How retailers like Lowe's are using AI to make shopping 'simpler, faster, and more fun'
Computer vision models can also offer a lot of potential for retailers.
This article is part of "How AI Is Changing Everything," a series on AI adoption across industries.
The next time you stop by Lowe's for a new house plant, supplies to prepare for hurricane season, or a part to fix a bathroom leak, the quantity and in-store location of the product will likely have been influenced by artificial intelligence.
The home-improvement retailer is using AI systems to develop a greater understanding of fast-changing customer needs and expectations and to optimize its store layouts accordingly. For example, in the case of a plant, AI could predict growing demand for a certain type of seasonal shrub and increase its orders as interest rises, then place the plants in the most obvious in-store location.
In the case of hurricane preparedness, sudden weather changes can be taken into account to order larger volumes of flashlights and weather radios. And plumbing items may be placed closer to the front of the store for leaks that require emergency attention during harsh and unpredictable seasons.
Chandhu Nair, the senior vice president of data, AI, and innovation at Lowe's, told Business Insider that the technology is allowing the store chain to create more immersive shopping experiences that are also easy and quick to navigate.
This effort is being driven by front-of-house retail staff and white-collar workers behind the scenes, who are ensuring that AI augments rather than replaces their jobs.
A team-wide effort
Nair said that delivering a "simpler, faster, and more fun" physical retail experience requires large volumes of real-world data, like "store traffic patterns" and "local preferences," provided by store associates and customers. It also needs the right tools for Lowe's spatial planning teams to extract meaningful insights from it, he added.
Previously, these teams relied largely on manual processes for collecting this information, analyzing it, and putting the insights into practice. Consequently, Nair said it could take months for Lowe's to see any meaningful results. But AI-powered spatial intelligence systems have reduced this to "a fraction of that time."
Nair said this is paramount because new product trends are always emerging and disappearing, especially because of social media apps like TikTok. He said, "We can now swap layouts more frequently throughout the year, reflecting what customers in that area need at that time."
Besides spatial intelligence and data analysis tools, Lowe's is also exploring the potential of digital twins — a piece of software that generates a virtual version of a physical environment, such as a retail store. Nair said the company has used Nvidia's 3D graphics platform, Omniverse, to create an early-stage app that offers sales and inventory data, automatically sorts stock, generates 3D versions of its physical assets, and more from a single platform.
If it ultimately gets adopted, "It would give merchants a way to test and refine layouts digitally before making changes in-store, helping surface the most relevant products in ways that align with how local customers shop," he told BI.
AI for smarter shopping
Lowe's isn't the only retailer that believes in the potential of AI. Research from Honeywell, a multinational conglomerate, found that 80% of retailers will acquire AI systems over the coming months to better understand customers, create a more efficient shopping experience, and improve worker productivity.
Computer vision models, in particular, can also offer a lot of potential for retailers. Vinod Goje, a software engineering leader and AI solutions strategist, told BI that such systems are capable of generating heat maps that signal parts of the store with the most and least foot traffic, allowing workers to place products and design retail layouts more strategically.
Goje added that retailers can also install computer vision systems on shelves to ensure products are in the right place and replenished when stock runs low. The tech can also work with AI to show customers personalized offers on in-store smart screens, he said.
In the future, agentic AI systems, which are designed to make decisions independent of humans, could disrupt the retail sector even further. Sucharita Kodali, principal analyst at market research firm Forrester, told BI that AI agents could find people to fill in for ill employees, order merchandise when stock levels are low, and develop marketing plans in line with available stock.
Challenges to consider
Of course, as retailers like Lowe's become more reliant on AI to improve efficiencies, concerns are growing that the technology could wipe out millions of blue-collar jobs in the next few years. That said, Nair emphasized that Lowe's approach is to augment staff and not put them out of work; using AI for store-layout optimization requires "human creativity," he said, in addition to "data-powered insights" and "efficient technology."
Amid concerns about AI adoption, Nair emphasized that the company isn't using "technology for technology's sake," but rather focusing on solutions that address staff's biggest pain points, based on feedback from in-store and e-commerce teams.
Looking ahead
Although many of Lowe's AI projects are still in their infancy, Nair is optimistic about their role in the century-old retailer's future. He said his team will continue to "get better at connecting insights and predictions" to "adapt stores even faster" and create "smarter and more personal" experiences for its loyal customers.
To do this, Nair and his team will continue to experiment with new AI tools, improve them through "quicker feedback loops," and strive to create "a high-value retail experience that keeps evolving with our customers."
He told BI, "We're excited about what's ahead and how AI will help us keep solving problems and fulfilling dreams for the home."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Experts Reveal How To Avoid This Rude Email Habit
To get ahead in your career, you need a strong network. And part of that means learning how to email people for their time and connections. One of the simple yet critical requests you'll encounter in your life is being asked to introduce someone else over email, or needing an introduction yourself. Introducing two people over email is a social and professional skill everyone needs to learn, but so many of us get it wrong. It takes emotional intelligence and delicate phrasing to make it as easy as possible for everyone to get the outcome they want. If you do not want to confuse and irritate your connections, you need to be thoughtful about how you broker an introduction between two people over email ― and how you reply. We asked email and etiquette experts exactly where we go wrong and tips for how to be as courteous and as clear as possible in these requests. Here's their advice: The rudest thing you can do? Assume everyone is OK with being contacted for help. If you are the connection 'broker' who is writing the email, you are the one who needs to be mindful of everyone's time and capacity. 'The first thing is, you have to ask yourself, 'Who wants what from whom?'' said William Schwalbe, co-author of Send: Why People Email So Badly And How To Do It Better. If you know both people equally well, and this is a casual request to make new friends or a professional connection, you don't have to be as formal, because the stakes are lower. 'Delighted to make this introduction, I thought you would enjoy getting to know each other. I'll leave it to the two of you to take it from here' is how Schwalbe said you can phrase these requests. But often an introduction email is about asking one party to do something on behalf of another. If the email is to help someone else's career with an informational interview, for example, you need to confirm if the person who will be fulfilling this request is OK with being contacted for help. 'The biggest mistake I see when making an email introduction is not getting the consent of the person being introduced and giving them an opportunity to decline,' said Pattie Ehsaei, a senior vice president of mergers and acquisitions lending at a major bank who also runs the TikTok account Duchess of Decorum, where she teaches workplace etiquette. 'Ask both parties in a private email if they welcome an introduction to the other party, and if both consent, then and only then do you proceed with the introduction,' Ehsaei suggested. People are busy or unavailable for many reasons you may not know. In this preliminary email, you should explain the favor and give the person who is going to be asked to do something in return an easy way to decline. 'The last sentence should be 'I totally understand if you can't do it at this time,' or, 'I'll take no reply as indication that this isn't a good time for the introduction,' ''I'll assume that you can't unless I hear otherwise,'' Schwalbe said. No one likes being surprised with a task they did not agree to do. In this way, you preserve your relationship with your connection by letting them know that their time is important to you. And it can be polite to ask upfront about their preferred method of communication ― especially if this person's contact information is usually private. You can end this email with a line like: 'P.S. If you are willing to talk to them, do you prefer your home email, your work, email, or a text?' Schwalbe suggested. Even if you explained the request in a previous email or text, you should still summarize who everyone is in your official email to the two people being connected. 'Don't presume that the person you asked is going to remember, even if only a couple of days have gone by,' Schwalbe said. Here is a basic fictional template of how this could go: Subject line: Mark <> Julia Hey Mark and Julia, As I mentioned earlier, I'm delighted to make this introduction. Mark is a recent college grad who is hoping to learn more about breaking into marine biology research. He's a sharp writer who just did an internship at X. Julia is my dear friend who is a leader in X. I will let Mark take it from here to set up a time to chat. A good broker makes it easy for everyone to understand what the next steps are. To avoid being included in reply-all emails, Schwalbe said you should make it clear that you want to be dropped from the email thread. Schwalbe said you can phrase this request as 'You can drop me from correspondence going forward, but I look forward to hearing how it all goes.' If you're the person seeking the introduction, don't dilly-dally on a reply. If you ask your connection with help brokering an introduction, you need to follow through on your request right away. It shows your enthusiasm, interest and that you don't take this opportunity for granted, Schwalbe said. In our fictional example, this reply could look like: Hey Julia, I would love to talk to you about how to get into marine biology research. I really admire your career and would be happy to learn more about your journey over coffee or a phone call. That said, I completely understand if time doesn't allow for this kind of conversation. If you are available, please let me know what times would be best in your schedule. Schwalbe said as the person requesting help, it is courteous to give the person helping you an additional opportunity to decline if they are busy. If the request is job-related, you could include a sentence like: 'I would love to send you my resume, if you'd be willing to receive a copy,' Schwalbe said. Don't send attachments or PDFs of your portfolio until you hear back because it can come off as presumptuous in a first email, Schwalbe said. If you don't hear back, do not immediately follow up. Wait two weeks before bumping the email thread again and circling back with your connection broker after another two weeks of silence, as a general rule, Schwalbe said. This way, you give people enough time to respond if they are on vacation or busy. It's polite to keep your broker posted, regardless of the outcome. 'If something comes of it, the asker really should loop back,' Schwalbe said. 'If somebody wants me to speak to somebody, and I speak to them, and I never hear back, it is slightly irritating.' And even if you hear radio silence from your email recipient, you should tell your connector that you're still thankful for the time they took to help you. You can say something like, 'As it happened I didn't hear back but I know how busy they are, and wanted you to know that even though nothing came of it, I really appreciate your desire to help me,' Schwalbe said. When you're seeking help, be sensitive to how often you ask your broker for help. Unless they have given you permission to see their contact list as yours, 'I think of it as kind of one-and-done,' Schwalbe said. In other words, you cannot ask your connector for help with an introduction and ask for their help again with a different contact two weeks later. Emails are great for coordinating schedules and making introductions, but they are ultimately words in an inbox. Showing sincere appreciation for someone's help means going one step further. 'An email thank-you, no matter how extravagantly phrased, is still just an email,' Schwalbe said. Schwalbe gave the example of someone's connection being the reason you land a job. Whether you are the asker, helper or broker, if somebody 'really helps out somebody else in the chain, it's really nice to send a handwritten note, flowers, chocolate,' he said. That's why, in Schwalbe's view, the biggest mistake we make with these kinds of emails is not understanding the value of someone giving you their undivided time and attention. 'It is a big favor to ask someone to take the time, and it's a favor a lot of people are genuinely delighted to do, but it's still a big favor,' Schwalbe said. HuffPost.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Torn between Amsterdam and the US for grad school, she made a pros and cons list to guide her decision. Take a look.
When Royanne Ng got into Columbia University last year, she should have been elated. Instead, the nearly $80,000 first-year tuition and fees — not including housing — made her stomach turn. The Singaporean student turned the Ivy League program down and chose one across the Atlantic instead for a fraction of the cost. At Columbia, she was offered a spot in the Film and Media Studies MA with a concentration in emergent media — a track that explores formats like virtual and augmented reality. The 28-year-old is now pursuing a one-year master's in cultural data and AI at the University of Amsterdam, a program that blends machine learning with theory and tech policy. Ng also applied to NYU but wasn't accepted, and she ultimately dropped her application to the University of Edinburgh in the UK. Her postgrad degree had to be "very strategic," she told Business Insider — a move to boost her job prospects and reposition her career in Singapore. "If I'm going to spend this much of my financial savings on a degree, it has to be really, really worth it," she said. The US once had a near-monopoly on elite higher education. But as tuition rises, safety concerns grow, and political rhetoric turns hostile toward international students, the calculation is shifting. Here's how Ng made her choice. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Prestige vs practicality Columbia's program offered big advantages: name recognition, accomplished alumni, and the implicit promise of career opportunities, Ng said. The brand name, she added, carried the common assumption that it gives students "a head start when it comes to job opportunities." But the costs were impossible to ignore. Columbia's program ran for two years and charged nearly $80,000 in tuition and fees just for its first-year students. In contrast, the University of Amsterdam's fees were about €17,000 for a one-year program. "The difference is just so stark," she said, especially when Columbia required a hefty deposit that felt like too much commitment. It wasn't just about money. She said many US courses were "more traditional" — rooted in legacy disciplines and slower to adapt. Europe had programs that were a lot more novel and flexible, often designed with interdisciplinary or future-facing themes, she added. Amsterdam's curriculum hit the mark. Ng said it aligned with her goal of transitioning from tech communications and a humanities background into a career that connects AI and policy — one she hopes to pursue in Singapore. Safety and geopolitical concerns Ng's family was also worried about her safety if she chose to study in New York — and so was she. For someone who had lived in Singapore her whole life — a country known for its low crime rates and political calm — she was concerned about gun violence, racial politics, and geopolitical uncertainty in the US. Still, she said the right school depends on the student's goals after graduation. Students hoping to stay and work in the US might prioritize a school's brand, alumni network, and credentials. But Ng plans to return to Singapore, so standing out in the local job market mattered more. Ng is set to finish her program in August. Here's her pros-and-cons list of US graduate schools: Ng had created a rough version at the end of 2023 while debating whether to choose the US for graduate school. When BI reached out to her in June, she pulled it together into a neat table: Pros Cons 1) Education quality Vibrant and mentally stimulating study environment, with motivated students and highly reputable professors. There's also an assumption that many top US schools have extremely good courses and teaching 1) Health and safety Worries among family members about safety of living in certain cities, with more risk due to geopolitical instability. Not sure if causing my loved ones to constantly worry would be a worthwhile trade-off for great education 2) Reputation and optics Excellent brand name, which would be helpful for future job securing and possible advancement 2) Financial costs Some schools I applied to cost about 5x more than graduate schools in Europe. Not sure if this cost difference can really be compensated by an equivalent degree of education quality. There were also a lot of miscellaneous fees involved just in applying to schools and securing spots when offered. 3) Solid alumni network Would be in connection with illustrious alumni network, which could also be helpful for career and job advancement 3) Local labour market incompatibility Given that I was looking at programmes within humanities and social sciences departments, I was also very conscious about whether certain courses would help me stand out or gain an edge in the Singapore job market. I had to consider the possibility that even excellent brand names might not be able to change the fact that many companies still look for science, tech and data roles. 4) Course material and programmes During my research of graduate schools, I observed that many US schools offered relatively traditional programmes, based on the write-up and descriptions of Masters courses. I did tend to see more exciting and novel courses offered in the UK and Europe, marketing interdisciplinary skills combining humanities/social sciences, data science or specific sector knowledge. I felt that this interdisciplinary angle was of particular interest as someone wanting to stay relevant in the job market, so this was a major consideration in choosing my graduate programme.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
NYC used to be the fashion capital of the world — now you can hardly find a decent clothing store
It's time for class to return New York, New York. Once, a helluva town. The prices stay up but the merchandise is down. Days of old, need shmattas for a wedding, confirmation, bar mitzvah, divorce settlement, you'd just walk in the West 30s and see dudes pushing racks of dresses, coats, suits. Shove names like Gucci, Valentino, Chanel, Dior. That Seventh Avenue chunk was Fashion Alley. So busy that — amble by in your own outfit — some rack-pusher could've even hustled it right off your behind to resell to a pushcart in Venezuela. These movable racks had clothes, shoes, sprinkles, feathers, fashion, flowers — many Washington, DC, thieves ago — that was then IT! Not now. Sayonara. Products aren't in stores. Why? Because there aren't many stores. Because shops aren't paying their bills. Saturation was luxury clientele. Now they're not buying what they did. Handbags? Meh 'Handbags do not always enthuse luxury spenders. Chanel, Gucci, Balenciaga, Valentino, Dior changed their top designers. Sales are down. Money's down. The look is down. Revenue is from a wearable look. That's what's notable. But look at what's wearable today,' so says a designer who formerly dressed the Oscars and Tonys. 'Small brands are even affected. Tees made in China, Vietnam, Uruguay. It's scary. Fashion's not unique, not special, not wanted in the big time. No reason for the consumer to shop. 'VIP society has become casual. Jeans for a thousand dollars? Chanel shirt to go with the jeans — $1,200. 'And European runway garbage isn't wearable. Theirs is your crotch hanging out, butt crack visible, breasts grabbable, designers making your navel into a small potted plant growing feathers. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'The onetime personal shopper's been poached. That bar mitzvah or top-of-the-line wedding shopper who went to your home with carte blanche so you needn't suffer dressing room tryouts has switched to everyday Nordstroms. Once the prevail of Saks 5th, Neimans, those high-priced, nose-up-your-behind salespeople who'd hand-carry original Paris creations to a VIP? Gone. Kaput.' Stores closing. The new generation wears garbage. Fast fashion. Guys do T-shirts. Stomachs hang out. Chopped tops, cutoff jeans. They'll spend on food and experiences — not clothing. It's only to look hot on Instagram or TikTok. You have to give consumers a reason to buy. Canadians no longer come. Chinese are buying less. Europeans are down in terms of shopping here. Luxury people aren't customers anymore. Stores are going out of business. No one has style I was in Due restaurant the other night. Throats were in pasta. Behinds were in jeans. Watch, French billionaire Bernard Arnault who already owns LVMH, Dior, Bulgari, Givenchy, Fendi, Tiffany, Celine, Kenzo, Marc Jacobs, Pucci, Loro Piana, Loewe, Guerlain, Sephora, plus another stock of stores, and already owns 57th and 5th's three most famous corners . . . watch. Just watch. WATCH. He'll grab Bergdorf's next. With shmattas' hem lengths today, if a female wants her appendix taken out and doesn't want it to show, they'll have to remove it through her nose. And not only in New York, kids, not only in New York.
