Skin cancer: Primary school sun safety lessons trialled
Children as young as five are being taught how to check UV levels and apply sunscreen, as part of a new pilot aimed at reducing future skin cancer cases.The initiative, currently being trialled in primary schools across Kent, is planned to be introduced into Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) lessons nationwide from 2026.Melanoma, the most serious form of skin cancer, is linked to UV exposure - and experts say sunburn in childhood significantly increases the risk later in life.In 2021, around 18,300 people were diagnosed with melanoma in the UK, according to Cancer Research. That figure is projected to rise to 21,300 by 2026, the charity says.
Michelle Baker, from the charity Melanoma Fund, which is behind the education project, said changing children's habits early is key. "People think melanoma is an older person's disease," she says, "but it's often seeded in childhood."She says the project aims to "grow skin cancer out of the next generation". Giving children a sense of control and responsibility for their sun protection is central to this. "We're saying this is your superpower," she adds.At Platt Primary school in Maidstone, pupils are learning to read UV indexes, apply sunscreen properly, and understand when they need protection.Headteacher Emma Smith said the pupils have been "really receptive"."If we educate them early, they're more likely to keep that knowledge as they get older - especially when social media starts to influence their choices."
No 'safe tan'
The childhood sun safety drive comes as Cancer Research UK says the rise in melanoma cases among adults is a particular cause for concern.A recent study from the charity found that cancer deaths cost the UK economy £10.3bn a year, more than any other health condition – underlining the importance of preventative measures.Consultant dermatologist Dr Katie Lacy says that educating children about how to look after their skin is key to reducing melanoma rates.Research shows that nine out of 10 cases are caused by UV exposure from the sun and sunbeds.Getting sunburnt regularly increases the chances of skin cancer. Dr Lacy stresses there is no such thing as a "safe tan", explaining that tanning is a response to skin damage.
"Most melanomas don't come from existing moles - so if you notice something new, get it checked," she adds.She also highlights the growing role of AI in screening suspicious moles within the NHS - which could help streamline referrals to specialist services.The ABCDE checklist can help identify if a mole is abnormal:A - asymmetrical (does the mole have an uneven shape?)B - border (are the edges blurry or jagged?)C - colour (is it an uneven colour with different shades and tones?)D - diameter (is the mole bigger than your other ones?)E - evolving (is it changing, such as starting to itch, bleed or become crusty?)Source: Cancer Research UKFor Kara Leece, diagnosed with melanoma at 29, the message is personal."If I'd had that education at primary school, I think I could've prevented it," she told BBC News."Now I have a scar that reminds me of what I've been through. When children ask about it, I tell them my story - because I don't want this to happen to anyone else."
Tips for keeping kids sun safe
Try to keep children in the shade between 11am and 3pm, when the sun is at its strongestKit them out with wide-brimmed hats, sunglasses and clothing to cover their skin. Sunscreen is also very important - apply it regularly and generously, and make sure it's at least SPF 30 and four or five starsSource: Cancer Research UK
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Weston Park baton walk symbol of hope for suicide survivors
A charity started by a father who lost his son to suicide has held a Walk of Hope to encourage open conversations around mental McCarthy, a former BBC and Sky News reporter, lost his son Ross to suicide aged Ross left a farewell note asking his family to campaign for better mental health support, Mr McCarthy co-founded the charity Baton of said Saturday's event at Sheffield's Weston Park was about "smashing stigma surrounding suicide and encourage open conversation". He said: "Having witnessed first hand the trauma of losing a wonderful son with so much to give, I realised belatedly just how woeful society is when it comes to mental wellbeing."Together there is so much we can do and that includes bringing to an end the dreadful silence surrounding the subject."The event saw campaigners carry a Baton of Hope, a gold baton designed and crafted by Thomas Lyte, goldsmiths and silversmiths to Queen Elizabeth bearers included people who had lost loved ones to suicide or survived a suicide attempt. Debbi Marlow, who was among those who carried the baton, lost her brother Andrew to suicide three years said: "We've come together in the name of our loved ones and to consider people who struggle with their mental health."Suicide is everyone's business. In some way so many of us will be affected by suicide, whether we lose someone who is very special to us or we're aware of that. We're all connected as humans by suicide in some way."We need to connect and talk about it and the baton allows those conversations."Leah Laycock, who also carried the baton, witnessed her father attempt suicide as a child and is a suicide survivor said: "Once upon a time, I wouldn't talk about it but after coming across the Baton of Hope charity, meeting other people and connecting with them has helped me so much."And it's brought my journey of recovery forward very quickly, which is amazing."Carrying the baton feels like a symbol of survival, strength, and hope – not just for me but for everyone who's ever felt like they couldn't go on." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Top dermatologist's urgent warning to those with spots - common remedy could leave you scarred for life
Popping an unsightly pimple before a big social event or work presentation may seem like a simple solution. But while this might seem like a good idea at the time, it's a bad habit that can do more than just scar you, a skin expert has warned. According to Dr Conal Perrett, a dermatologist at The Devonshire Clinic on Harley Street, London, popping spots can risk spreading infection or requiring pricey follow-up care, often costing hundreds of pounds, to fully clear. Instead, he suggested targeted treatments and gentle skincare to support natural healing for spots. Acne is one of the most common inflammatory skin conditions in adolescents. More than 80 per cent of teenagers battle with pimples. The condition is caused by hair follicles becoming plugged with oil or dead skin cells, which can be a result of shifts in hormones, or using cosmetic products and certain medications. It can also occur later in life for a number of reasons. Dr Perrett advised: 'Refrain from picking or squeezing any blemishes, as this can worsen inflammation and lead to permanent marks.' The correct way to treat a troublesome spot depends on the type you have, the doctor warned 'For stubborn scarring, advanced treatments such as chemical peels, laser and microneedling can be the best way forward.' 'Using the right skincare ingredients, alongside daily sun protection, can make a significant difference. 'For more persistent or severe acne, seeking professional advice is the best way to protect the skin and support a smooth, healthy complexion in the future.' Dr Perrett also urged people, in particular acne sufferers, to look out for the five main types of spots: blackheads, papules, pustules, nodules and cysts. Dark spots on your face are likely blackheads, Dr Perrett noted, which can be treated and prevented with products containing salicylic acids and gentle retinoids—because they keep pores clear. Such products are available on the high street, often as serums. Small, red inflamed bumps without visible puss-filled heads, meanwhile, are likely papules—which occur when clogged pores trigger deeper inflammation. This redness can be reduced by products containing benzoyl peroxide, niacinamide, topical retinoids, alpha hydroxy acids and azelaic acid. Spots that look similar to papules but have a red base and white or yellow tip, are likely pustules which carry a higher risk of scarring if popped. These troublesome spots can be treated with the same way as papules, but in some cases prescription-strength retinoids and oral antibiotics may be needed. Another, nodules, are large, painful and sit deep within the skin. These have a significant chance of leaving permanent scarring, so they also require prescription-strength retinoids and oral antibiotics. Cysts, meanwhile, have the highest likelihood of scarring and are large, soft, pus-filled lumps that sit deep below the skin's surface. 'It is crucial to never squeeze cysts, as this can dramatically increase scarring and spread infection,' Dr Perrett warned. If patients have painful cysts and nodules, steroid injections such as corticosteroid to quickly reduce swelling, redness and pain. However, he added, if pimples stubbornly persist patients should see a dermatologist. For those with acne scars he said wearing a hydrating SPF can, minimise how visible they are. 'Sun exposure stimulates melanin production, which can make scars appear darker and more pronounced,' he said. 'A broad-spectrum sunscreen with SPF 30 or higher should be applied every morning and reapplied throughout the day. 'Pairing sun protection with a good moisturizer enhances skin repair by maintaining hydration, which is crucial for cell turnover and barrier function.' This is especially important for those taking the acne medication Roaccutane, as it makes them more sensitive to ultraviolet radiation from the sun, he warned. Research has suggested diet may also play a role in acne prevention. Experts advise avoiding sugar and focusing on a healthy, well-balanced diet with high amounts of nuts, legumes, fish, red meat, fruits and vegetables. Some studies also suggest there is a higher risk of acne with frequent milk consumption, but more research is needed before dietary recommendations can be made. For this reason, experts recommend keeping a diary to see if any of foods directly aggravate acne and avoid them if this is the case.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reform the NHS, not our shopping baskets
This week, the NHS will publish its 10 Year Health Plan. The most we can expect from this exercise in Soviet-style planning is tinkering around the edges of an edifice that was erected when Joseph Stalin ruled in Moscow. By 2035, the end date of this 10-year plan, the country will almost certainly be unable to afford the NHS in its present form – if, indeed, it hasn't collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions by then. Unable to address the fundamental problems of the NHS, the dirigistes of Whitehall have come up with a new plan to direct us how to lead our lives – telling us what we should or shouldn't be allowed to choose to put in our shopping baskets. Supermarkets will be expected to cut 100 calories from the average shopping basket by limiting sales of sugary and salty snacks or other 'junk food'. Ever since Napoleon Bonaparte sneered at England as 'a nation of shopkeepers', we have worn his insult as a badge of honour. We are proud to be a people who earn our living by trade and we cherish the liberties that are the glory of a commercial society. Even those of us who are not shopkeepers are at least customers. So little does this Labour Government know the British people that it is about to resort to distinctly Napoleonic measures to punish both retailers and consumers. Yet previous attempts to control consumption have never succeeded in changing enduring patterns of behaviour rooted in human nature. It is outrageous that officials feel empowered to tell us what we can, and cannot, eat. The public is being infantilised and robbed of agency. Centuries have passed since Parliament abandoned sumptuary laws that prohibited the lower orders from imitating the luxurious dress of the aristocracy. But the bureaucratic mind is obdurate in its disdain for popular tastes in food and drink. Combined with Labour's instinct to meddle, along with its insatiable fiscal appetite, it is no surprise that, as we report today, a modern version of the sumptuary laws is about to land on an unsuspecting nation. Obesity is a genuine and growing problem, but, hitherto, all attempts to address it by fiscal means have failed. The latest obesity tax – supermarkets will be fined if they don't reduce the nation's calorie intake, and this will inevitably be passed on to consumers – now emerging from the bowels of the Health Department and the Treasury, claims to be aimed directly at our waistlines. In reality, like all its predecessors, it will target our wallets. There is a certain grim irony in the fact that this policy should have been adopted at the same time as the decision by the NHS to prescribe the weight-loss drug semaglutide (contained in Ozempic and Wegovy). It is fairly obvious that the underlying rationale of the new regulations is less about obesity than about the Government's failure to control spending. No doubt figures will be trotted out about how many lives will be saved by cutting consumption of ultra-processed foods or any other category of comestible that attracts the ire of the health bureaucrats. But the truth is that new rules are being concocted because the Government is running scared of its own MPs, who have effectively imposed a veto on cuts in welfare spending. What would genuinely make a difference to life expectancy and health outcomes would, of course, be a radical reform of the NHS, a more active population, and a reduction in the numbers wasting their lives on benefits. Rachel Reeves has just poured another £29 billion into the health service, without any clear cost-benefit calculation. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is intelligent enough to know that he has inherited an obsolete behemoth that is crying out for root-and-branch reform. But building a new consensus for a new NHS would require the Labour Party to rethink its assumptions about the social contract, as well as the role of insurance and individual responsibility. The original 1946 NHS Act created 'a comprehensive health service designed to secure improvement in the physical and mental health of the people of England and Wales'. Today, the nation's health is not safe in the hands of a dysfunctional Labour Party that would rather do anything – even introducing an assisted-dying service – than take on the overdue task of making the NHS fit for purpose. These new directives are at best a displacement activity, at worst an act of fiscal condescension. A nation of shopkeepers deserves better than to be bossed around by its own government.
