Trump Administration Strips Security Clearance From 37 Officials
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump's administration has said it is revoking the security clearances from 37 current and former national security officials, citing the "politicization or weaponization of intelligence."
Newsweek contacted the Office of the Director of National Intelligence for comment by email outside of regular working hours.
Why It Matters
The action forms part of a continuing effort by the White House to penalize officials it deems hostile to its aims, and it renews debate over the use of security clearances as a political instrument.
In March, Trump revoked the security clearances from a number of his political opponents, including former President Joe Biden and his family, former Vice President Kamala Harris, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Representatives Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard speaking at the White House in Washington, D.C. in July.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard speaking at the White House in Washington, D.C. in July.
Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP
What To Know
In a memo posted on X, formerly Twitter, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard accused the affected individuals of "manipulating intelligence, leaking classified intelligence without authorization, and/or committing intentional egregious violations of tradecraft standards."
She added: "Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right. Those in the intelligence community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold. In doing so, they undermine our national security, the safety and security of the American people and the foundational principles of our democratic republic."
The memo did not offer any evidence to support the accusations.
The memo said that the affected individuals had engaged in some or all of the following actions: "Politicization or weaponization of intelligence to advance personal, partisan, or non-objective agendas inconsistent with national security priorities; failure to safeguard classified information in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and agency policies; failure to adhere to professional analytic tradecraft standards; and other conduct detrimental to the trust and confidence required for continued access to national security information."
The 37 people affected by the latest revocations include: Andrew Cedar, Andrew P. Miller, Benjamin A. Cooper, Beth E. Sanner, Brett M. Holmgren, Charles A. Kupchan, Christopher Center, Corinne A. Graff, Dilpreet K. Sidhu, Edward Gistaro, Emily J. Horne, Harry Hannah, Heather R. Gutierrez, Jamie S. Jowers, Jeffrey M. Prescott, Joel T. Meyer, Joel Willett, John W. Ficklin, Julia S. Gurganus, Julia Santucci, Loren DeJonge Schulman, Luke R. Hartig, Maher B. Bitar, Mark B Feierstein, Mary Beth Goodman, Megan F. Doherty, Michael P. Dempsey, Perry J. Blatstein, Richard H. Ledgett, Samantha E. Vinograd, Sarah S. Farnsworth, Shelby L. Pierson, Stephanie O'Sullivan, Thomas W. West, Vinh X. Nguyen, William J. Tuttle, Yael Eisenstate.
The memo said these individuals would have their access to classified systems, facilities, materials and information cut off immediately, and that any contracts or employment would also be terminated.
It also said that agencies are required to report to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence as soon as the revocations are completed.
Many of the individuals left the government a number of years ago, according to The Associated Press. Some worked on issues that have long infuriated Trump, including the investigation into Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election.
What People Are Saying
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard wrote on X on Tuesday: "Our intelligence community must be committed to upholding the values and principles enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and maintain a laserlike focus on our mission of ensuring the safety, security and freedom of the American people."
The memo said: "Intelligence community professionals must remain nonpartisan, fact-driven, and committed to truth above all else. All personnel are reminded that holding a clearance is a privilege, not a right, and this privilege is contingent upon continued adherence to the principles and responsibilities of our profession. Any betrayal of these standards compromises not only our mission, but also the safety and security of the American people."
Mark Zaid, a national security lawyer whose own clearance was revoked by Trump, told The Associated Press: "These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Host Has Lame Defense For Why Gavin Newsom's Tweets Are Bad, But Trump's Are Not
Fox Newshost Dana Perino attempted to defend her pearl-clutching towardCalifornia Gov. Gavin Newsom's trend oftrolling tweets on Tuesday's episode of'The Five.' But doing so required her to ignore the reason for the governor's recent mockery of Donald Trump's social media style and insisted Newsom is just being a copycat. Newsom has recently been mocking MAGA by mimicking the president's all-caps online posts, complete with insults and ludicrously narcissistic praise of himself. In the process, Trump lovers like Kid Rock have gotten themselves in a MAGA tizzy over the posts. On Monday, Perino suggested with a straight face that Newsom has 'to stop it with the Twitter thing,' claiming he was 'making a fool' of himself in the process. Many people on social media mocked Perino's complaints about Newsom's posts because many of them are direct copies of previous Trump posts. As a result, she faced accusations of hypocrisy and having a partisan double standard where mean tweets are concerned. Related: Newsom's Press Office responded with an all-caps post that began, 'DANA 'DING DONG' PERINO (NEVER HEARD OF HER UNTIL TODAY!) IS MELTING DOWN BECAUSE OF ME, GAVIN C. NEWSOM!' Perino attempted to defend her pearl-clutching by saying, 'We get the joke,' though her excuse required her to be humorless. Related: 'He was reading tweets that were written for him by people that he is heavily investing in to try to help him look more like Trump, I guess,' she said. 'I mean, I thought they hated Trump, but they're trying to be more like him and they have to pay people to do it.' She also insisted that the problem she had with Newsom's posts is that they weren't authentic. She added: 'You're trying to do somebody else who you say is Hitler, and you think that we don't get the joke. Oh, no, we get the joke. It's just not funny.' Perino's co-host, Jesse Watters, also seemed a bit miffed at Newsom for following the lead of the GOP's fearless leader. 'They claim conservatives don't get the joke, we do ― we just think you look like a tool,' he said without irony. Both Perino and Watters' lame defenses of their partisan double standards were mocked by others on social media. Related... Fox News' Dana Perino Called Out For Hypocrisy Over Gavin Newsom Posts Kid Rock Goes Into Meltdown Mode After Getting Punked By Gavin Newsom's X Account Gavin Newsom's Troll Job Of Trump Is Working Incredibly Well Poli Sci Experts Predict What Exactly Gavin Newsom's Mockery Of Trump Could Achieve
Los Angeles Times
5 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas shows how Trump's anti-green moves threaten a red economy
Deep-red Texas needs to build power plants at an astonishing speed and scale to keep its economy humming. President Donald Trump just made that much harder. So many data centers, crypto-mining operations and factories are planned for the Lone Star State that its peak electricity demand is poised to surge in the next five years — perhaps even double. The vast majority of new power capacity planned there would utilize the sun, the wind or batteries. But Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill kills tax credits for renewable projects starting in 2028, making them more expensive to build. Other states face the same problem, as power demand nationwide is expected to soar after decades of minimal growth. But it's particularly acute in Texas, which has been rapidly adding renewable energy while it struggles to build gas-burning power plants. The state's bustling economy will be threatened if it can't add more electricity. Texas' gross domestic product jumped 51% from 2020 through 2024 — compared to 37% for the country as a whole — fueled by cheap power. 'We're in an energy crunch,' said Joshua Rhodes, an electricity expert and research scientist at the University of Texas at Austin. 'We should be doubling down on everything we can build right now. Making things more expensive is antithetical to that.' Clean power is expected to continue growing across the US, despite Trump's tax and spending bill. But the legislation will cut the amount installed. BloombergNEF, for example, forecasts that annual deployment of new solar, wind and energy storage facilities in 2035 will be 23% lower than it would have been without the bill. Oil and gas get most of the attention, but green energy has been the Texas economic boom's secret ingredient. All but 6% of new electric capacity added to the state's grid since 2020 has come from renewables or batteries. With vast, windswept plains, Texas has long been the top market for wind power. Solar surged as panel prices declined almost 50% in the past five years. It certainly helps that renewables are fast and relatively easy to install, compared to fossil fuel power plants that take years to build. Texas now has more clean energy and storage systems than any other state, supplying more than 30% of its electricity. Texas enjoys relatively low electricity prices — which have become a magnet for energy-hungry facilities like data centers. The state's power grid manager, known as Ercot, forecasts peak demand to approach 150 gigawatts by 2030, up from a record of 85.5 gigawatts in 2023. Transmission service providers, including utility companies, say demand could get even higher, topping 200 gigawatts in 2030. For a sense of scale, a gigawatt is the output of one commercial nuclear reactor and can power about 200,000 Texas homes. The state now has about 178 gigawatts of installed generating or storage capacity, but not all of that electricity is available at any given moment. Gas and coal plants need to be taken offline for maintenance, batteries must recharge after use, and the output of solar and wind facilities varies with the weather and time of day. There always needs to be a comfortable cushion between installed capacity and actual demand. Texas' grid is largely cut off from the rest of the country, so meeting expected demand growth will require adding lots of generation within the state — quickly. The state's clean-energy boom had been expected to continue. But with Trump's budget bill, wind and solar projects that go into service after the start of 2028 will no longer qualify for key federal incentives, unless they begin construction by July 5, 2026. Less-profitable projects will likely be cancelled. A White House spokesman said that depending on 'unreliable energy sources' could lead to reliability issues. The new policies will prompt developers to focus instead on domestically produced coal, gas and nuclear energy, Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields said in an emailed statement. Led by Republican Governor Greg Abbott, Texas officials have tried to encourage construction of power plants burning natural gas. They've even set aside $5 billion of public money to offer gas plant developers low-interest loans. But projects keep dropping out of the loan program due to cost uncertainties and problems procuring equipment. Indeed, there's currently a global manufacturing shortage of the turbines used in gas-fired plants, with a five-year backlog for new orders. Anyone planning a new gas plant faces a long wait for the gear. A spokeswoman for Ercot said the state continues to see new power-generating projects being proposed to address growing demand. But any obstacle to new supplies poses a threat to the Texas economy, which would be the world's eighth-largest if the state were considered as a country. Curtailing renewables would mean less electricity added to the grid. The renewable plants that do get built will cost more than before the One Big Beautiful Bill, driving up prices. Residential ratepayers in Texas could pay about 23% more in 2035 than they would have if the bill hadn't upended the market, while industrial customers could see bills surge 54%, according to Energy Innovation Policy & Technology, an energy and climate think tank. Higher utility bills for consumers will mean less money to spend elsewhere every month. 'We will severely restrict economic growth,' said Doug Lewin, a Texas energy expert and president of Stoic Energy Consulting. 'Because we can't grow without energy.' Wade, Malik and Sanchez write for Bloomberg. Mark Chediak and Jennifer A. Dlouhy contributed.
New York Post
5 minutes ago
- New York Post
Tulsi Gabbard to downsize ODNI's workforce by 40%, eliminate ‘politicized' offices
WASHINGTON — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced plans Wednesday to cut her agency's workforce by up to 40% in the coming weeks — and eliminate several offices that 'politicized' the flow of critical information. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence had been staffed by more than 1,800 employees when Gabbard was sworn in but is expected to retain just 1,300, while at least three offices deemed redundant will be shut down, according to senior officials. The 'core functions' of those offices — Foreign Malign Influence Center (FMIC), National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center and the Cyber Threat Intelligence Integration Center — will be taken up either by ODNI's Mission Integration office or the National Intelligence Council. Advertisement 3 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence,' Gabbard said. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post The latter comprises the most senior intelligence analysts, who help oversee more than a dozen agencies. ODNI officials claimed in a briefing with reporters that the FMIC had eroded Americans' civil liberties, particularly during the Biden administration — and even contributed to moves by big tech platforms to censor speech like The Post's bombshell story on former first son Hunter Biden in October 2020. Advertisement One official compared the office to the State Department's Global Engagement Center, which Secretary Marco Rubio closed down in April following similar accusations of suppressing free speech. 3 The Office of the Director of National Intelligence had been staffed by more than 1,800 employees when Gabbard was sworn in but is expected to retain just around 1,300, according to senior ODNI officials. AFP via Getty Images The other two offices focused on monitoring threats involving weapons of mass destruction and cyberattacks — both of which are handled by other existing executive branch agencies. Additionally, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has agreed to absorb the National Intelligence University into his department's National Defense University for all intelligence-related programs and courses. Advertisement The initiative, branded 'ODNI 2.0,' could save US taxpayers up to $700 million, the officials projected. 3 Gabbard has accused ex-DNI James Clapper and some of his aides for weaponizing the work of intelligence. Patrick McMullan via Getty Images Gabbard announced the changes in a message to the workforce Wednesday afternoon, which said ODNI was 'at a crossroads.' 'Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence, and politicized weaponization of intelligence,' she said in a statement. Advertisement 'ODNI and the IC must make serious changes to fulfill its responsibility to the American people and the US Constitution by focusing on our core mission: find the truth and provide objective, unbiased, timely intelligence to the President and policymakers,' she added. 'Ending the weaponization of intelligence and holding bad actors accountable are essential to begin to earn the American people's trust which has long been eroded.'
