logo
A Decade of Bringing California Public Libraries State-of-the-Art Broadband on the CENIC Network

A Decade of Bringing California Public Libraries State-of-the-Art Broadband on the CENIC Network

Business Wire24-06-2025
LA MIRADA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--In 2014, California's Public Libraries embarked on a remarkable journey, joining the vast majority of California's public schools, colleges, and universities as members of CENIC, with the vision of bringing robust, high-speed broadband to all Californians. By connecting to the California Research and Education Network (CalREN), public libraries gained access to a world-class network built for California's leading research universities and positioned libraries as critical digital lifelines for the communities they serve. Today, nearly 1000 of the state's 1127 libraries connect to CalREN thanks to ongoing support from the State of California and the sustained leadership of the State Librarian, Greg Lucas, and Governor Gavin Newsom, whose collaboration with CENIC ensures that library patrons, whether in urban centers or rural communities, have access to reliable, high-capacity Internet – a service that has become a fundamental and necessary utility in the 21st century.
Prior to participation with CENIC, 44% of library jurisdictions were not applying for CTF (the California Teleconnect Fund) or E-rate (the federal universal services fund), and another 11% of library jurisdictions were only applying for CTF. These state and federal subsidy programs assist public libraries by lowering the cost of high-speed broadband services. By joining CENIC, libraries receive expert assistance in handling their federal E-rate applications and filing for CTF eligibility, all organized by CENIC. In the State Library's latest report to the State Legislature, over $110 million (and counting) in cumulative federal E-rate funds have been drawn down from the federal government since partnering with CENIC to address library broadband needs.
The critical E-rate program is currently under legal review by the U.S. Supreme Court, introducing uncertainty into a program that underpins digital access for schools and libraries nationwide. At the same time, the proposed Federal Fiscal Year 2026 Budget calls for the elimination of funding for the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) and its administering body, the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), which is the federal agency solely dedicated to library funding. This follows the President's March 14 Executive Order targeting IMLS and six other independent agencies for dismantling.
The potential consequences of this rollback are profound. Without these essential federal investments, many libraries, especially those serving rural, low-income, and historically underserved communities, could not afford the high-speed connections and modern infrastructure required to meet today's digital demands.
A recent State Library survey revealed that 31 library jurisdictions (the term of art for library systems) urgently need to upgrade bandwidth at one or more branches. In total, libraries face an estimated $20 million in needed infrastructure improvements and equipment replacements to offer adequate broadband access for their patrons.
This comes as home Internet speeds have surged, with many California households now enjoying 1 Gigabit connections or more through residential fiber and cable providers. According to BroadbandNow, 96% of people have access to 100 Mbps broadband, and 51.1% have access to 1 Gbps broadband speeds.
As patrons walk into libraries expecting the same speed and seamless digital experience that many have at home, high-speeds for library networks are becoming increasingly important.
With branches hosting everything from virtual reality learning to Zoom-based workforce training, sustaining and continuing to upgrade these connections will only become more critical over time.
'When we upgraded our broadband connection, our libraries were much better equipped to handle the technology needs of the diverse communities we serve. Small business owners were able to connect with customers and conduct business online more effectively, students could virtually communicate with teachers, submit their work online, and participate in virtual learning, and job seekers were now better able to hone their skills, apply for and interview for jobs, and submit resumes. This demonstrates the library's role as a digital equalizer,' said Nancy Schram, Library Director at the Ventura County Library and CENIC Board member. 'In today's world, if your connection can't handle teleconferencing, streaming educational content, or large file uploads, your community is effectively cut off from opportunity.'
As more public services, educational resources, and job applications move online and AI and data-heavy technologies become mainstream, the need for future-proofed Internet access at libraries is no longer optional. It is essential. For millions of Californians, the public library remains the only place offering free Internet, computer access, digital literacy training, and tech support to ensure they don't fall behind.
'Connecting California's libraries to CalREN is an important step toward digital opportunity in our state, and the project was the largest and most complex effort since CENIC connected K12 schools 20 years ago. Libraries serve as community anchors. When they are equipped with world-class broadband, every resident, regardless of geography or income, has access to the tools they need for work, education, health, and economic security. The goal is for every Californian to prosper, and ensure that the talent, imagination, and the capacity for innovation in every community can flourish," said Louis Fox, President and CEO of CENIC.
California's libraries are not just places to borrow books; they are community hubs, educational anchors, and gateways to opportunity. The next decade depends on bold goals and continued investments in our libraries to ensure they remain that way.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bitcoin Tipping Is Now Live on X, Powered by BitBit and Spark
Bitcoin Tipping Is Now Live on X, Powered by BitBit and Spark

Associated Press

time24 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Bitcoin Tipping Is Now Live on X, Powered by BitBit and Spark

LOS ANGELES (CA), 8/18/2025 - BitBit, the self-custodial social wallet that lets users instantly send and receive Bitcoin directly in their browser, today announced the launch of its X (formerly Twitter) integration, enabling users worldwide to exchange Bitcoin tips on the platform seamlessly. The payments will be associated with X usernames, allowing anyone to receive them, even without a wallet. The integration leverages Spark,the fastest, cheapest, most UX-friendly way to build financial apps and launch assets on Bitcoin. Spark is built by Lightspark, providing open, always-on payments solutions for the Internet powered by Bitcoin: the only open, neutral network for moving value. Lightspark powers integrations with partners such as Coinbase, NuBank, Bitso, and many more to enable payments on Bitcoin. 'At Lightspark, we're working tirelessly to ensure the future of money looks like the open Internet,' said David Marcus, Lightspark's co-founder and CEO. 'Spark is built on Bitcoin because it's the only open, neutral network for moving value. By choosing Spark, the BitBit wallet builds on this openness and proves Bitcoin's potential to empower creators and the global X community.' While tips have been available on X since 2021, this is the first self-custodial tipping solution available to the public. By leveraging Spark, the fastest, cheapest, and most UX-friendly way to build financial apps and launch assets on Bitcoin, the solution eliminates the technical friction and complexity associated with scaling solutions like the Lightning Network, providing users with a seamless and intuitive wallet experience. Tip receivers will have 21 days to create a wallet to receive the money; otherwise, a refund transaction will automatically be sent back to the sender. 'It's very important to meet people where they are rather than assume they will learn how to use new technologies,' said Felipe Servin, Founder and CEO of BitBit. 'With over 500 million people already using X and most of the Bitcoin-focused conversations happening there, this is the ideal place to integrate Bitcoin payments for the general public.' The extension is now live for all Chrome-compatible browsers, with mobile support and stablecoin integrations coming very soon. Install it here: About Spark Spark is the fastest, cheapest, most UX-friendly way to build financial apps and launch assets on Bitcoin. We're building the Bitcoin internet. Follow on X @spark About BitBit BitBit is a self-custodial social Bitcoin wallet that lets users send and receive Bitcoin and stablecoins right directly in their browser. Powered by Spark, a next-gen Bitcoin Layer 2, BitBit integrates directly with X usernames for frictionless tipping, payments, and community engagement, all without sacrificing privacy or control of funds. To learn more about BitBit, visit Press Contact [email protected]

US judge hears if Trump team broke law during LA Ice protests
US judge hears if Trump team broke law during LA Ice protests

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US judge hears if Trump team broke law during LA Ice protests

A federal judge in San Francisco on Monday began hearing evidence and arguments on whether the Trump administration violated federal law when it deployed national guard soldiers and US marines to Los Angeles after protests over immigration raids this summer. The Trump administration federalized California national guard members and sent them to the second-largest US city over the objections of the California governor, Gavin Newsom, and city leaders, after protests erupted on 7 June when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) officers arrested people at multiple locations. California is asking Judge Charles Breyer to order the Trump administration to return control of the remaining troops to the state and to stop the federal government from using military troops in California 'to execute or assist in the execution of federal law or any civilian law enforcement functions by any federal agent or officer'. 'The factual question which the court must address is whether the military was used to enforce domestic law, and if so, whether there continues to be a threat that it could be done again,' Breyer said at the start of Monday's court hearing. The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act prevents the president from using the military as a domestic police force. The case could set precedent for how Trump can deploy the guard in the future in California or other states. Trump's decision to deploy the troops marked the first time in 60 years that a US president had taken such a step without a governor's consent. Critics say that Trump's actions in many ways reflect a strongman approach by a president who has continually trodden upon norms and has had a disregard for institutional limits. 'This is the first, perhaps, of many,' Trump said in June of the deployment of national guard troops in Los Angeles. 'You know, if we didn't attack this one very strongly, you'd have them all over the country, but I can inform the rest of the country, that when they do it, if they do it, they're going to be met with equal or greater force.' Many of the troops have been withdrawn, but Rob Bonta, California's attorney general, said on Sunday that 300 national guard troops remain in the state. The Trump administration last week extended the activation of troops in the LA area through 6 November, according to a court filing by Newsom. 'The federal government deployed military troops to the streets of Los Angeles for the purposes of political theater and public intimidation,' Bonta said in a statement. 'This dangerous move has no precedent in American history.' The hearing comes the same day Trump placed the DC Metropolitan police department under federal control and deployed the national guard by invoking section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has said national guard units would take to the streets of DC over the coming week. Related: US citizens jailed in LA Ice raids speak out: 'They came ready to attack' The Department of Defense ordered the deployment of roughly 4,000 California national guard troops and 700 marines. Most of the troops have since left but 250 national guard members remain, according to the latest figures provided by the Pentagon. The remaining troops are at the Joint Forces training base in Los Alamitos, according to Newsom. Newsom won an early victory from Breyer, who found the Trump administration had violated the 10th amendment, which defines power between federal and state governments, and exceeded its authority. The Trump administration immediately filed an appeal arguing that courts cannot second-guess the president's decisions and secured a temporary halt from the appeals court, allowing control of the California national guard to stay in federal hands as the lawsuit continues to unfold. After their deployment, the soldiers accompanied federal immigration officers on immigration raids in Los Angeles and at two marijuana farm sites in Ventura county while marines mostly stood guard around a federal building in downtown Los Angeles that includes a detention center at the core of protests. The Trump administration argued the troops were needed to protect federal buildings and personnel in Los Angeles, which has been a battleground in the federal government's aggressive immigration strategy. Since June, federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the US from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops and farms. Some US citizens have also been detained. Ernesto Santacruz Jr, the field office director for the Department of Homeland Security in Los Angeles, said in court documents that the troops were needed because local law enforcement had been slow to respond when a crowd gathered outside the federal building to protest against the 7 June immigration arrests. 'The presence of the national guard and marines has played an essential role in protecting federal property and personnel from the violent mobs,' Santacruz said. After opposition from the Trump administration, Breyer issued an order allowing California's attorneys to take Santacruz's deposition. They also took a declaration from a military official on the national guard and marines role in Los Angeles. Related: Inside the neighborhood patrols watching for Ice: 'They thought they could scare us – but this is LA' The Trump administration's attorneys argued in court filings last week the case should be canceled because the claims under the Posse Comitatus Act 'fail as a matter of law'. They argued that there was a law that gives the president the authority to call on the national guard to enforce US laws when federal law enforcement is not enough. Trump federalized members of the California national guard under Section 12406 of Title 10, which allows the president to call the national guard into federal service when the country 'is invaded', when 'there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government' or when the president is otherwise unable 'to execute the laws of the United States'. Breyer found the protests in Los Angeles 'fall far short of 'rebellion'. 'Next week's trial is not cancelled,' he said in a ruling ordering the three-day, non-jury trial. During the month the protests took place, tensions heightened between Trump and Newsom. The California governor compared the president to failed dictators and Trump entertained the idea of having Newsom arrested. Solve the daily Crossword

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E: 5 Electrifying Differences
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E: 5 Electrifying Differences

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E: 5 Electrifying Differences

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E: 5 Electrifying Differences originally appeared on Autoblog. Ford and Hyundai go head-to-head The electric crossover segment is only getting more competitive as the years go by, and the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Hyundai Ioniq 5 are two of the closest rivals around. Both models feature impressive performance specs, thanks in part to the instant torque from their electric motors, which makes it a rather negligible factor for most drivers. Outside of performance, the Mustang Mach-E and Ioniq 5 feature distinctive styles, charging capabilities, and pricing that could sway consumers toward one EV over the other. 1. Ford Mustang Mach-E has a lower entry cost Ford reduced the price of the Mustang Mach-E for the 2025 model year, making it more affordable than most of its competitors, including the Hyundai Ioniq 5. Starting at $37,995, the base Mustang Mach-E undercuts the base Ioniq 5 SE Standard Range, priced from $42,600, by more than $4,000. That trend continues into the middle of the range as well. The Mustang Mach-E Premium starts at $41,995, while the Ioniq 5 SE starts at $46,650. That number gets more competitive towards the end of the range, with the Ioniq 5 Limited narrowly beating out the Mustang Mach-E GT, priced from $54,300 and $54,495, respectively. Notably, however, both models have a top-spec model designed for performance. The Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally starts at $58,490, easily undercutting the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N, available from $66,200. The Mustang Mach-E Rally sprints to 60 mph in 3.4 seconds, but the Ioniq 5 N has a slight edge in performance, with a 0-to-60 time of just 3.25 seconds. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is also available in off-road form. The XRT model starts at $55,500, undercutting the Mustang Mach-E Rally from that angle as well. Notably, however, Ford's electric crossover comes with more specialized features, like Drift Mode, that offer a higher level of driver engagement. 2. Ford Mustang Mach-E's extended-range battery offers longer driving ranges If you plan on using an EV as your daily driver, then you already know range anxiety isn't something to take lightly. When it comes down to the Ford Mustang Mach-E and Hyundai Ioniq 5, the former is the better pick, with longer ranges available on most models. At the base level, for example, the Mustang Mach-E with a standard battery offers a 260-mile range, while the Ioniq 5 falls a little short at 245 miles of range. Moving beyond the base models, things get more competitive. An Ioniq 5 equipped with rear-wheel drive offers an EPA-estimated 318 miles. The Mustang Mach-E offers 260 miles in a similar setup, but stepping up to the extended-range battery increases range to 320 miles with rear-wheel drive. Adding AWD to both models reduces the Ioniq 5's range to 290 miles, while a Mustang Mach-E with the larger battery comes in at 300 miles on the dot. The Ford Mustang Mach-E GT continues that trend, with a slightly larger battery to account for its increase in performance. That model delivers an EPA-estimated 280-mile range when paired with AWD. At the tippity top of the range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally features a 265-mile range, while the Ioniq 5 N offers just 221 miles of range. 3. Hyundai Ioniq 5 has a faster charging speed If you frequently make long trips, a bit of extra range isn't quite going to cut it. In that scenario, charging times become a priority, especially when every minute counts. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is the class leader in that respect, charging from 10% to 80% in as little as 20 minutes at DC fast chargers across all trim levels and setups. The Mustang Mach-E is one of the slower-charging models in the segment. Ford's electric crossover takes 38 minutes to reach an 80% charge, nearly twice that of the Ioniq 5. For comparison purposes, the Volkswagen ID.4, which competes with both models, lands in the middle, with a 28-minute charge time. The Mustang Mach-E's electrical architecture is designed to handle 150 kW, while the Ioniq 5 can handle up to 350 kW. 4. Ford Mustang Mach-E has a larger frunk The front trunk, or frunk, isn't the most important part of an electric crossover, but it can be a nice addition, especially for tailgating and similar gatherings. The Mustang Mach-E features a five-cubic-foot frunk, but the fun doesn't stop there. Ford went above and beyond to design the frunk with a plastic tray that can be rinsed and drained. Not only that, but the American automaker showed just how functional it can be with a promotional photo where they filled it with chicken wings. The Hyundai Ioniq 5's frunk doesn't compare to that of the Mustang Mach-E, measuring just 0.85 cu ft. Interestingly, models sold outside of North America get a 2.01 cu ft. frunk. The reasoning for the smaller frunk in North America seems to boil down to the front motor in both RWD and AWD setups. On the bright side, at least the Ioniq 5 has a frunk, unlike the Chevrolet Equinox EV, which houses the powertrain beneath the hood. 5. Both models feature their own unique styling If you park the Mustang Mach-E and Ioniq 5 next to one another, it's clear that their styling couldn't be more different. Ford's offering carries elements lifted from the Mustang muscle car, including the pony badging, sleek lines, and aggressive demeanor. Inside, however, the electric crossover couldn't be more different from its muscle car sibling. The EV features an interior with a flat floor that offers plenty of room in the cabin for passengers, up to 101 cu ft. to be exact. Folding down the rear seats puts cargo space at a rather roomy 59.7 cu ft. A 15.5-inch touchscreen display and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto make for a connected experience. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 goes more retro, with styling reminiscent of decades past that blends with a futuristic aesthetic. The Korean EV features flush door handles and parametric pixel LED lighting, as well as LED accent lighting, that merge well with the clamshell hood and invigorating lines. Inside, the Ioniq 5 comes loaded with tech, including a 12.3-inch touchscreen display and wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity. The exterior is somewhat deceptive, as the interior boasts 106.5 cu ft. of passenger space and 58.5 cu ft. of cargo space with the rear seats folded down. Final thoughts While the Ioniq 5's style is the more unique of the two, the Mustang's styling elements are hard to ignore. Then again, I also have a 2022 Chevy Blazer RS that incorporates design elements from the Camaro. In other words, I may be a little biased towards the muscle car aesthetic. With its lower price, slightly better range (with the larger battery), and larger frunk, however, the Ford Mustang Mach-E has plenty of advantages outside of appearance. The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is an excellent EV as well, with competitive range, some of the fastest charging speeds in the industry, and a roomy interior fit for families. That's not to mention the retro styling that's sure to turn heads. When all is said and done, the Ioniq 5 features the substance and style to make it one of the most competitive electric crossovers on the market. 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs. Ford Mustang Mach-E: 5 Electrifying Differences first appeared on Autoblog on Aug 16, 2025 This story was originally reported by Autoblog on Aug 16, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store