Mia Davies: ‘It takes courage and conviction to step into the political arena'
It takes courage and conviction to step into public arena to test yourself, many do not.
To Matt Moran and Trish Cook, with the result still undecided in Bullwinkel, I wish you both the very best.
The first Member for Bullwinkel will have a special place in our nation's history, just like that courageous woman it is named for. I know we all understood the privilege it was to contest the election as a candidate and speak of Sister Vivian Bullwinkel as its namesake.
I have always been a firm believer that The Nationals brand of representation and advocacy, our approach to policy and politics, is something more Australians deserve.
The contest was always going to be a challenge for The Nationals, but that was not a reason to vacate the space.
We fight fiercely for our electorates, we bring commonsense to the debate, and have a track record of delivering for our constituencies – most of which are vast, diverse and challenging to service.
I thank David Littleproud and his Federal team for their support throughout the campaign.
Too often the value of our team and its contribution to a stable Government or Opposition is underestimated or diminished by those that would prefer to see us gone. I remind those that have been devising or reporting on our demise for decades that we are still here, fighting and making a difference.
I joined our Party to do just that. To make a difference. To give people in communities we represent a voice, and to fight so they could plan a future that meant they could thrive instead of just survive.
For seventeen years in the State Parliament I did that to the very best of my ability.
Thank you to the good and decent people of the Central Wheatbelt who supported me to represent them for three terms, after four years of representing communities from Northampton to Esperance in the Legislative Council.
Taking a seat at the biggest decision-making table in our State will remain one of the greatest privileges and highlights of my time in politics. Sitting alongside this are the moments in my constituency that never made it to the paper but improved the lives of people who work hard, do the right thing and quietly go about life.
Two years ago I started contemplating life after politics and announced I would not be contesting the 2025 State election. It was time for a change and a new challenge.
Less than year ago the new Federal electorate of Bullwinkel was created.
The new seat, plus the policy positions emerging from an east-coast centric Federal Labor Government that were undermining and destroying businesses, industry and communities I'd spent twenty years representing, caused me to examine my own conscience.
This wasn't the election to sit on the sidelines.
In my family, we have a saying — it's actually written on my Dad's gravestone — if you think you can make a difference, you should.
That means stepping into the arena ready to have a fight whether you think you'll win, draw or lose.
On this occasion we lost. But that does not equate to a lack of effort or conviction, and I thank those people who joined our campaign as we sought to garner support from communities and voters that had never voted Nationals before.
Some have been members and volunteers, supporters and friends for many years. Others have found their way to our Party for the very first time.
We ran a campaign with energy, integrity and a positive message for the electorate and I sincerely thank everyone that joined us for the journey.
The end of this campaign draws a line under a chapter of my life that has been dominated by politics. It has been exhilarating and demanding, but above all, rewarding.
I hope there is something out there that will give me the same satisfaction I have gained from serving the Central Wheatbelt and State in Parliament for seventeen years.
I look forward to that challenge.
Thank you!
Mia Davies was a candidate for the Federal seat of Bullwinkel and the former state Opposition leader
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
MP's big issue with Albo's Palestine pledge
Anthony Albanese should have consulted the opposition before pledging to recognise Palestinian statehood next month, a Liberal frontbencher says. The Prime Minister unleashed a firestorm when he declared his intention on Monday. He has been both accused of 'rewarding terrorists' and praised for joining the global push to realise the rights of Palestinians. Sussan Ley has criticised him for, in her view, bungling one of the biggest foreign policy challenges facing governments and vowed to reverse Palestinian recognition. In the same breath, she has also lashed him for being 'fixated' on events abroad. Though, with more than 100,000 marching across the Sydney Harbour Bridge in protest of the war in Gaza, it is a hot-button issue for Australians – especially the many with family ties in the region. Senior opposition MP Tim Wilson on Sunday said it would have been 'sensible' to reach out to the Coalition and form a bipartisan position that could go beyond the government of the day. Opposition frontbencher Tim Wilson says Labor should have consulted the Coalition on Palestinian recognition. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'We've taken a long-term bipartisan position around a two-state solution based on a series of preconditions that we would expect in that - like the lasting security and respect for the state of Israel, like making sure Israeli hostages are returned, like making sure there isn't going to be Hamas running any government,' Mr Wilson told the ABC. 'Up until last Monday, that was also the position of the government.' He said the Albanese government has 'thrown that into turmoil by making a commitment to recognise a Palestinian state but not being able to then say if those preconditions are going to be met'. 'There wasn't the engagement with the opposition up until this point,' Mr Wilson said. 'I would have thought that actually having an engagement with the opposition for a lasting policy position from the Australian government would be a sensible way forward. 'They've chosen not to take that path.' When announcing his Palestine pledge, Mr Albanese outlined four 'commitments' he secured from Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority (PA). The first two were Hamas having 'no role' in a future Palestinian state and the PA recognising 'Israel's right to exist in peace and security'. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged to recognise Palestinian statehood at the UN General Assembly. Martin Ollman / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia While Mr Albanese said Mr Abbas 'reaffirmed' his support for the second point, the PA administers the West Bank and has no presence in Gaza or over Hamas. The PA itself is often criticised for its corruption, ineffectiveness and lack of elections. The last presidential vote was in 2005. It also faces accusations of supporting terrorism by paying families of 'martyrs' – Palestinians wounded or killed in flare-ups with Israel. Mr Albanese said Mr Abbas also committed to scrapping the 'Martyrs Fund' as part of broader transparency reforms, demilitarising, and holding elections. Both independent experts and the opposition have said it is impossible for these commitments to be fulfilled before the UN General Assembly, where Mr Albanese and several other Western leaders have vowed to recognise Palestine.
Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Productivity to dominate agenda as symposium begins
One of the leading events on the economic calendar is set to consume federal parliament as the nation's top minds scry for a solution to Australia's slumped productivity. Treasurer Jim Chalmers will finally convene his economic reform roundtable on Tuesday after weeks of anticipation. Heavyweights in the field, like former treasury secretary Ken Henry, consumer watchdog chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb, Australian Council of Trade Unions secretary Sally McManus, Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black and others will gather in Canberra over three days to discuss ways to lift Australians' living standards. Productivity will be a primary focus but the forum will also discuss ways to build resilience and strengthen the budget. The federal government has been teasing the event for weeks as stakeholders submitted ideas to reinvigorate the economy. Everything from cuts to property investor tax breaks to AI to environmental law reform have been floated but Dr Chalmers has reined in expectations this will result in an immediate shake-up of the economy. "The best way to think about this reform roundtable is three days which will help inform the next three budgets," he told AAP. "It's not an opportunity to make decisions. It's an opportunity to inform the decisions of the cabinet." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says his government is "unashamedly open", though major changes in some areas like tax policy have already been ruled out. The gathering is expected to dwarf every other economic event in Australia but another on the other side of the globe will still likely make news. Dozens of central bankers, policymakers, academics and economists from around the world are also expected to gather in the US for the Federal Reserve's own roundtable. The three-day Jackson Hole Economic Symposium kicks off on Thursday as the curtains close on Australia's forum and its experts are expected to discuss productivity and labour markets. Across the ditch, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand is set to make an interest rate decision a week after Australia's central bank chose to cut by 25 basis points. Australia's corporate reporting season will also continue as companies with companies like Ampol. Woodside, Santos, Bega Cheese, Whitehaven Coal and Inghams all set to reveal their earnings throughout the week. Wall Street investors, meanwhile, appeared to have a mild case of the jitters on Friday with mixed data clouding the Fed's next monetary policy. The blue-chip Dow Jones ended higher but other indexes slipped. There were also hopes President Donald Trump's meeting with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin would not only pave the way for a resolution to the Ukraine conflict but determine the outlook for crude prices. The Dow rose 34.86 points, or 0.08 per cent to 44,946.12, the S&P 500 lost 18.74 points, or 0.29 per cent, to 6,449.80 and the Nasdaq Composite lost 87.69 points, or 0.40 per cent, to 21,622.98. Australian share futures took a 53-point, or 0.59 per cent, dip to 7,713. The S&P/ASX200 shrugged off a midday wobble to charge higher by 64.8 points, or 0.73 per cent, to a best-ever close of 8,938.6, a 1.4 per cent gain for the week. The broader all Ordinaries surged 63 points higher, up 0.69 per cent, to 9,212.1, the best close for Australia's top 500 stocks, now with a combined value of more than $2.9 trillion.
7NEWS
9 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Electric vehicle tax: Road user charge to offset fuel excise losses could be coming soon
Rarely do Australians collectively put up their hands to volunteer for a new tax. But it appears to be happening in the automotive industry, with disparate groups calling for the introduction of a road-user charge for electric vehicles to support the nation's future transport needs. It is a proposal likely to be debated this week at the federal government's productivity roundtable after Treasurer Jim Chalmers signalled his support for future changes. But while infrastructure and transport groups agree on a road-user charge as a concept, they disagree on when it should be introduced, who should pay and whether petrol and diesel vehicle drivers should be charged more. While some argue the fee should only apply to electric vehicles not subject to fuel excise, others say a road-user charge would be more effective if applied to every vehicle. The debate over transport taxes follows record EV sales. Australians purchased more than 29,000 of them in the three months to June, according to the Australian Automobile Association, representing nine per cent of all car sales. It also comes amid falling fuel excise collection, which raised $15.71 billion in the 2024 financial year but could fall to zero by 2050 as electric vehicles replace fuel-powered cars, the Parliamentary Budget Office warns. Urgent changes are needed to address Australia's dwindling tax revenue for roads, Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief executive Adrian Dwyer says. Groups attending a roundtable on the issue last Monday widely agreed the current system for charging motorists was 'unfair, unsustainable and inefficient,' he said. 'A distance-based charge on light EVs is the logical starting point. 'Heavy EVs can be included but starting there alone won't address the issues structural to this debate, namely the core issue of fairness as more light EVs join the fleet.' But making electric vehicle drivers pay for all lost tax revenue would also be unjust, according to Polestar Australia managing director Scott Maynard. Fuel excise collection has been dropping for many reasons, he says, including more efficient internal combustion engines. 'Petrol cars ... have come down and down in their usage of fuel; their economy has improved and it would be unfair to try and recoup all of the targeted fuel excise revenue strictly from electric vehicle drivers,' Maynard said. 'To simply, in a really ham-fisted way, nail an addition cost to electric vehicles only at a transitional point where we're trying to get people to consider them as a true alternative to traditionally powered vehicles that pollute our air, is not the way to do it.' Adding an ongoing charge to electric cars at early stage in their adoption could make potential buyers reconsider or delay purchases, Maynard said. It is a concern shared by the Electric Vehicle Council, legal and policy head Aman Gaur says, which supports the introduction of a road-user charge but at a suitable time and if introduced for all vehicles. 'We support fair funding of our roads but I think there's been really important considerations that have been left out of what I would call a pretty shallow debate about fuel excise at the moment,' he says. 'We would only support a road-user charge if it's universal; universal and focused on emissions intensity.' Any road-user charge should apply to all light vehicles, Mr Gaur says, and should only be introduced to electric cars when their adoption hits 30 per cent. Several state governments have floated plans to introduce a road-user charge for electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles from 2027, including NSW, Tasmania, South Australia and Western Australia. However the legality of state-based charges is in question after the High Court found Victoria's Zero and Low Emission Vehicles charge unconstitutional in October 2023. The states' timeline for introducing a charge could be appropriate, Australian Electric Vehicle Association national president Chris Jones concedes, as the nation's electric fleet is likely to reach 30 per cent of new car sales by that date. A road-user charge should be based on a vehicle's mass and how many kilometres it travels each year, he says, and should apply to all vehicles regardless of their fuel source. 'The average person drives 12,000km a year so it would work out to cost about $380 to $400 a year.' The government should also leave existing fuel excise charges in place, as they would act as an incentive for motorists to purchase low-emission vehicles. 'It's directly proportionate to how much pollution you cause,' Dr Jones said. 'It's an effective pollution tax and we want to discourage people from buying vehicles that run on petrol.' While a road-user charge is likely to be discussed at the Economic Reform Roundtable from Tuesday, Chalmers said the government will 'take the time to get this right'. In the meantime, Gaur said he hoped the road tax reform debate could be tackled sensibly and suggestions EV drivers do not pay to use roads can be discredited as fees include registration, stamp duty, luxury car and fringe benefits taxes, and taxes on electricity. 'EV drivers do pay tax,' he said. 'That is a really pernicious and completely untrue part of this conversation.'
