logo
Two new studies suggest Paris climate goal is dead. One scientist is going even further

Two new studies suggest Paris climate goal is dead. One scientist is going even further

CNN10-02-2025
Swaths of the US may be grappling with frigid weather, but for the planet as a whole, heat records are being obliterated — and it spells very bad news. Two new studies conclude it's a signal the planet is likely on track to breach the Paris climate agreement goal of restricting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
The studies, both published Monday in the journal Nature Climate Change, are the latest evidence the world is failing to tackle the climate crisis, and they come just weeks after an even starker warning from renowned climate scientist James Hansen, who said the planet was on course to shoot past 2 degrees of global warming over the next two decades.
While many scientists have said these levels of warming can be avoided with immediate, rapid emission cuts, the chances of this seem increasingly slim as international climate action falters. One of President Donald Trump's first actions was to pull the US out of the Paris climate agreement and now others, including Argentina and Indonesia, are reportedly mulling withdrawal.
The Paris agreement is hugely symbolic. In 2015, almost every country in the world agreed to keep global warming to well below 2 degrees above the period before humans began burning large amounts of fossil fuels, with the ambition of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees.
Above 1.5 degrees, scientists say increasingly extreme heat, drought, floods and fires will become hard for humans and ecosystems to adapt to. At 2 degrees, millions of more lives would be at risk and the danger rises significantly of triggering tipping points such as ice sheet melting and the death of the world's coral reefs.
Since 2015, 1.5 has become synonymous with staving off more catastrophic climate change. Yet global temperatures have kept rising. Last year was the first calendar year to breach 1.5 degrees.
As Paris goals refer to averages over around two decades, rather than single months or years, this means breaching the agreement can only be confidently confirmed in hindsight, once it's too late.
So scientists behind these two new papers attempted to determine whether the world is already in its first long-term period of 1.5 degree warming. The news is not good.
The study by Alex Cannon, a research scientist at Environment and Climate Change Canada, found there was a 60% to 80% chance the Paris threshold has already been crossed given 12 consecutive months have already been at least 1.5 degrees.
If the world experiences 18 consecutive months at or above the 1.5 degree limit, it will be 'virtually certain' the Paris agreement has been breached, the report found.
The other paper, led by Emanuele Bevacqua, a climate scientist at the Helmholtz Centre in Germany, used real-world climate data and climate modeling. Looking at historical warming trends, it found the first single year to breach a temperature threshold also fell within the first 20-year period in which average temperatures reached the same threshold.
If these trends continue, it is almost certain 2024 will fall within the first 20-year period of 1.5-degree warming, the report concluded.
Both papers stress that rapid and strong climate action can still reduce the likelihood of breaching the Paris agreement goals over the next years and decades.
'To all intents and purposes, breaching the 1.5 degree threshold is a given,' said Richard Allen, a climate science professor at the University of Reading, who was not involved in the studies. 'We need to double down efforts to avoid the even more dangerous 2-degree Celsius threshold by rapidly and massively cutting greenhouse gas emissions.'
For others, however, that ship has already sailed. The climate scientist James Hansen, who was among the first to publicly warn the world about climate change, said last year the 1.5 goal was 'deader than a doornail.'
This month he co-authored a paper which concluded global warming is accelerating faster than expected, due in large part to regulations to reduce shipping pollution. While this pollution is a human health hazard, it also has the effect of reflecting sunlight away from the Earth.
As a result, he said, global heating is likely to exceed 2 degrees in the next few decades with devastating consequences, including ice sheet melt and sea level rise.
The new papers are undoubtedly bad news, said Daniela Schmidt, professor of Earth sciences at the University of Bristol, but she warned against fixating on 1.5 degrees. It 'has the real risk of reducing actions, demotivating all of us,' if it's surpassed, she said.
A lack of ambition will keep the world on its current warming trajectory of around 3 degrees, she added. 'Such warming has immense, and in parts irreversible, consequences for nature and people.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump warned by top Senate Democrats to rethink advanced AI chip sales to China
Trump warned by top Senate Democrats to rethink advanced AI chip sales to China

CNBC

time2 days ago

  • CNBC

Trump warned by top Senate Democrats to rethink advanced AI chip sales to China

Six Senate Democrats on Friday released an open letter asking President Donald Trump to reconsider his decision to allow tech giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices to sell AI semiconductor chips to China in exchange for 15% of revenue from the sales. The letter — signed by Senators Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Jack Reed, D-R.I.; Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.; Christopher Coons, D-Del.; and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. — was in response to an Aug. 11 announcement by Trump that Nvidia and AMD would pay the U.S. government a 15% cut of revenue from chip sales to China in exchange for export licenses. "Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains. The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies," the letter states. "The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm," the letter continues. Senators also warned that selling advanced AI chips — specifically Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips — to China could help strengthen its military systems, a claim that Nvidia denies. In a statement to CNBC, a Nvidia spokesperson said: "The H20 would not enhance anyone's military capabilities, but would have helped America attract the support of developers worldwide and win the AI race. Banning the H20 cost American taxpayers billions of dollars, without any benefit." The letter from Senate Democrats also requests a detailed response from the administration by Friday, Aug. 22, regarding the current deal involving Nvidia and AMD, as well as any similar arrangements being made with other companies. "We again urge your administration to quickly reverse course and abandon this reckless plan to trade away U.S. technology leadership," the letter states. A request for comment from the White House and AMD was not immediately returned. Despite Trump allowing chip sales to resume, it has already become clear that China isn't welcoming Nvidia back with open arms, instead urging tech companies to avoid buying U.S. companies' chips, according to a Bloomberg report. "We're hearing that this is a hard mandate, and that [authorities are actually] stopping additional orders of H20s for some companies," Qingyuan Lin, a senior analyst covering China semiconductors at Bernstein, told CNBC. In a separate report, The Information said regulators in China have ordered major tech companies, including ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent, to suspend Nvidia chip purchases until a national security review is complete. —

Trump wants to clean up the space industry's red tape: Here's who wins
Trump wants to clean up the space industry's red tape: Here's who wins

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Trump wants to clean up the space industry's red tape: Here's who wins

During a press conference in late 2024, President Donald Trump vowed to 'slash massive numbers of job-killing regulations' in his second term and pledged to eliminate 10 old rules for every new one. Now he's bringing that deregulation drive to commercial space, ordering federal agencies to streamline launch licensing, fast-track spaceport development, and clear out the Federal Aviation Administration's industry advisory board. 'Inefficient permitting processes discourage investment and innovation, limiting the ability of U.S. companies to lead in global space markets,' he stated in an Executive Order signed August 13. The order directs the Department of Transportation (DOT) to cut 'outdated, redundant, or overly restrictive' rules that govern launch and reentry licenses. It also instructs the Federal Aviation Administration, which is housed under the DOT, to eliminate or accelerate environmental reviews, ease the path to building new spaceports, and to appoint a 'senior executive' charged with fostering 'innovation and deregulation.' The Commerce Department also has been ordered to stand up a new process for authorizing 'novel space activities,' like in-space manufacturing or satellite refueling, that don't fit neatly into existing licensing regimes. The executive order came the same day transportation secretary and acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy dismissed every member of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC), a long-standing industry advisory board inside DOT that shapes spaceflight rules and priorities. For companies that have spent years mired in environmental reviews and licensing delays, the order was a welcome sign that future bids would experience shorter timelines and more regulatory clarity. The Commercial Space Federation, an industry trade group whose members include SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, and a dozen others, applauded the executive order for providing 'regulatory relief to unleash the U.S. commercial space industry.' Indeed, commercial players are poised to gain a lot under this new regime. Launch companies could benefit from faster permitting and streamlined environmental reviews. State-backed spaceport operators, like Space Florida, may also be aided by provisions that accelerate new site development. Creating a mission authorization framework for 'novel' space activities is equally consequential: startups like Varda Space Industries or Orbit Fab, which are developing technologies to manufacture pharmaceuticals in space and in-orbit refueling, respectively, may gain an advantage by a regulatory approach led by Commerce. Environmental rule sticking point Not everyone is celebrating the order. The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group that has challenged the FAA's approval of SpaceX's Starship program in Texas, called the order 'reckless.' 'Bending the knee to powerful corporations by allowing federal agencies to ignore bedrock environmental laws is incredibly dangerous and puts all of us in harm's way. This is clearly not in the public interest,' senior attorney Jared Margolis said. For groups like CBD, environmental reviews are not 'overly complex,' as the Order charges – they are often completely insufficient. In 2023, environmental groups including the CBD alleged that the FAA's environmental assessment of SpaceX's south Texas plans were inadequate and in violation of the National Environment Policy Act. SpaceX has separately waged an increasingly public campaign against 'superfluous' regulations and environmental analyses that have hindered a speedier test campaign. There are still some unknowns. Legal challenges to the order could slow progress, and the new COMSTAC members, who have yet to be appointed, will inform the future of space rule-making. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump wants to clean up the space industry's red tape. Here's who wins.
Trump wants to clean up the space industry's red tape. Here's who wins.

TechCrunch

time3 days ago

  • TechCrunch

Trump wants to clean up the space industry's red tape. Here's who wins.

During a press conference in late 2024, President Donald Trump vowed to 'slash massive numbers of job-killing regulations' in his second term and pledged to eliminate 10 old rules for every new one. Now, he's bringing that deregulation drive to commercial space, ordering federal agencies to streamline launch licensing, fast-track spaceport development, and clear out the Federal Aviation Administration's industry advisory board. 'Inefficient permitting processes discourage investment and innovation, limiting the ability of U.S. companies to lead in global space markets,' he stated in an Executive Order signed August 13. The order directs the Department of Transportation to cut 'outdated, redundant, or overly restrictive' rules that govern launch and re-entry licenses. It also instructs the Federal Aviation Administration, which is housed under the DOT, to eliminate or accelerate environmental reviews, ease the path to building new spaceports, and to appoint a 'senior executive' charged with fostering 'innovation and deregulation.' The Commerce Department also has been ordered to stand up a new process for authorizing 'novel space activities,' like in-space manufacturing or satellite refueling, that don't fit neatly into existing licensing regimes. The executive order came the same dayTransportation Secretary and Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy dismissed every member of the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC), a longstanding industry advisory board inside DOT that shapes spaceflight rules and priorities. For companies that have spent years mired in environmental reviews and licensing delays, the order was a welcome sign that future bids would experience shorter timelines and more regulatory clarity. The Commercial Space Federation, an industry trade group whose members include SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, and a dozen others, applauded the executive order for providing 'regulatory relief to unleash the U.S. commercial space industry.' Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Indeed, commercial players are poised to gain a lot under this new regime. Launch companies could benefit from faster permitting and streamlined environmental reviews. State-backed spaceport operators, like Space Florida, may also be aided by provisions that accelerate new site development. Creating a mission authorization framework for 'novel' space activities is equally consequential: startups like Varda Space Industries or Orbit Fab, which are developing technologies to manufacture pharmaceuticals in space and in-orbit refueling, respectively, may gain an advantage by a regulatory approach led by Commerce. Environmental rule sticking point Not everyone is celebrating the order. The Center for Biological Diversity, an environmental group that has challenged the FAA's approval of SpaceX's Starship program in Texas, called the order 'reckless.' 'Bending the knee to powerful corporations by allowing federal agencies to ignore bedrock environmental laws is incredibly dangerous and puts all of us in harm's way. This is clearly not in the public interest,' senior attorney Jared Margolis said. For groups like CBD, environmental reviews are not 'overly complex,' as the Order charges – they are often completely insufficient. In 2023, environmental groups including the CBD alleged that the FAA's environmental assessment of SpaceX's south Texas plans were inadequate and in violation of the National Environment Policy Act. SpaceX has separately waged an increasingly public campaign against 'superfluous' regulations and environmental analyses that have hindered a speedier test campaign. There are still some unknowns. Legal challenges to the order could slow progress, and the new COMSTAC members, who have yet to be appointed, will inform the future of space rule-making.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store