logo
Here's the $9.4 billion in DOGE cuts that Trump is asking Congress to approve

Here's the $9.4 billion in DOGE cuts that Trump is asking Congress to approve

Yahoo2 days ago

The White House has formally asked Congress to cut $9.4 billion in federal spending.
That includes foreign aid and funding for PBS and NPR.
It could be the first of many "DOGE cut" bills that lawmakers vote on.
For months, DOGE has been cutting federal spending without consulting Congress. Now, the White House is asking lawmakers to vote to make some of those cuts permanent.
President Donald Trump's Office of Management and Budget sent a $9.4 billion "rescission package" to Congress on Tuesday that would claw back federal funding that lawmakers have previously approved.
The package includes $8.3 billion in foreign aid cuts and nearly $1.1 billion in cuts to public broadcasting.
That's less than half of one percent of the $2 trillion in federal spending cuts once floated by Elon Musk, who until recently was the de facto DOGE leader. And these cuts are seen as low-hanging fruit.
This could be the first of several bills sent to Congress to codify DOGE cuts into law.
"We look forward to working with the Congress to identify additional opportunities to put the Nation's fiscal house back in order," Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought wrote in a letter accompanying the request.
The administration is asking Congress to cut a total of $9.4 billion.
$1.07 billion of that is funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, a government-backed entity that funds NPR and PBS. That's equivalent to two years of funding.
The other $8.3 billion includes various forms of foreign aid: $6.3 billion of that funding is related to the US Agency for International Development, or USAID, the foreign aid agency that DOGE shuttered in the early months of the administration.
That includes $2.5 billion in development assistance, $1.65 billion in economic support funds, and $900 billion for global health programs.
The White House has also requested that Congress rescind $1.13 billion in contributions to various international organizations, including $800 billion for migration and refugee assistance, and a combined $64 million for organizations like the Inter-American Foundation, the African Development Foundation, at the United States Institute of Peace.
Under the Impoundment Control Act, or ICA, the president is generally required to spend money that Congress has already approved. The law was passed in 1974, after President Richard Nixon refused to spend money on a variety of programs that he disagreed with.
Trump and his allies have argued that this law is unconstitutional, and some Republicans in Congress have introduced a bill to eliminate it entirely.
The administration has also withheld hundreds of billions of dollars in federal funding already, and the Government Accountability Office has found that the administration is violating the ICA.
But the ICA also provides for the president to make rescission requests to Congress, and the Trump administration is now using that tool.
Under the law, Congress has 45 days of consecutive session to approve the cuts, or the money must be spent. That means lawmakers have until early September to get this done.
Unlike other bills, rescission bills only require a simple majority in the Senate to pass. That means Democrats, who are expected to broadly oppose the legislation, have no way of blocking the cuts on their own.
That doesn't mean GOP support will be unanimous. Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, for example, recently wrote an op-ed in a local paper opposing cuts to public broadcasting funding.
The last time a president tried to do this, it failed. In 2018, the Trump administration asked Congress to rescind $15 billion in federal spending, but the bill failed to pass the Senate.
Here's the full text of the White House's rescission request:
https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/25960446-proposed-rescissions-of-budgetary-resources/?embed=1
Read the original article on Business Insider

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump
Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stephen Miller Melts Down as Musk Exits With His Wife and an Attack on Trump

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller spammed social media Tuesday night in a raging display of his unwavering support for President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as it faced increasing backlash from MAGA figures, including Elon Musk. The Trump loyalist went in hard to sell the 1,038-page document that passed the House by a single vote on May 22. Miller's comments came hours after former DOGE chief Musk attacked the mega-spending bill as the legislation moves to the Senate, labeling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest man also threatened to 'fire all politicians who betrayed the American people' at next year's midterm elections. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote on X. Miller responded by calling Trump's bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations' and 'the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House.' Miller pointedly described those on Trump's side of the argument as the president's 'closest allies.' It is unclear how much personal animus there is between Miller and Musk after the tech billionaire walked out on the administration, taking Miller's wife Katie with him. Katie Miller was hired by DOGE under the same 'special government employee' status as Musk, meaning that she was also time-limited to 130 days in office, but that has done little to quell unsubstantiated internet speculation about Musk and the Millers. She will now reportedly work for Musk full-time. Miller began his own barrage of posts on X, first by claiming Trump's bill would fund increased deportation. '[The bill] will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale, and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens from the United States,' Miller wrote. 'For that reason alone, it's the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World, in generations.' 'Now or never,' the 39-year-old wrote in another post. Trump's bill is estimated to increase the budget deficit by approximately $600 billion in the next fiscal year. Miller tried to explain his take on the bill by breaking it down into three sections: 'The most significant border security and deportation effort' in history, a full 'extension and expansion' of Trump's tax cuts and finally cutting almost $2 trillion through 'the largest welcome reform in history.' 'Item 1 alone (border security + deportation),' Miller wrote, 'makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' Critics of Trump's bill fear it would lead to millions of Americans losing health coverage by slashing Medicaid and introducing budget cuts to food assistance programs, with spending on border security and military programs increased. Some Republicans have also expressed fears about the rising cost of the bill, despite a deadline of July 4 to get the measure passed and signed into law. Miller's flurry of posts included him bragging that the bill 'was designed by President Trump and his allies in Congress to deliver on his core campaign pledges to voters and that is exactly what it does. This is the most MAGA bill ever passed by the House, and it's not even close.' 'The bill was designed by President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People,' he wrote in another post. Miller also called out GOP Kentucky senator Rand Paul, who told Fox Business his biggest objection to Trump's bill was the addition of '$5 trillion to the debt ceiling' over the next decade. 'Why doesn't Rand ever fight this hard to deport illegals?' Miller asked in a post. Miller clarified Trump's bill would not fund the Department of Education, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, or the Environmental Protection Agency. Experts have, however, warned the bill could ruin student loan borrowers and universities and will have an environmental impact through increased mining and logging of public lands to raise revenue. 'We could have never dreamed of a bill like this in 2017,' Miller posted on X. Miller's loyalty comes as other Republican senators have joined Musk in questioning the contents of Trump's bill. At least four are demanding changes, according to Reuters. They include Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Ron Johnson. While Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate, they cannot afford to lose support. Georgia Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene revealed she had not read a part of the bulky bill that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence systems for a decade. 'Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278-279 of (the bill) that strips states of the right to make laws or regulate AI for 10 years,' Greene posted on X. 'I am adamantly OPPOSED to this and it is a violation of state rights and I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there.' California Republican Jack Kimble was also critical of the bill on Tuesday. He posted on X: 'Full transparency, I did not know that the big beautiful bill was a real budget and would be used to determine spending levels. It seems to me that this is something that should have been made known to those in the House of Representative[s].' When a follower told him 'you're supposed to read the bills before you vote on them' Kimble replied 'Yeah, my bad.' Ron Johnson also agreed with Musk's 'disgusting abomination' comments on the bill. Speaking to NewsNation's The Hill on Tuesday, Johnson said, 'He's telling the truth... that's all I'm doing, too.' 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long-term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down. It supports it going up.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Trump was already aware of 'where Elon Musk stood on this bill' and that he would not be changing it. 'This is one, big, beautiful bill,' Leavitt said on Tuesday. 'And he's sticking to it.'

Elon Musk Unfollows Stephen Miller on X as He Takes His Wife
Elon Musk Unfollows Stephen Miller on X as He Takes His Wife

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk Unfollows Stephen Miller on X as He Takes His Wife

After days of unsubtle back-and-forth on X, Musk has now unfollowed Stephen Miller. The change in status occurred some time before 1 p.m. on Thursday, when X account Big Tech Alert publicized its discovery. The news comes one week after Musk reportedly poached Miller's wife, Katie Miller, who left DOGE to work for him full time. However, as of 3:55 p.m. on Thursday, Miller still follows Musk, meaning the sudden unfollowing is one-sided—at least for now. The unfollowing may be one-sided, but it's hardly unexpected. Miller has spent most of his time doing everything he could to thwart the former DOGE administrator, staunchly defending Trump's Big Beautiful Bill after Musk called it an 'abomination.' Without naming Musk explicitly, Miller took to X on Wednesday to correct his criticisms of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' after Musk told reporters he felt the bill undermined DOGE's work. Miller also called the bill 'the most essential piece of legislation... in generations.' Of course, there's also a personal undercurrent to their professional tension thanks to Katie Miller's career change. According to CNN, Katie is working in a communications capacity, helping Musk to arrange 'interviews unrelated to his time in government.' She's also on X, where she recently changed her header image to a photo of a SpaceX rocket, and responded with a heart emoji to a post asking, 'Who here loves Stephen Miller?' However, Musk's reasoning behind unfollowing Miller may not be personal. He also recently unfollowed conservative pundit Charlie Kirk, per Big Tech Alert. Rather than an escalation of his feud with Miller, Musk's recent following choices may be part of the Tesla CEO's sudden push to burn his bridges with the White House since departing DOGE on May 30. In the past two days, Musk has unleashed near-constant tweets condemning the Big Beautiful Bill and later, the president himself. Just minutes before followers noticed he'd unfollowed Miller, Musk began firing off an ongoing series of posts in response to Trump's comment that he was 'very disappointed' in him for opposing the Big Beautiful Bill. In one post, Musk wrote, 'Without me, Trump never would have won the election.' In a second, he added, 'Such ingratitude.' Musk has only gotten more extreme with his post-breakup comments in the hours since unfollowing Miller. Most recently, he took to X to accuse the president of being 'in the Epstein files,' concluding his rant with, 'Have a nice day, DJT!'

Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay
Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cuts to care: The price mothers and children will pay

HONOLULU (KHON2) — Congress continues to discuss possible cuts to Medicaid and many in Hawaii are concerned about the potential impacts. Some officials warn pregnant women and children could be hit the hardest. Those who rely on the service for themselves and their children also fear the worst. On Aug. 8, 2023, wildfires rip through the Lahaina community forcing thousands to flee. Mairey Garcia, then 10 weeks pregnant with her second child, made it out alive with her husband and daughter. Wanted man arrested after 'crime spree' leads to officer-involved shooting 'We live in Maui, for almost 16 years,' she said. 'Thinking and looking back after the fire, I don't want to think about it anymore.' They lost everything. Uprooting her family and relocating after the devastation on Maui she dealt with so many stressors and the added responsibility of another baby on the way. Garcia said having Aloha Care medical coverage was a huge weight off her shoulders. 'It's the only thing I have that time to support my babies and my family as well, because I can't afford to get a medical,' she Feb. 23, 2024 she gave birth to a healthy baby girl. 'Aloha Care has been there for me from the very start. It's been a blessing for me,' Garcia said. She is not alone. According to Aloha Care CEO Francoise Culley-Trotman, 1,500 moms delivered babies last year covered by Aloha Care. With 70,000 members it's the states second largest medicaid-medicare health plan. But if a bill to cut more than $600 billion in funding for Medicaid passes congress in the coming weeks, many will lose that lifeline. Download the free KHON2 app for iOS or Android to stay informed on the latest news 'The Republican tax bill makes the biggest cuts to Medicaid in history, meaning many people on Med-QUEST will lose coverage and hospitals and clinics may be forced to reduce services or close altogether,' U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz said in a statement. 'These cuts will disproportionately impact pregnant women and children.' 'This issue goes beyond just our membership or even the Quest recipients to what happens to our state and our ability to take care of people,' Culley-Trotman explained. She said cuts this extreme will increase preterm births and impact the long term health of mothers. 'Just an overall worsening of maternal and infant statistics in our state,' she added. For Garcia, it's personal. She worries about what will happen to her family and had this message for lawmakers. 'Please don't pass the bill,' she said. 'Because a lot of people need help and and rely on this program.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store