Lexington makes changes to diversity, equity and inclusion office as DEI attacks ramp up
The city of Lexington is giving its Officer of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion a new role as attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion ramp up.
Arthur Lucas, who has served in the position for several years, will continue to work on diversity efforts but through the human resources department, said Sally Hamilton, the city's chief administrative officer.
Lucas currently works out of Hamilton's office.
When Lucas was hired, there was debate on whether he should be placed in Hamilton's office or with human resources. Because his work is across city government it would be better if he was in human resources so his duties can also be expanded, Hamilton said.
His title will be changed to a senior administrator to better reflect the breadth of his duties, she said.
The Lexington-Fayette Urban County Council took its first vote on the title change at a Tuesday work session. A final vote will likely come at its March 6 meeting.
Lucas helps the city with a lot of different initiatives. In hiring, the city doesn't give additional weight to someone who is diverse. Rather, the city makes sure everyone has the same opportunities, Hamilton said.
'For example, when we have interview panels we make sure that everyone on that panel is not all the same type of person,' Hamilton said.
Employers often hire people who look like them, Hamilton said.
Hamilton said the city is not making other major changes in light of federal and state efforts to eliminate DEI initiatives.
The University of Kentucky also voluntarily eliminated its Office of Institutional Diversity in August 2024 in light of efforts to ax DEI offices.
In one of his first acts in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order dismantling all federal DEI offices.
State legislators also have proposed bills in the Kentucky House and Senate that target DEI efforts in state universities and in local government.
Senate Bill 164, filed Thursday by Sen. Lindsey Tichenor, R-Smithfield, would block all levels of government from 'providing preferential treatment' to individuals or groups based on race, sex, color, or national origin.
It also would prohibit state and local government agencies from 'requiring or incentivizing' a person to attend a DEI training, or from allocating resources to 'establish or maintain diversity, equity and inclusion offices.'
Senate Bill 165, also filed by Tichenor, would prohibit similar DEI initiatives in Kentucky public schools.
A similar bill targeting DEI in public schools has been filed in the House.
Efforts to pass anti-DEI legislation have so far failed in the Republican-controlled General Assembly.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘No Kings Day' Exposed: Activist Powerhouses Mobilize Across America
Left-wing agitators have been planning events scheduled for this weekend to promote hate against President Donald Trump with 'No Kings Day,' following violent anti-ICE riots across America. The 'No Kings Day' mobilizations are set for June 14 across the country, as The Dallas Express previously reported. Several of these events are occurring across the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex and are organized by powerful national groups. The group 50501 is a leading force behind these mobilizations – the latest in a series against Trump, with 'Hands Off' and 'May Day' events earlier this year. As The Dallas Express reported, 50501 previously organized demonstrations across the DFW area. Other groups like Indivisible – an influential left-wing network – are also organizing the demonstrations. Indivisible is known for working with groups like the Democratic Socialists of America, whose 'paramilitary wing' is Antifa. According to The Federalist, Indivisible boosted previous protests like 'Hands Off' with things like 'infrastructure to get the campaign off the ground.' A spokesman for 'No Kings Day' told The Dallas Express that 50501 started anti-Trump events earlier this year, and other groups like Indivisible joined. Last month, Indivisible announced that it and other left-wing groups are helping organize the upcoming events. The 'No Kings' spokesman said he could not limit the 'goal to a singular purpose' because the demonstrations are coming from 'different local organizations in each city.' He said national groups like Indivisible, the American Federation of Teachers, SEIU, and other unions are planning the mobilizations. 'No Kings Day' partners also include the ACLU, Bernie Sanders and his group Our Revolution, Move On of the Tesla Takedown demonstrations, and the anti-Trump protest group Families Over Billionaires – which is supported by a billionaire-funded dark money network. 'People are tired of not feeling like they're being heard in Washington D.C., people are tired of feeling like Congress has abdicated its responsibility to be a check and a balance on the executive branch,' the 'No Kings' spokesman said. The upcoming events fall in the wake of violent anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles and Dallas, as The Dallas Express reported. Gov. Greg Abbott deployed the National Guard across Texas this week to keep order. The Dallas Express asked if organizers expect the 'No Kings' events to 'merge with anti-ICE actors,' and the spokesman said he could not speak to it from a 'global perspective.' 'These are grassroots organizations that people want to amplify their voices by partnering up with other organizations,' the spokesman said. 'I don't think anybody's going to say, 'Don't do that.'' The 'No Kings' spokesman said organizers are working with police and training 'marshals' to keep the mobilizations peaceful. He blamed the violence on 'one-sided escalation.' 'I think at their very nature, they're nonviolent, they're peaceful. But then when you do things like calling the National Guard, it amplifies tensions,' he said. The riots in Los Angeles featured burning vehicles, a siege against the ICE building, and attacks against state and federal police, as The Dallas Express previously reported. The Dallas Express asked the spokesman's thoughts on the riots in Los Angeles 'before the National Guard was there,' where rioters started 'throwing rocks at immigration agents and surrounding the federal building.' 'It's very strange to portray single actors throwing rocks as an entire movement if you're not doing the same thing for masked ICE agents kidnapping people in schools, in hospitals, on the streets,' the spokesman replied. The FBI is currently investigating those with 'monetary connections responsible for the riots,' as The Dallas Express previously reported. Tech tycoon Neville Singham – a Marxist sympathizer who moved to Shanghai – uses 'a global web of nonprofits and shell entities' to push Chinese Communist Party propaganda worldwide. Singham supports the Party for Socialism and Liberation, a communist group that helped organize the Los Angeles riots with a 'history of anti-Israel activism,' as The Dallas Express also reported. The group CHIRLA – Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles – helped organize inflammatory rallies in the city, The Dallas Express reported at the time. Singham's wife, Jodie Evans, is the founder of the left-wing activist group Code Pink, which published an anti-ICE toolkit to resist immigration enforcement. The group advocates for Chinese interests, claiming, 'China is not our enemy.' The anti-Trump 'No Kings Day' events are set to take place in Dallas and Fort Worth, as well as the suburbs Arlington, Burleson, Denton, Euless, Flower Mound, Frisco, McKinney, and Sanger. Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker previously told The Dallas Express she has 'full faith' in police to keep Saturday's demonstrations under control. Both the Fort Worth Police Department and the Dallas Police Department are monitoring the events. The Dallas Express reached out to Indivisible and 50501 but did not hear back in time for publication.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Moran asks federal officials to keep airspace restrictions at D.C. airport in place
U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran demanded commitments from federal officials during hearings Thursday to keep airspace safe at Reagan Washington National Airport, the site of a deadly collision in January. (Kansas Reflector screen capture of U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran's YouTube channel) TOPEKA — U.S. Sen. Jerry Moran pressed federal officials Wednesday on how they intend to ensure safety at the Reagan Washington National Airport in Washington, D.C., in the wake of a January crash between a passenger plane from Wichita and an Army helicopter that left no survivors. Moran, a Kansas Republican, questioned U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Federal Aviation Administration administrator nominee Bryan Bedford at separate committee hearings Wednesday on whether they would commit to keeping in place restrictions on non-essential helicopter flights around the D.C. airport. 'It's my understanding, from information from the Army, that since Jan. 29, seven flights have taken off and landed at the Pentagon,' Moran said to Hegseth. 'Six of those flights occurred during periods of high volume at DCA. One of those aircraft caused two different commercial flights to abort landing on May 1, and since this latest incident, I understand that all flights have been halted.' Since the January crash, Moran has pushed for aviation reforms, introducing legislation that mandates in busy airspace the use of Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast, or ADS-B, which automatically transmits an aircraft's location to nearby pilots once per second. The legislation also removes the possibility for pilots to opt out of using ADS-B. Moran introduced that legislation after close calls at the same airport where the crash took place. The Pentagon, which is less than two miles away from Reagan National as the crow flies, halted military helicopter flights near the airport. The legislation has been in a committee awaiting action since it was introduced in early May. Moran wants the flight restrictions in place until the FAA can come up with a safe route, if there is one. Hegseth, in response, said no authorization for VIP or convenience flights exists in that area. 'You have our assurance that I'm working with (Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy) very closely to make sure that the only flights that would be — even in a modified path — would be those that are necessary and are authorized,' Hegseth said. Moran sits on the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, where he questioned Hegseth, and the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, where he requested a commitment from Bedford to maintain safety restrictions. 'My understanding is the FAA is supreme when it comes to the control of the airspace,' Bedford said. 'But we want to be good partners with the Department of Defense, and we have protocols on how to do that — multiple protocols, as I understand.' The FAA creates military operating areas, which include restricted and prohibited spaces, and line of fire space and alert zones, and determines the airspace classifications around airports. The busiest airports, like Reagan, are Class B airspace. Bedford said the FAA can accommodate the U.S. Department of Defense's needs, but he added, 'we can't have this mixed-use traffic in Class B airspace.'
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Military Crackdown Is Starting To Dent His Poll Numbers
As Donald Trump launched his militarized crackdown in Los Angeles, the president and many of his advisers were convinced that deploying troops to the streets of a major American city would be good politics for them. They maintain, three people familiar with the matter say, that immigration was one of Trump's strongest issues, that it helped get him back in the White House, and that his mass deportation program has polled well since the 2024 campaign. No matter the pushback to Trump sending in the troops (likely illegally) from Democrats, the media, or protesters, the administration's brain trust saw this as a winner for them — and something they wish to replicate. 'If it works out well in L.A., expect it everywhere,' a Trump administration official said of the president's desire for militarized Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids across the nation. (This official and the other three sources spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal deliberations.) But just days into Trump's deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to quell anti-ICE protests in L.A., new public polling suggests that Trump's recent deportation operations, and his decision to use the military against his domestic enemies, are not boosting his approval ratings. In fact, Trump's latest power grab is tanking his latest numbers. Trump's general platform of federal immigration crackdowns polled well in the build-up to his election and second term; 2024 polling showed Trump's calls for grand-scale deportations of undocumented immigrants enjoyed majority support. (However, that majority support diminished when voters were pressed on specific policies and methods.) In April of last year — to the alarm of Democratic operatives and Biden officials — a Harris Poll survey showed 42 percent of Democrats warming up to the idea. According to a polling analysis by data journalist G. Elliott Morris, Trump entered office with a strong positive approval rating on immigration. But those ratings peaked in February at a high of +11.3 percent. Now, for the second time since April, Morris' polling average shows Trump's immigration approval rating in the negatives. It appears the militarized incursion into Los Angeles is not playing well with the public at large. A recent YouGov survey shows 47 percent of American adults disapprove of Trump ordering the Marines to L.A., compared to 34 percent who support it. In the same poll, 45 percent disapprove of the president's use of National Guard troops, with 38 percent of respondents backing it. This aligns with a Wednesday Quinnipiac poll that found 54 percent of respondents disapprove of Trump's handling of immigration, and that 56 percent disapprove of his handling of deportations. (This is a markedly negative turn from an April Quinnipiac poll that found only 50 percent of respondents disapproved of his handling of immigration issues.) Similarly, a Thursday AP/NORC poll found that 53 percent disapproved of Trump's handling of immigration, compared to 46 percent who approve. A text survey conducted by The Washington Post and George Mason University's Schar School found that the public rated Trump's immigration and deportation policies 'negatively by a 15 percentage-point margin, 52 percent to 37 percent.' A Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Thursday shows a stark disconnect between the public's general approval for strong action to restore order, and disapproval of what Trump is doing in Southern California. It found that 48 percent of respondents theoretically agree with the statement that the president should 'deploy the military to bring order to the streets.' But only 38 percent of respondents actually approved of how the president is responding to protests in Los Angeles. Those numbers are likely to continue trending downward as the Trump administration continues to behave badly in L.A. On Thursday — during a press conference in which Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem declared her department would be staying in Los Angeles to 'liberate this city from the socialist and burdensome leadership' of Democrats — Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was tackled to the ground and handcuffed by FBI agents when he attempted to ask a question of Noem. Video of Padilla's detention quickly went viral on social media. After being released without charges, the senator told reporters that 'if this is how DHS responds to a senator with a question you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California.' Without a doubt the videos and stories of teenagers, pregnant women, and everyday working people being chased and detained by ICE is reaffirming what polling and surveys have long showed to be true: Americans generally believe that undocumented migrants with criminal records should be deported, but they are generally put off by indiscriminate immigration raids and deportations that disregard the circumstances of the individual. There's a silver lining, perhaps, for Trump and his party in some of this data. Democrats in Congress are also wildly unpopular, driven by dissatisfaction from their own liberal voters. 'The public supports keeping America safe and secure, and they don't like the concept of people here illegally — the issue is how it's administered,' says Frank Luntz, a longtime pollster and a conservative Trump critic. 'They have an agenda the American people support; their problem is the way they execute it and articulate it.' Voters do want immigration laws enforced, he says, but they 'don't want senators beaten up at press conferences. This has been the challenge of the Trump administration from the beginning,' Luntz adds, 'because they think they are on the right track, but the way it's being administered right now, they're not.' Even the president himself — who wrote on Thursday that 'all' undocumented people 'have to go home' — seems to be oscillating on the issue, at least from a public-relations standpoint. Earlier in the day Trump posted on Truth Social that 'farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them. This is not good,' Trump wrote. 'We must protect our Farmers, but get the CRIMINALS OUT OF THE USA. Changes are coming!' For the time being, however, the Trump administration is barreling ahead on its vision of his very American police state. 'In November, the American people resoundingly rejected the Democrat vision for immigration — open borders and millions of unvetted illegal aliens — and endorsed President Trump's vision for immigration — deportations and enforced immigration law,' White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement to Rolling Stone. 'President Trump is keeping his promise to the American people and violent left-wing rioters won't stop that.' Asked about the recent slate of negative polls for Trump on immigration, John McLaughlin, a top Trump pollster, simply replies: 'You mean the fake polls?' He points to rosy results for Trump in his own surveys and conservative-leaning polls: 'We did a national poll for Club for Growth yesterday among 1,000 likely voters and Trump's approval was 53-44 Rasmussen Reports poll today is 53-45,' McLaughlin says. More from Rolling Stone Kim Gordon Has Words for Donald Trump on Re-Recorded 'Bye Bye 25!' Trump Calls on Iran to Agree to Nuclear Deal 'Before There Is Nothing Left' Is Trump's Troop Deployment to Los Angeles Illegal? Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence