School Reform Program, Known for Science of Reading Approach, Looks to Grow
Success For All, a teaching approach using the science of reading, could expand to 150 more schools in the next three years with the help of $13.5 million in grants from an anonymous donor.
Success For All, developed in the late 1980s by two Johns Hopkins University professors, relies heavily on phonics and group learning, with students reading whole story books instead of textbooks.
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
It has shown outsized gains in some cities and was recently featured in episodes of the 'Sold a Story' podcast about surprisingly high reading scores in the small, Appalachian city of Steubenville, Ohio.
Used in about 500 schools nationwide, Success for All's foundation is offering $100,000 'scholarships' to help cover training, learning materials and teaching coaches to 50 district, charter or private schools that are adopting it in each of the next three years.
Most of the $15 million needed for the scholarships comes from a single donation from a family foundation that wishes to be anonymous. Success For All officials said the donor gave the program $200,000 a few years ago. After being taken on a tour of schools in Virginia using the approach, the family offered $13.5 million — the largest donation ever for the donor — to help launch it in schools with large numbers of low income students.
Julie Wible, CEO of the Success For All Foundation, said the donor wanted to improve literacy for low-income students — and Success For All offered more than just a curriculum, but also a change in teaching styles and social-emotional help for students.
'This concept of supporting an entire school gave them clarity about how to guarantee improvement in schools,' Wible said. 'A high quality reading model is critical but it will not be enough to significantly change an entire school.'
Most of the grants for this fall have already been awarded, but Success For All is still accepting applications for a few that remain.
Success For All estimates that schools will spend about $150,000 in the first year of adding the program, then lesser amounts the next few years. Wible said the program wanted to help schools, but still wanted them to have 'skin in the game' so they would be committed to the shift.
The Archdiocese of Los Angeles, which added Success For All at 18 of its schools in the 2023-24 school year, was awarded scholarships in this first round to add it to four more this fall.
Robert Tagorda, chief academic officer for the archdiocese, said the archdiocese chose Success For All because they believe it will help low-income students, including many who are learning English as their second language.
The program is already showing gains, so the archdiocese will apply for additional scholarships to add more schools for the 2026-27 school year.
Success for All received significant federal funding in the 1990s amid President Bill Clinton's push to support students at Title I schools but was essentially shut out of President George W. Bush's Reading First initiative, prompting a complaint to the U.S. Department of Education's inspector general. The program rebounded during the Obama administration when it received an i3 grant designed to scale up evidence-based initiatives.
More recently, the program has received attention through coverage of reading gains in Steubenville, Ohio, which started using Success For All in 2000. Once known for a well-publicized rape case involving its high school football team, the Steubenville school district drew better notice in 2016 when Stanford University researchers showed the district with much higher reading scores than expected at schools where nearly every student is considered economically disadvantaged.
The district has also been an outlier for its lower-than-expected absenteeism rates for its socioeconomic issues. At the same time, strong test results in elementary school have faded by high school.
The 'Sold a Story' podcast, widely credited with shifting national debate about reading instruction toward the science of reading, had three episodes about Steubenville this spring. Episodes covered the district's use of Success For All the last 25 years and challenges it faced in winning approval from Ohio and other states as a science of reading approach because there was no textbook that could be reviewed.
Wible said the program now has approval from most states.
Lynnett Gorman, Principal of Steubenville's Pugliese West Elementary, a 2021 National Blue Ribbon School, credits Success For All for the district's strong results.
'It really has helped our students be successful,' she said. 'I hope schools who are interested apply for the grant scholarships. What a great opportunity.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Measles vaccination rates fell in almost 80 percent of US counties after COVID pandemic: Research
New research shows measles vaccination rates for children fell in almost 80 percent of counties across the country after the COVID-19 pandemic. A Johns Hopkins University study tracked immunization records across 2,066 counties and 33 states. Researchers compared the kindergarten vaccination rates from 2017-2020 to averages from 2022-2024, as reported by The Associated Press. The study comes a month after more than 1,000 measles cases were reported in the U.S. — backtracking on the country's declaration of measles elimination in 2000. The outbreak was first reported in Texas and soon spread to Kentucky, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri and Montana in addition to other areas. Johns Hopkins University found that Gaines County in the Lone Star State saw a 2-percentage point increase in vaccination rates after the pandemic, though its 82.4 percent rate was still below herd immunity, as reported by the AP. Overall, 742 Texas residents contracted measles, including 411 people in Gaines County, which saw the most cases in the state, along with Terry County, Lubbock County and El Paso County. Kansas saw children's vaccination rates spiral in counties after the pandemic. Gray County recorded a 23-percentage point drop in measles immunizations after the COVID-19 pandemic, while Haskell County measured a decline of 18 points, and the vaccination rates in Stevens County fell by 0.5 points. Officials in Stevens recorded seven cases of measles, Haskell leaders reported 11 individuals with measles, and Gray County said 25 people have contracted the infectious disease. Postpandemic vaccination levels also fell in Colorado, more specifically in El Paso County. There the vaccination rate dropped by 3.8 percentage points, AP reported. Residents in Arapahoe County, Colo., saw a 3.5 percentage point decrease in vaccination rates. The state has reported a total of 12 measles cases. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said 30 percent of the contracted measles cases are found in individuals under the age of 5, noting that 22 percent of those in that age category among the cases have been hospitalized. Thirty-seven percent of individuals who contracted measles through the recent outbreak are between the ages of 5 and 19, and 32 percent are older than 20. 'The risk for widespread measles in the United States remains low due to robust U.S. immunization and surveillance programs and outbreak response capacity supported by federal, state, tribal, local, and territorial health partners. Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination remains the most important tool for preventing measles,' the CDC wrote in March when 222 cases were reported nationwide. 'To prevent measles infection and spread from imported cases, all U.S. residents should be up to date on their MMR vaccinations, especially before traveling internationally, regardless of the destination,' it added. Despite the outbreaks, President Trump's proposed budget aims to cut $3.6 billion in discretionary funding for the CDC. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Amid Calls to Close Ed Dept., Schwinn Promises to Aid ‘Most Struggling Schools'
Despite strong opposition to her nomination from some conservative groups, Penny Schwinn faced relatively light questioning from senators Thursday as she seeks to become second in charge of the U.S. Department of Education. Though Democrats probed where she stands on President Donald Trump's plan to shutter the department, the former Tennessee education commissioner appeared to answer questions to their satisfaction. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter Democratic Sen. Maggie Hasan of New Hampshire homed in on the administration's move to end grants to train and hire K-12 school mental health professionals — part of a 2022 law that passed with bipartisan support. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter 'Do you think that what the department did helps or hurts the communities that were counting on the funding that they were promised?' she asked. 'If confirmed, do you commit to reigning in the chaos and operational failures that we are seeing at the department?' Schwinn said the department will open a new competition for those grants and promised to 'have an efficient, effective and outcomes-oriented department.' Related She voiced support for Trump's ultimate goal to eliminate the department and repeatedly said states and local communities are in the best position to make decisions about education. As a charter school founder who served in the Delaware and Texas education agencies before leading Tennessee's for four years, Schwinn has a reputation for working across the aisle. She pushed for reading reforms and using pandemic relief funds to implement a statewide tutoring program. A vote on her confirmation is expected in the coming days. 'What we need to do is ensure that we've created a system that is going to drive outcomes,' she told GOP Sen. Jim Banks of Indiana. 'That is not going to happen from the federal government, whether there's a Department of Education or not.' At the same time, Schwinn implied that there is a role for the department in ensuring states intervene in their lowest-performing schools. 'There must be a commitment to ensuring that our most struggling schools improve because our students deserve that,' she said. A 2024 report from the Government Accountability Office found that less than half of states are meeting those requirements under the Every Student Succeeds Act. Schwinn's tenure in Tennessee, for example, included overseeing a state turnaround effort known as the Achievement School District. Considering it a failure, the state legislature recently shut it down and will try another approach. 'There's real tension there,' Thomas Toch, director of FutureEd, a think tank at Georgetown University, told The 74. 'Will the Trump administration make a meaningful commitment to school improvement? Or will [Education Secretary Linda] McMahon and her team dodge that responsibility in the name of local control?' Some observers have called Schwinn a smart pick for her focus on improving reading achievement and her attempts to avoid some of the more divisive culture war debates of the post-pandemic era. But to others she has a troubled track record that includes contracts with vendors that gave the appearance of a conflict of interest. On Wednesday, The 74 reported that after Trump nominated her, she registered a new business in Florida with a longtime colleague. While the venture was ultimately dissolved, Schwinn's sister replaced her as a manager a few weeks before the nominee submitted her financial disclosure documents. Related Some parent groups have vehemently opposed her nomination, viewing her as more left-leaning than most Trump nominees. 'It amazes me that President Trump would consider Penny Schwinn conservative,' said Tiffany Boyd, a homeschool advocate who opposed Schwinn's plan to conduct well-being checks on students during the pandemic. Schwinn nixed the idea after strong backlash. Boyd also cited a teacher recruitment effort that focused, in part, on attracting more teachers of color — efforts that the department now says push 'illegal diversity, equity and inclusion.' But none of that surfaced during the hearing. Even Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who has vowed to fight the 'left's indoctrination of students,' opted to skip direct questions to Schwinn and said he would submit them in writing. The committee interviewed Schwinn as part of a panel, along with Kimberly Richey, Trump's choice to lead the Office for Civil Rights, and two Department of Labor nominees. In that format, the senators focused on issues most important to them — for example, Chairman Bill Cassidy emphasized better serving students with dyslexia. 'As the Department of Education streamlines educational funding, how can we ensure that resources are there to identify and address an issue, specifically speaking of dyslexia?' he asked. Schwinn touted Tennessee's move to include 'characteristics of dyslexia' as a disability category in its state education funding formula and ramp up screening of students' early reading skills. The federal government, she said, could do a better job of guiding states on this issue and sharing lessons from states that have posted the greatest gains in literacy, like Mississippi and Louisiana. Related Some advocates are eager to have an educator who prioritized reading instruction at the department. 'We love her track record of improving student outcomes in Tennessee and talking a bit more technically about literacy and the science of reading — which we think having leadership on the federal level around is going to be key,' said Keri Rodrigues, president of the National Parents Foundation. But she stressed that it was federally funded research, now at risk under the Trump administration, that informed those improvements. 'The research and the funding for all these 'state miracles,' ' she said, 'come from regional and federal efforts — which I think a lot of folks are forgetting.'
Eater
21 hours ago
- Eater
The Forgotten History (and Slippery Science) of Canola Oil
If you've been hearing that canola is a killer, you're not alone. It's one of the so-called 'hateful eight' seed oils: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. says it's among the most deadly things you can eat, and Joe Rogan agrees. But is it true? In a recent episode of Eater podcast, Gastropod, co-hosts Cynthia Graber and Nicola Twilley get to the bottom of the debate over the plant formerly (and still, in some places) known as rapeseed. Why does it have such an unfortunate name, and how did it transform into canola, at least in North America? Is it really engine oil? Does it actually contain a poisonous solvent? And why on earth are Brits buying up a fancy cold-pressed version by the gallon, as the new, home-grown olive oil? Are they roasting their potatoes with an inflammation- and disease-causing disaster? Listen to the episode for the forgotten history and slippery science of this much discussed, little understood oil. And read on for an edited excerpt from the episode, in which Carla Taylor, professor in food and human nutritional sciences at the University of Manitoba, Matti Marklund, nutrition scientist at Johns Hopkins University, and Darriush Mozaffarian, cardiologist and director of the Food is Medicine Institute at Tufts University, share the most rigorous and up-to-date scientific consensus on canola oil and health — and the evidence behind it. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Fox News : Seed oils are one of the… most unhealthy ingredients that we have in foods. [...] They're very very cheap, but they — they are associated with all kinds of very very serious illnesses. Including body wide inflammation. Joe Rogan, The Joe Rogan Experience : Seed oils are some of the worst fucking things your body can consume. There's some sort of a correlation between seed oils and macular degeneration. Like, it causes inflammation, and inflammation is fucking terrible for you, no matter what. Nicola Twilley, Gastropod co-host: We, like many of you, have been hearing this anti-seed oil propaganda for a while now. Thanks to all the haters out there, a lot of people are now cutting out canola along with its fellow seed oils. So what's the truth? Cynthia Graber, Gastropod co-host: Inflammation is blamed for just about every health problem these days, but the science of it is definitely more nuanced. Inflammation can be bad, but also a little inflammation can sometimes help you heal. That's part of why this immune system response exists. Twilley: The problem with canola — again, according to the critics — is to do with the particular fatty acids it contains. Carla Taylor, University of Manitoba: Canola oil is known for its high monounsaturated fatty acid content. Graber: The term monounsaturated has to do with its structure. Monounsaturated fatty acids are the kinds of fatty acids you find a lot of in vegetable oils like olive oils. Our bodies can make monounsaturated fatty acids, but it's also important that we get them from food. Twilley: Saturated fatty acids are fats like in meat, cheese, coconut oil, and palm oil, and science has shown pretty clearly that these aren't as great in large amounts for most of us for our overall health. Canola oil has very little saturated fat. Graber: And then there's what's known as polyunsaturated fatty acids. These are the omega fats — omega-3 and omega-6 are the main ones. Twilley: Guess what, canola oil has those, too. Taylor: It also has a fairly good level of omega-3 as ALA, alpha linolenic acid. And the other polyunsaturated fatty acid there, besides the ALA, is primarily what we abbreviate as LA or linoleic acid, which is an omega-6 fatty acid. If we get those in our diet, then we can convert them to all these other fatty acids that we need in our body. Graber: Omega-3 and omega-6 are called essential fatty acids because our bodies need them, and we can't make them ourselves. We have to get them in food. Twilley: So: great! Canola has both of these essential polyunsaturated fatty acids. But then the argument goes, the linoleic acid, the LA — which is the omega-6 — in our bodies, that becomes something called arachidonic acid. Matti Marklund, Johns Hopkins University: Another omega-6 fatty acid. Which can be turned into pro-inflammatory metabolites. Graber: Matti Marklund and a team of researchers around the world tried to figure out whether eating linoleic acid was connected to arachidonic acid and to bad health outcomes. And, as we discussed in our recent episode about nutrition science, it's hard to get good information on what people eat, so they found a way to measure it that was much more scientific. Marklund: Instead of asking people what they are eating, can we take a blood sample and measure the fatty acid concentration in the blood? Twilley: Matti and his colleagues analyzed the data from more than 30 different studies involving more than 70,000 people from different countries. Some of them were short term studies, some ran for more than thirty years. Marklund: And during that follow up time, we are looking at how many people are developing cardiovascular disease. We also looked at cardiovascular mortality as an outcome. And what we found was that those with the highest levels of linoleic acid in their blood had the lowest risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. Twilley: So that's good, right? Lower risk of cardiovascular disease sounds like a win to me. Graber: But what about this idea that linoleic acid or omega 6 turns into arachidonic acid and that's where the problem lies? Well, Matti told us that first of all arachidonic acid turns into different chemicals in the body, some cause inflammation and some actually are anti-inflammatory. But even more importantly, it seems as though, inside our bodies, linoleic acid doesn't turn into much arachidonic acid at all. Marklund: Studies using a stable isotope — so they can actually look at the specific molecules — they have found that there is very limited conversion of linoleic acid to arachidonic acid in the human body. Twilley: So that whole mechanism that's supposed to be behind the omega-6s in canola and other seed oils causing inflammation — it turns out that's not what's actually going on. In fact, Matti told us, the evidence suggests that linoleic acid — the supposedly bad stuff in canola oil — it not only doesn't increase inflammation, it also seems to have some real health benefits, and not just for lowering the risk of heart attacks and strokes. Marklund: We also found that linoleic acid was strongly associated with lower risk of type two diabetes. So linoleic acid, we know, can, can also improve glucose metabolism. And there are other data suggesting that linoleic acid reduces inflammation, it can also reduce blood pressure. Graber: But another thing that seed oil haters claim is that it's the ratio, that we have way too much omega-6 compared to omega-3 in our diets today, and that's what's making us sick. Matti checked for that, too. Marklund: Yeah, we did. So we did statistically adjust for omega-3 fatty acid levels, and we also did kind of stratified analysis where we look specifically in those with low omega-3 and those with high omega-3 acid levels. And we didn't see any difference in this association between linoleic acid and cardiovascular disease. So our study and other studies does not really suggest that the ratio itself should be changed by reducing omega-6 fatty acids. It's more, probably, that you should increase omega-3 fatty acids to improve the ratio. Twilley: In other words, cutting out seed oils is not going to help boost your omega-3 levels. For that, you have to eat more omega-3s. And, outside of oily fish, which are delicious but which most Americans consume very little of — and outside of tofu and chia seeds and flaxseed, which are also pretty underrepresented in the standard Western diet — canola is actually a bit of a omega-3 superstar. Taylor: It is at a level that is a little bit higher than soybean oil. Definitely much higher than the omega-3 found in something like corn oil or the traditional sunflower, safflower oils and so forth. And also compared to olive oil, canola oil has a much higher level of omega-3. Graber: Darriush Mozaffarian is director of the Tufts University Food is Medicine Institute and he's one of the co-authors of Matti's study. He says basically there's no reason to avoid canola or any other seed oil. Darriush Mozaffarian, Tufts University: This is, you know, one of the great Internet myths that's out there, that seed oils are harmful. Canola oil has been studied in well over a hundred randomized control trials and overwhelmingly been shown to improve every risk factor that has been looked at, and never been shown to be pro inflammatory, which is kind of the theory. We have all the science. Like, we don't need any more studies on canola oil. This is one of the most well established areas of science there is, is the health effects of plant oils. Twilley: So, long story short: RFK and Joe Rogan, and a whole bunch of other online influencer types are, to put it politely, completely and utterly incorrect on this issue, as well as many others. Graber: Now, just saying that a processed junk food like cookies or chips has canola oil won't give it magical health-promoting properties, of course. And we certainly can't say that there won't ever be research linking omega-6s to increased risk of any disease. Still, Matti and Darriush and Carla and everyone else who studies it say that canola and other seed oils are fine. The freshest news from the food world every day
