The Trump-Musk bromance is breaking up and could break America
It was a marriage made in heaven — until it wasn't.
President Trump and Elon Musk, two titans of ego, united for the cameras and the 'greater good.' But like all fairy tales, this one didn't last. The honeymoon is now officially over.
Barely had Trump announced his artificial intelligence infrastructure project, Stargate, when Musk, his so-called 'First Buddy,' slipped into the role of disgruntled spouse.
The White House rollout, featuring SoftBank, OpenAI and Oracle, promised a half-trillion-dollar leap into AI supremacy. 'They don't actually have the money,' Musk sniped on X, his personal soapbox. 'SoftBank has well under $10B secured. I have that on good authority.'
Musk's rapid turn from ally to adversary sends a clear signal: Trump needs to cut ties — before the bromance drags him, and possibly the nation, under.
What might have initially seemed like a strategic alignment — a billionaire tech mogul and a bombastic political leader coming together to shape America's future — was, in reality, a ticking time bomb.
Musk and Trump are not Batman and Robin. They are two Batmans, each with their own unyielding desire to dominate the spotlight, the narrative and the accolades. The combustible mix of their egos, coupled with their insatiable need for public adoration, is destined to end in a fiery implosion.
Musk's recent public mockery of Trump's AI initiative is not just a minor jab — it's a declaration of independence. For Trump, who demands absolute loyalty and reverence, this is tantamount to betrayal. But Musk has never been one to play second fiddle, and Trump has never been one to share the stage. Their alliance was never rooted in mutual respect. Rather, it was a transaction of convenience, driven by mutual utility.
Musk had the money, the influence, and the tech-world clout to help amplify Trump's reelection campaign, casting himself as a visionary willing to bet on a populist wildcard. Trump, in turn, held the ultimate prize: the keys to the kingdom.
For Musk, those keys unlocked an unprecedented opportunity for federal largesse — contracts worth billions, aimed squarely at propelling his enterprises to new heights. SpaceX could solidify its dominance in the race for the stars with long-term NASA and Department of Defense funding. Tesla could secure its place as the backbone of the nation's energy infrastructure, with federal dollars subsidizing sprawling projects tied to renewable energy grids. The newly announced AI infrastructure project, Stargate, represented yet another goldmine, with Musk poised to position himself as the architect of America's technological future.
For Trump, Musk's support was a strategic coup. Musk's backing brought an air of Silicon Valley sophistication to Trump's administration, creating a rare bridge between populism and the tech elite. It was lust, not love — a high-stakes quid pro quo driven by ambition, not allegiance.
Moreover, and this is a critical point, Trump's brand of traditionalism stands in direct opposition to Musk's vision of a tech-driven future. Musk fancies himself a modern-day Prometheus, delivering the fire of innovation to humanity: electric vehicles to revolutionize transportation, plans to colonize Mars as a backup for civilization and AI advancements to reshape industries. His worldview is one of relentless progress, a future unshackled from the constraints of the past.
Trump, by contrast, embodies a different archetype of power. His appeal is rooted in populism, nostalgia, and a promise to restore America to a bygone era of strength and simplicity — a time when industry roared, borders were fortified and traditional values defined the nation's character. Trump wants to make Detroit great again. Musk wants to turn it into a launchpad for Mars.
These conflicting ideologies were always destined to clash. Musk's techno-utopianism leaves little room for Trump's vision of a grounded, tradition-oriented resurgence.
This will not end well.
When billionaires feud, the repercussions rarely stay confined to their personal disputes. Both Musk and Trump command vast influence, shaping entire industries, political ideologies and cultural movements. A public falling out between these two powerhouses risks exacerbating existing societal divides, potentially stalling progress in crucial areas of innovation and policy.
We've already had a preview of this clash during the H-1B visa controversy, where Musk's call for expanded tech talent collided head-on with MAGA's staunch protectionism.
Now, I ask you to imagine this tension writ large.
Musk's legion of tech-savvy futurists, who hail him as a modern-day Tony Stark, pitted against Trump's loyal traditionalists, who view him as the guardian of American values. Such a schism would not only deepen ideological fractures but also risk turning cultural and policy debates into entrenched battlegrounds, paralyzing collaboration.
The two men represent two competing forces shaping the 21st century.
When personal quests outweigh collaboration, the price is paid by everyone. Trump would be wise to cut ties with Musk now — before it's too late.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Walmart Shareholders Fail Racial Equity Audit Proposal for a Third Time
The third time was not the charm for United for Respect Education Fund. The non-profit filed a shareholder proposal asking Walmart to undergo a third-party, independent racial equity audit focused on analyzing the company's impact on Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) communities. Per the proposal, once completed, Walmart should share the results publicly on its website. More from Sourcing Journal Walmart to Bring Drone Delivery to Five Additional Cities Trump Lashes Out at Walmart, Says Retailer Should 'Eat the Tariffs' Walmart US Nearly Doubled Deliveries Made in Three Hours or Less 'Given its worker demographics and scale, we request Walmart assess its behavior through a racial equity lens to obtain a complete picture of how it contributes to, and could help dismantle, social and economic inequality,' the filers wrote in their proposal. 'A racial equity audit would help Walmart identify, remedy and avoid adverse impacts on nonwhite stakeholders, communities of color and long-term diversified shareholders. Failure to effectively address inequities in its operations exposes stakeholders, including employees, to unacceptable abuses and exposes Walmart to risks that may ultimately affect shareholder long-term value.' According to Walmart's 2024 Mid-Year Belonging Report, people of color make up 51 percent of its U.S. workforce. United for Respect Education Fund filed similar proposals in 2023 and 2024. But this time around, part of the importance for the group and its co-filers was the fact that Walmart, like several other major companies, announced late last year that it would roll back some of its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts in favor of a theme of 'belonging.' Ultimately, the filers' argument proved unsuccessful in swaying shareholders' minds. In 2023, the proposal garnered 18.1 percent of shareholder votes; in 2024, that proportion declined to 15.4 percent. This year, the proposal received 6.9 percent of shareholder votes, according to a vote result announcement from Walmart's Thursday shareholder meeting. That's down 8.5 percentage points from last year. Like in previous years, Walmart recommended shareholders vote against the proposal. 'The Board recommends shareholders vote against these proposals because we already disclose substantial information on our people strategies, providing information about our business rationale, key metrics, progress, Board oversight and approach to continuous improvement based on stakeholder feedback and results,' the company published in its 2025 proxy statement. Ahead of the vote, Bianca Agustin, co-executive director of United for Respect, told Sourcing Journal that the organization had hoped to see at least the same percentage of shareholder votes headed their way as last year. She had also hoped that the proposal would garner one-fifth of all shareholder votes, since many proxy advisers recommend a company open formal dialogue with shareholders proposing a change if their proposition receives at least 20 percent of the total vote. Ultimately, the filers saw neither of those outcomes come to fruition this year. Nonetheless, Agustin said she hoped the proposal would bring attention to Walmart's DEI-related decisioning in recent months. 'We [wanted] to basically give a referendum on Walmart's really, really opaque decision to roll back the DEI initiatives,' she told Sourcing Journal. 'We [wanted] to send a strong message to the company that stakeholders do not agree with their decision, and that…they have a responsibility to lead in this moment of political turmoil and division. Given the demographic of their workforce and the communities they operate in, that responsibility is enhanced for Walmart.' TaNeka Hightower, a Tennessee resident who is currently on medical leave from her role at Walmart, supported the non-profit and its co-filers in re-filing the proposal this year. She said she believes a racial equity audit would help answer questions about pay equity and would provide insight into broader employee concerns about their ability to move up within the company, the treatment they receive from upper management and more. 'If we were to do a racial equity audit, it would really give an insight as to the disparity between Black and Brown workers in comparison to others,' Hightower told Sourcing Journal. 'The people up top that are the ones benefiting from all the profits, while the people that are actually doing the work to get the profits in the store aren't able to live.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk's Estranged Daughter Seemingly Relishes Trump Fallout: 'Such Beauty In Life'
Elon Musk's estranged daughter Vivian Wilson seems to be relishing the public fallout between her father and President Donald Trump — understandably so, as the tech billionaire previously stated that Wilson is 'dead' to him for coming out as trans and legally changing her name. Wilson's supposed glee at the ongoing political feud kicked off this week in the form of two Instagram posts that multiplemediaoutlets captured before they expired for public viewing. 'I do not want to comment. I love being proven right,' said Wilson in the first clip Thursday through laughter, per People. The second post — accompanied by a Chase Icon song titled 'Job Application'— included a screenshot of a Threads postin which Wilson simply wrote, 'Such beauty in life.' Musk, the CEO of Tesla, spent millions to help fuel Trump's reelection, but began criticizing the president last month over the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates would add $2.4 trillion to the national deficit over the next 10 years. The feud reached a peak Thursday when Musk posted on X, formerly Twitter, that the reason the Jeffrey Epstein files haven't been released is because Trump is in them. Epstein, a financier, died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Musk has since deleted his post, which prompted colorful reactions from critics — including his daughter. Wilson has long distanced herself from her father. The 21-year-old changed her legal name in 2022, opting for the surname of her mother Justine Wilson, and is one of 14 known children Musk has had with four different women. Musk said in 2024 that his transgender daughter was 'killed by the woke mind virus.' Wilson responded at the time by noting she looks 'pretty good for a dead bitch,' and hasn't relented against Musk since. She has not only called him a 'serial adulterer' and fake Christian, but slammed his 'Nazi salute shit' after Musk's appearance at Trump's inauguration event in January. Bill Maher Unveils New Trump-Musk 'Couple Name' As Their Bromance Combusts 'What The F**k...': Watch Joe Rogan And Trump's FBI Director React To Musk's Post No, You Do Not Have To Hand It To Elon Musk
Miami Herald
25 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Legendary fund manager sends blunt 6-word message on bitcoin
It's been a wild ride for markets since President Trump announced widespread tariffs on April 2. Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" announcement included higher tariff rates than hoped, leading to investors reworking their expectations for the U.S. economy. There's evidence that a potential U.S. economic slowdown may already be underway, and despite ongoing tariff negotiations, risks remain that tariffs may push the economy into stagflation or outright recession. That risk continues to cast a shadow over risk assets, including stocks and cryptocurrency, which tend to perform best when wallets are fat and consumers and businesses are increasing spending, rather than ratcheting back. Related: President Trump sends harsh message to Federal Reserve on interest rate cuts The stock market sell-off was big, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite falling 19% and 24% from early-year highs, respectively. Bitcoin fell alongside stocks, losing 27% from its January high through April 8. The drop in risk assets was unsettling, but created opportunity for risk-tolerant investors to 'buy the dip.' Since President Trump paused most of the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 on April 9, the Nasdaq and bitcoin have surged higher by 28% and 39% respectively. The gains have been impressive, but not everyone is convinced it will be clear sailing from here. Veteran Wall Street bond manager Bill Gross has navigated good and bad markets since 1971. He co-founded Pacific Investment Management Co., or PIMCO, a huge firm with $2 trillion under management. He formerly managed over $270 billion via PIMCO's Total Return Fund, earning him the "Bond King" nickname before moving to Janus Henderson Investors from 2014 to 2019. Gross offered a blunt message about bitcoin this week, and given his track record, his opinion is worth considering. Image source: Bloomberg/Getty Images There's been considerable debate about what will happen to the economy next. Many think tariffs will tax cash-strapped consumers later this year, lowering economic growth, even as businesses press pause on projects awaiting trade deal clarity. Others believe the risks of tariffs derailing activity are overblown and temporary. The jobs market arguably remains healthy, given that the unemployment rate is relatively low at 4.2%. However, unemployment is up from 3.4% in 2023, and companies announced 93,816 job cuts in May, up 47% year over year, according to Challenger, Grey, & Christmas. Related: Analyst resets stocks, gold outlook after rally The uptick in joblessness prompted the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by 1% last year; however, the Fed has paused on additional cuts over fear that reducing rates could swell inflation, given that tariffs are only beginning to be felt on prices. The Fed's hesitancy to cut interest rates has drawn sharp criticism from the White House, ostensibly because it recognizes tariffs may slow GDP, worsening unemployment. If the economy were to drop off, and the Fed remained unwilling to budge on interest rates, Congress may be unable to adjust fiscal policy fast enough to bridge the gap, given our deficit and mountain of debt. The U.S. deficit is over $1.8 trillion, representing roughly 6.4% of gross domestic product. Meanwhile, total public debt outstanding is approximately 122% of GDP, far higher than its 75% level in 2008 during the Great Recession. The economic uncertainty has led to bitcoin and gold finding willing buyers as market participants look to diversify risk. Bill Gross's 50 years of Wall Street experience mean he's seen many market pops and drops, including the Nifty 50, skyrocketing inflation in the 1970s, the S&L crisis in the late 80s and early 90s, the Internet boom and bust, the Great Recession, Covid, and the 2002 bear market. More Experts Fed official sends strong message about interest-rate cutsBillionaire fund manager sends surprising message on trade deficitHedge-fund manager sees U.S. becoming Greece In short, Gross has been around the block, making his take on bitcoin worth paying attention to. Gross believes bitcoin is valuable because individuals and others widely hold it, and its supply is capped. "There are now approximately 19.4 million Bitcoins priced at about 107,000 each. The supply of total coins is capped at 21 million over the next few years of "mining," wrote Gross recently on X. "While hard to estimate, approximately 90-95% are held by individuals, institutions, and the moment there is "value" to a Bitcoin." However, Gross appears to think that bitcoin's value may be reflected in its price after its recent rally. "It is in the "meme stock" world for the most part - more valuable than a Trump coin but subject to excessive volatility with underlying value hard to measure," wrote Gross. "There are better risk/reward opportunities," added Gross bluntly. "Any asset category using high leverage is a future risk not only to the asset itself but to the financial system as a whole." Related: Veteran fund manager resets stock market forecast amid Musk, Trump fallout The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
