Harley-Davidson reveals India pricing for 2025 model range
Harley-Davidson Road Glide
advertisementNow in its 26th year, the Harley-Davidson CVO brings in superior touring performance and design. The CVO can be had in two different variants, the CVO Street Glide and the CVO Road Glide. Both of these are powered by the Milwaukee 117 1,923cc motor that makes 107bhp and 175Nm of torque.
Harley-Davidson Panamerica Special
Here are the 2025 Harley-Davidson range prices (ex-showroom) -H-D Nightster - Rs 13.51 lakhH-D Nightster Special - Rs 14.29 lakhH-D Sportster S - Rs 16.70 lakhH-D Panamerica Special - Rs 25.10 lakhH-D Breakout - Rs 37.19 lakhH-D Heritage Classic - Rs 23.85 lakhH-D Fatboy - Rs 25.90 lakhH-D Street Glide - Rs 39.29 lakhH-D Road Glide - Rs 42.30 lakhH-D X440 - Rs 2.39 lakh
Harley-Davidson Heritage Classic
advertisementHarley-Davidson will be revealing the prices of the CVO Street Glide and CVO Road Glide closer to their launch dates. While prices for the Street Bob will be revealed at a later date as well.Subscribe to Auto Today MagazineMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian student arrivals to US crash 46% in July: Here's how it could cost American students
Indian student visa crash hits US university finances hard. (AI Image) Indian students are vanishing from America's campuses—and it's not just a blip. In July 2025, student visa arrivals to the US dropped 28% year-on-year to just under 79,000, marking the steepest monthly fall so far this year, according to the International Trade Administration (via Bloomberg ). But the real gut punch lies in the breakdown: Arrivals from India fell a staggering 46%, while China, once the dominant source of foreign students, declined by 26%. When your top two source countries both head for the exits, the alarm bells aren't just ringing—they're blaring through every admissions and finance office from Boston to Berkeley. And the implications go far beyond lecture halls. An analysis of SEVIS and State Department data by JB International and NAFSA predicts a 30–40% drop in new international student enrolment this fall. The hit? Nearly $7 billion in lost community spending and over 60,000 jobs—gone. For context, in 2024, international students contributed $46 billion to the US economy and supported nearly 400,000 jobs, suggests a report from The PIE News . Indian students—known for enrolling in high-cost STEM programs—have been the financial spine of many US universities, especially mid-tier private colleges that rely on full-tuition-paying internationals to stay afloat. But visa hurdles, backlogs, rising rejections, and hostile immigration rhetoric have turned an already complex process into a gamble many families aren't willing to take anymore. What's driving the decline? At the heart of the decline lies a cascade of administrative tightening and rising anxieties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The U.S. State Department—under the Trump administration—hit pause on all new student (F, M) and exchange (J) visa interview scheduling starting May 27, 2025, citing a need to build in new vetting protocols. This freeze came smack in the middle of the summer application crucible and immediately slowed the flow of hopefuls. Then, in mid‑June, interviews officially resumed—but with a catch: mandatory, intensified social‑media screening. Applicants were now required to make all their social‑media accounts public and consent to full examination of their digital trail—including posts, comments, associations, and even deleted content. In effect, a perfect storm was engineered: A visa‑pause when thousands apply, then a rollback coupled with a surveillance of digital lives. For Indian students—many applying for high‑stakes STEM programs—this came during the apex of the admissions season. The result? Crippling uncertainty, cascading deferrals, and a mighty wedge in what had long been America's most reliable recruitment funnel. International students: The quiet funders of their American classmates For years, American universities have quietly balanced their books using a financial sleight of hand: Offering steep tuition discounts to domestic students while charging international students full freight. The practice, long taken for granted, is now starting to crack. According to an annual study by the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO), the average institutional tuition discount rate for first-time, full-time undergraduates at private nonprofit colleges reached a record 56.3% in the 2024–25 academic year. For all undergraduates receiving institutional aid, the average discount was 51.4%. In practical terms, that means for every $1 billed in tuition, colleges gave back 56 cents in institutional grant aid to incoming freshmen—netting just $22,000 on a $50,000 sticker price. By contrast, international students rarely receive such aid. They pay far closer to the listed price and, in doing so, have long subsidised the cost of education for their American classmates. When this full-pay segment starts to shrink—as current visa data from July 2025 suggests—the fallout is not gradual, it's immediate. Fewer international students doesn't just mean fewer bodies on campus; it means a sharp and sudden drop in revenue at precisely the moment institutions are running out of other financial cushions. The result? Fewer scholarships, slashed services, larger class sizes, and fewer course offerings—for American students. When foreign tuition dollars vanish, the subsidy model collapses—and it's the locals who feel the cut first. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Hero Glamour X: 5 key highlights of the new 125cc entrant
Hero MotoCorp recently introduced the new Glamour X in India, priced at ₹89,999 for the Drum variant and ₹99,999 for the Disc variant (ex-showroom, Delhi). The Glamour has been one of Hero's most popular 125cc motorcycles since its debut in 2005, and the new Glamour X is now bringing with it a blend of design updates, fresh technology, and segment-first features. With these updates, the Hero Glamour X 125 will compete with other feature-rich 125cc motorcycles like the Honda SP125, TVS Raider, and Bajaj Pulsar NS125, where it aims to stand out by offering more technology at a competitive price point. Here are the five key highlights of the newly launched motorcycle:
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
How Trump's tariff politics threaten America's global standing
America's liberal hegemony is unsustainable today and apparently beyond repair. Donald Trump ensures the end of that order faster than expected. It is too predictable and requires no special expertise to decode. His tariff drama, as a form of soft coercion to bend a trade partner into accepting the US's terms and conditions, is an ill-advised move and ultimately fatal for its interests in the long run. It is political suicide and diplomatic myopia. It exposes the US's weakness and shaky political psychology. The dividends will be negative. Trump is holding onto something that will ensure quick disrepute and erosion of American leadership. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The US's liberal hegemony, promoted by liberal democracy, a free-market economy, globalisation, and political and military influence, has declined over the years. Its crisis has created a multiplex world order, competition, and diversification. Trump lives in an ivory tower, indulging in imaginary pomposity, power, and hubris. The US economy is badly affected, and recovery is too remote. It must have domestic prosperity and international heft to wield authority. Trump has exacerbated the matter further by showing off a false sense of superiority. His hubris has exposed his duplicity. The European Union (EU) is not under its control. West Asia has become more fragile after the Iran-Israel war and the Gaza fiasco. Despite the Alaska meet, the Russia-Ukraine war is not likely to end soon. War fatigue is obvious, but hubris keeps the war going. Trump's verbosity about bringing instant peace has failed deplorably. The China-Taiwan conflict boils the waters of the Indo-Pacific. Can Trump manage to address multiple pressure points? This is the time for tactical diplomatic cooperation to ease global problems and strengthen the domestic economy. Paradoxically, transactional Trump prefers conflict to negotiation. Tariffs are weaponized to secure concessions. His tariff model is a conflict model. Partnership is not built through impositions, imperatives, coercion, or bullying. Every country protects its interests. Mutual interest is the foundation of a secure partnership. These are elementary in international relations. To coerce a country through tariff threats, vetoes, sanctions, and social media comments does not make a country a responsible global power. The US has imposed a total of 50 per cent tariff on Indian exports. Reportedly, exemptions are applied to a host of products that the US needs most. These include pharmaceuticals, energy products, electronics, and semiconductors. The reason behind imposing this tariff is to restrict India from buying energy and weapons from Russia. Russia is India's time-tested traditional partner. India has significantly reduced its singular dependencies on Russia by diversifying its export-import partnerships to secure its interests. India's purchase of Russian oil has significantly reduced the global energy crisis and inflation. Trump's failure to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine pushes the policy of economic blockade to force the Kremlin to come to the negotiating table. This policy will engender a severe energy crisis and uncontrollable inflation, and the Global South will bear the brunt. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India is an energy-dependent country. Its infrastructures require energy. Its dense demography will suffer in the event of a hike in energy prices and soaring inflation. It has a political price attached to it. These consequences are not featured in Trump's critical calculation and can be called a miscalculation. Trump's tariff framework has two sides to it: one is economic, and the other is geopolitical. Here, geopolitics is more important than the economic dimension. The geopolitical game through tariffs creates an atmosphere of extreme discomfort. The US cannot impose tariffs, interfere in India's neighbourhood, pass frivolous and unnecessary statements on India's Operation Sindoor in Pakistan to fight terrorism, and still ask for partnership. These contradictions hardly coexist. The US interferes in Bangladesh and Myanmar and irks India with irresponsible and unstatesmanlike statements concerning India's ceasefire with Pakistan. Its preferential treatment of Pakistan, a country that carries out cross-border terrorism in India, does not make the US a friend or a trusted partner. However, despite a chequered history, India has built a significant partnership with the US for over a decade. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India can antagonise neither Russia, a traditional strategic partner, nor China, a neighbour. It has to take a balanced line. It has shown great statesmanship, restraint, and composure despite Trump's provocations through social media. The US needs India to cool the waters of the Indo-Pacific—not through coercion but through cooperation. China is America's archenemy. The latter cannot control the former without a formidable alliance. Therefore, India is a Quad member, delivering its responsibility through strategic cooperation and partnership. The US intends to develop contrary camps: either one is its friend or a rival. This kind of rigid determinism is counterproductive in international relations. The era of binary choices is over in the age of a multipolar world order. Either/or binary thinking is untenable—interests matter. Interest-based cooperation will be more profitable and attractive. The US's moralising on partnership ethics and high-tariff trade architecture does not hold any merit in an increasingly competitive world order. When the US was at the helm of the global order, it never referred to morality while pushing its interests unilaterally. India has mainly been more considerate and has preferred a balanced approach to international relations. It has diversified immensely. It is not entirely dependent on the US's adversaries, Russia and Iran. Its dependencies on them have minimised over the years. It has developed an incredible partnership with the US. But the US wants India to toe its line as and when the former requires and become its puppet. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Can the US follow India as and when the latter requires it? On the issue of Pakistan, the US has no trouble switching sides. Why would India do anything counterintuitive? India is an aspirational country and has a bright future. It is gradually diversifying its scope of expression, connection, and cooperation with special attention to the Global South. It follows its own pace and works in the direction that leads it toward a future of progress. Moreover, China will seemingly be the primary beneficiary of Trump's tariff exercise. The US cannot build a firewall against China without trusted partners. India's indispensability is irrefutable because it is a key player in the Indo-Pacific. Tariff pressure may force countries to come closer to China. Though China is an equally coercive power and its debt-trap diplomacy is globally infamous, it has manufacturing strength, supply chain support, critical technology, and rare earth resources to attract partners for collaboration and trade. Therefore, Trump's policy miscalculations and misplaced priorities will eventually empower China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If good sense prevails and he retracts the tariff diplomacy from his policy itinerary, it may ease the tension. The US must get down from the ivory tower and understand the geopolitical and geostrategic complexities. Its self-insulated sense of unquestioned grandeur and brandishing of unending power will become a hamartia ensuring its downfall. Howdy Modi and Namaste Trump in 2019 and 2020, respectively, gave an impression of a bromance. It was cosmetic and short-lived. Trump's transactionalism has ruined everything. Recent incidents of unnecessary meddling in Indian affairs and tariff coercion proved Henry Kissinger's statement: 'It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.' The tariff shock is not Trump's miscalculation—it speaks of his political madness and policy myopia. Dr. Jajati K. Pattnaik teaches at the Centre for West Asian Studies, School of International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Dr. Chandan K. Panda teaches at Rajiv Gandhi University (A Central University), Itanagar. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
