Fleeing Pakistan, Afghans rebuild from nothing
Pushed out of Pakistan where she was born, Nazmine Khan's first experience of her country, Afghanistan, was in a sweltering tent at a border camp.
"We never thought we would return to Afghanistan," said the 15-year-old girl, who has little idea of what will become of her or her family, only that she is likely to have fewer freedoms.
"When our parents told us we had to leave, we cried," added Khan.
Having nowhere to go in Afghanistan, she and six other family members shared a stifling tent in the Omari camp near the Torkham border point.
Islamabad, accusing Afghans of links to narcotics and "supporting terrorism", announced a new campaign in March to expel hundreds of thousands of Afghans, with or without documents.
Many had lived in Pakistan for decades after fleeing successive wars and crises but did not wait to be arrested by Pakistani forces before leaving, seeing their removal as inevitable.
Since April 1, more than 92,000 Afghans have been sent back to their country of origin, according to Islamabad, out of the some three million the United Nations says are living in Pakistan.
Khan's family fled Afghanistan in the 1960s. Her four brothers and sister were also born in Pakistan.
"In a few days we'll look for a place to rent" in the border province of Nangarhar where the family has roots, she told AFP, speaking in Pakistan's commonly spoken tongue of Urdu, not knowing any Afghan languages.
In the family's tent there is little more than a cloth to lie on and a few cushions, but no mattress or blanket. Flies buzz under the tarpaulin as countless children in ragged clothes come and go.
- 'Already suffering' -
When it comes to her own future, Khan feels "completely lost", she said.
Having dropped out of school in Pakistan, the Taliban authorities' ban on girls studying beyond primary school will hardly change the course of her life.
But from what little she heard about her country while living in eastern Pakistan's Punjab, she knows that "here there are not the same freedoms".
Since returning to power in 2021, the Taliban authorities have imposed restrictions on women characterised by the UN as "gender apartheid".
Women have been banned from universities, parks, gyms and beauty salons and squeezed from many jobs.
"It is now a new life... for them, and they are starting this with very little utilities, belongings, cash, support," said Ibrahim Humadi, programme lead for non-governmental group Islamic Relief, which has set up about 200 tents for returnees in the Omari camp.
Some stay longer than the three days offered on arrival, not knowing where to go with their meager savings, he said.
"They also know that even in their area of return, the community will be welcoming them, will be supporting them... but they know also the community are already suffering from the situation in Afghanistan," he added.
Around 85 percent of the Afghan population lives on less than one dollar a day, according to the United Nations Development Programme.
"We had never seen (Afghanistan) in our lives. We do not know if we can find work, so we are worried," said Jalil Khan Mohamedin, 28, as he piled belongings -- quilts, bed frames and fans -- into a truck that will take the 16 members of his family to the capital Kabul, though nothing awaits them there.
- 'Still don't understand' -
The Taliban authorities have said they are preparing towns specifically for returnees.
But at one site near Torkham, there is nothing more than cleared roads on a rocky plain.
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) believes "greater clarity" is needed to ensure that the sites intended for returnees are "viable" in terms of basic infrastructure and services such as health and education.
It's important that "returnees are making informed decisions and that their relocation to the townships is voluntary", communications officer Avand Azeez Agha told AFP.
Looking dazed, Khan's brother Dilawar still struggles to accept leaving Pakistan, where he was born 25 years ago.
His Pakistani wife did not want to follow him and asked for a divorce.
"When we crossed the border, we felt like going back, then after a day it felt fine," said the former truck driver.
"We still don't understand. We were only working."
qb-cgo/sw/mtp
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US blocks Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN Security Council
The United States vetoed Wednesday a UN Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, which Washington claimed undermined ongoing diplomacy to resolve the conflict. It was the 15-member body's first vote on the situation since November, when the United States -- a key Israeli ally -- also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. "This resolution would undermine diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire that reflects the realities on the ground and emboldens Hamas," Washington's United Nations envoy Dorothy Shea said ahead of the vote. "This resolution also draws false equivalence between Israel and Hamas," she said. The draft resolution had demanded "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." It also called for the "immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups." Underlining a "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Palestinian territory, the resolution, had it passed, would have demanded the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. The veto was the first wielded by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. Israel has faced growing international pressure to end its war in Gaza, which was triggered by the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israeli soil. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. The United Nations said that was not enough to meet the humanitarian needs. - 'Judged by history' - A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also faced criticism for going against long-standing humanitarian principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent. Israeli bombardment on Wednesday killed at least 16 people in the Gaza Strip, including 12 in a single strike on a tent housing displaced people, the Palestinian territory's civil defense agency told AFP. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed in southern Gaza when Israeli troops opened fire near a GHF aid site, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, on Tuesday urged the Council to act. "All of us will be judged by history as to how much have we done in order to stop this crime against the Palestinian people," he said. Israel's ambassador to the UN Danny Danon attacked the text ahead of the vote. "This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief. It undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas," he was to tell the council, according to remarks released by his office. "It ignores the one party still endangering civilians in Gaza: Hamas." abd-gw/nl
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Warns Putin Plans to Retaliate 'Very Strongly' Against Ukraine
Donald Trump's silence on Vladimir Putin's threats contrasts with a growing bipartisan push in the Senate to impose severe new sanctions on Russia. Credit - SPUTNIK/AFP via Getty Images President Donald Trump said Wednesday that Vladimir Putin intends to retaliate 'very strongly' against Ukraine for a surprise drone strike on Russian airfields over the weekend, a declaration that provoked alarm in Washington and abroad even as Trump touted his efforts to bring peace to the region. The revelation came in a social media post shortly after Trump spoke with the Russian President for more than an hour by phone—a call he described as 'a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace.' In his statement, Trump appeared to accept Putin's warning at face value and offered no indication that he had urged restraint. 'President Putin did say, and very strongly, that he will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to Ukraine's surprise drone strike that targeted five Russian airbases and damaged or destroyed at least 41 military aircraft, including strategic bombers. The Ukrainian operation, which spanned five time zones and caused an estimated $7 billion in damage, marked one of Kyiv's boldest assaults deep inside Russian territory since the war began more than three years ago. Read More: Ukraine's Drone Strikes Against Russia Could Become the Global Norm Trump's post briefly vanished from his platform before reappearing later on Wednesday, prompting speculation about whether he had second thoughts about its tone. The White House has not released a transcript of the call or clarified whether Trump pushed back on Putin's vow to retaliate or offered support to Ukraine. The statement was Trump's first public comment on the drone strikes, which many experts saw as a significant blow to Russia. While Trump has long promised he could end the war quickly—even before he took office—his latest interaction with Putin did little to clarify how. Instead, some Democrats say it underscored his continued reluctance to criticize the Russian leader, even in the face of a threatened escalation that could cost more Ukrainian lives. Read More: Trump Discovers the War in Ukraine May Be Too Complicated to Fix 'Trump is being played,' Sen. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat who met with Ukrainian delegates on Wednesday morning, told TIME in an interview. 'I'm disappointed that Trump didn't come down on him and say there's no need for you to respond. No Russian was injured or killed in this operation. Sure, it makes you look bad, because it's humiliating. But there's no reason you need to kill people by bombing Ukrainian civilians, which is what you're planning to do.' Trump's silence on Putin's threats contrasted with a growing bipartisan push in the Senate to impose severe new sanctions on Russia. A recent sanctions bill co-authored by Blumenthal and Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina would slap massive penalties—including 500% tariffs—on any country buying Russian oil, gas, uranium and other exports. The legislation is aimed squarely at China and India, which bankroll much of Russia's war economy, and is supported by more than 80 Senators. 'That's what Trump could have said to Putin for starters,' Blumenthal told TIME. 'I'm supporting sanctions on anybody who buys your energy product.' But Trump has so far refused to endorse the measure. He has mused about sanctions, but remains skeptical that economic pressure will end the war—particularly if it jeopardizes his efforts to broker a broader foreign policy agenda, including curbing Iran's nuclear program. In the same post where he described Putin's planned reprisal against Ukraine, Trump expressed optimism about working with the Russian leader to resolve the Iranian nuclear crisis after Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei criticized the U.S. proposal for a deal. 'I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement,' Trump wrote. 'President Putin suggested that he will participate in the discussions with Iran and that he could, perhaps, be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.' Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, described Trump's willingness to let Putin help secure a nuclear deal with Iran as the 'total opposite of what has been traditional U.S. policy—actually standing with democracies,' he said in an interview with TIME. 'Are you really gonna tell me somebody's gonna take the word of Vladimir Putin? I'll tell you, somebody—that's a fool.' Blumenthal added: 'I wouldn't trust Putin to mediate or negotiate anything on my behalf.' The phone call between Trump and Putin came as the war, which has dragged on for nearly 3.5 years, shows no signs of abating despite mounting pressure for a diplomatic breakthrough. While the front lines have largely frozen since late last year, the latest wave of Ukrainian attacks—and Russia's vow to retaliate—have renewed fears of a broader escalation. In addition to last weekend's drone strikes, Ukraine's security agency said it had detonated explosives beneath the Kerch Bridge—a critical Russian supply line to Crimea. Russian officials denied the bridge was damaged, but said that its troops had taken another village in Ukraine's Sumy region, part of an effort to create a buffer zone on the border. Read more: How Putin Missed His Shot at Peace The Ukrainian government has dismissed Russia's latest offers for a ceasefire as a stalling tactic. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday labeled the Kremlin's latest proposal 'an ultimatum' and derided the second round of peace talks in Turkey as 'a political performance.' Trump, who previously called Zelensky a 'dictator,' has insisted that he can bring both sides to the table. He has taken credit for the recent talks in Turkey—though neither delegation made concessions—and is open to the idea of a summit that could include himself, Zelensky, and Putin. But his critics say such overtures ring hollow without a clear strategy. They argue that Trump's equivocations, praise for Putin, and attacks on Ukraine's leadership have only muddled U.S. policy. 'This war doesn't have to go on,' Blumenthal told TIME. 'Trump doesn't have to remain silent.' Write to Nik Popli at
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canada steelworkers urge Ottawa to counter Trump
Steelworkers in the Canadian city of Hamilton see President Donald Trump's latest trade war escalation as a wake-up call, insisting US efforts to protect struggling metal producers demand an equivalent national response. Hamilton is known locally as "Steeltown," with expansive industrial plants dominating the view from the main bridge that leads into the city. Hamilton has endured countless setbacks as the steel industry that drove its growth through much of 20th Century declined. Trump's decision to double steel and aluminum tariffs to a crippling 50 percent did not come as a shock to those who have spent decades in the industry. "Steel is like a roller-coaster," said Jake Lombardo, who retired after 38 years at Stelco, one of Hamilton's main plants. Lombardo's career spanned the era that saw automation and cheaper foreign product hollow out Hamilton's steel sector. He voiced a degree of understanding for Trump's efforts to shield US producers from external competition. "I'm not a Trump supporter, but one thing I like (about) what he said, he wants to do things in-house. And I don't think there's anything wrong with that," Lombardo, 69, told AFP. "We should have been doing this a long time ago." Hamilton's steel industry was born in the early part of the last century, hitting its peak in the decades following World War II, when the main local union, United Steelworkers Local 1005, counted more than 12,000 members. That number has since fallen to about 650, said union president Ron Wells. Wells said he wasn't opposed to a future where Canadian producers serve Canadian demand and cross-border trade is reduced. But, like Lombardo, he believes Ottawa needs to create the environment that ensures that Canadian steelmakers thrive. "We've been saying that for, like years, if not decades," Wells told AFP. - 'Better late than never'? - The union chief said he was encouraged by Prime Minister Mark Carney's pledge to counter Trump's trade war by boosting internal trade and ushering in an era of massive construction across Canada. Asked about the prospect that Hamilton could benefit from Carney's recent promise that his government would "build baby build," Wells said: "we applaud it." "It's better late than never." Carney on Wednesday called Trump's decision to double steel and aluminum tariffs "unjustified" and "illegal" and promised that Canada -- the largest supplier of foreign steel and aluminum to the United States -- will respond. But in the short term, Wells said there is cause for concern. Stelco, which was bought by the US steel producer Cleveland-Cliffs last year, had been sending about 30 percent of its output to the United States, Wells said. Those orders largely dried up when Trump imposed a blanket 25 percent tariff on all metal imports in March. But Stelco was still selling to Canadian clients who were making products subsequently sold to the United States, with the American importers absorbing the 25 percent tariff hit. - 'The wrong foe' - At 50 percent, Wells voiced fear that business could vanish. "People are just pissed off that (Trump) keeps changing his mind and he's playing chicken with the economy," Wells told AFP. "Our members want to see the tariffs situation get resolved. So go back to full production and we can share the wealth." The Canadian Steel Producers Association, an industry group, said Wednesday that "at a 25 per cent tariff rate, we saw significant layoffs, curtailed investments and a significant drop of shipments to the United States." "At a 50 per cent tariff rate, the US market is effectively closed to Canadian steel, leaving billions of dollars of Canadian steel without a market," it warned. Throughout Trump's trade war, Canadian workers in targeted sectors -- notably auto and metal -- have voiced frustration over the president's decision to harm a bilateral trade relationship widely seen as mutually beneficial. "We think they're picking on the wrong foe," Wells said. Tony Mclaughlin, who has worked for Stelco for 47 years, told AFP he "always thought we'd be exempt," from tariffs." "Is he trying to get a new trade agreement?" He asked. "Maybe that's the big plan." bs/nl
