logo
Widow sues health firm after weight-loss op death

Widow sues health firm after weight-loss op death

Yahoo05-02-2025
The widow of a 48-year-old man who died after weight loss surgery is taking legal action against the private healthcare firm which carried out the operation.
Philip Morris died in 2021, four days after part of his stomach was removed during a gastric sleeve procedure at the Spire St Anthony's Hospital in Surrey.
In February 2024, a coroner concluded he probably would have survived if a carbon dioxide monitor was working correctly.
Following the inquest Spire Healthcare said it accepted the coroner's findings and had taken action to address them.
Widow calls for greater private care transparency
'Equipment issue' in weight loss surgery death
Women regret cut-price weight loss surgery abroad
Mr Morris' widow, Dana, received two interim compensation payments from Spire Healthcare last year, but is now taking the company to the High Court.
Mrs Morris, 49, said Spire's reluctance to accept full liability and agree a financial settlement had "prolonged their nightmare" and caused "further unnecessary grief".
"We definitely can't move on to kind of whatever grieving could look like," she said, adding: "I don't feel like we've even started that process."
Court papers obtained by BBC Wales allege substandard treatment by Spire Healthcare as well as medics involved in Mr Morris' surgery and aftercare.
A date for the High Court hearing has not yet been set.
Mr Morris, from Newport, was a founding member of Wales Arts Review and was its managing director from 2012 to 2016.
The family moved to south London from Newport in 2016.
Mr Morris - who weighed 22 stone, had type 2 diabetes and sleep apnoea - elected for private surgery due to long NHS waits following the Covid-19 pandemic.
Following the surgery, Mr Morris experienced severe abdominal pain which left him struggling to talk and breathe.
He was placed in the intensive care unit of the private hospital where a decision was made to intubate him before moving him to an NHS hospital.
A four-day inquest in Croydon in February 2024 heard the procedure was found to be "extremely difficult" and that his "airway was lost".
Senior coroner Sarah Ormond-Walshe said there was a "missed opportunity" to try to create a new airway because a carbon dioxide monitoring device was not working correctly.
She found that "no-one checked that this piece of equipment was working" because it was not any individual's responsibility to check.
In a narrative conclusion, the coroner found Mr Morris died after "suffering complications of an emergency procedure carried out in turn to treat complications of post bariatric surgery".
A year on, Mr Morris' widow and their son Orson, 15, have been diagnosed with PTSD and Orson continues to require counselling.
"We feel like we're trying to bring justice for Phil," Mrs Morris said.
"It's not right that he went in to improve his health and if things had gone to plan what life would be like now."
"Spire's mistakes cost Phil his life and we will forever suffer those consequences. Lessons must be learned so this never happens to any other family," she added.
Spire Healthcare said it was unable to comment on specific details, due to ongoing legal proceedings.
But in a statement the company said: "We apologise for the distress caused by Mr Morris' death and can confirm that Mrs Morris' claims are being responded to through the appropriate legal channels."
Call for more weight loss support to deter foreign treatment
Obesity in Wales worse than feared - researchers
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Most adults do not plan on getting COVID-19 shot amid vaccine policy changes
Most adults do not plan on getting COVID-19 shot amid vaccine policy changes

The Hill

timea few seconds ago

  • The Hill

Most adults do not plan on getting COVID-19 shot amid vaccine policy changes

More than half of American adults — 59 percent — say they do not expect to get the COVID-19 booster shot this autumn, according to new poll findings from healthcare policy group KFF. Poll results show that 23 percent of U.S. adults say they will 'probably not' get the vaccine, while 37 percent will 'definitely not' get the shot. Americans who said they will 'probably' or 'definitely' not get the shot were also more likely to say they think changes to U.S. vaccine policy are 'major' and will make people less safe. The data comes as the Trump administration makes drastic changes to the country's vaccine policy. Secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced earlier this year that the COVID-19 shot will no longer be recommended for healthy children and pregnant women. Kennedy also abruptly fired all 17 members of an independent vaccine advisory panel for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in June. He then replaced the panel with eight hand-picked appointees, many of whom have expressed vaccine skepticism in the past. Adults who identify as Republicans are far less likely to plan on getting the vaccine compared to those who identify as Democrats. About six out of 10 Republicans said they would 'definitely not' get the shot compared to about one out of 10 Democrats, according to the poll. White adults are the most likely to say that they are against getting the vaccine once the colder months arrive with about four out of 10 admitting they will 'definitely not' get the shot. Meanwhile, 32 percent of Black adults say they will 'definitely not' get the COVID-19 vaccine this fall, along with 30 percent of adults who identify as Hispanic. Adults between the ages of 30 and 49 are the most likely to say that they do not plan on getting the vaccine, with 42 percent of that age group saying they will 'definitely not' get the shot in the fall. The U.S. appears to be experiencing another summer wave of COVID-19 cases. As of July 29, COVID-19 infections are growing or likely growing in 40 states, including Florida, Texas, and New York, according to the CDC. The KFF poll was conducted via a national representative survey of about 1,300 people between July 8-14.

Government sues Silver Cross Hospital over mandatory COVID-19 vaccines; ex-employees say rights violated
Government sues Silver Cross Hospital over mandatory COVID-19 vaccines; ex-employees say rights violated

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Government sues Silver Cross Hospital over mandatory COVID-19 vaccines; ex-employees say rights violated

Silver Cross Hospital violated federal law when it fired two employees in 2021 who did not comply with the New Lenox hospital's mandatory policy that all employees be vaccinated for COVID-19, lawsuits from the allege. The employees had asked for, and been denied, reasonable accommodation when they asked to be exempt from the vaccination policy due to religious and disability reasons, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charged in lawsuits filed Thursday in federal court in Chicago. A spokeswoman for Silver Cross said Friday the hospital does not comment on pending or ongoing litigation or employment-related matters. 'As a regional healthcare provider, Silver Cross Hospital's foremost responsibility is to ensure the health and safety of our patients, our staff and the communities we serve,' she said in an email. One employee, Sarah Kotan, who worked in the hospital's lab, requested a religious accommodation because taking the COVID-19 vaccine conflicted with her religious beliefs and practices, one of the EEOC's lawsuit alleges. Debra Phillips, who worked in the hospital's insurance department, requested an accommodation based on disability after she had a severe allergic reaction to the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, the EEOC said in her lawsuit. Silver Cross denied their requests for accommodation and fired them, even though the hospital could have put safeguards in place, such as requiring both to undergo weekly COVID-19 testing, the EEOC lawsuits say. Kotan and Phillips are seeking unspecified monetary damages, including back pay, according to the complaints. Silver Cross enacted a policy in September 2021 requiring all employees be vaccinated by the end of October of that year, but allowed for employees to seek exemptions, the lawsuits say. The EEOC said Kotan and Phillips had their exemption requests denied, and when they appealed those were denied as well. The EEOC said it tried negotiating with the hospital in both cases in order to avoid a lawsuit, but was unable in either instance to secure a settlement agreeable to the commission. Krotan was fired from her lab job in October 2021, and Phillips from her insurance department job in December 2021, although she was never told she had been fired after being placed on unpaid leave from Silver Cross, according to the EEOC. Phillips' lawsuit alleges that she didn't find out she had been fired and believed she was still on unpaid leave until February 2022, when she asked the hospital for a copy of her personnel record. 'Absent an undue hardship, civil rights laws affirmatively require employers to accommodate an employee's disability and religious practices,' said Andrea Lucas, the EEOC's acting chair, in a news release Friday announcing the lawsuits. 'Unfortunately, many employers' vaccine mandates turned a blind eye to these long-standing civil rights laws. However, the novelty of the COVID-19 pandemic is not a shield for employers to engage in garden variety discrimination.'

What We'd Lose Without Public Radio
What We'd Lose Without Public Radio

Vogue

time3 hours ago

  • Vogue

What We'd Lose Without Public Radio

After Roben Farzard read Greg Franklin's posts, in late 2020, he decided to do something unusual. Farzad had met Greg Franklin the year before, when they sat next to each other on a bench watching their kids' basketball game at the local JCC. Less than a year later, Farzad was reading Franklin's account of his wife's COVID, her seizures, her intubation. To care for his wife and two kids, Franklin had had to leave his job at a real estate asset management company, initially under the Family and Medical Leave Act and then for good in August 2020. By the time Farzad got involved, Franklin's wife was home and stable, and Franklin was finally able to consider starting his job search. Farzad offered to host a live Zoom show, to 'leverage' the 'hive mind' of the audience of his radio show, Full Disclosure. After some hesitation—Franklin felt sheepish about asking for help, since, in 2020, everybody needed help—he agreed. He told his story and listeners called in to offer their networks, to suggest tactics, to request a follow-up meeting with ideas, leads, and offers. 'All these people just showed up—people who felt sad, who felt otherwise hopeless and trapped indoors,' says Farzad. 'It just showed me how vital that community thing was.' Franklin found a new job in April, one he's been in ever since. 'Having that community reach out was really uplifting,' he says. To me, his story represents the rawest and most special element of public radio: it's hyperlocal, invested in the community it serves, and in keeping that community healthy and informed. Farzad's show is distributed by Radio IQ, a public radio station based in Virginia's Appalachian mountains. After the recent rescission bill, that station has just lost $600,000 in funding that it had been apportioned by Congress. The bill claws back $1.1 billion worth of funds for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) for the next two years, which channels federal funding to NPR—my employer—as well as PBS, and our member stations like Radio IQ. NPR's structure is a little weird, a little antiquated, mostly vestiges of the CPB's creation in 1967 when President Johnson signed the Public Broadcasting Act into law; NPR was incorporated in February 1970. But NPR produces the news shows Morning Edition and All Things Considered as well as programs like my podcast, Planet Money, and member stations buy the content we make (as well as that of American Public Media–they have Kai Ryssdal, not us!) to broadcast on their airwaves. Only a small percent of NPR's budget is directly from the federal government, but a lot more of it—some 30%—comes from those fees for our programs from our approximately 1,000 member stations. And many of those really rely on federal money.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store