Did Obama White House fake Russian interference intel? Grand jury probe ordered
Pam Bondi has instructed a prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury following referrals from the Trump administration's top intelligence official.
The decision comes after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard referred the case, citing declassified documents released in July that she claims challenge the Obama administration's findings that Russia aimed to help Trump beat Hillary Clinton. Also Read | Explosive report fuels Trump's call for Hillary Clinton to 'pay a big price' over Russia hoax
According to a CNN report, Tulsi Gabbard has requested the department to investigate former President Barack Obama and top officials in his administration for an alleged conspiracy.
On Truth Social, Donald Trump had recently declared the 24-page document proves the scandal is "TOTALLY UNDISPUTED" and "the biggest in American History," demanding perpetrators 'pay a big price' . The annex, released by Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel, details emails suggesting Hillary Clinton approved a strategy to 'distract people from her own missing email' by amplifying Russia-Trump allegations.
What is not known? It was not clear which former officials might be the target of any grand jury activity, where the grand jury that might ultimately hear evidence will be located or which prosecutors – whether career employees or political appointees – might be involved in pursuing the investigation.
It was also not clear what precise claims of misconduct Trump administration officials believe could form the basis of criminal charges, which a grand jury would have to sign off on for an indictment to be issued.
The initial findings had led to the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who secured several convictions of Trump associates but found no evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Trump's campaign and Moscow. The investigation had shadowed much of Trump's first term in office.
A new outcry surfaced last week when Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a set of emails that FBI Director Kash Patel claimed on social media proved that the 'Clinton campaign plotted to frame President Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax.'
(With inputs from The Assosciated Press)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Putin's mammoth war machine…': U.S. Commanders' confession shocks Senators
Top U.S. military commanders delivered a stark warning to Senators, leaving the chamber visibly unsettled. As Putin's war machine steadily grows, a dangerous three-way axis with China and North Korea is emerging. With American forces stretched thin and fresh threats building near Taiwan and the Korean Peninsula, alarm bells are sounding in Washington. WATCH as leaders of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and U.S. Forces Korea testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee. This hearing was held on April 10, 2025. Show more Show less
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
After Muslim World, Netanyahu Gets Snubbed By Tiny Nation On Bid To KICK OUT Palestinians From Gaza
BIG! Putin To Meet Zelensky? Trump Vows 3-Way Meeting Without Asking After Warning On 'Russia Bluff' U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that he will arrange a rare three-way meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. The announcement follows a private virtual call between Trump, Zelensky, and European leaders, during which Zelensky reportedly said Putin is 'bluffing." The proposed meeting could mark a dramatic turning point in the ongoing conflict, with Trump positioning himself as a direct mediator between Moscow and Kyiv. This high-stakes diplomatic gamble comes at a critical moment, with the world watching to see if the confrontation will de-escalate—or explode. Watch. 83 views | 55 minutes ago
Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ukraine's Alaska agenda: Kiev wants a lasting ceasefire, NATO-backed security, reparations, and sustained sanctions on Russia
As US President Donald Trump prepares to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, August 15, Ukraine hopes for an agreement that will meet its demands of stopping the war and preventing future aggression. But since Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will not attend this meeting, Kyiv fears being left out of negotiations that could decide its fate. Ukraine and its European allies also fear that Friday's Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin could yield a settlement that sacrifices Kyiv's interests for the appearance of peace. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program President Zelensky will hold a pre-summit call with Trump alongside European leaders on Wednesday, August 13, to lay out non-negotiable red lines, including a durable ceasefire, full participation in talks, and compensation for war damage estimated at up to $1 trillion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Safest Cities Where People can Live in Peace Undo Ukraine's core demands ahead of the Alaska talks Zelensky has warned that any decisions made without Ukraine 'are at the same time decisions against peace,' as quoted by Politico. Ukrainian officials say Putin's ultimate goal is not just holding territory but ending Ukraine's independence. These are Kyiv's longstanding demands, which they are eagerly hoping to meet. Live Events A sustainable ceasefire Kyiv insists on a durable ceasefire before discussing any territorial issues, rejecting US suggestions of 'land swaps' involving the Donbas. Zelenskyy says ceding the region would invite future offensives and undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. NATO 's Mark Rutte has floated a possible compromise in which some areas remain under Russian control but are legally recognized as Ukrainian. 'When it comes to this whole issue of territory, when it comes to acknowledging, for example, maybe in a future deal that Russia is controlling de facto, factually some of the territory of Ukraine, it has to be effectual recognition, and not a political de jure recognition,' he told ABC. Russia must pay for the damage Ukraine insists that Moscow must bear the financial burden for the destruction it has inflicted (by starting a war), a toll estimated between $500 billion and $1 trillion in damages to infrastructure, homes, and livelihoods. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, speaking at the Ukraine Recovery Conference last month, underlined this demand: 'Russia must pay for the approximately €500 billion in damages caused. Until this happens, Moscow must not be granted access to its frozen assets.' Ukraine points to the fact that close European allies hold significant Russian state assets, with almost €200 billion frozen in Belgium alone, as a major source of leverage. Kyiv believes these funds must remain inaccessible to Moscow until full reparations are made. Binding security guarantees via NATO and the EU President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has made clear that only full membership in NATO and the European Union can guarantee Ukraine's long-term security: A Politico article quotes Zewleanskey, 'Will we be in NATO? In the EU? I haven't heard anything — simply not a single proposal that would guarantee that a new war won't start tomorrow. We need security guarantees that will preserve, first of all, our state, a sovereign state, our independence.' However, Ukraine faces pushback: US President Donald Trump has ruled out NATO membership, a stance quietly backed by some European capitals, and Moscow demands a permanent NATO veto for Ukraine. Zelenskyy also criticizes EU member states that are hesitant to admit a large, poor country with a vast agricultural sector. For now, European partners, not the US, are Ukraine's primary source of military assistance. Since the war began, Europe has provided at least €73.9 billion in military aid, compared to €64 billion from the US, according to the Kiel Institute. Return of abducted children and prisoners of war Ukraine demands the immediate return of nearly 20,000 children, who it says were abducted by Russia. Only 1,453 have been returned so far, often through mediation by Qatar and other states. Moscow claims these transfers are evacuations to safety, but refuses to return the children to their families, instead placing them in adoption systems and subjecting them to Russian propaganda. In 2023, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin over the unlawful deportation of children from occupied Ukraine to Russia. On prisoners of war, there has been more progress: more than 2,000 POWs have been exchanged under Trump's mediation, but thousands remain in Russian custody without access for international human rights monitors. No lifting of sanctions on Russia Kyiv, backed by European allies, demands that existing primary and secondary sanctions remain in place and even be strengthened. They argue that easing sanctions or resuming trade with Russia would allow Moscow to rebuild its war machine. Economist Timothy Ash estimates the war has already cost Russia about $2 trillion, nearly equivalent to its annual GDP. The risks for Ukraine are clear. As he told Politico, 'Ukraine could survive the war, but not survive the peace,' if a bad deal undermines its security and sovereignty.
