logo
'AI agents' to the rescue: How to work in a world with a distraction every two minutes

'AI agents' to the rescue: How to work in a world with a distraction every two minutes

SBS Australia01-05-2025

Microsoft's annual Work Trend Index shows nearly 47 per cent of Australian bosses are asking their employees to do more. Source: AAP / Bianca De Marchi For Farid (not his real name), every notification that flashes on his screen while he's at work reinforces an "extreme stress". "[The notifications] were very annoying ... When I tried to focus on my task, they broke my focus and I had to jump to another task, even if it was just reading the first sentence of the notifications," he said. "Being distracted is not a good reason to give to your manager ... So I always try my best to finish my work, even if that sometimes means staying [on] after hours." That is why the IT engineer has chosen to disable notifications on his work device.
Farid is among tens of thousands of Australian workers who have similar experiences every day. According to Microsoft's annual Work Trend Index, during a typical 9-to-5 workday, employees are interrupted every two minutes by "meetings, emails, or pings", averaging 275 interruptions a day. The recent report is based on data from 31,000 workers across 31 countries, including 1,000 from Australia.
Herman Tse, professor of Leadership and Organisational Behaviour at Monash University, said: "constant emails, instant messengers, meetings, and live streams" are the main sources of distraction. "They're constantly bombarded by these kinds of instant demands from different sources: boss, peers, subordinates, requests and everything," he told SBS News. "Constant disruptions or distractions [will] reduce our cognitive attention ... The more these kinds of situations happen, the less likely we are to concentrate deeply on our work."
The Microsoft report shows that in Australia, nearly half (47 per cent) of bosses are asking employees to do more, while almost 80 per cent of employees say they lack "the time or energy to keep up". This is what Microsoft's head of modern work, Lucy Debono, describes as a "capacity gap". "Essentially, we're not running out of work to do, but potentially we're running out of human capacity to do it," she told SBS News.
There are several traditional solutions to help workers stay focused and deal with the 'capacity gap'. Tse suggests that office workers "don't attend redundant meetings" all the time, and could shift from "time management to attention management". "Try to block 90 minutes every morning, maybe from 9am to 10.30am — this is what we call the focus time. During this window, turn off the notifications of any digital devices and delegate the routine. "Without a clear structure of what I call a compass, an internal compass to focus on attention rather than only on time management, people will feel more fatigued." However, the modern-day workplace has access to new techniques to handle work distractions and improve efficiency. Enter artificial intelligence (AI).
These methods are used in "frontier firms," companies that work based on human and AI teams. "AI can help to bridge this capacity gap," Debono said. "Turning to AI as that thought partner, like you would talk to a colleague, a friend, a teammate, that's where you start to get the real sort of value and return from an interaction. "Asking an AI [agent] to help organise your day, to summarise your emails, to prioritise your tasks, really helps you to stay much more focused on what you need to deliver and not to get distracted."
The Microsoft research shows that 40 per cent of employees in Australia use AI as a thought partner, which is 12 per cent less than the average in Asia-Pacific countries. According to Microsoft, AI agents are an AI-powered system that can reason, plan and act to complete tasks or entire workflows autonomously, with human oversight at key moments. The Work Trend Index report predicts that in future, we will "see the rise of the agent boss — someone who builds, delegates to, and manages [AI] agents to amplify their impact".
Debono said: "The research tells us that many leaders today see agents as a means to address the issue and help reduce the level of distraction in various ways. "What we see from this research is where human and agent teams come together, that's where we're going to have the most impact, the highest efficiency and human skills."
The Microsoft report also shows that 40 per cent of business leaders report they are already using AI agents to fully automate their workstreams. Seventy-five per cent say they will use these agents in the next 12 to 18 months. However, a significant number of people say they don't trust using AI. A 2023 study by the University of Queensland found that only 34 per cent of Australians are willing to trust AI.
"[Australian companies] are not [at] that forefront right now ... They're still concerned about whether they should trust AI [and] whether [it] will expose their information and will put them into danger," Tse said. "They still have a strong, what we call, psychosocial risk. That means wherever they rely more on AI, they show their employees that the human value of a job becomes less important. "They'd be afraid that they were more likely to be replaced by AI sooner rather than later."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Airport launches Australia-first drone security trial
Airport launches Australia-first drone security trial

9 News

time7 hours ago

  • 9 News

Airport launches Australia-first drone security trial

Your web browser is no longer supported. To improve your experience update it here Port Lincoln Airport has started an Australian-first 12-month trial of drone technology to boost security and surveillance. The remotely piloted drone, operated from Melbourne about 850 kilometres away, is equipped with thermal cameras and navigates around a pre-programmed path at up to 80 kilometres per hour. Its primary function is to scan the airport perimeter, identifying potential risks posed by people or wildlife. Port Lincoln Airport has started an Australian-first 12-month trial of drone technology to boost security and surveillance. (Nine) The drone is equipped with technology that allows for direct communication. "We have an actual speaker attached to our drone and we're able to actually blare noise, music - and if it's a person we can even talk to them," Gregory Neyland from MSS Security said. The trial, which took 18 months to launch, aims to assess the drone's effectiveness in streamlining and improving surveillance capabilities at airports and potentially other businesses. "We, as a council that owns the airport are looking for innovative ideas and solutions - ways that we can be more efficient," said Delfina Lanzill from the Lower Eyre Council. Despite the introduction of drone technology, on-the-ground security guards won't be going anywhere. "You will always need people on the ground to be able to respond to an incident. This just helps them do their job effectively," Neyland said. This article was produced with the assistance of 9ExPress . South Australia national Australia Adelaide Melbourne Technology 9ExPress CONTACT US

Ukrainian drone strikes show up Australia's out-of-date defences
Ukrainian drone strikes show up Australia's out-of-date defences

The Age

time12 hours ago

  • The Age

Ukrainian drone strikes show up Australia's out-of-date defences

Over the weekend, Ukraine provided a demonstration of something that has been largely misinterpreted by the many 'pop-up' war experts that have emerged here and elsewhere in the past three years. What the audacious Ukrainian strikes showed was not a new way of war nor new drone capabilities. Both have been on display for more than three years – for those who have noticed. What the Ukrainians actually provided on the weekend was a lesson that has two sides: On one side, they showed what can be done when politicians and military leaders take risk and free up their people to exercise creativity. The other side of the lesson is that Ukraine showed what happens to those who do not pay sufficient attention to the lessons of war, and whose learning and adaptation culture and systems are inadequate. Unfortunately, the Australian defence department and its part-time minister have shown no indication they have learned the first lesson but have demonstrated a full measure of the second. Australia's defence force is slowly but surely being degraded in size and capacity by being denied funding, due to a focus on submarines that will arrive too late to deter China's rapid military build-up and aggression. The 2 per cent of GDP being spent on defence has been recognised by every credible defence expert in this country as insufficient for normal defence needs, let along running a defence force and paying down the nuclear submarines as well as paying the exorbitant salaries of the hundreds of AUKUS bureaucrats who are travelling the world, writing briefs and producing nothing. The Ukrainian drone strikes on the weekend are another 'foot-stomp' moment for Australia. They demonstrated that taking risks and being innovative can result in the development of a long-range strike capability that does not just have to build on the small number of exquisite and expensive systems Australia is procuring. And unlike these big expensive systems, which once lost are gone forever, drones can be produced in mass quantities by Australian industry in case we are involved in a sustained war. Loading The expensive and exquisitely 'focused' defence force we are building is designed for 20th century war. It will also take decades to deliver because of the zero-risk procurement policy of the defence department. We need to shift to a balanced force that balances crewed and uncrewed systems, expensive and cheap systems – designed for 21st century war. And we need to speed up and delegate down authorities to procure more relevant equipment that can be upgraded regularly. Drones are not just an aerial asset – land and maritime drones have proven their utility in Ukraine and this has been ignored in Canberra. And with the latest developments, which include uncrewed naval vessels that carry strike drones and uncrewed aerial vehicles that carry smaller attack drones, Australia has an opportunity to learn from Ukraine and develop new kinds of high-tech deterrents to Chinese aggression. The second lesson of the weekend is that those who are slow to learn and adapt pay the consequences. The Russians, who have had their airbases attacked regularly in the past two years, have been slow to upgrade their defences and paid the price on the weekend. Australian military bases and critical infrastructure are totally defenceless against these kinds of drone attacks. That has been clear from three years of war in Ukraine ,and yet, this government has done nothing to protect Australian soldiers from such threats. Not only have budgets for drone defences not materialised, but an extraordinarily dense air safety bureaucracy has also prevented units from using drones and experimenting with new ideas like the Ukrainian military has throughout the war. Few soldiers see drones on training exercises these days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store