logo
Families fight to block parole for murderers who refuse to reveal location of their victims

Families fight to block parole for murderers who refuse to reveal location of their victims

Yahoo2 days ago
The families of victims involved in Scotland's highest profile murder cases are demanding convicted killers be refused parole unless they reveal where they dumped the bodies.
Arlene Fraser was murdered by her husband Nat Fraser in Moray in 1998 after waving her children off to school. Her remains have never been found.
Edinburgh bookkeeper Suzanne Pilley's body has also not been discovered despite her former lover David Gilroy being convicted of killing her and getting rid of her remains in remote woods in 2010.
Gilroy's public denial began after he was confronted on camera by Sky News weeks after Ms Pilley, 38, vanished. He lied and said he was not involved in her death.
Asked directly if he killed Ms Pilley, he replied: "I've got nothing to say, I've assisted the police with questions."
He was later arrested, convicted and jailed for at least 18 years.
The families of Ms Fraser and Ms Pilley joined forces to host a media conference in Glasgow on Wednesday after a meeting with Scotland's justice secretary to discuss upcoming changes to parole legislation.
Both Fraser and Gilroy are serving mandatory life sentences, but Fraser will be eligible for parole in October 2028 and Gilroy in March 2030.
Original plans to strengthen the law in Scotland would have seen killers being compelled to reveal the location of their victim's bodies or face having their parole rejected.
But Scottish ministers have accepted a proposed amendment that states parole boards "must" take into account the refusal to cooperate.
Under current legislation, parole board rules dictate that it "may" be taken into account.
Ms Pilley's sister, Gail Fairgrieve, said: "The parole board needs to understand that his crime is still continuing, he is perpetrating the crime against us. We are still dealing with this every day.
"Everyday events - like you go into a card shop and you can't buy anything for your sister. It is there constantly, and he has information that could put us at ease. There is no remorse."
Carol Gillies, Ms Fraser's sister, said: "It's a form of mental torture. He has that information, there is no doubt about it."
Talking directly to killer Fraser, Ms Gillies said: "This is your choice. Tell us more or go back to your cell."
Justice Secretary Angela Constance denied watering down the plans amid recent accusations of a "betrayal" to victims.
The MSP told Sky News the families of murder victims gave their support to the proposals.
She said: "Right now the parole board doesn't have to take this information into consideration. What I am saying is that I have and will continue to work with parliament to ensure that the law changes so that the parole board must take this into account."
In England Helen's Law was introduced in 2021; denying killers parole until they reveal where they hid victims' remains.
It was named after Helen McCourt who was killed in 1988. The English law has prevented several murderers from being released.
The new Scottish legislation is likely to come into force within the next year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hundreds arrested in week-long crackdown on suspected illegal working
Hundreds arrested in week-long crackdown on suspected illegal working

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Hundreds arrested in week-long crackdown on suspected illegal working

Hundreds of arrests have been made as part of what the Government called a 'week-long crackdown' on asylum seekers taking jobs for delivery firms. A total of 1,780 people were stopped and spoken to at locations across the UK over suspected illegal working activity between July 20 and 27. Some 280 were arrested as a result, in areas including Hillingdon in north-west London, Dumfries in Scotland, and Birmingham, the Home Office said. Some 89 of those have been detained pending removal from the country and 53 are now having their asylum support reviewed, which the Government said could result in their support being suspended or withdrawn. The Home Office described the operation as a 'nationwide intensification week' targeting illegal working hotspots, with a focus on the gig economy and people working as delivery riders. Immigration enforcement teams will receive £5 million from the £100 million in funding already announced for border security, aimed at increasing visits by officers in these areas over the coming months, it said. Border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said: 'Illegal working undermines our border security and we're cracking down hard on it. 'That's why we have intensified our enforcement activity right across the UK to crack down on those who think they can evade immigration and employment laws in the UK. ' As well as the arrests, 51 businesses including car washes and restaurants were issued with penalty notices that could see them handed hefty fines if they are found to have hired people without the right to work in the UK. Eddy Montgomery, enforcement director at the Home Office, said officers were taking action 'around the clock' against 'those who think they can get away with working illegally'. Asylum seekers in the UK are normally barred from work while their claim is being processed, though permission can be applied for after a year of waiting. Officials had indicated there would be an increase in work to target areas of suspected activity, as ministers hope to tackle the 'pull factors' attracting migrants to the UK. It comes after the Government announced it would share information about asylum hotel locations with food delivery firms in a bid to disrupt such hotspots. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the Conservatives wanted to strip asylum seekers of their status and deport them, if they work illegally, and claimed 'this story has only happened' because he 'exposed what Labour refused to see'. He described one hotel housing asylum seekers as a 'black-market, courier hub in plain sight', referring to food delivery riders he had seen allegedly operating out of the site without permission. 'Labour are now boasting about arrests, but we know they are too scared to actually deport anyone,' Mr Philp continued. 'People breaking the law are still being put up in hotels and handed benefits. 'It's a racket and Labour are letting it run.' Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat have said they will ramp up facial verification and fraud checks over the coming months to prevent people working as riders without permission.

Netanyahu ‘not a partner in peace', says Scottish Labour leader Sarwar
Netanyahu ‘not a partner in peace', says Scottish Labour leader Sarwar

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Netanyahu ‘not a partner in peace', says Scottish Labour leader Sarwar

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is 'not a partner in peace' who will eventually have to answer to international courts over the crisis in Gaza, the leader of Scottish Labour has said. Anas Sarwar hit out at the Israeli premier as he announced plans to take over Gaza City in a new offensive. While Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said the plans were 'wrong', Mr Sarwar was much more strident, describing Mr Netanyahu as a 'war criminal'. Following news of the offensive, the Scottish Greens urged the Prime Minister to expel the Israeli ambassador from the UK. But Mr Sarwar said he did not want to 'get into stunts'. 'The problem here is Benjamin Netanyahu, his Israel government, his illegal occupation, his lack of interest in peace and the fact that he clearly has no respect for international law, and gives no value to the sanctity of human life,' he told the PA news agency. 'He is a danger to his own population in Israel, but he's also a danger to the Palestinian population and a danger to the wider region in the Middle East.' He added: 'We all have to be resolute in saying that Netanyahu is a war criminal, he's not acting in the interests of peace. 'He's not a partner for peace, Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed horrific acts on October 7 2023 – they aren't partners for peace.' Diplomacy, the Scottish Labour leader said, had not yet worked in ending the conflict, but shutting off communications would not help matters. 'Diplomacy hasn't worked in terms of the war ending, because the war is still ongoing,' he said. 'There is a plausible case for genocide that the Israeli government has to answer and one day I believe will have to answer to the ICC and the ICJ. 'But we have to urgently end the war – if we think just stopping talking to the Israeli government means that we end the war, I think that's a pretty naive view of the situation right now.' The only person who the Israel Government would listen to, he said, would be US President Donald Trump, as he urged the international community to exert as much pressure as possible on the administration. Asked if he felt the UK Government had done enough to solve the issue, the Scottish Labour leader said it had done 'a lot', but added: 'I think there's still more we have to look at.' Scottish Green co-leader Lorna Slater said the UK Government has been an 'active participant' in what she described as a 'genocide' in Gaza. 'Urging restraint is not enough, the hypocrisy must end. The arms sales must stop and so must the military collaboration and political support that has gone with them. 'That must mean backing sanctions against Israeli forces and expelling the Israeli ambassador who has served as a mouthpiece for genocide. 'This has been a disgraceful chapter in UK foreign policy and has made the Prime Minister and his colleagues complicit in some of the worst war crimes of this century.' The UK Government has been contacted for comment. Meanwhile, Scottish First Minister John Swinney hit out at the announcement of the new offensive. 'The decision of the Israeli Government to seize control of Gaza City is completely and utterly unacceptable,' he said in a post on X. 'It will create even more human suffering for the Palestinian people and further escalate the conflict. 'The international community must stop Israel and secure a ceasefire.'

Jury announces verdict in case of man accused of killing pregnant woman, 16-year-old boy
Jury announces verdict in case of man accused of killing pregnant woman, 16-year-old boy

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jury announces verdict in case of man accused of killing pregnant woman, 16-year-old boy

A Montgomery County jury has reached a verdict in the case involving a man who is accused of shooting and killing his pregnant ex-girlfriend and a 16-year-old boy. [DOWNLOAD: Free WHIO-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] The jury found Nicole 'Nico' Cunigan, Jr. guilty on all 10 charges he faced, including murder and felonious assault. TRENDING STORIES: Motorized wheelchairs spotted going down Ohio interstate Fire reported in Trotwood neighborhood; large plume of smoke visible for miles 'That's just evil;' People shocked after pregnant woman found dead in sealed plastic tote Cunigan, 33, was on trial for the murders of Precious Taste, the mother of his children, and their unborn child, as well as Deante Johnson. The trial, which started Tuesday, had closing statements Friday morning. The jury began deliberations around 2 p.m. They returned a verdict shortly before 5 p.m. Cunigan has 10 different charges against him. His lawyer tried to say that no one ever even proved Cunigan was the man captured on video firing a gun and jumping into a home. As reported on News Center 7 at 5:00, prosecutors described him as a widely jealous and obsessive man who stalked his ex and the mother of his children. 'Nico Cunigan murdered three people and we presented evidence to you supporting the same,' Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Bryan Moore said. Prosecutors began their closing arguments after a big surprise: Cunigan and his lawyer decided not to put the accused man on the witness stand. They did not call any witnesses, prompting the judge to question Cunigan. 'Do you understand you have the right to testify?' the judge asked. Cunigan responded by saying, 'Yes.' That left his lawyers to do all the defense in his closing arguments, looking to poke holes in the story of witnesses. 'You didn't hear from one witness who saw that video or saw that picture of the person at the window and identified Nico Cunigan,' Lucas Wilder, Cunigan's defense lawyer, said in court. Wilder claimed police had tunnel vision on this, focusing only on Cunigan. He claimed Cunigan didn't threaten Taste, who was four months pregnant. 'Nothing, nothing violent, nothing aggressive. It was apologies,' Wilder said. Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Anthony Schoen brought up a text message claiming to show Cunigan's jealousy. 'There's a text message, 'I'm watching your every movement. You better not touch anyone else,'' Schoen said. Schoen told the jury that they are the witnesses. They saw video that showed Cunigan going to the house and leaving around 6 a.m., and then returning wearing the same clothes, with the same hair, 15 minutes later, and going on a killing spree. 'Watch that video, pop, pop, pop. Jump in because I have to make sure everyone's dead,' Schoen said. Cunigan will be sentenced on August 29. [SIGN UP: WHIO-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store