
I Spoke With Our World's Greatest Minds on Division, Faith, and Rebuilding Community. Hope Is How We Must Move Forward
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
It's no secret: Our country is going through dark times. Extreme weather is devastating local communities. Families are struggling to put food on the table. Our children's health is rapidly declining. Meanwhile, Americans are becoming increasingly resentful of fellow citizens who don't look like them.
We need a new path forward.
I recently had the immense pleasure, and challenge, of interviewing some of America's great minds for PBS' new non-fiction series, Wisdom Keepers, exploring who we are, how we got here, and what it means to be human. I spoke with a broad range of influential leaders, from world-renowned philosophers and scientists to faith leaders and more.
St. Marks Episcopal Church in Altadena parishioners hold candles during Great Vigil of Easter service on April 19, 2025, in Eagle Rock, Calif.
St. Marks Episcopal Church in Altadena parishioners hold candles during Great Vigil of Easter service on April 19, 2025, in Eagle Rock, Calif.It's impossible to capture all they taught in a single op-ed, but I've taken away four important lessons that can help us move forward as a country, find common ground, and rebuild.
1. Look for meaning.
Reverend Kelly Brown Douglas, African American Episcopal priest and womanist theologian, asked a simple, yet devastating question, "Are we going to be the authors of our own destruction?" We have traveled so deep into sin, into narcissism, thinking only about ourselves and competing against the "other." How do we escape this cycle and ensure lasting change?
Reverend Kelly Brown Douglas on the set of Wisdom Keepers.
Reverend Kelly Brown Douglas on the set of Wisdom Keepers.
Photo Courtesy of Rengim Mutevellioglu/Fordham University
To Reverend Douglas, a core part of this flaw in our humanity is our individualistic journeys to live a happy life, when, in reality, we need to think about how we can live a more meaningful life. Asking ourselves this question is inherently less selfish. It forces us to think about how we can do good for the community and not just ourselves. As Reverend Douglas put it, "Our pursuits must always be connected to the common good."
2. Use other people as your reference point.
Franciscan priest and spiritual writer Richard Rohr took it a step further. He told me, "You have to get outside of your defended world." Rohr insists we aren't the same, we don't need to be, and we need to stop defending this notion that we are. We must embrace our differences and the collective.
"When you can allow other people to be the reference point, at least as much as you are, you start in the school of compassion," he said.
When we are the center of our world, we are choosing to guide ourselves with ego. In contrast, when we allow others to be our reference point, we are guiding ourselves with compassion. When it comes to building community and navigating our path forward, we must think less about "I" and more about "we." Less about what we like and more about what is.
3. Have humility in seeking out truth.
For Former National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins, fake news and our country's push back on "fact" is at the center of our society's divisions. Our political polarization has created a crisis about what information to trust. He put it simply, "Willingness to accept objective truth as a reality is under threat."
To reverse this dangerous path we're on, Collins believes we need to prioritize integrity, competence, and humility. We need to understand—and accept—what we know and what we don't know, what we're an expert on and where we have room to learn more.
4. Put love at the center.
Pastor A.R. Bernard, who runs the Christian Cultural Center, a Brooklyn megachurch, explained the road ahead pretty simply: love is our path forward.
After experiencing the devastating death of two sons only two years apart, Pastor Bernard told me his faith saved him and kept him from living in anger and surrendering to his suffering. Thanks to his faith, and at the center of that faith, love, Pastor Bernard knew that there was more to his existence than his grief.
The first half of 2025 has brought so many of us immense pain and loss, from the flash floods in Texas to immigrant families being torn apart, daily shootings, and the ongoing wars. The list goes on. Dealing with these tragedies is no easy thing. But that doesn't mean there isn't a road ahead.
What emerged from the hours of deep conversations, the persistent conclusion might be put this way: "Yes, we are broken. But the good news is we can be fixed." When Pandora of mythological fame opened the box and released all the troubles of the world, something important remained. The first human woman looked down and saw "hope still lay in the bottom of the box."
My guests are clear-eyed, not starry-eyed. They live in the real world and see it for what it is. Yet, for all their willingness to talk with me about where we are in this post Great Recession, post-pandemic, Trump Redux, deeply divided country, and world, hope is still there. It's right there, waiting to be grasped and embraced.
Ray Suarez is a journalist and host of the new PBS program Wisdom Keepers.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Biden ‘Politburo' aide Bruce Reed blames ex-prez's debate fiasco on his stutter
WASHINGTON — A member of former President Joe Biden's so-called 'Politburo' testified that his ex-boss's infamously bad debate performance was the result of his stutter during a closed-door transcribed interview with House Oversight Committee lawyers this week. Bruce Reed, 65, Biden's former deputy chief of staff for policy, delivered a spirited defense of the 46th president's cognitive abilities during his roughly six-hour-long transcribed interview Tuesday, The Post has learned. 'Mr. Reed claimed in his transcribed interview that Joe Biden's debate performance was the result of his stutter,' a source familiar with Reed's testimony told The Post. Advertisement 'When asked whether Americans' concerns about Joe Biden's mental acuity were legitimate, Mr. Reed responded that he believes Americans should not have had any concerns about the President's mental faculties.' 3 Bruce Reed has been described as a policy wonk and was seen as a driving force behind much of former President Joe Biden's domestic agenda. Bloomberg via Getty Images Reed, who is now the ninth ex-Biden aide to appear before the panel, did not take questions from the press before his closed-door testimony. Biden struggled with a stutter during his youth, but he participated in numerous public debates over the past five decades where he seemed much more coherent. Advertisement Biden, 82, agreed to debate President Trump in late June of last year, far earlier than presidential verbal bouts have typically taken place during recent decades, usually in the fall. Reed, who has been described by Democratic operatives as a policy wonk, was among the advisers who helped prepare Biden for the notorious fumbling debate. Biden appeared on the debate stage borderline stonefaced at times and struggled to complete some of his thoughts, with his mouth agape during portions. The stunning display sparked a Democratic mutiny against Biden that led to him dropping out of the 2024 race. Advertisement 3 Former President Joe Biden has ripped into Republicans for questioning whether he actually made the decisions on how autopen was used. POOL/AFP via Getty Images 'During his interview, Mr. Reed stated that the decision to hold the debate early was a deliberate strategy to get ahead of early voting and the Olympics,' the source recounted. 'He emphasized that the campaign's push for the early debate was unrelated to concerns about President Biden's age.' The bombshell book 'Original Sin' described Reed as one of what the authors called Biden's 'Politburo,' the core inner circle of 'ultimate decision-makers' around the 46th president. He is now the last of the non-family 'Politburo' members described in the book to testify before the panel. Advertisement The 65-year-old has been a key figure in the Biden team and Democratic politics for years. In addition to his time as deputy chief of staff for policy during the Biden administration, Reed also served as Biden's chief of staff during the first half of his vice presidency and held key roles in the 2020 and 2024 campaigns. He also worked in the Clinton administration as the director of the Domestic Policy Council, a deputy campaign manager for policy during the 1992 Clinton campaign for the presidency, and a speechwriter for former Vice President Al Gore during his Senate days. Back in May, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) revived his probe into whether there was a 'cover-up' of Biden's mental cognition that he had opened last Congress. 3 Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer revived the probe into Joe Biden's acuity back in May. Getty Images The Kentucky Republican also expanded the probe to look at Biden's use of autopen to sign official documents after revelations emerged that the 46th president used the device very frequently. No lawmakers were present for Reed's transcribed interview. Biden has publicly ripped into aspersions from Republicans over his use of the autopen and insisted that he made every decision. Advertisement Other ex-Biden aides who sat before the Oversight panel, include former White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain; former senior adviser Mike Donilon; former counselor Steve Ricchetti; Jill Biden's powerful former chief of staff Anthony Bernal; former presidential physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor; Ashley Williams, former special assistant to the president and deputy director of Oval Office Operations; and Neera Tanden, the former White House director of the Domestic Policy Council. Some of those ex-Biden aides who came before the powerful investigatory committee had been subpoenaed and opted to plead their Fifth Amendment, refraining from answering questions. Reed had agreed to a transcribed interview before the Oversight Committee and, therefore, wasn't able to plead the Fifth. The powerful investigatory panel is slated to hear from former senior adviser Anita Dunn on Thursday. There are at least four more ex-Biden aides scheduled to appear before the panel after Dunn.


The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate Democrat questions FAA on recent airplane evacuations
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) questioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) over recent airplane evacuations in a Tuesday letter. In her letter, Duckworth referenced three recent evacuation incidents, all previously noted by the FAA, and stated, 'fortunately, for all three incidents, professional and highly trained flight crews were able to guide all passengers to safety with minimal injuries.' 'While FAA has yet to disclose how long any of the referenced passenger evacuations took, these incidents once again raise serious questions about FAA's 90 second evacuation standard as well as FAA's assumptions about how evacuations occur in real world conditions (such as the assumption every passenger will comply with instructions to deplane without carry-on bags),' the Illinois senator added. Duckworth's letter follows a few notable aviation incidents in the last year that have rattled Americans and raised questions about air safety, including a deadly crash between an American Airlines flight and an Army Black Hawk helicopter close to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport that left no survivors. 'We will respond directly to Sen. Duckworth,' the FAA said in an email to The Hill on Tuesday. 'Concerning evacuations: Safety is our top priority. That's why the FAA's message to passengers is simple: if you have to evacuate, leave your bags behind and follow crew instructions.' Duckworth also pressed the FAA to 'provide detailed responses to' questions about the three previously mentioned incidents, like the length of time 'to evacuate all passengers and crew' and the number of passengers that 'exited with carry-on bags.'

40 minutes ago
Ghislaine Maxwell, in DOJ interview, said nothing that would be harmful to Trump: Sources
During her nine hours speaking with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last month, Ghislaine Maxwell said nothing during the interview that would be harmful to President Donald Trump, telling Blanche that Trump had never done anything in her presence that would have caused concern, according to sources familiar with what Maxwell said. The Trump administration, meanwhile, is considering publicly releasing the transcripts from the interview, multiple sources familiar with the internal discussions told ABC News. Maxwell's meetings with Blanche took place for nine hours over two days. There is also an audio recording of the interview, the sources said, but it's not clear whether the administration plans to release the audio to accompany any public release of the transcript. The public release of the transcripts could come as soon as this week, the sources said. Maxwell, an associate of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was convicted of sex trafficking and other charges and sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2022, which she was serving at a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, until her recent move to a more relaxed federal prison camp in Texas. She is appealing her conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court. ABC previously reported that it was Maxwell who requested the interview with the DOJ, according to sources familiar with the matter. Maxwell is also asking the Supreme Court to review her conviction and Trump has not ruled out a pardon for her. Maxwell's lawyer, David Markus, said following her meetings with Blanche that Maxwell 'would welcome any relief.' He also said Maxwell was asked about "one hundred different people," and said "she didn't hold anything back." Trump, asked Tuesday whether he approved the prison transfer for Maxwell, said, "I didn't know about it at all, no. I read about it just like you did. It's not a very uncommon thing," Trump also just said that anything Blanche discussed with Maxwell during his meetings with her would be "totally above board." Following his first day of meetings with Maxwell, Blanche tweeted that "The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time." CNN first reported the administration was considering releasing the transcripts. In an interview with Newsmax last week, when asked when Americans could hear about the contents of the meeting, Trump said: "I don't know, because I haven't spoken about it, but he's a very talented guy, Todd Blanche, and a very straight shooter, and I think he probably wanted to know, you know, just to get a feeling of it, because we'd like to release everything, but we don't want people to get hurt that shouldn't be hurt. And I would assume that was why he was there. I want to release everything. I just don't want people to get hurt."