Judge rules in favour of ASP in crab price deadline challenge, minister says he'll change legislation
Fisheries Minister Gerry Byrne says he is "gob struck," claiming the ASP did not provide empathy when FFAW president Dwan Street fell ill. (Ted Dillon/CBC)
The Association of Seafood Producers won its court challenge on Wednesday, arguing that Fisheries Minister Gerry Byrne acted outside his authority by moving the snow crab price setting deadline and that the move was contrary to the Fishing Industry Collective Bargaining Act.
Justice Alexander MacDonald said the only reasonable interpretation of the legislation is that the minister can change the date only if all parties ask him to do it. Only the Fish, Food and Allied Workers union (FFAW) had made that request to Byrne.
Despite for the court's decision, Byrne says legislation is subject to interpretation and he thinks his decision to move the date was the right thing to do.
"We are going to table legislation, an amendment, to allow this to occur lawfully," Byrne told CBC News.
But MacDonald says Byrne made the best decision he could under the circumstances. He also said there isn't any evidence that the minister had improper motives to move the date to April 13.
Byrne told CBC News he felt as though there was a positive relationship between the ASP and FFAW, and that both the government and ASP were notified of the request for delay.
"I am gob struck … [that] when a person faces an uncertainty, someone in such a lead role as that, that empathy could not be provided," said Byrne. "That's quite remarkable in my opinion."
Strained relationship
Ray Critch, representing the FFAW, says the union made the request when FFAW president Dwan Street fell ill.
Street was a key negotiator, and Critch says it was important for the union to have her involved in the process.
Fish, Food and Allied Workers union lawyer Ray Critch says the ASP wasn't willing to accommodate delays to setting the crab price. (Ted Dillon/CBC)
"The ASP had made clear by that point that they weren't willing to accommodate any delays," said Critch. "In the end, the relationship between the association and the union is a strained one."
Critch says the court's decision was unfortunate.
"I think ultimately the minister has to have some discretion when they need to … be able to change the date," he said.
But ASP executive director Jeff Loder says the minister's decision was wrong, and the date change resulted in a delay in the fishery.
Association of Seafood Producers executive director Jeff Loder says his organization should have been consulted before Fisheries Minister Gerry Byrne pushed the crab price deadline. (Ted Dillon/CBC)
"It's never a good day in Newfoundland and Labrador when a minister of the Crown or any government minister acts in a way, makes a decision, that is not consistent with the rules," Loder said Wednesday.
Loder says the ASP never was made aware of FFAW's request to delay the price setting date.
"At a minimum, there should have been consultation and we could have had a discussion about this," he said.
Both the ASP and FFAW submitted their pricing recommendations. The panel hearing began on Apr. 6, and a decision is due on Thursday — the crab season's opening day.
Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter here. Click here to visit our landing page.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada and the U.S. exchange draft document on security deal, CBC reports
-- In the latest development signaling progress in cross-border defense cooperation, Canada and the United States have begun exchanging a working document outlining the potential terms of a new bilateral security deal. The draft, fewer than five pages, has been sent between Ottawa and Washington, according to reporting by CBC News and Radio-Canada. Sources familiar with the talks told CBC that the document includes a framework for Canadian participation in the 'Golden Dome' security initiative, originally proposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump. The proposal also incorporates pledges for increased Canadian infrastructure investment in the Arctic and renewed commitments to meeting NATO defense spending targets. Despite signs of movement, officials involved in the process are cautioning against premature conclusions. 'There's no deal agreed upon by both countries,' a Canadian government official told CBC, speaking on background due to the confidential nature of the negotiations. The same official added that such documents are common as countries test the waters in complex discussions: 'In a negotiation, there will be many documents sent back and forth with several hypothetical scenarios.' While the text provides a structural basis for talks, sources suggest multiple issues remain unresolved. Two sources confirmed to CBC that there is no expectation of a finalized agreement in time for the G7 summit slated to take place in Alberta next week. This indicates that, while the process has advanced, significant hurdles remain before anything can be formally announced. Both sides are said to be weighing domestic and geopolitical considerations linked to the deal's provisions. The stakes are high, with long-term security collaboration and defense readiness among the core components under review. Related articles Canada and the U.S. exchange draft document on security deal, CBC reports U.S. suspends nuclear equipment supplier licenses to China amid trade war Trump discusses Ukraine war, Iran with Putin Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada and the U.S. exchange draft document on security deal, CBC reports
-- In the latest development signaling progress in cross-border defense cooperation, Canada and the United States have begun exchanging a working document outlining the potential terms of a new bilateral security deal. The draft, fewer than five pages, has been sent between Ottawa and Washington, according to reporting by CBC News and Radio-Canada. Sources familiar with the talks told CBC that the document includes a framework for Canadian participation in the 'Golden Dome' security initiative, originally proposed by former U.S. President Donald Trump. The proposal also incorporates pledges for increased Canadian infrastructure investment in the Arctic and renewed commitments to meeting NATO defense spending targets. Despite signs of movement, officials involved in the process are cautioning against premature conclusions. 'There's no deal agreed upon by both countries,' a Canadian government official told CBC, speaking on background due to the confidential nature of the negotiations. The same official added that such documents are common as countries test the waters in complex discussions: 'In a negotiation, there will be many documents sent back and forth with several hypothetical scenarios.' While the text provides a structural basis for talks, sources suggest multiple issues remain unresolved. Two sources confirmed to CBC that there is no expectation of a finalized agreement in time for the G7 summit slated to take place in Alberta next week. This indicates that, while the process has advanced, significant hurdles remain before anything can be formally announced. Both sides are said to be weighing domestic and geopolitical considerations linked to the deal's provisions. The stakes are high, with long-term security collaboration and defense readiness among the core components under review. Related articles Canada and the U.S. exchange draft document on security deal, CBC reports U.S. suspends nuclear equipment supplier licenses to China amid trade war Trump discusses Ukraine war, Iran with Putin
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NYC mayoral candidates answer questions on taxes, affordability, spending
The Brief The Citizens Budget Commission sent out a questionnaire to the New York City mayoral candidates. Nine of the candidates responded, answering questions regarding government efficiency, taxes and other topics. NEW YORK CITY - The Citizens Budget Commission's (CBC) new questionnaire sheds some light on the potential future spending habits of New York City's mayoral candidates. All answers provided by the candidates were taken from their responses to the CBC's 2025 New York City Mayoral Candidate Questionnaire. What we know SKIP TO: Services and operations | Education | Attracting residents and businesses | Taxes Twelve candidates were sent the questionnaire – only New York City Mayor Eric Adams, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and Senator Zellnor Myrie did not submit responses. The other candidates are as follows: Former Assemblymember Michael Blake Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo New York City Comptroller Brad Lander Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani Senator Jessica Ramos (who just recently endorsed Cuomo) Curtis Sliwa Former New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer Whitney Tilson Jim Walden A more comprehensive look at each candidate can be found here. What they're saying Here are some of the subjects broached by the questionnaire. A majority of the candidates rated the efficiency of NYC's services and operations from fair to poor, with only Jim Walden rating the efficiency as "good" – Mamdani, Sliwa and Tilson were the three to rate the services and operations as "poor." In comparison, none of the candidates rates the quality of these services as "poor," with Stringer and Blake going so far as to label them "good" (the other candidates all settled on "fair"). "If you can't afford rent, find a good school or feel safe walking home, you're not staying in New York City." Senator Jessica Ramos The variation of answers was far greater when the candidates were asked which two major agencies offer significant opportunity to improve said efficiency. Blake and Ramos highlighted NYCHA (NYC Housing Authority) as one of their two chosen agencies; Blake, Mamdani and Sliwa pointed to education. While on the subject of education, only one candidate argued against the concept that increasing public school per-student spending would increase achievement: Curtis Sliwa. "Results come from better leadership, not blank checks." Tilson did not commit to a yes or no answer: "Higher per-pupil spending generally does not increase achievement, but I want to invest in certain areas, such as expanding 3-K and reading tutors in elementary schools, for struggling children." All seven other candidates agreed with the idea that an increase in per-student spending would lead to higher achievement rates. Every candidate who participated in the questionnaire agreed that public safety and housing affordability were the two most pressing issues regarding attracting new residents and businesses. "New Yorkers with children under the age of six are leaving the city at more than twice the rate of those without young children." Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani When asked to choose a third factor, the candidates began to diverge in perspective. Lander, Ramos, Stringer, Tilson and Walden concurred that the city's quality of education offered is an obstacle to attracting newcomers. Sliwa cited high taxes as his suspected issue, while Mamdani zeroed in on childcare, or more accurately, a lack of affordable childcare options. Cuomo and Blake settled on similar matters, with Blake attributing the issue to the cost of living overall, while Cuomo pointed to "quality of life write large" as the issue. All candidates involved said they would keep the city's sales tax as it is currently – answers diverged in regard to personal income taxes and property taxes. Ramos and Mamdani would increase the personal income tax of New Yorkers, while Cuomo and Sliwa would decrease them, with the other candidates saying they would keep them the same. Walden, Cuomo and Sliwa would decrease the property tax rate, while Blake would increase it – most other candidates would keep the rate as it is now, except for Ramos, who did not provide an answer. The Source This article includes information from a Citizens Budget Commission questionnaire.
