logo
How Sparsely Populated Norway Amassed $1.8 Trillion

How Sparsely Populated Norway Amassed $1.8 Trillion

Bloomberga day ago

Of all the world's sovereign wealth funds, Norway's is one of the most unusual. These giant, state-linked investment vehicles tend to pick and choose what assets they hold to manage risk, maximize returns and further national strategic interests. Not so with Norges Bank Investment Management, which largely tracks global indexes in order to generate an income from the country's oil and gas revenues.
Launched in the early 1990s to invest mostly in bonds, the fund has grown to become the largest of its kind by acquiring small equity stakes in thousands of companies across the world. The fund's $1.8 trillion of assets generate far more income for the Nordic country's 5.5 million population than its oil and gas industry.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Best High-Yield Bank Stock to Invest $25,000 in Right Now
The Best High-Yield Bank Stock to Invest $25,000 in Right Now

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Best High-Yield Bank Stock to Invest $25,000 in Right Now

I just upped my position in Bank of Nova Scotia. The Canadian banking giant started a business shift in 2024. After no dividend hike in 2024, Scotiabank is back on the dividend growth train. 10 stocks we like better than Bank Of Nova Scotia › Citigroup (NYSE: C) is a popular U.S. bank with an attractive 2.8% yield. But what if you could get more than twice that yield without taking on a huge amount of risk? That's exactly what I did when I doubled my position in this Canadian banking giant. The trigger for my investment was the company's return to dividend growth with a 4% hike announced after it reported earnings for its fiscal second quarter of 2025. Here's why you might want to follow along if you have $25,000, or even just $500, to invest. Banks like Citigroup can be complex, but the core of the operation is usually pretty simple. They take in deposits and make loans. Customers include individuals and businesses. That's usually the foundation of even the largest banks. On top of that they layer more complex businesses, like wealth management or investment banking. Generally speaking, this creates a fairly solid business and one that provides necessary services. But sometimes banks get out over their skis, which is exactly what happened to Citigroup during the Great Recession. The bank ended up taking a government bailout and cutting its dividend. It wasn't alone, a lot of major U.S. banks did the same, including Bank of America. Some smaller banks got so extended in the housing crisis that they had to sell themselves, usually to larger banks like Citigroup and Bank of America. This situation turned me off from the U.S. banking system and turned me on to Canada's highly regulated banking system. I own Toronto-Dominion Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia (NYSE: BNS). I just upped my stake in Bank of Nova Scotia, which is usually just called Scotiabank, after the company returned to dividend growth following a turnaround year. It has a 5.9% dividend yield, which is more than double what you'd get from Citigroup. To put some dollars and cents on that, $25,000 worth of Citigroup stock nets you an annual income stream of $700. The same investment in Bank of Nova Scotia brings in around $1,475. Bank of Nova Scotia is one of the largest banks in Canada, largely offering basic banking services. Canadian banks tend to be operated in a very conservative manner because of the heavy banking regulation in the country. This has, effectively, provided the biggest banks with entrenched industry positions. As one of the largest banks, Bank of Nova Scotia has a rock solid business foundation in its home country. This is not true of U.S. banks, where competition tends to be pretty fierce. The big highlight for me on the Canadian side of the border was the fact that Bank of Nova Scotia (and Toronto-Dominion Bank) maintained its dividend through the Great Recession. I'm confident that Scotiabank will keep paying a reliable dividend, too, noting that the company has paid a dividend every single year since 1833. That's nearly 200 years! The one big problem with Scotiabank is that it has chosen a different path when it comes to growth. Most of its peers have pushed into the U.S. market. Scotiabank focused on growing its business in Central and South America. That didn't work out as well as hoped and it changed gears, with plans to increase its presence in the U.S. market while refocusing on key Central and South American markets. It basically wants to provide a seamless banking experience from Mexico, though the United States, and on to Canada. The revamp resulted in management holding the dividend steady in 2024 as it shifted gears. In 2025 the bank provided the big update I was looking for with the dividend increase. Management and the board is clearly comfortable enough with the progress they have made to resume dividend increases. That tells me all I need to know, because there was no need to hike the dividend yet. It was a choice meant to signal financial strength at a business that is starting to shift in a new direction. To be honest, the fiscal second quarter wasn't the best one for Scotiabank. Adjusted net income, adjusted earnings, and return on equity all fell year over year. The core Canadian operations were particularly weak as the company materially increased its reserves for bad debt. But that's a preemptive move to ensure it remains financially strong. And exactly what I would expect from a conservatively run bank. The really big news is that Bank of Nova Scotia is confident in the success it is achieving with its turnaround. The high yield is paying me well to stick by a relatively conservative bank as it continues to shift in a new business direction. And the dividend increase was enough to get me to double down. But for dividend investors with $500 or $25,000, the end result of going with Scotiabank over a U.S. bank like Citigroup is dramatically more income. Before you buy stock in Bank Of Nova Scotia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Bank Of Nova Scotia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $657,871!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $875,479!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 998% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Citigroup is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in Bank Of Nova Scotia and Toronto-Dominion Bank. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bank of America. The Motley Fool recommends Bank Of Nova Scotia. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Best High-Yield Bank Stock to Invest $25,000 in Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Borregaard ASA: Change in Group Executive Management
Borregaard ASA: Change in Group Executive Management

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Borregaard ASA: Change in Group Executive Management

Knut-Harald Bakke has been appointed EVP BioSolutions, effective 1 August 2025. He will also join the Group Executive Management on the same date. Bakke succeeds Tom Erik Foss-Jacobsen, who will assume the role of CEO on 1 August (see stock exchange release dated 23 May 2025). Bakke currently serves as Director of Investor Relations and has previously held the position of Energy Director at Borregaard. Prior to joining the company in 2019, he held senior leadership roles at Norsk Hydro, where he was responsible for global energy market operations. He holds an MSc in Industrial Economics and Technology Management from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). Borregaard will initiate a process to appoint a new Director of Investor Relations. In the interim, CFO Per Bjarne Lyngstad will assume the responsibility from 1 August. Contacts:Dag Arthur Aasbø, SVP Organisation and Public Affairs, +47 918 34 108Per Bjarne Lyngstad, CFO, +47 952 44 515 This information is subject to the disclosure requirements pursuant to Section 5-12 of the Norwegian Securities Trading Act.

Calculating The Fair Value Of Warpaint London PLC (LON:W7L)
Calculating The Fair Value Of Warpaint London PLC (LON:W7L)

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Calculating The Fair Value Of Warpaint London PLC (LON:W7L)

Using the 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity, Warpaint London fair value estimate is UK£4.92 Current share price of UK£4.55 suggests Warpaint London is potentially trading close to its fair value Analyst price target for W7L is UK£6.67, which is 36% above our fair value estimate In this article we are going to estimate the intrinsic value of Warpaint London PLC (LON:W7L) by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today's value. Our analysis will employ the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Believe it or not, it's not too difficult to follow, as you'll see from our example! Remember though, that there are many ways to estimate a company's value, and a DCF is just one method. Anyone interested in learning a bit more about intrinsic value should have a read of the Simply Wall St analysis model. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. We're using the 2-stage growth model, which simply means we take in account two stages of company's growth. In the initial period the company may have a higher growth rate and the second stage is usually assumed to have a stable growth rate. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years. A DCF is all about the idea that a dollar in the future is less valuable than a dollar today, so we need to discount the sum of these future cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate: 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Levered FCF (£, Millions) UK£11.2m UK£16.7m UK£18.5m UK£19.8m UK£21.0m UK£22.0m UK£22.9m UK£23.8m UK£24.6m UK£25.3m Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x3 Analyst x4 Analyst x2 Est @ 7.26% Est @ 5.84% Est @ 4.85% Est @ 4.16% Est @ 3.67% Est @ 3.33% Est @ 3.09% Present Value (£, Millions) Discounted @ 7.4% UK£10.4 UK£14.5 UK£14.9 UK£14.9 UK£14.7 UK£14.3 UK£13.9 UK£13.4 UK£12.9 UK£12.4 ("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = UK£136m The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business's cash flow after the first stage. The Gordon Growth formula is used to calculate Terminal Value at a future annual growth rate equal to the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield of 2.5%. We discount the terminal cash flows to today's value at a cost of equity of 7.4%. Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2034 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = UK£25m× (1 + 2.5%) ÷ (7.4%– 2.5%) = UK£533m Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= UK£533m÷ ( 1 + 7.4%)10= UK£261m The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is UK£397m. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of UK£4.6, the company appears about fair value at a 7.5% discount to where the stock price trades currently. The assumptions in any calculation have a big impact on the valuation, so it is better to view this as a rough estimate, not precise down to the last cent. The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. You don't have to agree with these inputs, I recommend redoing the calculations yourself and playing with them. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at Warpaint London as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 7.4%, which is based on a levered beta of 0.949. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business. View our latest analysis for Warpaint London Strength Earnings growth over the past year exceeded the industry. Currently debt free. Weakness Earnings growth over the past year is below its 5-year average. Dividend is low compared to the top 25% of dividend payers in the Personal Products market. Opportunity Annual revenue is forecast to grow faster than the British market. Good value based on P/E ratio and estimated fair value. Threat Dividends are not covered by cash flow. Annual earnings are forecast to grow slower than the British market. Whilst important, the DCF calculation shouldn't be the only metric you look at when researching a company. It's not possible to obtain a foolproof valuation with a DCF model. Rather it should be seen as a guide to "what assumptions need to be true for this stock to be under/overvalued?" For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. For Warpaint London, we've put together three pertinent factors you should consider: Risks: Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Warpaint London (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about. Future Earnings: How does W7L's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart. Other High Quality Alternatives: Do you like a good all-rounder? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing! PS. The Simply Wall St app conducts a discounted cash flow valuation for every stock on the AIM every day. If you want to find the calculation for other stocks just search here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store