Herefordshire farm visited by Prince of Wales
The Prince of Wales has paid a visit to an innovative Duchy of Cornwall farm in Herefordshire.William was given an hour-long tour on Tuesday of Lower Blakemere Farm, which is spearheading efforts to cut carbon emissions through greener farming practices.Tenant farmers Phil and Heather Gorringe and their son Monty welcomed the prince to the site which is one of the Duchy's seven Focus Farms, an initiative designed to share knowledge and experiences of the transition to greener farming practices."We are so lucky to have had a [royal] visit," said Mrs Gorringe. "It's good for the team."
"I think also it gives you a real boost because we are a Focus Farm. It gives that whole thing a boost, that actually you might be being useful and on the right track."
The farm, which was established in the early 1980s as a specialist seed grower, is also the home of composting equipment provider Wiggly Wigglers.The prince was shown two types of kitchen waste composting bins, sifting through waste and inspecting composting worms by hand.As he looked at the wormery bin, he was heard to say: "Oh my goodness, look at that, that's amazing."
"He got right in there," said Mrs Gorringe. "He basically wanted to know how the heck it worked in terms of Bokashi [a Japanese method of composting]."He had not heard of that, but in terms of worms he seemed really interested that it was functioning in such a small scale."He wanted to know if we could replicate that on a larger scale - for farm composting."
Mrs Gorringe added that the royal visit went some way to validating the work being done on the farm."It's tough farming, it's tough moving to a regenerative process, it really is," she said."So it gives everyone a boost."
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump says national security concerns in Nippon-U.S. Steel deal can be resolved
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday that concerns over national security risks posed by Nippon Steel's $14.9 billion bid for U.S. Steel can be resolved if the companies fulfill certain conditions that his administration has laid out, paving the way for the deal's approval. Shares of U.S. Steel rose 3.5% on the news in after-the-bell trading as investors bet the deal was close to done. Trump, in an executive order, said conditions for resolving the national security concerns would be laid out in an agreement, without providing details. 'I additionally find that the threatened impairment to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the Proposed Transaction can be adequately mitigated if the conditions set forth in section 3 of this order are met,' Trump said in the order, which was released by the White House. The companies thanked Trump in a news release, saying the agreement includes $11 billion in new investments to be made by 2028 and governance commitments including a golden share to be issued to the U.S. government. They did not detail how much control the golden share would give the U.S. Shares of U.S. Steel had dipped earlier on Friday after a Nippon Steel executive told the Japanese Nikkei newspaper that its planned takeover of U.S. Steel required 'a degree of management freedom' to go ahead after Trump earlier had said the U.S. would be in control with a golden share. The bid, first announced by Nippon Steel in December 2023, has faced opposition from the start. Both Democratic former President Joe Biden and Trump, a Republican, asserted last year that U.S. Steel should remain U.S.-owned, as they sought to woo voters ahead of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, where the company is headquartered. Biden in January, shortly before leaving office, blocked the deal on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which began on January 20 and opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple 'investment' in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion. At a rally in Pennsylvania on May 30, Trump lauded an agreement between the companies and said Nippon Steel would make a 'great partner' for U.S. Steel. But he later told reporters the deal still lacked his final approval, leaving unresolved whether he would allow Nippon Steel to take ownership. Nippon Steel and the Trump administration asked a U.S. appeals court on June 5 for an eight-day extension of a pause in litigation to give them more time to reach a deal for the Japanese firm. The pause expires Friday, but could be extended.
Scottish Sun
15 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Nowhere near enough' – Top horse owner rejects £2.2MILLION offer for superstar syndicate filly Shes Perfect
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TOP horse owner said he was 'delighted' to miss out on £2.2million - claiming the offer for his superstar filly was 'nowhere near enough'. Members of the Basher Watts Racing 2 syndicate voted overwhelmingly in favour of rejecting the life-changing sum for Shes Perfect. 1 Basher Watts, third from left, was briefly a Classic-winning owner with his syndicate and filly Shes Perfect - until they were demoted to second Credit: Shutterstock Editorial The Charlie Fellowes-trained three-year-old was first past the post in the French 1,000 Guineas under Kieran Shoemark last month. But, amid boos and cries of 'cheat' in the winner's enclosure, she was demoted and placed second behind Zarigana, with connections also losing their appeal against the decision of French stewards. Shes Perfect returns to action at Chantilly on Sunday in the Group 1 Prix de Diane Longines, where victory is worth 'just' £472,231. The horse was bought for around £42,000 in May last year - meaning, if they had sold to Japanese buyers, the syndicate would have made a 5,138 per cent profit on their investment. It equated, Basher said, to around £20,000 each. But, while much more than they stand to make at the races with her, Basher said the sum was 'nowhere near enough', and added: "Some things are worth more than money." Explaining the deal, the syndicate boss said: "So, what actually happened? "We had a Japanese client approach Charlie and offer £2.2m. "How it works is people own a share of the horse and are entitled to a percentage of the sale which, in this case, after fees, if you own one per cent you would have got about £20,000. "So I put it to the group and 37 out of 38 voted no. "I'm delighted everyone voted no. "For me, I had a dream of getting lucky and owning a Classic, Group 1 runner - a horse who will take you to all the big racecourses… which is what she did. "She might not earn £2.2m in prize money but, we had her valued and, if she never raced again, she'd be worth up to £1m. "So, you're trading the rest of her career for £1m. "That to all of us, and me, is just not worth it. "Those 15 minutes we experienced at Longchamp where we were Classic-winning owners, I would not trade that for any amount of money. "Horse racing is my passion, my love, and this is my dream to be in the poisition we are in. "Some things mean so much more than money and this is one of those moments. We are absolutely living our dream. "If she gets beat on Sunday who cares? As long as she is fit and well we're going to have many fantastic days out with her. "The time to sell will be down to the syndicate only - and at the moment she's not for sale. "Imagine her winning in someone else's silks - I dont know how I'd process that. She's our baby, our dream. "And it's not worth trading in the dream for that amount of money." FREE BETS - GET THE BEST SIGN UP DEALS AND RACING OFFERS Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: Establishes time and monetary limits before playing Only gambles with money they can afford to lose Never chases their losses Doesn't gamble if they're upset, angry or depressed Gamcare – Gamble Aware – Find our detailed guide on responsible gambling practices here.
Scotsman
16 hours ago
- Scotsman
Council secrecy over Christmas events casts a shadow
Edinburgh's Christmas Market and Hogmanay celebrations have never been far from controversy. Yet again concerns are bubbling away over procurement rules and the council's ability to recover funds from operators. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... At last month's full council my Conservative colleague Phil Doggart asked the council leader a simple question. He prefaced it by indicating he had been asking officers similar questions for six weeks without an answer. Phil said: 'Can the council leader confirm that Unique Assembly has complied with all the terms of the winter festivals contract and is not in breach of any terms of the contract, and the council has received all monies due to it.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The council leader read a prepared statement that didn't answer the question, deflected onto the cancellation of events because of weather and puffed up the benefit of the winter and summer festivals. What she did say was that work was ongoing and reporting would go to two council committees. She then used the pretext of allowing local companies who are suppliers to the contractor to be reimbursed first. The second committee met yesterday with the only reporting being a short cryptic reference to the committee having 'received correspondence' and that a legal review of issues raised was under way. Equally cryptic was the noting of the response to two Freedom of Information requests which seem to admit the funds due have not been paid. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Councillors clearly aren't happy with the secrecy as another political party added to the tension by lodging an amendment calling for a lot more information to be released to councillors, even if this must happen in private. Loved by many and loathed by others, the market's use of public space by private operators for profit causes a public debate. Reinstatement of public areas causes annoyance. Seeming flouting of planning rules has, in the past, led to allegations of preferential treatment. There is then the issue of whether this helps all year-round local businesses who pay rates and property costs by bringing footfall. Or whether it draws business away to short term market operators imported from elsewhere. Given this, you would think the council would be making sure that the procurement of these events was squeaky clean. Yet the correspondence seems to be linked to other potential operators who failed to get the contract. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If the council wants the controversy to go away it will have to openly show it is acting in the best interests of the taxpayer and local businesses and has complied with all the legal rules. The disinfectant of sunlight is required here but watch this space as it may take some time.
