines such as KLM, Air France and Turkish Airlines mop up the rest of the journeys, and therefore hurl travellers out of the continent to their connecting hubs. I asked a Kenyan aviation expert why it was so hard for African airlines to expand their coverage, and he said: 'Every plane isn't just a plane. It's insurance, it's parts, it's maintenance.' The bar is very high for an additional route. And so while it would be great to pop over from Nairobi to N'Djamena, there just isn't enough traffic to justify the cost.
There might be, if the prices were lower. Air travel remains a huge luxury in Africa, and there are no low-cost regional equivalents to budget carriers such as easyJet and Ryanair, as a result of everything from lack of demand to the high capital required to establish a new airline. However, there is a chicken-and-egg element here: pan-African travel for leisure is considered prohibitively costly and cumbersome, and so the infrastructure required to support it, as well as domestic tourism markets, are discouraged.
There is another reason that raises a deeper question about how high the barriers are between countries that often share borders, languages and even tribal and ethnic relations.
The visa problem
It is an enduring travesty that in most parts of Africa, it is easier to gain entry if you have a western passport than an African one. My travel within the continent opened up vastly after I received a British passport, and it always feels like an uncomfortable colonial throwback to produce it for admission, rather than my Sudanese one. There are strong regional groupings, such as the Economic Community of West African States, and Kenya has recently declared that it will soon allow visa-free travel for all Africans – a bold announcement that has no launch date.
Other barriers linger, and some are getting higher. A historic free travel treaty between Sudan and Egypt was scrapped after the start of the war in Sudan to stanch the flow of refugees. This year, the African Union called for acceleration of visa-free movement to boost regional integration, and officials blamed enduring travel restrictions for not only the blocking of the goal of a united Africa but for hampering growth and development. Part of that slow growth is the stagnation of the aviation industry. Free movement, said the vice-president for regional development, 'must be the backbone of our integration'.
Sign up to The Long Wave
Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world
after newsletter promotion
Air Afrique: could the glamorous past be a model for the future?
There was once a pan-African airline whose posters I recall being a part of the iconography of travel on the continent: Air Afrique. Established in 1961 by a collective of west African Francophone countries and two French airlines, Air Afrique flew to 56 destinations, 35 of which were in Africa. As a marker of how much travel is crucial to fostering connections, it became more than just an airline and developed into a cultural powerhouse, sponsoring film festivals and establishing style standards (in a nod to this years after the airline closed, a Parisian art collective created an Air Afrique installation at men's fashion week in 2022).
After dominating African travel for four decades, Air Afrique succumbed to bankruptcy in 2002 as a result of mismanagement and the challenges of the aviation industry after 9/11. And there is a lesson there on how economic and political shocks such as recessions and pandemics are hard to manage, even by the most established players. It is understandable why airlines and policymakers may choose to be conservative.
But the case for increased African and African diaspora travel routes is becoming ever more persuasive. Three years ago, Kenya announced that it would be partnering with South Africa to launch a new pan-African carrier. And Nigeria is in talks to launch direct flights to Jamaica and Barbados.
There is clearly much infrastructure, investment and liberation of visa regimes needed to turn these ambitions into reality. But there is now such a vast disconnect between the growing cultural and political links between many countries that share so much, that the business case for extending them through air travel should eventually become obvious. And just think of the airline stewards' uniforms.
To receive the complete version of The Long Wave in your inbox every Wednesday, please subscribe here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Do Trump's hardline tariffs and travel bans put off Brits from visiting the US?
Do Trump's hardline tariffs and travel bans put off Brits from visiting the US?

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Do Trump's hardline tariffs and travel bans put off Brits from visiting the US?

Tariffs, travel bans, mass firings – if there's one thing you can be sure about with Donald Trump, it's that he'll make news. Constantly . That's even the case here in the UK, where most of his decisions have no direct impact. But is all that coverage having an effect on Brits hopping across the pond for a vacation? If you look at the dry numbers from the US National Travel and Tourism Office, you might think the answer is no. In January, the month of Trump's second inauguration, the number of UK visitors to the US was 5% higher than the previous January. February and April also saw more Brits going to the US than the same months in 2024, suggesting that far from putting people off, we may even be more keen to visit the country when it's run by Trump. ABTA, the British trade association for the travel industry, tells a similar tale. They 'haven't seen any significant changes in terms of UK-US travel post-Trump administration', a spokesperson told Metro, with 'no noticeable shifts away' from the States. But that may not be the full story. Australia-based tour company Intrepid Travel offers small-group trips to destinations as diverse as Nepal, the Galápagos Islands, Antarctica – and the United States. However, the latter has had a significant fall in interest over the past five months, with bookings from UK customers down 12%. That decline appears to be driven by one age group in particular: 21 to 30-year-olds, with whom bookings have fallen by almost a quarter. There was less of an impact for customers above that age bracket. Joanna Reeve, Intrepid's General Manager for the UK & Ireland, told Metro: 'While there is no way to know for sure what is causing the dip, negative perception of the US under the new administration could be playing a part in people's travel choices. 'New immigration rules and travel restrictions could be off-putting for potential visitors.' The country still remains popular overall, she said. According to the Office for National Statistics, the US was the sixth most popular country visited by UK residents in 2023 – though it wasn't far off Portugal and Greece in fifth and fourth place respectively. A survey for ABTA taken in summer last year – before Trump was elected, but while the presidential election campaign was in full swing – found the US came third after only Spain and France when people were asked where they planned to visit in the next 12 months. Even those who disagree with the direction of the Trump administration might want to consider visiting the US in order to mitigate its impact, Joanna suggested. She said: 'There are ways to travel there in a way that supports local people, like through supporting indigenous-led experiences. More Trending 'We're also encouraging people to visit and support the National Parks as they are facing huge cuts to their funding.' Interestingly, the attitude of young travellers with Intrepid – if they are indeed being put off by Trump – does not appear to reflect the broader UK. An Ipsos poll from just before Inauguration Day in January found 18 to 34-year-olds were the most likely age group in the UK to have a favourable view of the US President. However, 47% of Brits between those ages still disliked him compared to 31% who felt the opposite. Those aged 35 to 54 were 64% unfavourable, while 72% of those aged 55 or over felt the same. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Donald Trump roasts Elon Musk and suggests he has 'Trump derangement syndrome' MORE: Donald Trump's travel ban isn't actually about protecting Americans MORE: Fears of a serial killer prowling Texas after 38 bodies pulled from lake in three years

Chad suspends visa issuance to US citizens over travel ban
Chad suspends visa issuance to US citizens over travel ban

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Chad suspends visa issuance to US citizens over travel ban

N'DJAMENA, June 5 (Reuters) - Chad suspended visa issuance to U.S. citizens on Thursday after its nationals were included in a U.S. travel ban targeting 12 countries, President Idriss Deby said in a Facebook post. "I have instructed the government to act in accordance with the principles of reciprocity and suspend the issuance of visas to U.S. citizens," Deby said. "Chad has no planes to offer, no billions of dollars to give but Chad has its dignity and pride," Deby added, making reference to Qatar's gift of a $400 million airplane to U.S. President Donald Trump. Chad is among seven African countries on the list of 12 included in the U.S. administration's travel ban.

Ryanair's £55 'fee' can be avoided if you follow airport worker's advice
Ryanair's £55 'fee' can be avoided if you follow airport worker's advice

Daily Record

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Record

Ryanair's £55 'fee' can be avoided if you follow airport worker's advice

People who will be travelling with the budget airline this summer have '24 hours to avoid the charge'. Millions of tourists will be making their way through UK airports this summer, and for those not used to flying beyond the annual summer holiday, the experience can be rather hectic. It could potentially lead to unexpected fees before the holiday even kicks off if they're not used to airports. Ryanair, the well-known budget carrier, runs about 3,600 flights daily. The airline offers routes from the UK to various European destinations including Cyprus, Denmark, France, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain and beyond. ‌ TikTok user Mesha has offered some insider advice for those planning a summer break with Ryanair. Working for the airline at London Stansted Airport, she wanted to help travellers have a seamless journey with Ryanair. ‌ Mesha's video highlights some lesser-known rules and benefits of flying with Ryanair during the summer holidays. She points out that families can bring "two free baby items per child" on their flights, covering essentials like pushchairs, car seats, and cots without additional charges, though extra items beyond the two allowed will incur fees, reports the Express. She also said that some Ryanair staff may prevent passengers from boarding the flight if they have a hot drink in hand, as Ryanair has a strict policy against bringing hot beverages onboard. She explained: "Ryanair does not permit hot drinks on board. You can purchase drinks on board, but you cannot take a hot drink from outside onto the aircraft for safety reasons. You think we're just trying to make you buy more on board, but we're really not!" Travellers should also be particularly attentive in airports since the carrier no longer announces final calls for passengers. She advised: "Look at your boarding pass. It tells you what time the gate closes. Make sure you are at the gate no later than a few minutes before that closing time." Her biggest piece of advice for Ryanair customers this summer is to ensure they check-in online. Mesha added: "It is the easiest thing to do. It opens 24 hours before your flight departs and closes two hours before." She warned: "If you do not check in online, you will be charged £55 when you get to the airport. You cannot check in, get your boarding card - nothing - without paying that £55 online." ‌ In her video, she highlighted the need to be vigilant regarding the check-in process, especially for those who book their travels through a third party. She wrote over the top of her video: "You need to get the booking details so that you can check yourself in because most of the time, they do not check you in, and you'll still be charged." The Ryanair website highlighted that passengers utilising its online service can avoid the fee altogether. The £55 charge is only applied to those turning up at the airport without having performed an online check-in. ‌ A comment from a Ryanair spokesperson said: "If you do not check in online up to 2 hours before your scheduled departure time, you may check in at the airport up to 40 minutes before departure, but you will be charged an airport check-in fee. We urge all passengers to check in online before arriving at the airport so these fees can be avoided." Addressing last-minute airport check-ins, Mesha warned travellers about the risk of being removed from their flight in the event it's overbooked, adding: "How they decide who is offloaded is based on the last people to check in."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store