Mia Davies: ‘It takes courage and conviction to step into the political arena'
Congratulations to everyone that saw the opportunity to make a difference for our nation and stepped up to contend as a candidate at this Federal election.
It takes courage and conviction to step into public arena to test yourself, many do not.
To Matt Moran and Trish Cook, with the result still undecided in Bullwinkel, I wish you both the very best.
The first Member for Bullwinkel will have a special place in our nation's history, just like that courageous woman it is named for. I know we all understood the privilege it was to contest the election as a candidate and speak of Sister Vivian Bullwinkel as its namesake.
I have always been a firm believer that The Nationals brand of representation and advocacy, our approach to policy and politics, is something more Australians deserve.
The contest was always going to be a challenge for The Nationals, but that was not a reason to vacate the space.
We fight fiercely for our electorates, we bring commonsense to the debate, and have a track record of delivering for our constituencies – most of which are vast, diverse and challenging to service.
I thank David Littleproud and his Federal team for their support throughout the campaign.
Too often the value of our team and its contribution to a stable Government or Opposition is underestimated or diminished by those that would prefer to see us gone. I remind those that have been devising or reporting on our demise for decades that we are still here, fighting and making a difference.
I joined our Party to do just that. To make a difference. To give people in communities we represent a voice, and to fight so they could plan a future that meant they could thrive instead of just survive.
For seventeen years in the State Parliament I did that to the very best of my ability.
Thank you to the good and decent people of the Central Wheatbelt who supported me to represent them for three terms, after four years of representing communities from Northampton to Esperance in the Legislative Council.
Taking a seat at the biggest decision-making table in our State will remain one of the greatest privileges and highlights of my time in politics. Sitting alongside this are the moments in my constituency that never made it to the paper but improved the lives of people who work hard, do the right thing and quietly go about life.
Two years ago I started contemplating life after politics and announced I would not be contesting the 2025 State election. It was time for a change and a new challenge.
Less than year ago the new Federal electorate of Bullwinkel was created.
The new seat, plus the policy positions emerging from an east-coast centric Federal Labor Government that were undermining and destroying businesses, industry and communities I'd spent twenty years representing, caused me to examine my own conscience.
This wasn't the election to sit on the sidelines.
In my family, we have a saying — it's actually written on my Dad's gravestone — if you think you can make a difference, you should.
That means stepping into the arena ready to have a fight whether you think you'll win, draw or lose.
On this occasion we lost. But that does not equate to a lack of effort or conviction, and I thank those people who joined our campaign as we sought to garner support from communities and voters that had never voted Nationals before.
Some have been members and volunteers, supporters and friends for many years. Others have found their way to our Party for the very first time.
We ran a campaign with energy, integrity and a positive message for the electorate and I sincerely thank everyone that joined us for the journey.
The end of this campaign draws a line under a chapter of my life that has been dominated by politics. It has been exhilarating and demanding, but above all, rewarding.
I hope there is something out there that will give me the same satisfaction I have gained from serving the Central Wheatbelt and State in Parliament for seventeen years.
I look forward to that challenge.
Thank you!
Mia Davies was a candidate for the Federal seat of Bullwinkel and the former state Opposition leader
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
4 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Ditch unrealised gains tax, index threshold for Coalition to consider bipartisan support on super tax, shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien and James Paterson declare
Two leading Coalition ministers have called on Labor to scrap taxing unrealised gains and index the threshold in its controversial superannuation proposal if the opposition is to consider bipartisan support for the plan. The Albanese government's proposal to double the tax rate to 30 per cent on funds in super accounts above $3 million has drawn backlash over plans to hit unrealised gains and maintain the threshold over time despite inflation pushing more Aussies into the higher bracket. It has sparked fears for small business owners, farmers who hold properties in their self-managed super funds, and startup investors, who use SMSF's as an investment vehicle. The groups are are particularly concerned about paying tax on paper gains they have not realised. Newly appointed shadow finance minister James Paterson said the two controversial components of the bill were core reasons why the Coalition continues to oppose it. 'We're going to fight this every step in the way because we think it's wrong in principle,' Mr Paterson said on Sky News' AM Agenda. 'Unless the government was willing to walk away from the two key principles in this bill, which is taxing unrealised gains and failing to index the threshold, then there's no conceivable world in which we could support it. 'We're very proud to oppose it because we think it is bad tax law.' It follows shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien telling The Australian the opposition is willing to engage with Labor on the proposed super changes if the government ditches the two controversial elements. 'We will be constructive, but (Treasurer) Jim Chalmers has to be prepared to change his direction on this,' Mr O'Brien said. 'What is being put forward really does breach a red line in taxing unrealised capital gains. 'But if Jim Chalmers is prepared to be humble for a moment and realise he's made a mistake and wishes to engage with me, my door is open.' The Coalition's call for negotiation on the super tax comes as Labor needs only the Greens' support in the senate to legislate the change. The Greens expressed support for taxing unrealised gains but urged Labor to lower the threshold to $2m but index this with inflation. Labor's plan will hit more people than the Greens' counterproposal over the long term, according to the Australian Financial Review. The Greens' lowered threshold would immediately capture an extra 16,000 taxpayers in the first year but would hit less Aussies after about 16 years. Mr Chalmers has claimed the tax would initially only hit 80,000 Australians, however, Assistant Treasurer Danile Mulino conceded about 1.2 million, or 10 per cent of taxpayers, will face the tax within 30 years. Leading fund manager and Wilson Asset Management founder Geoff Wilson supports the Greens' call, but wants the threshold indexed well above the rate of inflation. 'With the Greens indexing it to the CPI (consumer price index), the risk there is young people are going to be significantly disadvantaged again because superannuation (is something) you effectively invest in assets,' Mr Wilson told in May. 'What it would make sense for them to be looking at is growth in asset prices, which runs at probably double, if not more, than the CPI growth. 'If you want young people not to be disadvantaged, that's what you need to do.' Modelling by AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina shows a 22-year-old on an average income would breach the $3m threshold by the time they turn 62. She took to LinkedIn last month with a diagram showing how an Aussie earning a three per cent annual wage growth and receiving the 12 per cent super guarantee would breach the threshold. Ms Mousina also told Sky News her diagram may have even underestimated how quickly the 22-year-old's super account would hit $3m. 'Average super returns have been about nine per cent in Australia in the last 30 to 40 years and I'm using assumptions closer to six per cent,' she said. On plans to hit unrealised gains, Mr Wilson said this would impact the 'lifeblood of Australia' as people would restructure their investments away from risk. He also warned it could 'destroy innovation' and entrepreneurialism as a large amount of investment into technology start-ups comes from self-managed super funds.
7NEWS
4 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Tributes for Australian veteran lost in Ukraine landmine blast
Family and friends will gather this week to honour a 28-year-old Australian veteran killed clearing landmines in Ukraine. Nick Parsons was working with UK-based humanitarian group Prevail Together when he suffered fatal injuries near the city of Izyum in eastern Ukraine last month. The blast also claimed the life of British co-founder Chris Garrett and left a third person critically injured. Known affectionately as 'Nic' among friends, Parsons was remembered by close mate Lachie Romer as someone who brought light and laughter wherever he went. 'Nic was ... always up for a laugh, always there when you needed him, and someone who made life better just by being in it,' Romer wrote in a fundraiser to support Parsons' family and help cover funeral expenses. The campaign has seen an outpouring of support nationwide, raising over $20,000 in its first 15 hours. 'Let's come together and do this for Nic — for the good times, the laughs, and the memories we'll never forget,' Romer said. 'Rest easy, legend. 'We'll miss you forever.' A funeral service will be held on Thursday, June 5, at Morleys Funeral Home in Townsville, Queensland,followed by a memorial gathering at the Townsville RSL, where loved ones will share stories and celebrate Nicholas' life. Following the tragedy, Ukraine's ambassador to Australia, Vasyl Myroshnychenko, praised Parsons' courage and selflessness. 'Demining is one of those areas where your life is 50/50 — you can live or you can die. 'We are very thankful to him and for his courageous work in Ukraine.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese also offered his condolences, confirming Parsons had been engaged in humanitarian work and not in combat. 'The situation is extremely dangerous and we continue to strongly advise all Australians not to travel to Ukraine under any circumstances,' Albanese said. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is currently providing consular support to Parsons' family, while Prevail Together works alongside Ukrainian authorities to investigate the incident. Meanwhile, in a significant military development, a on Sunday. The operation, personally overseen by President Volodymyr Zelensky, reportedly took more than 18 months to plan. The attack came just one day ahead of new direct talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul, as Russian forces continued to bombard Ukrainian cities with missiles and drones.
The Advertiser
4 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Out, damned spot! Take meddling Tony with you
This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to "Stubborn stains on your shirtfront? Gravy on your favourite blue tie? Spots that shouldn't be there on your leopard print? You want to look fresh and new but everything comes out of the wash the same old grey? "Try Polliegone, our new wonder product. Its active ingredients, Reality and Self-Awareness, work to clean up and brighten the dirtiest laundry. It removes the grime you never thought you'd shift. Add a cup and a half to your next load and we promise you won't believe the difference!" If only it were that simple. As the Liberal Party learns once again, some stains persist no matter what you throw at them. Tony Abbott is one of them, along with his sidekick Peta Credlin. No amount of scrubbing seems to get rid of them. Not being turfed out of the prime ministership by his own party after only two years in the top job. Not losing his own seat. And for both of them, not a decade of being largely ignored as a pair of fringe right-wing commentators. Since the May 3 election loss, Abbott and Credlin have been back in the trenches, waging war. Not against Labor, as you'd expect, but against their own party and its new leader Sussan Ley and the moderate faction that prevailed in narrowly electing her to the top job. Abbott is demanding Ley proceed with her predecessor Peter Dutton's federal takeover of the NSW division of the party, prompted by the latter's egregious failure to nominate candidates for last year's local government elections. The takeover has always been opposed by the moderate faction, seen as a naked power grab by their rivals on the right. The last thing Ley needs as she firms up her leadership is Abbott shouting from the sidelines about a factional brawl irrelevant to most Australians. And the last thing the Liberal Party on the whole needs is a failed former leader exerting influence over its inner workings. There's nothing new about former PMs making unwanted intrusions into their parties' affairs. Howard and Keating you can understand; love or loathe them, they made names for themselves in office and earned their place as historical artefacts. But Abbott? As PM, he was such a disaster, even his own faction helped turf him out. There was his calamitous first budget, which broke a slew of election promises. His captain's calls, including reinstating knighthoods and bestowing one on Prince Philip. His climate denial. He wasn't helped by his gaffes, from eating unpeeled onions to winking while talking to a sex worker on radio or the 30 opinion polls which showed he and his government were on the nose. In two short years, he'd turned a landslide into a mudslide. It's been downhill for the Coalition ever since. So his lingering sway over the party is inexplicable. And his meddling - including his role in the defection from the Nationals of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - will do nothing but destabilise the Liberals, already at rock bottom. Ley would do well to learn some lessons from Labor, which fends off deftly Keating's occasional explosive barbs. It still shows great fondness to its former PM but his influence over how the party functions is negligible. If the Liberal leader can demonstrate she's immune to Abbott's sidelines hectoring, she can only go up in the public's estimation. Right faction Liberals would also benefit from distancing themselves from Abbott. They don't need his intrusion when they have much more contemporary talent in their ranks, Andrew Hastie and James Paterson included. You know, people with some understanding of the 21st century. As for Abbott, a full cycle of Polliegone might help him realise that winning factions is less important than winning government. And that continuing to exert influence over the Liberal Party will do nothing for its credibility or his own. Reality and self-awareness can cure tone deafness. HAVE YOUR SAY: Should Tony Abbott stop meddling in Liberal Party affairs? Is his lingering influence over the party surprising given his failure as a PM? Do you have more respect for former prime ministers who ride off into the sunset, keeping their opinions to themselves, than those who keep themselves in the public eye? Email us: echidna@ SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: - Spooked consumers slashed retail spending after Donald Trump's tariffs sent a shudder through markets. Turnover fell 0.1 per cent in April after rising 0.3 per cent the month prior, the Australian Bureau of Statistics reported. - The chemical conglomerate behind Post-it notes and Scotch-Brite has been handed a yellow card over "significant contamination" from historic toxic chemicals found in a Blue Mountains quarry it leased. - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is being urged by the opposition to visit Israel as Australia strengthens its language against the Middle Eastern nation for blocking aid into Gaza. THEY SAID IT: "Justice means minding one's own business and not meddling with other men's concerns." - Plato YOU SAID IT: Billionaires' money would be better spent fixing problems on Earth, wrote Garry, rather than indulging fantasies about colonising Mars. "Thank you, Garry, for giving voice to my internal dialogue," writes Margaret. "Humans evolved on Earth, with Earth, along with the other life forms. Why in the heck would we want to be transplanted into an alien environment with no animals, no vegetation, no breathable air, where existence is a perpetual struggle? We have to cling onto the last chances we have here and try to salvage what we can or else we go under as a species and take a bunch of other species with us. Making and/or possessing large amounts of money and the power that comes along with it, seems to come at a price - debit on the common sense, rationality and humanity side of the ledger. "We can learn an enormous amount from exploring space, but we don't need to live in impossible conditions to do it," writes Sue. "I would have put Musk's fantasy in the mid-life crisis category but I think I prefer your Peter Pan syndrome diagnosis. What is it with billionaires? With all that money, why can't they do constructive things like create jobs, fund health and wellbeing programs in areas of need - that would probably give them tax breaks as well - lead the way by developing renewable energy technology, buying land and creating programs to revitalise the populations of endangered species? Those would give them the fame they seem to need and do everyone some good as well." Chris writes: "I reckon that it's a great idea about Musk, Bezos and the whole gang heading off to Mars. The sooner the better. It would be even better if they also took along Donald Trump and his entire wrecking gang plus all the members of the US Congress and Senate as well. That way, we could clean out the whole shebang and start again. What about including Benjamin Netanyahu as well? Also, shove in Putin and maybe Xi Jinping, the North Korean El Supremo and their government leadership and all the Hamas gang. It'll have to be a pretty big rocket to take all these jokers but, boy, wouldn't it be worth it to see them all blast off and never come back?" "Garry, you leave little for me to say; you have covered the subject well," writes Maggie. "So I'll just add that moving a few (dozen? hundred?) people to Mars does nothing for the billions left behind. I hope that Musk gets to Mars soon. And stays there." Anita writes: "A wonderful argument against Mars' colonisation, Garry. Because we've been wrong before in underestimating the potential of exploration, most assume we're wrong again. They think Mars is another 'New World' like the Americas or Australasia. This is not so. Human beings are adaptable omnivores, but we still have a limited number of options regarding habitat. It has to be 'Earth-like', so they think terraforming will solve it, but it won't. The radiation could kill us en route! We have to spend the funds available on viable projects to remediate our environment. Aiming for human settlement of Mars is pie-in-the-sky, wishful folly." "It is everyone's responsibility to get one's priorities right," writes Arthur. "Wisdom is required to get priorities right. Unfortunately being wealthy does not equate to being wise. Musk, Bezos and Trump demonstrate that to be true. The poorest people have to decide between eating or spending their sparse resources on luxuries. They make a wise choice to eat. The wisdom of their choice is immediately obvious. The wealthy can decide to buy half a dozen motorcars which are of no use to them but the stupidity of their decision is not obvious, nor is the morality or lack of it clear. Some billionaires, the wiser ones, spend large sums on charity but they are in a minority." This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to "Stubborn stains on your shirtfront? Gravy on your favourite blue tie? Spots that shouldn't be there on your leopard print? You want to look fresh and new but everything comes out of the wash the same old grey? "Try Polliegone, our new wonder product. Its active ingredients, Reality and Self-Awareness, work to clean up and brighten the dirtiest laundry. It removes the grime you never thought you'd shift. Add a cup and a half to your next load and we promise you won't believe the difference!" If only it were that simple. As the Liberal Party learns once again, some stains persist no matter what you throw at them. Tony Abbott is one of them, along with his sidekick Peta Credlin. No amount of scrubbing seems to get rid of them. Not being turfed out of the prime ministership by his own party after only two years in the top job. Not losing his own seat. And for both of them, not a decade of being largely ignored as a pair of fringe right-wing commentators. Since the May 3 election loss, Abbott and Credlin have been back in the trenches, waging war. Not against Labor, as you'd expect, but against their own party and its new leader Sussan Ley and the moderate faction that prevailed in narrowly electing her to the top job. Abbott is demanding Ley proceed with her predecessor Peter Dutton's federal takeover of the NSW division of the party, prompted by the latter's egregious failure to nominate candidates for last year's local government elections. The takeover has always been opposed by the moderate faction, seen as a naked power grab by their rivals on the right. The last thing Ley needs as she firms up her leadership is Abbott shouting from the sidelines about a factional brawl irrelevant to most Australians. And the last thing the Liberal Party on the whole needs is a failed former leader exerting influence over its inner workings. There's nothing new about former PMs making unwanted intrusions into their parties' affairs. Howard and Keating you can understand; love or loathe them, they made names for themselves in office and earned their place as historical artefacts. But Abbott? As PM, he was such a disaster, even his own faction helped turf him out. There was his calamitous first budget, which broke a slew of election promises. His captain's calls, including reinstating knighthoods and bestowing one on Prince Philip. His climate denial. He wasn't helped by his gaffes, from eating unpeeled onions to winking while talking to a sex worker on radio or the 30 opinion polls which showed he and his government were on the nose. In two short years, he'd turned a landslide into a mudslide. It's been downhill for the Coalition ever since. So his lingering sway over the party is inexplicable. And his meddling - including his role in the defection from the Nationals of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - will do nothing but destabilise the Liberals, already at rock bottom. Ley would do well to learn some lessons from Labor, which fends off deftly Keating's occasional explosive barbs. It still shows great fondness to its former PM but his influence over how the party functions is negligible. If the Liberal leader can demonstrate she's immune to Abbott's sidelines hectoring, she can only go up in the public's estimation. Right faction Liberals would also benefit from distancing themselves from Abbott. They don't need his intrusion when they have much more contemporary talent in their ranks, Andrew Hastie and James Paterson included. You know, people with some understanding of the 21st century. As for Abbott, a full cycle of Polliegone might help him realise that winning factions is less important than winning government. And that continuing to exert influence over the Liberal Party will do nothing for its credibility or his own. Reality and self-awareness can cure tone deafness. HAVE YOUR SAY: Should Tony Abbott stop meddling in Liberal Party affairs? Is his lingering influence over the party surprising given his failure as a PM? Do you have more respect for former prime ministers who ride off into the sunset, keeping their opinions to themselves, than those who keep themselves in the public eye? Email us: echidna@ SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: - Spooked consumers slashed retail spending after Donald Trump's tariffs sent a shudder through markets. Turnover fell 0.1 per cent in April after rising 0.3 per cent the month prior, the Australian Bureau of Statistics reported. - The chemical conglomerate behind Post-it notes and Scotch-Brite has been handed a yellow card over "significant contamination" from historic toxic chemicals found in a Blue Mountains quarry it leased. - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is being urged by the opposition to visit Israel as Australia strengthens its language against the Middle Eastern nation for blocking aid into Gaza. THEY SAID IT: "Justice means minding one's own business and not meddling with other men's concerns." - Plato YOU SAID IT: Billionaires' money would be better spent fixing problems on Earth, wrote Garry, rather than indulging fantasies about colonising Mars. "Thank you, Garry, for giving voice to my internal dialogue," writes Margaret. "Humans evolved on Earth, with Earth, along with the other life forms. Why in the heck would we want to be transplanted into an alien environment with no animals, no vegetation, no breathable air, where existence is a perpetual struggle? We have to cling onto the last chances we have here and try to salvage what we can or else we go under as a species and take a bunch of other species with us. Making and/or possessing large amounts of money and the power that comes along with it, seems to come at a price - debit on the common sense, rationality and humanity side of the ledger. "We can learn an enormous amount from exploring space, but we don't need to live in impossible conditions to do it," writes Sue. "I would have put Musk's fantasy in the mid-life crisis category but I think I prefer your Peter Pan syndrome diagnosis. What is it with billionaires? With all that money, why can't they do constructive things like create jobs, fund health and wellbeing programs in areas of need - that would probably give them tax breaks as well - lead the way by developing renewable energy technology, buying land and creating programs to revitalise the populations of endangered species? Those would give them the fame they seem to need and do everyone some good as well." Chris writes: "I reckon that it's a great idea about Musk, Bezos and the whole gang heading off to Mars. The sooner the better. It would be even better if they also took along Donald Trump and his entire wrecking gang plus all the members of the US Congress and Senate as well. That way, we could clean out the whole shebang and start again. What about including Benjamin Netanyahu as well? Also, shove in Putin and maybe Xi Jinping, the North Korean El Supremo and their government leadership and all the Hamas gang. It'll have to be a pretty big rocket to take all these jokers but, boy, wouldn't it be worth it to see them all blast off and never come back?" "Garry, you leave little for me to say; you have covered the subject well," writes Maggie. "So I'll just add that moving a few (dozen? hundred?) people to Mars does nothing for the billions left behind. I hope that Musk gets to Mars soon. And stays there." Anita writes: "A wonderful argument against Mars' colonisation, Garry. Because we've been wrong before in underestimating the potential of exploration, most assume we're wrong again. They think Mars is another 'New World' like the Americas or Australasia. This is not so. Human beings are adaptable omnivores, but we still have a limited number of options regarding habitat. It has to be 'Earth-like', so they think terraforming will solve it, but it won't. The radiation could kill us en route! We have to spend the funds available on viable projects to remediate our environment. Aiming for human settlement of Mars is pie-in-the-sky, wishful folly." "It is everyone's responsibility to get one's priorities right," writes Arthur. "Wisdom is required to get priorities right. Unfortunately being wealthy does not equate to being wise. Musk, Bezos and Trump demonstrate that to be true. The poorest people have to decide between eating or spending their sparse resources on luxuries. They make a wise choice to eat. The wisdom of their choice is immediately obvious. The wealthy can decide to buy half a dozen motorcars which are of no use to them but the stupidity of their decision is not obvious, nor is the morality or lack of it clear. Some billionaires, the wiser ones, spend large sums on charity but they are in a minority." This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to "Stubborn stains on your shirtfront? Gravy on your favourite blue tie? Spots that shouldn't be there on your leopard print? You want to look fresh and new but everything comes out of the wash the same old grey? "Try Polliegone, our new wonder product. Its active ingredients, Reality and Self-Awareness, work to clean up and brighten the dirtiest laundry. It removes the grime you never thought you'd shift. Add a cup and a half to your next load and we promise you won't believe the difference!" If only it were that simple. As the Liberal Party learns once again, some stains persist no matter what you throw at them. Tony Abbott is one of them, along with his sidekick Peta Credlin. No amount of scrubbing seems to get rid of them. Not being turfed out of the prime ministership by his own party after only two years in the top job. Not losing his own seat. And for both of them, not a decade of being largely ignored as a pair of fringe right-wing commentators. Since the May 3 election loss, Abbott and Credlin have been back in the trenches, waging war. Not against Labor, as you'd expect, but against their own party and its new leader Sussan Ley and the moderate faction that prevailed in narrowly electing her to the top job. Abbott is demanding Ley proceed with her predecessor Peter Dutton's federal takeover of the NSW division of the party, prompted by the latter's egregious failure to nominate candidates for last year's local government elections. The takeover has always been opposed by the moderate faction, seen as a naked power grab by their rivals on the right. The last thing Ley needs as she firms up her leadership is Abbott shouting from the sidelines about a factional brawl irrelevant to most Australians. And the last thing the Liberal Party on the whole needs is a failed former leader exerting influence over its inner workings. There's nothing new about former PMs making unwanted intrusions into their parties' affairs. Howard and Keating you can understand; love or loathe them, they made names for themselves in office and earned their place as historical artefacts. But Abbott? As PM, he was such a disaster, even his own faction helped turf him out. There was his calamitous first budget, which broke a slew of election promises. His captain's calls, including reinstating knighthoods and bestowing one on Prince Philip. His climate denial. He wasn't helped by his gaffes, from eating unpeeled onions to winking while talking to a sex worker on radio or the 30 opinion polls which showed he and his government were on the nose. In two short years, he'd turned a landslide into a mudslide. It's been downhill for the Coalition ever since. So his lingering sway over the party is inexplicable. And his meddling - including his role in the defection from the Nationals of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - will do nothing but destabilise the Liberals, already at rock bottom. Ley would do well to learn some lessons from Labor, which fends off deftly Keating's occasional explosive barbs. It still shows great fondness to its former PM but his influence over how the party functions is negligible. If the Liberal leader can demonstrate she's immune to Abbott's sidelines hectoring, she can only go up in the public's estimation. Right faction Liberals would also benefit from distancing themselves from Abbott. They don't need his intrusion when they have much more contemporary talent in their ranks, Andrew Hastie and James Paterson included. You know, people with some understanding of the 21st century. As for Abbott, a full cycle of Polliegone might help him realise that winning factions is less important than winning government. And that continuing to exert influence over the Liberal Party will do nothing for its credibility or his own. Reality and self-awareness can cure tone deafness. HAVE YOUR SAY: Should Tony Abbott stop meddling in Liberal Party affairs? Is his lingering influence over the party surprising given his failure as a PM? Do you have more respect for former prime ministers who ride off into the sunset, keeping their opinions to themselves, than those who keep themselves in the public eye? Email us: echidna@ SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: - Spooked consumers slashed retail spending after Donald Trump's tariffs sent a shudder through markets. Turnover fell 0.1 per cent in April after rising 0.3 per cent the month prior, the Australian Bureau of Statistics reported. - The chemical conglomerate behind Post-it notes and Scotch-Brite has been handed a yellow card over "significant contamination" from historic toxic chemicals found in a Blue Mountains quarry it leased. - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is being urged by the opposition to visit Israel as Australia strengthens its language against the Middle Eastern nation for blocking aid into Gaza. THEY SAID IT: "Justice means minding one's own business and not meddling with other men's concerns." - Plato YOU SAID IT: Billionaires' money would be better spent fixing problems on Earth, wrote Garry, rather than indulging fantasies about colonising Mars. "Thank you, Garry, for giving voice to my internal dialogue," writes Margaret. "Humans evolved on Earth, with Earth, along with the other life forms. Why in the heck would we want to be transplanted into an alien environment with no animals, no vegetation, no breathable air, where existence is a perpetual struggle? We have to cling onto the last chances we have here and try to salvage what we can or else we go under as a species and take a bunch of other species with us. Making and/or possessing large amounts of money and the power that comes along with it, seems to come at a price - debit on the common sense, rationality and humanity side of the ledger. "We can learn an enormous amount from exploring space, but we don't need to live in impossible conditions to do it," writes Sue. "I would have put Musk's fantasy in the mid-life crisis category but I think I prefer your Peter Pan syndrome diagnosis. What is it with billionaires? With all that money, why can't they do constructive things like create jobs, fund health and wellbeing programs in areas of need - that would probably give them tax breaks as well - lead the way by developing renewable energy technology, buying land and creating programs to revitalise the populations of endangered species? Those would give them the fame they seem to need and do everyone some good as well." Chris writes: "I reckon that it's a great idea about Musk, Bezos and the whole gang heading off to Mars. The sooner the better. It would be even better if they also took along Donald Trump and his entire wrecking gang plus all the members of the US Congress and Senate as well. That way, we could clean out the whole shebang and start again. What about including Benjamin Netanyahu as well? Also, shove in Putin and maybe Xi Jinping, the North Korean El Supremo and their government leadership and all the Hamas gang. It'll have to be a pretty big rocket to take all these jokers but, boy, wouldn't it be worth it to see them all blast off and never come back?" "Garry, you leave little for me to say; you have covered the subject well," writes Maggie. "So I'll just add that moving a few (dozen? hundred?) people to Mars does nothing for the billions left behind. I hope that Musk gets to Mars soon. And stays there." Anita writes: "A wonderful argument against Mars' colonisation, Garry. Because we've been wrong before in underestimating the potential of exploration, most assume we're wrong again. They think Mars is another 'New World' like the Americas or Australasia. This is not so. Human beings are adaptable omnivores, but we still have a limited number of options regarding habitat. It has to be 'Earth-like', so they think terraforming will solve it, but it won't. The radiation could kill us en route! We have to spend the funds available on viable projects to remediate our environment. Aiming for human settlement of Mars is pie-in-the-sky, wishful folly." "It is everyone's responsibility to get one's priorities right," writes Arthur. "Wisdom is required to get priorities right. Unfortunately being wealthy does not equate to being wise. Musk, Bezos and Trump demonstrate that to be true. The poorest people have to decide between eating or spending their sparse resources on luxuries. They make a wise choice to eat. The wisdom of their choice is immediately obvious. The wealthy can decide to buy half a dozen motorcars which are of no use to them but the stupidity of their decision is not obvious, nor is the morality or lack of it clear. Some billionaires, the wiser ones, spend large sums on charity but they are in a minority." This is a sample of The Echidna newsletter sent out each weekday morning. To sign up for FREE, go to "Stubborn stains on your shirtfront? Gravy on your favourite blue tie? Spots that shouldn't be there on your leopard print? You want to look fresh and new but everything comes out of the wash the same old grey? "Try Polliegone, our new wonder product. Its active ingredients, Reality and Self-Awareness, work to clean up and brighten the dirtiest laundry. It removes the grime you never thought you'd shift. Add a cup and a half to your next load and we promise you won't believe the difference!" If only it were that simple. As the Liberal Party learns once again, some stains persist no matter what you throw at them. Tony Abbott is one of them, along with his sidekick Peta Credlin. No amount of scrubbing seems to get rid of them. Not being turfed out of the prime ministership by his own party after only two years in the top job. Not losing his own seat. And for both of them, not a decade of being largely ignored as a pair of fringe right-wing commentators. Since the May 3 election loss, Abbott and Credlin have been back in the trenches, waging war. Not against Labor, as you'd expect, but against their own party and its new leader Sussan Ley and the moderate faction that prevailed in narrowly electing her to the top job. Abbott is demanding Ley proceed with her predecessor Peter Dutton's federal takeover of the NSW division of the party, prompted by the latter's egregious failure to nominate candidates for last year's local government elections. The takeover has always been opposed by the moderate faction, seen as a naked power grab by their rivals on the right. The last thing Ley needs as she firms up her leadership is Abbott shouting from the sidelines about a factional brawl irrelevant to most Australians. And the last thing the Liberal Party on the whole needs is a failed former leader exerting influence over its inner workings. There's nothing new about former PMs making unwanted intrusions into their parties' affairs. Howard and Keating you can understand; love or loathe them, they made names for themselves in office and earned their place as historical artefacts. But Abbott? As PM, he was such a disaster, even his own faction helped turf him out. There was his calamitous first budget, which broke a slew of election promises. His captain's calls, including reinstating knighthoods and bestowing one on Prince Philip. His climate denial. He wasn't helped by his gaffes, from eating unpeeled onions to winking while talking to a sex worker on radio or the 30 opinion polls which showed he and his government were on the nose. In two short years, he'd turned a landslide into a mudslide. It's been downhill for the Coalition ever since. So his lingering sway over the party is inexplicable. And his meddling - including his role in the defection from the Nationals of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price - will do nothing but destabilise the Liberals, already at rock bottom. Ley would do well to learn some lessons from Labor, which fends off deftly Keating's occasional explosive barbs. It still shows great fondness to its former PM but his influence over how the party functions is negligible. If the Liberal leader can demonstrate she's immune to Abbott's sidelines hectoring, she can only go up in the public's estimation. Right faction Liberals would also benefit from distancing themselves from Abbott. They don't need his intrusion when they have much more contemporary talent in their ranks, Andrew Hastie and James Paterson included. You know, people with some understanding of the 21st century. As for Abbott, a full cycle of Polliegone might help him realise that winning factions is less important than winning government. And that continuing to exert influence over the Liberal Party will do nothing for its credibility or his own. Reality and self-awareness can cure tone deafness. HAVE YOUR SAY: Should Tony Abbott stop meddling in Liberal Party affairs? Is his lingering influence over the party surprising given his failure as a PM? Do you have more respect for former prime ministers who ride off into the sunset, keeping their opinions to themselves, than those who keep themselves in the public eye? Email us: echidna@ SHARE THE LOVE: If you enjoy The Echidna, forward it to a friend so they can sign up, too. IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: - Spooked consumers slashed retail spending after Donald Trump's tariffs sent a shudder through markets. Turnover fell 0.1 per cent in April after rising 0.3 per cent the month prior, the Australian Bureau of Statistics reported. - The chemical conglomerate behind Post-it notes and Scotch-Brite has been handed a yellow card over "significant contamination" from historic toxic chemicals found in a Blue Mountains quarry it leased. - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is being urged by the opposition to visit Israel as Australia strengthens its language against the Middle Eastern nation for blocking aid into Gaza. THEY SAID IT: "Justice means minding one's own business and not meddling with other men's concerns." - Plato YOU SAID IT: Billionaires' money would be better spent fixing problems on Earth, wrote Garry, rather than indulging fantasies about colonising Mars. "Thank you, Garry, for giving voice to my internal dialogue," writes Margaret. "Humans evolved on Earth, with Earth, along with the other life forms. Why in the heck would we want to be transplanted into an alien environment with no animals, no vegetation, no breathable air, where existence is a perpetual struggle? We have to cling onto the last chances we have here and try to salvage what we can or else we go under as a species and take a bunch of other species with us. Making and/or possessing large amounts of money and the power that comes along with it, seems to come at a price - debit on the common sense, rationality and humanity side of the ledger. "We can learn an enormous amount from exploring space, but we don't need to live in impossible conditions to do it," writes Sue. "I would have put Musk's fantasy in the mid-life crisis category but I think I prefer your Peter Pan syndrome diagnosis. What is it with billionaires? With all that money, why can't they do constructive things like create jobs, fund health and wellbeing programs in areas of need - that would probably give them tax breaks as well - lead the way by developing renewable energy technology, buying land and creating programs to revitalise the populations of endangered species? Those would give them the fame they seem to need and do everyone some good as well." Chris writes: "I reckon that it's a great idea about Musk, Bezos and the whole gang heading off to Mars. The sooner the better. It would be even better if they also took along Donald Trump and his entire wrecking gang plus all the members of the US Congress and Senate as well. That way, we could clean out the whole shebang and start again. What about including Benjamin Netanyahu as well? Also, shove in Putin and maybe Xi Jinping, the North Korean El Supremo and their government leadership and all the Hamas gang. It'll have to be a pretty big rocket to take all these jokers but, boy, wouldn't it be worth it to see them all blast off and never come back?" "Garry, you leave little for me to say; you have covered the subject well," writes Maggie. "So I'll just add that moving a few (dozen? hundred?) people to Mars does nothing for the billions left behind. I hope that Musk gets to Mars soon. And stays there." Anita writes: "A wonderful argument against Mars' colonisation, Garry. Because we've been wrong before in underestimating the potential of exploration, most assume we're wrong again. They think Mars is another 'New World' like the Americas or Australasia. This is not so. Human beings are adaptable omnivores, but we still have a limited number of options regarding habitat. It has to be 'Earth-like', so they think terraforming will solve it, but it won't. The radiation could kill us en route! We have to spend the funds available on viable projects to remediate our environment. Aiming for human settlement of Mars is pie-in-the-sky, wishful folly." "It is everyone's responsibility to get one's priorities right," writes Arthur. "Wisdom is required to get priorities right. Unfortunately being wealthy does not equate to being wise. Musk, Bezos and Trump demonstrate that to be true. The poorest people have to decide between eating or spending their sparse resources on luxuries. They make a wise choice to eat. The wisdom of their choice is immediately obvious. The wealthy can decide to buy half a dozen motorcars which are of no use to them but the stupidity of their decision is not obvious, nor is the morality or lack of it clear. Some billionaires, the wiser ones, spend large sums on charity but they are in a minority."
