Algeria–U.S. energy ties grow amid Western Sahara tensions
Algeria is taking strategic steps to expand its energy partnership with the United States as tensions over the Western Sahara dispute continue to mount.
Algeria is enhancing its energy partnership with the U.S. amidst Western Sahara tensions.
Washington shows interest in reviving Western Sahara negotiations ahead of a UN session.
Economic partnerships align with Algeria's diplomatic strategies and regional positioning.
This renewed engagement comes as part of Algeria's broader push to assert economic diplomacy in the face of growing international pressure surrounding the long-standing territorial issue.
On June 24, the Secretary-General of Algeria's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Lounes Magramane, met with U.S. Ambassador Elizabeth Moore Aubin to discuss regional developments and bilateral cooperation.
Both parties reaffirmed their commitment to strengthening ties, with Ambassador Aubin later emphasizing the importance of this dialogue through her social media platforms.
As U.S. interest in the Western Sahara issue intensifies, reports indicate that Washington may be looking to revive stalled negotiations ahead of a key UN Security Council session scheduled for October.
The Trump administration is said to support Morocco's 2007 autonomy proposal, prompting Algeria to step up its own diplomatic efforts.
Algeria deepens energy investment with US firms
In a parallel move on the economic front, Algeria has opened its doors wider to American energy investors.
President Abdelmadjid Tebboune recently held back-to-back meetings with top executives from Chevron and ExxonMobil. Energy Minister Mohamed Arkab and Sonatrach CEO Rachid Hachichi were also present, signaling a unified and high-level push for foreign partnership.
Central to Algeria's new approach is a proposed energy law that would allow foreign companies to hold up to 80 percent ownership in new oil and gas ventures marking a major shift from previous investment rules.
Minister Arkab described the legislation as a transformative step, aimed at modernizing the sector while maintaining national resource control.
Earlier this year, Algeria's Ambassador to the U.S., Sabri Boukadoum, also expressed the country's openness to negotiating broad resource-based agreements with Washington, stating that 'the sky's the limit.'
As efforts to reignite UN-led talks on Western Sahara remain uncertain, Algeria's energy overtures could serve both as an economic opportunity and a calculated diplomatic response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Plan to sell off public land in the West nixed from ‘big, beautiful bill' amid GOP backlash
A controversial plan to sell hundreds of thousands of acres of public land across Western states — including California — was axed from the Republican tax and spending bill amid bipartisan backlash, prompting celebration from conservationists. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who spearheaded the proposal, announced he was pulling the provision on Saturday night on the social media platform X. Lee had said the land sale was intended to ease the financial burden of housing, pointing to a lack of affordability afflicting families in many communities. 'Because of the strict constraints of the budget reconciliation process, I was unable to secure clear, enforceable safeguards to guarantee that these lands would be sold only to American families — not to China, not to BlackRock and not to any foreign interests,' he wrote in the post. For that reason, he said, he was withdrawing the measure from the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' that Trump has said he wants passed by July 4. Lee's failed measure would have mandated the sale of between roughly 600,000 and 1.2 million acres of Bureau of Land Management land in 11 Western states, including California. The areas available for auction were supposed to be located within a five-mile radius of population centers. The effort represented a scaled-back version of a plan that was nixed from the reconciliation bill on Monday for violating Senate rules. The initial plan would have allowed for the sale of up to 3.3 million acres of land managed by BLM and the U.S. Forest Service. Lee's decision to scrap the proposal arrived after at least four Republican senators from Western states vowed to vote for an amendment to strike the proposal from the bill. At lease five House Republicans also voiced their opposition to the plan, including Reps. David Valadao of California and Ryan Zinke of Montana, who served as the Interior secretary during Trump's first term. The death of the provision was celebrated by conservationists as well as recreation advocates, including hunters and anglers, even as they steeled themselves for an ongoing fight over federal lands. The Trump administration has taken steps to open public lands for energy and resource extraction, including recently announcing it would rescind a rule that protects 58.5 million acres of national forestland from road construction and timber harvesting. Some critics saw the now-scrapped proposed land sale as means to offset tax cuts in the reconciliation bill. 'This is a victory for everyone who hikes, hunts, explores and cherishes these places, but it's not the end of the threats to our public lands,' said Athan Manuel, director of Sierra Club's Lands Protection Program, in a statement. 'Donald Trump and his allies in Congress have made it clear they will use every tool at their disposal to give away our public lands to billionaires and corporate polluters.' Chris Wood, president and chief executive of Trout Unlimited — a nonprofit dedicated to conserving rivers and streams to support trout and salmon — described protecting public lands as 'the most nonpartisan issue in the country.' 'This is certainly not the first attempt to privatize or transfer our public lands, and it won't be the last,' Wood said in a statement. 'We must stay vigilant and defend the places we love to fish, hike, hunt and explore.' Lee, in the Saturday X post, suggested the issue remained in play. He said he believed the federal government owns too much land — and that it is mismanaging it. Locked-away land in his state of Utah, he claimed, drives up taxes and limits the ability to build homes. 'President Trump promised to put underutilized federal land to work for American families, and I look forward to helping him achieve that in a way that respects the legacy of our public lands and reflects the values of the people who use them most.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Jeffries still has ‘a lot of questions' about Trump Iran action
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said in a Sunday interview that he still has 'a lot of questions' after the classified briefing on Friday about the Trump administration's strikes on Iran last weekend. In an interview on ABC News's 'This Week,' Jeffries said he has not seen evidence suggesting the strikes 'totally obliterated' the nuclear sites, as President Trump has claimed, and is still waiting for more of an explanation as to why the U.S. needed to strike without first seeking congressional authorization. 'There are a lot of questions that remain unanswered, in my view, as it relates to the actions that the Trump administration took relative to Iran,' Jeffries said. 'Why did they not seek the congressional authorization required by the Constitution for this type of preemptive strike?' 'I still haven't seen facts presented to us as a Congress to justify that step, and I certainly haven't seen facts to justify the statement that Donald Trump made that Iran's nuclear program has been completely and totally obliterated,' Jeffries added. Jeffries said the administration needs to make the case to the American people about how best to prevent Iran from becoming nuclear capable. 'Why did they abandon the aggressive diplomacy that was successful under the Obama administration? And what is their plan to stop us from getting into another failed Middle Eastern war?' Jeffries added. 'A lot of questions that need to be answered,' Jeffries said. 'And those answers haven't been compelling to date.' House Democrats on Friday left a closed-door briefing with Trump administration officials, saying they did not get satisfactory answers to either of their primary questions: Did Iran pose an imminent threat to Americans, thereby justifying Trump's move to launch the strikes without congressional approval? And did the attacks 'obliterate' Iran's capacity to make nuclear weapons, as Trump has claimed?
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Israel's military appears poised to expand into Gaza City amid cease-fire calls
Advertisement Attention in Israel and Washington has refocused on Gaza since Israel's 12-day war with Iran ended Tuesday. The military campaign in Gaza -- which was ignited by the Hamas-led October 2023 attack on Israel -- has lasted more than 630 days and is one of Israel's most protracted and deadliest wars. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing increasing pressure at home to end the conflict by agreeing to a ceasefire deal that would see Hamas release the hostages still being held in the enclave. Those hostages include up to 20 people who were taken captive in the October 2023 attack and are believed to still be alive, along with the remains of about 30 others. Trump on Sunday publicly pressed for a deal. 'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!! DJT,' he wrote on social media, hours after arguing that Netanyahu's long-running corruption trial be canceled since it would interfere with 'the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas.' Advertisement Later on Sunday, Netanyahu told a group of workers for the Shin Bet, the country's internal security agency, that Israel's campaign in Iran had 'opened up many opportunities, first among them to rescue the hostages.' Israel still must 'resolve the Gaza issue and defeat Hamas,' he said, adding, 'I believe that we will succeed in both these missions.' In an unusual move, a panel of three Israeli judges agreed Sunday to delay Netanyahu's scheduled testimony by a week. The move was announced after the prime minister attended a special court hearing, behind closed doors and accompanied by two of Israel's security chiefs, to press for a postponement of his upcoming court appearances. The court has been cross-examining Netanyahu this month in two scheduled court appearances each week. Netanyahu has argued for a delay in his cross-examination based on national security imperatives, the details of which he has not publicly disclosed. In recent days, the judicial authorities had rejected Netanyahu's requests for a two-week postponement, saying the reasons he had provided were too general and unconvincing. It was not immediately clear what changed their minds. In the decision Sunday, the judges said they would also consider Netanyahu's request to delay his testimony for a second week, based on developments. Trump had suggested Friday that there could be an agreement between Israel and Hamas within a week. But Trump has offered no details on what may have changed, and analysts said it was unclear what his claim was based on. Advertisement There has been no advancement in the ceasefire talks, according to an Israeli official and another person familiar with the matter. Israel and Hamas do not negotiate directly. But no Israeli negotiating teams have been dispatched to mediating countries, such as Qatar and Egypt -- a sign that the two sides remain far apart, at least on the contours of the type of two-phased deal that has been discussed so far through the traditional channels. Still, it is possible that higher level discussions might be happening separately and in secrecy. It was not immediately clear how many people might be affected by Sunday's evacuation orders from the Israeli military. Gaza City and other areas in the northern part of the enclave were largely emptied earlier in the war following previous evacuation orders. But hundreds of thousands of residents of northern Gaza returned home during a two-month ceasefire, which collapsed when Israel resumed fighting in mid-March. Negotiations since then for a renewed ceasefire have been at an impasse. Israel says it has accepted various versions of a proposal put forward by Steve Witkoff, the White House special envoy, which calls for a roughly two-month ceasefire and the release of about half the living hostages, along with the remains of some others. Talks for a permanent ceasefire would take place during that period, but the long-standing sticking points appear to remain unresolved. Hamas says it will only release all the hostages in return for a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an internationally guaranteed end of the war. Israel has said the war can only end if Hamas surrenders and disarms, and it has demanded that the group's leaders go into exile. Hamas has rejected those conditions. Advertisement The Hamas-led attack on Israel in October 2023 killed about 1,200 people, the majority of them civilians, according to the Israeli authorities. Israel's counter offensive has killed more than 56,000 people in Gaza, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between combatants and civilians in its data but has said more than half of the dead are women and children. This article originally appeared in
