logo
How the El Paso Walmart shooting prosecution cost $6 million, even without a trial

How the El Paso Walmart shooting prosecution cost $6 million, even without a trial

Yahoo15-05-2025
EL PASO, Texas (EL PASO MATTERS) — El Paso County taxpayers paid almost $4 million for the defense and $1.9 million for the prosecution of the man who gunned down 23 people and wounded 22 others at an El Paso Walmart in 2019, county records show.
More than $2 million of that went to experts hired since 2019 by the defense team representing Patrick Crusius, now 26, who pleaded guilty to capital murder and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon last month after District Attorney James Montoya decided not to seek the death penalty. The gunman, who said he attacked the Cielo Vista Walmart in August 2019 to stop 'the Hispanic invasion of Texas,' was sentenced to life in prison without possibility of parole.
Three defense attorneys – Joe Spencer, Felix Valenzuela and Mark Stevens – were paid a combined $602,000 over five years, according to the records, while defense investigators were paid more than $694,000. Another $688,000 was spent on 'miscellaneous' items, according to the records.
The records showed that the prosecution spent $1.9 million between May 2022 and April 30, with those costs covered by state grants. Those costs were for lawyers and other employees of the District Attorney's Office, and didn't include costs for the police investigation of the attack.
Spencer said defense attorneys were careful with expenses while committed to their ethical obligations to vigorously defend their client. Taxpayers paid for Crusius' defense because he was found to be indigent and unable to pay for his own defense.
'We were very cognizant from the very beginning that this case was going to be scrutinized as to how much attorneys fees were paid. So, we were very careful, very conservative. I know, personally, I didn't charge for all the hours that I put in,' he said in an interview with El Paso Matters.
Montoya couldn't immediately be reached for comment by El Paso Matters.
Spencer said the defense costs increased substantially because of efforts by former District Attorney Yvonne Rosales to recuse 409th District Judge Sam Medrano from the case, which included disclosures of extensive prosecutorial misconduct by Rosales and her associates. She resigned in December 2022.
'How much time did we spend on the Rosales shenanigans, as well as the motion to recuse Judge Medrano, which was all frivolous?' Spencer said.
County records showed that the defense and prosecution spent more than $300,000 in fiscal year 2022, when there was essentially no movement in the mass shooting prosecution aside from efforts related to allegations of misconduct by Rosales and her associates.
Spencer said former District Attorney Bill Hicks also added to the costs by providing massive amounts of case material known as discovery in ways that were difficult for defense lawyers to analyze.
Most of fiscal years 2023 and 2024 were spent arguing pretrial motions centered on defense allegations of prosecutorial misconduct by the Rosales and Hicks administrations. County records showed that the defense and prosecution spent a combined $3.2 million on the case in those years.
Spencer said the costs would have escalated if Montoya hadn't decided to end pursuit of the death penalty, which allowed for a plea agreement. He said the defense team had made it clear shortly after the Walmart attack that their client would plead guilty if the death penalty was off the table.
'We went to the state very early on and said, 'Let's resolve this case. We don't need to try this case.' But they were interested in the death penalty. As long as that was the case, we were in for the long haul,' Spencer said.
Cases that include the possibility of the death penalty are expensive to prosecute because the stakes are high. A 1992 report by the Dallas Morning News said the average Texas death penalty case cost $2.3 million to prosecute – an amount that equals $5.3 million in 2025 dollars.
The costs provided by the county are for the state prosecution of Crusius. He also pleaded guilty in a separate federal case on hate crimes and weapons charges, receiving 90 consecutive life sentences.
The federal public defender's office is generating a summary of defense costs as part of an effort by U.S. District Judge David Guaderrama to unseal records in the federal case. That summary is expected to be available this summer.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Santa Ana man arrested for allegedly taking upskirt videos of women
Santa Ana man arrested for allegedly taking upskirt videos of women

CBS News

time17 hours ago

  • CBS News

Santa Ana man arrested for allegedly taking upskirt videos of women

Irvine police arrested a 23-year-old man after Walmart security guards caught him allegedly recording a video up a woman's skirt. Investigators found hundreds of clips of different victims, dating back at least two years, in suspect Damian Bravo's phone after they arrested him last week, according to the Irvine Police Department. He has been booked on suspicion of invasion of privacy. He has been released after posting bail. Officers are hoping to identify and locate additional victims. "He's favored Walmart and Target," Officer Kyle Oldoerp said. Our concern is there are other victims who are unaware that this has occurred." The latest video was allegedly taken last week at the Walmart on Von Karman Avenue, according to police. "In these cases, we see they're being used for personal gratification in some cases," Oldoerp said. "They're trading them or posting them online or hosting websites—some of these hidden camera type videos. I'm not certain how he was using the videos but that's who we've seen them used in the past. Police have identified one victim so far. "It's absolutely troubling to us because there's a significant amount of victims on this man's phone," Oldoerp said. "We want to talk to those people. If anybody recognizes this guy or thinks they've been a victim of him, we want them to come forward and talk to detectives so we can add them to our case."

Tennessee immigrant group sues over raid records
Tennessee immigrant group sues over raid records

Axios

time20 hours ago

  • Axios

Tennessee immigrant group sues over raid records

A Tennessee nonprofit is suing to get access to records tied to an immigration crackdown that roiled Nashville. Why it matters: Authorities arrested about 200 people during an immigration sweep in May. They've released some details but have not provided records for all of the arrests. Catch up quick: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Homeland Security agents worked with the Tennessee Highway Patrol to conduct scores of traffic stops in south Nashville, which is home to many Hispanic residents. Metro police officers were not involved. Zoom in: The Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition (TIRRC) requested public records on the operation. "Although the Tennessee Highway Patrol produced some records, it also implausibly denied the existence of others, redacted some groundlessly, and delayed its production of video footage to the point of denial," the TIRRC said in a statement. The group filed a complaint Thursday in Davidson County Chancery Court saying the THP was violating public records laws. What she's saying:"The Tennessee Public Records Act ensures that ordinary Tennesseans can access information about how their government works and how state authority is being exercised in their name," TIRRC executive director Lisa Sherman Luna said in the statement.

Shooter who killed 10 Black people in Buffalo NY says grand jury was too white
Shooter who killed 10 Black people in Buffalo NY says grand jury was too white

USA Today

timea day ago

  • USA Today

Shooter who killed 10 Black people in Buffalo NY says grand jury was too white

A white supremacist who shot and killed 10 Black people at a supermarket in Buffalo, New York, asked a judge to dismiss his federal case because not enough Black and Hispanic people were on the grand jury that indicted him, a motion filed by his attorneys on Aug. 14 said. Lawyers for Payton Gendron, the gunman who is serving 11 life sentences on state charges in connection with the 2022 massacre, said Black and Hispanic people are "systematically" underrepresented in the Southern District of New York's jury pools, violating the constitutional rights of defendants, the motion said. In response, the U.S. Attorney's Office said Gendron's lawyers failed to prove there is a systematic underrepresentation in the jury pool and urged the judge to reject the motion. The judge has not filed a decision as of Friday, Aug. 15. The back-and-forth comes as Gendron is expected to go on trial next year for federal hate crime charges that carry the possibility of the death penalty, which federal prosecutors vowed to pursue. New York state, where Gendron pleaded guilty to 15 state charges, including multiple counts of murder, abolished capital punishment in 2004. On May 14, 2022, Gendron traveled to Buffalo and opened fire in a busy supermarket, killing 10 people and wounding three others. The victims ranged in age from 32 to 86 and included a church deacon, the grocery store's security guard, a man shopping for a birthday cake and a grandmother of nine. Gendron, who was 18 when he carried out the attack, wrote in documents posted online that he picked the grocery store because it was in a predominantly Black neighborhood. What was the makeup of the grand jury? In their filing, Gendron's attorneys say the grand jury that indicted their client was drawn from a pool that was missing "one third of the Black persons expected and one third of the Hispanic/Latino persons expected." The filing did not include the exact makeup of the grand jury, but the judge said at a hearing this week that the addition of two more Black people on the 60-person grand jury would have balanced the panel, according to the Associated Press. Gendron's attorneys also said that the district largely delegates the process of jury sourcing to an outside vendor that failed to properly document its procedures. The U.S. attorney's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment about its jury pool. Diversity in jury pools have been longstanding issues plaguing the criminal justice system. Advocates have called for changes to the jury pool selection processes on local, state and federal levels, such reducing a reliance on voter rolls, which experts say can exclude some racial groups. Gendron previously asked that his trial be moved, citing jury concerns This week's motion was not the first time Gendron's attorneys raised concerns over the demographic makeup of those weighing his federal case. In April, his attorneys filed a motion requesting that his trial be moved from Buffalo to New York City so it could be decided by an impartial, racially diverse jury. His attorneys also requested that the judge take the death penalty off the table, taking issue with the jury selection process. U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Vilardo rejected the motion to remove the death penalty, but has not decided on whether to move the trial to New York City. Gendron's federal trial is currently scheduled for June 2026. Cotnributing: N'dea Yancey-Bragg

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store