logo
How long will it take for Sizewell C power station to make energy bills lower?

How long will it take for Sizewell C power station to make energy bills lower?

Yahoo3 days ago

Rachel Reeves has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant, in a bid to give the UK more control over its energy supplies and to tackle the climate crisis.
The Chancellor is set to confirm the funding for the new plant in Suffolk at the GMB Congress on Tuesday ahead of the Treasury's spending review on Wednesday.
It will mark the first nuclear power plant to be completed in more than half-a-century, with the site expected to produce enough power for six million homes when it opens.
Energy secretary Ed Miliband said the UK needs "new nuclear" to deliver "a golden age of clean energy abundance" to bring down energy bills and "tackle the climate crisis".
However, campaigners have warned that the final bill for the project will be far higher than expected, with one group describing it as "HS2 mark 2", and fear the plant may be "obsolete" by the time it is built.
So, will the Sizewell C nuclear plant lower our energy bills? And if so, how long will it take?
Sizewell C will be located near the small fishing village of Sizewell, on the Suffolk coast between Aldeburgh and Southwold.
It is being built next to Sizewell B, a pressurised water reactor nuclear power plant, which began operating in 1995 and is the last nuclear plant to be completed in the UK.
Some locals fear the environmental impact of Sizewell C. Jenny Kirtley of the Together Against Sizewell C group told ITV News: "You've only got to look around the area and see the devastation that's happened.
"There are a huge mountains of earth everywhere and of course the wildlife is suffering. The deer don't know where to go. They're rambling around everywhere. The birds are leaving their nests."
Also concerned about the impact on the local economy, Kirtley added: "We've got 6,000 people living around here so where are people going to live? We know rents are going sky-high so it's going to get worse."
Click below to see the latest East England headlines
The chancellor has signed off on £14.2 billion of investment to build the new Sizewell C nuclear plant.
Meanwhile Rolls-Royce has been named as the preferred bidder to build small modular reactors (SMRs) in a programme backed by £2.5 billion of taxpayers' cash.
The government said its investment will go towards creating 10,000 jobs, including 1,500 apprenticeships, and support thousands more jobs across the UK.
The company Sizewell C has already signed £330 million in contracts with local companies, with 70% of contracts predicted to go to 3,500 British suppliers.
Alison Downes of the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, said ministers have not "come clean" about the full cost of the project, which her group previously estimated could come to around £40 billion.
'Where is the benefit for voters in ploughing more money into Sizewell C that could be spent on other priorities, and when the project will add to consumer bills and is guaranteed to be late and overspent just like Hinkley C?," she said.
Miliband has denied suggestions that the project will be 'HS2 mark 2' – a reference to the high-speed rail project that ballooned in cost amid repeated delays.
'I don't agree with that," he told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme, arguing that because the plant is a "replica" of the Hinkley Point C station, under construction in Somerset, "we can be confident it can be built cheaper and faster".
The plant is expected to be operational some time in the 2030s.
Pressed on how long the project will take, Miliband told the Today programme: 'Around a decade. That's what we believe is likely, mid-2030s is the date that we're putting on this.'
EDF Energy, which owns 16.5% of the project, said in 2023 that in a "best-case scenario", the "earliest that one of the two reactors could be operational would be the end of 2033".
Hereward Phillpot, a lawyer for the company, said the schedule for the project anticipates that both reactors will be operational by mid-2034.
In 2022, the previous Conservative government bought out China General Nuclear Power Group, meaning the state now owns 83.5% of the project, Sky News reported.
Environmental activist and founder of green energy company Ecotricity, Dale Vince, said nuclear projects are "never on time", pointing out that Hinkley Point C was originally meant to be switched-on in 2017 and is now expected to be operational from 2031.
Appearing on ITV's Good Morning Britain on 10 June, Miliband accepted that the completion of the plant will not immediately have an impact on people's energy bills.
"It isn't, but it's about the long-term," he said, suggesting more investment in nuclear will give Britain greater control and security over its energy supplies.
"My position is that we need all of these low-carbon alternatives. At the moment, we're stuck on the fossil fuel rollercoaster," the energy secretary said.
"There's gas markets internationally, which shape the price, controlled by petro-states and dictators. We're doing the short-term things, like solar and wind, and we're doing the long-term things – and it's good for jobs as well."
Sizewell C has said the project could deliver more than £1-1.5 billion of annual savings across the electricity system when it is up and running, but it is hard to tell how this will be passed down to ordinary household bills.
Vince argued that due to funding coming from people's household bills, "billpayers will be forced to subsidise Sizewell for years, no matter how much the costs balloon".
He said keeping the plant safe from an eroding Suffolk coastline "will cost billions more, and every upgrade will land on our energy bills".
Read more
Voices: Could 'going nuclear' finally end Ed Miliband's career? (The Independent)
Rolls-Royce to build Britain's first mini nuclear reactors (The Telegraph)
China banned from investing in Sizewell C, energy secretary Ed Miliband vows (The Independent)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't make us work on Israel's ‘genocide' in Gaza, say civil servants
Don't make us work on Israel's ‘genocide' in Gaza, say civil servants

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Don't make us work on Israel's ‘genocide' in Gaza, say civil servants

British civil servants must stop helping Israel with 'potential war crimes' in Gaza, union bosses have demanded. The Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union, which represents almost 200,000 civil servants across Whitehall, has advised members to 'stop all work within the civil service and its related areas which in any way potentially enables acts of genocide'. It has pledged to support civil servants who refuse to work on Israel and demanded that mandarins be given legal immunity for aiding potential 'war crimes'. Union chiefs want an urgent meeting with the Cabinet Office and have written to officials to 'seek assurances that members are protected from legal liability for any acts carried out by the state of Israel'. The move comes just days after about 300 Foreign Office officials were told to consider resigning after sending a letter to David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, warning against 'complicity' in Israel's actions. The letter cited the killing by Israeli forces of 15 aid workers in March and the blockade on aid into Gaza as examples of concerns. Sir Olly Robbins and Nick Dyer, two of the most senior mandarins in the Foreign Office, suggested that the complainants step down if they disagreed with the Government's policy. The response was said to have been met with fury in Whitehall, with one insider telling the BBC that there was a 'deep sense of disappointment that the space for challenge is being further shut down'. In a letter sent on Friday to Cat Little, the Cabinet permanent secretary, the PCS union said the Government's response to the concerns raised this week by civil servants was 'dismissive and inadequate'. It argued that the Government 'may be putting UK civil servants at risk of liability for crimes committed by the Israeli state and placing them in a position of conflict given their obligations under the civil service code'. Fran Heathcote, the general secretary of the PCS, said the union was 'extremely concerned that the Government continues to ignore our members' concerns that they may be held liable under international law for the war crimes being committed daily by the state of Israel'. Ministers' official line is that Israel is 'at risk' of breaching international law with its actions in Gaza, with 30 out of about 350 arms sales licences to Israel halted in September out of fear that the weapons may be used for war crimes. However, union bosses called on the Government to go further. Ms Heathcote said: 'Given the scale of the death toll and the depth of the destruction to Palestinian society in Gaza, this matter is urgent and government officials need to act quickly.' She argued that it was 'time for the UK Government to wake up and listen to its own workers'. Foreign Office bosses are said to back a 'healthy challenge' to policy, but have argued that it is up to civil servants to deliver the will of the Government. The PCS union has pledged to 'fully back any member facing any sort of disciplinary action for refusing to action or work on any arms export license to Israel'. A Foreign Office spokesman said this week that 'since day one, this Government has rigorously applied international law in relation to the war in Gaza' adding that it is 'the job of civil servants to deliver on the policies of the government of the day and to provide professional, impartial advice'. The Cabinet Office has been approached for comment. Sign in to access your portfolio

These 3 Catalysts Could Bump Bitcoin to $125,000 by the End of Summer
These 3 Catalysts Could Bump Bitcoin to $125,000 by the End of Summer

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

These 3 Catalysts Could Bump Bitcoin to $125,000 by the End of Summer

After hitting a price of nearly $112,000 in May, Bitcoin has struggled to gain any new momentum. The White House is scheduled to finalize plans for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve this summer. If the Federal Reserve cuts interest rates this summer, it could lead to a rally in Bitcoin. 10 stocks we like better than Bitcoin › Ever since hitting a new all-time high of $111,970 on May 22, Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) has struggled to find any upward momentum. In fact, over the past two weeks, Bitcoin has shown signs of dropping below the $100,000 level. The good news is that three big catalysts are emerging that could push Bitcoin higher within the next three months. If so, Bitcoin could hit a new all-time high above $125,000 before the end of summer. The first catalyst is new legislation for the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. Yes, an executive order already exists for the creation of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, but there is no legislation actually defining how it will work and function. The White House executive order in March specifically said that any future Bitcoin purchases must be "budget-neutral" with no direct impact on taxpayers. The new legislation is expected to outline a clear mechanism for how this would work. The big deadline to keep an eye on is July 22. That's when the Trump administration is scheduled to unveil the final architecture of its Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. According to Bo Hines, executive director of the White House President's Council of Advisers on Digital Assets, a "reserve framework" already exists and is already circulating among different inter-agency working groups. So, it really looks to be a case of when, and not if, new legislation for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will finally be voted on by members of Congress. If the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve is able to garner true bipartisan support, that's when Bitcoin could start to rally hard. One of the big stories of the year in the crypto industry has been the emergence of new companies that are following the Bitcoin Treasury Company (BTC) model. These companies do nothing but buy Bitcoin, and some of them have already amassed massive war chests to do just that. In addition, several high-profile companies within the tech industry are starting to consider adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets as a Treasury asset. In just the past six months, two major tech companies -- Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Meta (NASDAQ: META) -- have voted on shareholder proposals asking them to add Bitcoin to their balance sheets. While both voted "no" on these proposals, it's easy to see how the dam is starting to break. One by one, smaller companies are starting to embrace Bitcoin. The latest example is Trump Media & Technology Group (NASDAQ: DJT), which recently raised over $2 billion to buy Bitcoin. All it takes is one high-profile company to embrace Bitcoin as a Treasury asset, and it might set off a domino effect within corporate America. And, finally, there's the matter of the Federal Reserve and a potential interest rate cut coming soon. Starting in April, President Donald Trump has been calling for the Fed to lower rates, even going so far as to suggest he might be willing to replace Fed Chairman Jerome Powell if he does not acquiesce. In early June, President Trump ramped up his call for a rate cut, saying that one is needed immediately. He's now demanding "a full point" from the Fed. As he noted in a social media post, this would be "rocket fuel" for the economy, making it easier for people to borrow money. It would also be "rocket fuel" for the crypto market. Historically, rate cuts by the Fed have led to the infusion of cheap, fast money into crypto. The best example is from the pandemic era, when the Fed lowered rates by a full point in March 2020. That coincided with Bitcoin soaring to new all-time highs in the period from April 2020 to November 2021. On paper, all of these potential Bitcoin catalysts sound fantastic. But how likely are they? After all, if the Trump administration can't pass the Big Beautiful Bill, how will it ever be able to pass a Big Beautiful Bitcoin Bill? And Fed rate cuts are no slam-dunk, either. As long as the economy is at risk of higher inflation from new tariffs, the Fed will likely be unwilling to reduce rates. That's why some traders are warning of a "bull trap" for Bitcoin. In other words, investors might be cajoled into investing in Bitcoin due to rampant hype, buzz, and speculation. It will look like Bitcoin has no place to go but up. As soon as enough of these investors put their money into Bitcoin, the trap will close. The price of Bitcoin will sink, and these investors will lose their money. So, if you're thinking about investing in Bitcoin, make sure you are doing so because you believe in its long-term outlook. If you are trying to time the market over the short term, you are likely doing it all wrong. The good news is that online prediction markets currently give Bitcoin a 62% chance of hitting $125,000 before the end of the year. If the U.S. government goes all-in on its Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and if Corporate America continues to embrace crypto, it's possible that Bitcoin might reach that target by the end of the summer. Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,871!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $875,479!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 998% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Dominic Basulto has positions in Bitcoin. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. These 3 Catalysts Could Bump Bitcoin to $125,000 by the End of Summer was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

I gave Welsh government what it wanted, says chancellor
I gave Welsh government what it wanted, says chancellor

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

I gave Welsh government what it wanted, says chancellor

Rachel Reeves has defended the UK government's spending plans for Wales, telling BBC Wales she delivered what the Welsh government had asked for. Opposition parties have been critical of the chancellor's spending review, calling the money earmarked for the railways a "drop in the ocean" compared to what the country needs. The chancellor said the plan to spend £445m on Welsh railways was a "significant package" and defended the £118m earmarked for coal tips, which is short of estimates previously made by the Welsh government. Reeves denied the spending review had left Wales short changed and said Wales was getting a "record" amount of cash. New stations in £445m 10-year Wales rail plan Spending review sets scene for Senedd election Spending review could mean cuts in Wales - experts Rachel Reeves made the comments on a visit to the Taff's Well Transport for Wales depot on Friday. The Treasury is providing £300m for five new stations around Cardiff and Newport between 2026 and 2030, and a series of improvement works including measures to improve capacity in north Wales. Another £48m is going on the South Wales Metro, while £90m is being allocated over 10 years to work on future schemes. Speaking to BBC Wales, Reeves said: "This investment delivers the five train stations from the Burns review in south Wales, improvements to the core valley network as well as the level crossing improvements in north Wales to link people to the jobs that are available. "This is significant investment that the Welsh government asked for. A Labour government in Westminster working with the Labour government here in Wales to deliver for people in Wales. "At the same time there's the record devolution settlement for the Welsh government and, on top of that as well, the £118m for coal tips to keep those safe in Wales." When it was put to her that it was far short of the up to £600m previously estimated to be needed for coaltips, Reeves said: "No, the £118m is what the Welsh government asked for from the UK government and we've delivered that in full. "And we are also delivering in full the requests for investments for the Burns review stations for example." Asked if Wales was being short changed by the 0.9% cut to Welsh government capital spending, she said: "No, we're investing in the transport infrastructure, in the coal tips and a record devolution settlement."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store