logo
Woman cleared of illegal abortion planning complaint over her treatment

Woman cleared of illegal abortion planning complaint over her treatment

Yahoo27-05-2025

A woman cleared of having an illegal abortion is planning to file a complaint with the police, prosecutors and the NHS over how she was treated.
Nicola Packer told the BBC her situation 'could have been handled much more compassionately' and that what she had been through makes her 'feel sick'.
The 45-year-old was cleared by a jury last month of 'unlawfully administering to herself a poison or other noxious thing' with the 'intent to procure a miscarriage'.
She had taken prescribed abortion medicine when she was around 26 weeks pregnant, beyond the legal limit of 10 weeks for taking such medication at home and beyond the legal abortion limit of 24 weeks.
She told jurors she did not realise she had been pregnant for more than 10 weeks.
Audio has since been shared with the BBC of a senior Metropolitan Police officer speaking at a meeting in the days after Ms Packer's arrest, in which he shares 'concerns' about 'how the investigation has developed'.
The officer can be heard saying there are 'definitely valid discussions, I think, to be had around whether that arrest, in the circumstances, was best for Nicola'.
He adds that criminalisation of abortions is 'an uncomfortable area for police to be operating in' and is not 'something that sits well with us, or that we have really much experience in at all'.
In an interview with the broadcaster Ms Packer said those involved in her case 'need to be held accountable'.
She added: 'It's really making me feel sick – the way everything was handled. I did not need to go straight from the hospital to the police station. I could have gone home and recuperated for a couple of days.
'It just could have been handled much more compassionately, causing less trauma than they did.'
Ms Packer's trial heard she took abortion medicine at home in November 2020 and later brought the foetus to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in a backpack.
She spent the night in hospital and was arrested the next day.
Consultant gynaecologist Jonathan Lord, who has cared for Ms Packer and now acts as her advocate, confirmed she plans to file a complaint with the Met Police, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and the NHS over her treatment.
He was at the 2020 meeting and described it as 'utterly shocking'.
Speaking about the BBC File on 4 Investigates programme, he said: 'One of the many things that is so deeply unsettling about this documentary is the way the organisations (NHS, police, CPS) aren't accepting any accountability for the harm they are causing, but are hiding behind the law to defend that they 'did the right thing'.
'All of us make mistakes and errors of judgement, that's forgivable. But failing to learn from them, and worse still trying to defend utterly contemptible actions that have caused such suffering, is suggestive of a toxic culture at the heart of these institutions.
'That's why the law has to change as it is both driving this behaviour and acting as a shield to protect those who should know better.'
The case prompted calls for reform of the law, including from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (Rcog) which claimed the trial showed 'just how outdated and harmful' current abortion law is.
The college has issued recommendations stating that healthcare professionals do not call the police or external agencies if a woman states or they suspect she might have sought to end her own pregnancy 'unless she has given explicit consent to do so, or you consider it justified in her best interests'.
An amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill on decriminalisation in England and Wales is said to have the support of more than 60 cross-party MPs and backers hope for a vote on it as early as June.
Those backing the amendment, which states that 'no offence is committed by a woman acting in relation to her own pregnancy', insist it would not change any law regarding the provision of abortion services within a healthcare setting, including the time limit, the grounds for abortion or the requirement for the approval of two doctors.
A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said they are 'mindful this case would have been incredibly difficult for Ms Packer' but that they had acted 'impartially and without favour'.
The CPS had initially found there was insufficient evidence to proceed with a case against Ms Packer but police detectives requested a review of that decision, something the Met said 'is not unusual and is standard practice to ensure all critical evidence is considered'.
The case went to trial following that review.
The Met spokesperson added: 'We recognise the profound impact this investigation has had and we remain committed to carrying out our duties in a way that is fair and thorough.
A CPS spokesperson said prosecutors 'recognise the profound strength of feeling these cases evoke but have a duty to apply laws passed by Parliament fairly and impartially'.
They added: 'The role of the Crown Prosecution Service in this case was not to decide whether Nicola Packer's actions were right or wrong; but to make a factual judgement about whether she knew she was beyond the legal limit when she procured an abortion.
'Prosecutors considered there was enough evidence to bring this case for a court to decide, and we respect the jury's decision.'
Ms Packer also told the BBC she felt angry at midwives 'for calling the police when they really didn't have to'.
A Chelsea and Westminster Hospital spokesperson said: 'At the time, our staff acted in line with the processes and guidance available to them. Their first priority, as in all cases, was to support and provide care to the patient.
'We remain committed to providing safe, respectful and person-centred care at all times, and will continue to reflect on points of learning from this case.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CPS CEO Martinez nears exit after firing: How we got here
CPS CEO Martinez nears exit after firing: How we got here

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CPS CEO Martinez nears exit after firing: How we got here

CHICAGO (WGN) — Chicago Public Schools CEO Pedro Martinez returned to his high school alma mater for an 8th grade graduation ceremony on Tuesday, the same place where four years earlier Mayor Lori Lightfoot named him to the post. The Mexico-born immigrant will soon depart the district after a nearly four-year battle with current Mayor Brandon Johnson. Towards the end of Martinez's tenure, he and Johnson were at odds over money, with the mayor pushing for massive borrowing to shore up school finances. Martinez refused, prompting the mayor to call for his resignation. 'The experience of a lifetime': Ousted CPS CEO bids farewell in final Board of Education meeting Weeks after Martinez declined to step aside, the entire Chicago Board of Education resigned, giving Johnson an opportunity to appoint a new board before Chicagoans began choosing elected members at the ballot box. But before elected members took their seats, the Johnson-appointed board voted to fire Martinez. Martinez sued. 'The last time I even remember an affiliate agency where someone didn't leave easily was in 1986, when Harold Washington, after three years in office, was able to get rid of Ed Kelly as head of the park district,' political analyst Dick Simpson told WGN. 'It's probably been 40 or 50 years since we've had a similar situation.' In a goodbye letter to the CPS community, Martinez referenced taking over the district in 2021 when COVID 19 fears still lingered, saying he's proud of efforts to keep people healthy and the investments made thanks to federal relief dollars. Also in that letter, Martinez boasted that he's 'proud' of the decisions his administration made to change the way schools are funded, writing, 'I'm proud that the resources a CPS school receives no longer depends on its number of students.' But Martinez leaves having presented a budget for next school year that assumed $600 million in money that may or may not come to fruition. The Chicago Principals & Administrators Association called the budget 'magical.' But the structural issues are no longer Martinez's problem. A new job awaits him. Martinez is set to become Education Commissioner for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The school board will soon name an interim CEO. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

India brought forward its TB elimination deadline - but can it be met?
India brought forward its TB elimination deadline - but can it be met?

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

India brought forward its TB elimination deadline - but can it be met?

Atul Kumar (name changed) anxiously paced the corridor of a public hospital in India's capital Delhi. A small-appliance mechanic, he was struggling to secure medicines for his 26-year-old daughter who suffers from drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB). Mr Kumar said his daughter needed 22 tablets of Monopas, an antibiotic used for treating TB, every day. "In the past 18 months, I haven't received government-supplied medicine for even two full months," he told BBC Hindi in January, months before India's declared deadline to eliminate the infectious disease. Forced to buy costly drugs from private pharmacies, Mr Kumar was drowning in debt. A week's supply cost 1,400 rupees ($16; £12), more than half his weekly income. After the BBC raised the issue, authorities supplied the medicines Mr Kumar's daughter needed. Federal Health Secretary Punya Salila Srivastava said that the government usually acts quickly to fix medicine access issues when alerted. Mr Kumar's daughter is one of millions of Indians suffering from tuberculosis, a bacterial disease that infects the lungs and is spread when the infected person coughs or sneezes. India, home to 27% of the world's tuberculosis cases, sees two TB-related deaths every three minutes. India's TB burden has long been tied to poor case detection, underfunding and erratic drug supply. Despite this grim reality, the country has set an ambitious goal. It aims to eliminate TB by the end of 2025, five years ahead of the global target set by the World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations member states. Elimination, as defined by the WHO, means cutting new TB cases by 80% and deaths by 90% compared with 2015 levels. But visits to TB centres in Delhi and the eastern state of Odisha revealed troubling gaps in the government's TB programme. In Odisha's Khordha district, around 30km (18.6 miles) from state capital Bhubaneshwar, 32-year-old day-labourer Kanhucharan Sahu is struggling to continue his two-year-old daughter's TB treatment, with government medicines unavailable for three months and private ones costing 1,500 rupees a month - an unbearable burden. "We can't see her suffer anymore," he says, his voice breaking. "We even thought of abandoning her." At Odisha's local TB office, officials promised to review Sahu's case, but a staffer admitted, "We rarely get the medicines we need, so we ration them." Mr Sahu says he hasn't received the promised 1,000 rupees monthly support from the federal government and at the local TB office, officials admit to chronic shortages, leaving families like his adrift in a failing system. Vijayalakshmi Routray, who runs the patient support group Sahyog, says medicine shortages are now routine, with government outlets often running dry. "How can we talk about ending TB with such gaps?" she asks. There are other hurdles too - for example, changing treatment centres involves navigating complex bureaucracy, a barrier that often leads to missed doses and incomplete care. This poses a major hurdle for India's vast population of migrant workers. At a hospital near Khordha, 50-year-old Babu Nayak, a sweeper who was diagnosed with TB in 2023, struggles to continue his treatment. He was regularly forced to travel 100km to his village for medicines as officials insisted he collect them from the original centre where he was diagnosed and first treated. "It became too difficult," he says. Unable to travel so often, Mr Nayak stopped taking the medication altogether. "It was a mistake," he admitted, after contracting TB again last year and being hospitalised. At his hospital, no TB specialist was available, highlighting another critical gap in India's fight: a shortage of frontline health workers. The BBC shared its findings with the federal health ministry and officials in charge of the TB programme in Delhi and Odisha. There was no response despite repeated reminders. A 2023 parliamentary report showed there were many vacant roles across all levels of the TB programme, affecting diagnosis, treatment and follow-up - especially in rural and underserved areas. Can vaccines help India triumph over tuberculosis? In 2018, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi brought forward India's TB elimination target to 2025, he cited the government's intensified efforts as a reason for optimism. Two years later, the Covid pandemic disrupted TB elimination efforts globally, delaying diagnosis, diverting resources and pausing routine services. Medicine shortages, staff constraints and weakened patient monitoring have further widened the gap between ambition and reality. Despite these challenges, India has made some progress. Over the past decade, the country has reduced its tuberculosis-related mortality. Between 2015 and 2023, TB deaths declined from 28 to 22 per 100,000 people. This figure, however, is still high when compared with the global average which stands at 15.5. The number of reported cases has gone up, which the government credits to its targeted outreach and screening programmes. In 2024, India recorded 2.6 million TB cases, up from 2.5 million in 2023. Federal Health Minister JP Nadda recently touted innovations like handheld X-ray devices as game-changers in expanding testing. But on the ground, the picture is less optimistic. "I still see some patients come to me with reports of sputum (phlegm) smear microscopy for TB, a test which has a much lower detection rate as compared to genetic tests," says Dr Lancelot Pinto, a Mumbai-based epidemiologist. Genetic tests, which includes RT-PCR machines - widely used to diagnose HIV, influenza and most recently, Covid-19 - and Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing, also examine the sputum sample but with greater sensitivity and in a shorter timeframe. Besides, the tests can reveal whether the TB strain is drug-resistant or sensitive, something that microscopic testing can't do, Dr Pinto says. The gap, he adds, stems not just from lack of awareness but from limited access to modern tests. "Genetic testing is free at government hospitals but not uniformly available, with only a few states being able to provide it." In May, Modi led a high-level review of India's TB elimination programme, reaffirming the country's commitment to defeating the disease. But the official statement notably skipped mention of the 2025 deadline. Instead, it highlighted community-driven strategies - better sanitation, nutrition and social support for TB-affected families - as key to the fight. The government has also prioritised better diagnosis, treatment and prevention at the core of its elimination strategy. This approach mirrors the WHO's view of TB as a "disease of poverty". In its 2024 report, WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus called it "the definitive disease of deprivation", noting how poverty, malnutrition and treatment costs trap patients in a vicious cycle. As India pushes toward its goal of eliminating the disease, deep health and social inequalities remain hurdles. With just six months left until India's self-imposed deadline, new complications have emerged. The fallout from US President Donald Trump's withdrawal from the WHO and suspension of USAID operations has raised concerns about future funding for global TB efforts. Since 1998, USAID has invested more than $140m to help diagnose and treat TB patients in India. However, India's federal health secretary insists there is "no budgetary problem" anticipated. Meanwhile, hope lies on the horizon. Sixteen TB vaccine candidates are currently in development across the world, with the WHO projecting potential availability within five years, pending successful trials.

Huckabee suggests Muslim countries should give up land for Palestinian state
Huckabee suggests Muslim countries should give up land for Palestinian state

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Huckabee suggests Muslim countries should give up land for Palestinian state

The US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has suggested "Muslim countries" should give up some of their land to create a future Palestinian state. In an interview with the BBC, Huckabee said "Muslim countries have 644 times the amount of land that are controlled by Israel". "So maybe, if there is such a desire for the Palestinian state, there would be someone who would say, we'd like to host it," he said. The ambassador also called a two-state solution - a proposed formula for peace between Israel and the Palestinians that has generally received international backing, including from multiple US administrations - "an aspirational goal". The two-state solution envisages an independent Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank and in Gaza, with East Jerusalem as its capital. It would exist alongside Israel. In a separate interview with Bloomberg, Huckabee said the US was no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce later said the ambassador "speaks for himself", and it is the president who is responsible for US policy in the Middle East. Later this month at the United Nations in New York, French and Saudi diplomats will host a conference aimed at laying out a roadmap for an eventual Palestinian state. Although Huckabee did not say where any future Palestinian state could be located specifically or whether the US would support such an effort, he called the conference "ill-timed and inappropriate". "It's also something that is completely wrongheaded for European states to try to impose in the middle of a war," he said, arguing that it would result in Israel being "less secure". "At what point does it have to be in the same piece of real estate that Israel occupies?" he said on the BBC's Newshour programme. "I think that's a question that ought to be posed to everybody who's pushing for a two-state solution." Asked if the US position was that there could not be a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Huckabee said: "I wouldn't say there can never be, what I would say is that a culture would have to change. "Right now the culture is that it's OK to target Jews and kill them and you're rewarded for it. That has to change." Israel rejects a two-state solution. It says any final settlement must be the result of negotiations with the Palestinians, and statehood should not be a precondition. Huckabee has previously been a strong supporter of the idea of a "greater Israel", seeking permanent Israeli control of the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and using the biblical term "Judea and Samaria" for the West Bank. Some of his language echoes positions frequently taken by ultranationalist groups in Israel. Some in this movement, including far-right ministers in the Israeli governing coalition, have argued for the expulsion of Palestinians from the occupied West Bank and Gaza, saying any future Palestinian state could exist in Arab or Muslim countries. If such a policy was enacted, rights groups and European governments say it would be a clear violation of international law. The ambassador also strongly criticised US allies for sanctioning two far-right Israeli ministers over "repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities" in the occupied West Bank. The sanctioning of National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was part of a joint move announced by the UK, Norway, Australia, Canada and New Zealand on Tuesday. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the Israeli officials had "incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights". The men were banned from entering the UK and will have any assets in the UK frozen. Israel registered strong objections to the move, and Huckabee called it a "shocking decision". "I have not yet heard a good reason for why these two elected ministers have been sanctioned by countries that ought to respect the country's sovereignty and recognise that they have not conducted any criminal activity," he said. The war in Gaza began after Hamas attacked Israel in October 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking around 251 others hostage. There are 56 hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive. Since October 2023, at least 54,927 Palestinians have been killed, according to the territory's Hamas-run ministry of health. The UN estimates that more than a quarter of them are children. UK sanctions far-right Israeli ministers for 'inciting violence' against Palestinians Gaza health workers say four killed by Israeli gunfire near aid centre The unseen map that promised to bring peace to the Middle East

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store