Ditching Aukus would harm US, close ally tells Trump
A close ally of Donald Trump has urged the US president not to ditch the Aukus programme after the Pentagon said it was reviewing collaboration on submarines with the UK and Australia.
Glenn Youngkin, the Republican governor of Virginia, said he hoped shipbuilders in his state would 'have a chance' to continue to 'build for our allies' and played down the chance of the project being scrapped.
The Pentagon is currently reviewing Aukus, a trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US, involving collaboration on submarines, AI and quantum technology that is worth £176 billion over 30 years.
The programme was previously considered a pillar of Washington security policy, but came under review shortly after Mr Trump took office in January.
The US government was examining it as 'part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president's 'America first' agenda', a Pentagon official confirmed last week.
But Sir Keir Starmer said at the G7 summit in Canada earlier this week that he did not have 'any doubt' that Aukus would 'progress'.
Mr Youngkin, who visited London on Wednesday for a ceremony to unveil a restored statue of George Washington in Trafalgar Square, acknowledged that ending the programme would harm shipbuilders in his state.
'Our militaries have not only integrated and executed very well together over centuries, but I also believe that the sharing of technology has been really important,' he told The Telegraph.
Newport News Shipbuilding, a company in Virginia, is involved in manufacturing submarines for the project, while Lockheed Martin, which builds the missiles used by the submarines, has a major site in the state's city of Manassas.
'We build a lot of submarines and, in fact, build a part of every submarine in the US military,' he said. 'We, of course, would like to be able to build more submarines, and so I hope we have a chance to do so.'
He added that while 'long-standing policies occasionally have to be reviewed', the latest assessment of Aukus was 'just a matter of stepping back and looking at shipbuilding capacity'.
Mr Youngkin, tipped as a future presidential contender, shocked political observers when he won the 2021 gubernatorial race in Virginia - a state Joe Biden won in the previous year's presidential election.
In the 2024 presidential race, he acted as a surrogate for the Trump campaign in the state, although it was won by a 5.8 per cent margin by Kamala Harris.
The Aukus programme has become a major part of the 'special relationship' between the UK and US since it was announced by Mr Biden and Boris Johnson in 2021.
It is designed to boost Western power in the Indo-Pacific region and contains two 'pillars', the first of which is to help Australia obtain nuclear-powered attack submarines.
The three countries announced in 2023 that a new nuclear-powered submarine class would be built in the UK and Australia, while the US will sell Australia three second-hand Virginia-class submarines in the early 2030s.
The second pillar of the agreement allows for collaboration between the three countries on six technologies, including AI, quantum computing, hypersonic missiles and electronic warfare.
However, the idea has previously been opposed by Elbridge Colby, a senior Pentagon official appointed by Mr Trump, who said that the US should not give away 'crown jewel assets' like nuclear submarines.
Mr Colby is leading the review to ensure that all Pentagon-backed programmes are aligned with Mr Trump's 'America First' policy.
Mr Youngkin also told The Telegraph that the UK's unwillingness to directly defend Israel from Iranian attacks would not damage its relationship with the US.
'There is a recognition that the actions that right now are resulting in real violence around the world need to be resolved, and the way they're going to be resolved is through strength,' he said.
'I'm hopeful that President Trump's urging of everyone coming to the table and settling this is clear, but also the fact that the UK…while it has taken a different tone, is still very much one of our closest allies.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump asks Juventus players during White House visit whether a woman would make their team
Juventus players and staff were involved in an awkward encounter at the White House when Trump asked the team players and managers if women could make it into their team. In response, Juventus general manager Damien Comolli highlighted the strength of their women's team
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Costco rival plots big price hikes on hundreds of home essentials: 'Buckle up'
Sam's Club is weighing price hikes on a range of products in response to tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. Kitchen appliances and outdoor decor are among the items that may see increases, according to chief financial officer Todd Sears. 'If we see those higher costs come in, certainly we have to take a look at all options,' Sears told the Wall Street Journal. The Costco rival, which earns 80 to 90 percent of its profits from paid memberships, is known for offering high-quality goods at low prices. Sam's Club is currently luring new members with annual fees of $20 rather than $50 and promising to freeze prices on more than 1,000 items through July 22. The chain has no immediate plans to raise food prices, but shoppers are skeptical. On Reddit, several users reported price jumps — including a $3 increase on Folgers coffee and a bump in meat prices. Walmart, parent company of Sam's Club, has also been raising prices due to tariff s. Target has also been hiking prices. While social media users claimed prices are growing, Sam's Club did not expect cost growth in food products from tariffs. A partial reason for this is that it would reduce the chain's costs by improving packaging to lengthen shelf life and using less packaging. Sam's Club also uses data and algorithms to calculate fruit demand, which are imported from countries like the US and Mexico. It has also been working to manage its inventory as a way to minimize product markdowns. Walmart frequently helps Sam's Club thrive by giving the chain access to its supply chain, which has helped the business fulfill orders and save money. With Walmart having already rose product prices last month, senior equity research analyst Steven Shemesh believes the potential price rise won't harm Sam's Club too much. 'Increasing prices is definitely a risk, but Sam's Club, being under the Walmart umbrella, has many more tools to mitigate the impact of higher costs than a lot of other retailers out there,' he said. Sam's Club usually offers pricier items than Walmart, and with the potential price rise on expensive products, it could lead to a weakening demand. 'If tariffs are hypothetically 60 percent on the barbecue grills, maybe next year you don't carry them. You just plan for less unit volume in that situation,' said Rupesh Parikh, a managing director at investment bank Oppenheimer & Co. Social media users are expecting product prices to keep rising as a result of tariffs Walmart was one of the retailers that issued a price increase warning last year. Employees leaked price changes on Reddit days after Walmart confirmed the growth, gradually turning into an avalanche of price hikes on popular products. The company was also forced to axe about 1,500 jobs even though its quarterly revenue has continued to be successful. A Costco executive warned shoppers of price hikes in December, and accusations of food court price growth swirled the internet soon afterward. Once tariffs began to do its damage on gold, the chain was forced to place limits on its popular gold bars. Costs of select products at Target and Best Buy rose by mid May after its CEOs issued their warning in March, and hikes in Adidas and Nike brands resulted in price changes at Macy's.
The Independent
35 minutes ago
- The Independent
LA archbishop slams Trump's ‘cruel and arbitrary' immigration agenda
The archbishop of Los Angeles sharply criticized the Trump administration 's 'cruel and arbitrary' immigration policy, following widespread protests against the White House migration agenda throughout the city. In a column this week for the Catholic magazine Angelus, Archbishop José Gomez accused the administration of having 'no immigration policy beyond the stated goal of deporting thousands of people each day.' 'This is not policy, it is punishment, and it can only result in cruel and arbitrary outcomes,' the bishop, a longtime advocate of immigration reform and himself a naturalized U.S. citizen from Mexico, continued. 'Already we are hearing stories of innocent fathers and mothers being wrongly deported, with no recourse to appeal.' The bishop added that the Biden administration 'went too far in not securing our borders' and faulted both parties for not passing a major immigration reform since the late 1980s. The Independent has contacted the White House for comment. The comments come after federal troops were dispatched over the protests in Los Angeles, which is home to both the largest Catholic diocese in the United States and a population that's over one-third foreign-born. The bishop's remarks also illustrate the continued schism between the Catholic Church and the administration, which counts devout Catholic convert JD Vance as vice president. Before his death, Pope Francis criticized the administration over its treatment of migrants, arguing the church's values of protecting refugees and immigrants date back to the story of Jesus himself. 'What is built on the basis of force, and not on the truth about the equal dignity of every human being, begins badly and will end badly,' Francis said. His successor, Pope Leo, has also been critical, with then-cardinal Robert Prevost chiding Vance in February after he suggested Catholic teaching urged followers to love their families before others in their midst. 'JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others,' he wrote on social media. Prevost also reshared an article sharply criticizing the governments of the U.S. and El Salvador for their handling of the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran man the U.S. admitted it mistakenly deported to his home country despite a court order barring his removal, then initially declined to return to America. 'Do you not see the suffering?' the reshared article read. 'Is your conscience not disturbed? How can you stay quiet?' The disagreements have gone beyond just doctrinal disputes, though. The Trump administration's attempts to freeze foreign aid and suspend refugee resettlement have decimated Catholic relief agencies inside the U.S. that contracted with the federal government. In February, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops sued over the administration's abrupt suspension of refugee resettlement work. The following month, the conference announced it was ending its refugee partnerships with the government going forward, bringing to a close a nearly half-century collaboration on refugee resettlement. Last week, a committee in the Republican-controlled House announced it would investigate more than 200 non-governmental organizations that received taxpayer funds for migrant-related work, including major Catholic groups like Catholic Charities USA and the bishops' conference. In January, Vance accused the conference of resettling 'illegal immigrants,' comments New York Cardinal Timothy Dolan called 'scurrilous,' 'nasty,' and incorrect, given the church's history of resettling legal refugees.
