Congress takes the first step in making DOGE cuts permanent
The House just passed $9.4 billion in DOGE cuts.
It comes one week after Musk and Trump's feud exploded into public view.
Four Republicans voted against cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid.
Things may still be frosty between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump, but the DOGE agenda is continuing to chug along in Congress.
The House voted on Thursday to approve $9.4 billion in "DOGE cuts," passing a bill that would rescind roughly $1.1 billion in funding for NPR and PBS and more than $8.3 billion in foreign aid spending. That includes cuts to PEPFAR, a foreign aid program for the prevention and treatment of HIV and AIDS worldwide.
The package of cuts now heads to the Senate, where its fate remains uncertain. It could be the first of multiple rounds of DOGE cuts to come.
Four Republicans ultimately voted against the package, including:
Rep. Mark Amodei of Nevada
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania
Rep. Nicole Malliotakis of New York
Rep. Mike Turner of Ohio
The bill passed by a narrow 214-212 margin. Democrats unanimously opposed it.
A handful of Republicans expressed concerns about the bill ahead of the vote. Amodei had signed onto a statement opposing cuts to public broadcasting funds, while others raised concerns about the PEPFAR cuts.
Those concerns could play out again in the Senate, where Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine has said she's opposed to cutting PEPFAR, while Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska has declared her opposition to public broadcasting cuts.
Lawmakers are using a process known as "rescission" to make the cuts. That process allows the White House to ask Congress to claw back funding that it's already approved as part of previous funding bills. It only requires a simple majority vote in the Senate, but if lawmakers don't approve the rescission within 45 days, the money must be spent.
For Republicans, it's a way of making DOGE cuts permanent. The administration has already been withholding hundreds of billions of dollars in funding, but the rescissions process is provided for by the Impoundment Control Act, a Nixon-era law that generally requires the president to spend money that's approved by Congress.
Trump and his allies have argued that the law is unconstitutional, and some Republicans have introduced a bill to overturn it.
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
34 minutes ago
2 women marry in Mexico's embassy in Guatemala fueling a debate over same-sex marriage
GUATEMALA CITY -- Two Mexican women were married inside the grounds of Mexico's embassy in Guatemala on Friday, sparking anger in a nation that doesn't recognize same-sex marriage and debate over diplomatic sovereignty. The ceremony held in the embassy gardens was intended to celebrate Pride Month, which is celebrated every June, and the consulate said the marriage marked a step toward inclusion, respect and equality for all. "We celebrate love without borders," wrote the embassy in a post on the social media platform X. 'This is the first civil wedding of a same-sex couple at the Embassy of Mexico in Guatemala. It's a right granted to all individuals when both are Mexican citizens.' Shortly after, the ceremony sparked an outcry among conservative politicians in Guatemala, a largely Catholic country and one of a handful in Latin America that still doesn't recognize same-sex marriages. While such marriages aren't explicitly prohibited, Guatemalan law only refers to unions between a man and a woman. Allan Rodríguez, the head of the VAMOS party bloc and ally of former president Alejandro Giammattei, was among those to reject the wedding, writing in a statement that 'although the act may be protected under external jurisdictions, it clearly contradicts Guatemala's current legal framework.' According to the congressman, the properties where embassies are located 'are not foreign territory; they merely enjoy diplomatic privileges" and therefore are not a part of the Mexican state. He claimed considering them as such would "violate constitutional principles of sovereignty, territorial unity, and the rule of law.' Rodríguez, a former president of Congress, is sanctioned by the United States for obstructing anti-corruption efforts and undermining democracy in Guatemala. The office of progressive President Bernardo Arévalo said that under international law embassies like Mexico's "have territorial immunity and operate under the jurisdiction of the state they represent.' 'In this case, it is an activity carried out by the Mexican Consulate in Guatemala and aimed at Mexican citizens. Therefore, it is exclusively the responsibility of the Government of Mexico, through its diplomatic representation, to comment or speak on the matter," the embassy statement said. Still, debate only continued on, with Elmer Palencia, a congressman for the VALOR party, created by the daughter of a former dictator, called the marriage, 'not an act of inclusion, but a provocation.' "Out of respect for the host country, Mexico should refrain from that narrative. Guatemalan sovereignty and social institutions deserve that respect,' he said. Constitutional lawyer Edgar Ortíz contradicted the conservative politicians, saying the marriage doesn't violate Guatemala's sovereignty and complies with the Vienna Convention, which establishes that what happens on diplomatic premises 'are not subject to the host state's jurisdiction.' He noted that Guatemala's constitution establishes that the country will govern following international principles. 'In no way are Guatemala's laws being altered; the effects of this marriage will occur in Mexico, which does recognize same-sex marriage,' he said. 'Rather," he added, 'it is the Guatemalan lawmakers who are violating sovereignty, by interfering in Mexico's affairs and trying to tell them what they can or cannot do. That seems far more discourteous.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'No Kings' demonstrators to gather across Greater Cincinnati in opposition to Trump
A string of protests is planned throughout Greater Cincinnati as part of a nationwide movement opposed to President Donald Trump and his administration. The June 14 "No Kings" protests, organized by activist group Indivisible and its partners, are described as a "nationwide day of defiance." Events are slated to take place in nearly 2,000 communities across the nation to oppose what organizers describe as "corrupt, authoritarian politics." Numerous protests are scheduled to take place in the afternoon locally throughout Greater Cincinnati, including: Cincinnati – University Pavilion (University of Cincinnati): 2618 University Circle, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219. Union Township – Veterans Memorial Park: 906 Clough Pike, 45245. Loveland – Loveland Elementary School: 600 Loveland-Madeira Road, Loveland, Ohio 45140. Mason – Intersection of Mason Montgomery Road and Tylersville Road, 45040. West Chester Township – Intersection of Tylersville Road and Cox Lane, 45069. Hamilton – Intersection of South Martin Luther King Junior Boulevard and High Street, 45011. Middletown – Towne Mall: 3461 Towne Blvd., 45005. Oxford – Uptown Park: intersection of Main Street and High Street, 45056. Falling on Flag Day and Trump's birthday, the day of protest is intended to help counter Trump's planned Washington, D.C. military parade. It also coincides with large-scale protests in Los Angeles, which erupted in response to Trump's immigration policy. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency is carrying out a directive from Trump to find immigrants living in the United States without legal status. The aggressive crackdown has fueled anger and protests in Los Angeles and across the country, which have led to hundreds of arrests amid occasional violent clashes, vandalism and looting. Hundreds of demonstrators gathered on June 8 outside the Butler County Jail to protest the arrest of 19-year-old Honduran immigrant Emerson Colindres, who was detained by ICE agents on June 4 during a routine check-in with immigration officials at the agency's office in Blue Ash. The Enquirer will have reporters covering the protests and will update this story. USA TODAY contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: 'No Kings' protests on June 14 to counter Trump, military parade in DC
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
President Trump approves partnership between U. S. Steel and Nippon Steel
United States Steel (X) and Nippon Steel (NPSCY) together with its wholly owned subsidiary Nippon Steel North America, announced that President Trump has approved the companies' historic partnership that will unleash unprecedented investments in steelmaking in the United States, protecting and creating more than 100,000 jobs. On May 30, 2025, the partnership was celebrated by thousands of steel workers with President Trump at U. S. Steel's Irvin Plant of Mon Valley Works in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania. In addition to President Trump's Executive Order approving the partnership, the Companies have entered into a National Security Agreement with the U.S. Government. The NSA provides that approximately $11B in new investments will be made by 2028, which includes the initial investment in a greenfield project that would be completed after 2028. The NSA also includes commitments related to governance, domestic production, and trade matters. Along with President Trump's Executive Order, the companies have completed the U.S. Department of Justice review process. With those approvals, all necessary regulatory approvals for the partnership have now been received, and the partnership is expected to be finalized promptly. Confident Investing Starts Here:
