Cash Me If You Can: South African MSMEs' Audacious Treasure Hunt
South African MSMEs are facing significant challenges in securing formal finance, despite their crucial role in the economy, says the author.
Image: AI LAB
Grab your flying drone with the eye of an eagle and a robust pair of Shosholoza gumboots, because South Africa's micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) are once again marching through the African financial jungle in search of the elusive Goose that lays legendary Kruger Rands.
Having wrapped up May with a modest 0.25% reduction in repo rates from our responsible uncle, the Reserve Bank, Governor Lesetja 'Data Dependent' Kganyago, we also acknowledge the release of the Finfind South African MSME Access to Finance Report 2025, where MSME data meets the risk profile drama and access to funding proves elusive.
According to the report, over 70% of MSMEs in South Africa earning revenue below R1 million per annum are still struggling to secure formal finance. Yes, you read that right; the MSME economic genocide (Mr Trump, please check this one out, too). Despite all the glossy brochures and heartwarming "We Support Township Economy" slogans, most entrepreneurs still see no light at the end of the business loan tunnel.
The report affirms that MSMEs aren't just part of the South African economy — they are its favourite black tax family member. They hustle hard, contribute over 40% to SA's GDP, and employ more than 60% of the nation (yes, including your white cousin with his last-mile delivery bakkie). Despite MSMEs carrying more than one-third of the GDP, the golden egg bowl is mysteriously missing from the funding game for startups and early-stage businesses.
The report confirms that the demand for business loans is sky-high, but the supply is dololo (non-existent). Even more concerning is that inclusive startup finance packages don't even make the top 10 list of offerings from most funders.
For many MSMEs, walking into a bank feels like auditioning for a Mr. Bones movie: you're instantly thrown into the jungle of awkward financial rituals. One of the biggest mood-killers for MSMEs trying to secure funding from banks and Development Fund Institutions (DFI) is the Table Mountain of 38 stacks of paperwork. If anyone thinks I'm being economical with the truth, please grab your binoculars and look at page 65 of the report.
Between the endless forms — certified this, stamped that — it's less about 'access to finance' and more about 'Amazing Race: Bureaucracy 3rd Edition' kind of stuff. The anti-gospel is that it has been an unblessed seven-year journey of zero regulation on MSME credit data sharing. That's right, creditors are still playing 'black mampatile' - hide-and-seek with MSME credit data.
Due to a lack of information, most MSME funders default to the good old 'let's just check the owner's personal credit score' method. If your business has no data trail, they judge you by how you pay your Woolies account. Fair? No comment.
Fintechs, on the other hand are encroaching on the MSME missing middle with sleek apps and quicker approvals, while banks and DFIs remain stuck in the slow lane of requesting audited statements that small businesses can only dream of. But hold on, before you get super excited!
While digital platforms are fast, they often have interest rates so high that they could make MSME owners faint right in front of the bean counter. This could even be a worse incident if you fall under the group of 60% MSMEs that lack collateral, and 85% of them operating without insurance. God forbid!
Sure, it's easy to blame the banks — and yes, sometimes they do behave like the blue light brigades of finance, allowing only the 'VIP businesses' through. But let's be honest: as MSMEs owners, we also need to take a long, hard look at ourselves. Running a business without credible financial records, with no receipts, and with a 'we'll sort it out later' attitude won't cut it. We should not be shocked when funders ghost us.
Access to finance begins with access to our own numbers. Despite the missing pieces, the report ends on a high note, not quite a drone crash, but a hopeful soft landing. It calls for dedicated startup funds that target the sectors where demand is hotter than a Durban summer. It proposes a future anchored in Public-private partnerships, with co-investment in bold ideas from early-stage businesses. And while we're dreaming big, the focus should be on 'blended finance with entrepreneurship development, combining loans with intensive training, mentoring, and support for young entrepreneurs.
Before we count the eggs before the chicks, the report recommends that most MSMEs need a crash course in Finance 101. That means improving financial literacy so MSMEs can manage their money better and implement payroll systems that don't forget to pay staff at the end of the month.
On top of that, the report also acknowledges that many small businesses need a funding makeover — a proper funding and credit readiness check to spot the gaps before the big ask. MSMEs should avoid rocking up to a bank without proper documents, like wannabe refugees showing up at a visa office with fake documents, while expecting to fly where others long to go (US dream, of course).
MSMEs should seek solid pre-funding support that helps them prep their funding applications, round up the 38-stack paperwork, and impress the Artificial Intelligence (AI) assessor before the robot in suits invites them to sit across the table.
Sons and daughters of Africa, pay attention to the wise words of this report to avoid a real-life episode of Cash Me If You Can. If you follow this advice, you will become a brave treasure hunter, able to navigate red tape traps, decode paperwork puzzles, and survive the jungle of financial rituals. Bon Voyage, audacious folks, and be careful, don't be caught in Macron's flight drama!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
10 minutes ago
- The South African
Trump vs Musk vs Gates: Battle of the billionaires has just begun
By now you've probably heard the cyber supersonic boom of the internet exploding after Elon Musk dropped a bombshell tweet about President Donald Trump. Musk alleged that the reason why the Epstein files have not been fully disclosed to the public yet is because POTUS Donald J. Trump is in them. Musk ended the tweet with, 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He then attached a second tweet which read: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' In response, Trump dropped a post on his Truth Social announcing that his administration is revoking funding and subsidies for Musk's companies, including Tesla and Space X. To which Musk responded by announcing on X that he would be decommissioning the latest SpaceX Dragon rocket programme – which is much needed by NASA to service and supply the International Space Station. Given these latest developments, one has to wonder whether the rumours and reports are indeed true – is Musk on hard chemical drugs? Part of the backlash in the media and on social media right now is around who started the spat, and who's going to 'win'. One Musk-supporting X user pointed out: 'Musk criticized Trump's Bill. Trump, however, criticised Musk. Elon Musk played the ball, some are arguing, while Donald Trump played the man.' Musk's first salvo against Trump's budget came when, on 3 June, he could no longer contain his disgust at Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and spilt his guts about it on X, when he tweeted: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' During a live press briefing in the Oval Office on 5 June, while hosting neo-Nazi, pro-Zionist, ex-Blackrock executive, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump addressed Musk's comments about the bill. 'We've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He campaigned for me.' Then Trump said, 'I think I would've won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump told reporters. Elon must've been watching that press briefing live because minutes later, he responded to Trump's statement by tweeting: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' 'Such ingratitude,' he then added. Trump went on to tell the press: 'I'm very disappointed, because, Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. He only developed a problem when he found we're going to cut the EV [electric vehicle] mandate…because that's billions and billions of dollars. We wanna have cars of all types.' Trump also said, 'When he left, he said the most beautiful things about me. He hasn't said anything bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next. But, I'm very disappointed in Elon, I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump also later posted on his Truth Social: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' That's when the break-up started to turn nastier than the War of the Roses. The jibes went back and forth until it culminated in that earth-shattering tweet of the century from Musk. But Trump is not the only one Musk has just thrown under the Epstein bus. He recently, and in the past, did the same to Bill Gates. On 7 October 2024, during an interview with Tucker Carlson, Musk said: 'You know, I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is going to become public. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome.' Carlson asked Musk: 'Do you think Reid Hoffman (billionaire founder of LinkedIn) is uncomfortable?' Musk answered: 'Yes.' After a brief pause, he added, 'And Gates.' Last month, on 20 May 2025, at the Qatar Economic Forum in Doha, Musk was interviewed before a live and online audience by Bloomberg's Mishal Husain. Husain started to ask Musk about comments made by Bill Gates regarding Elon's decision to cut funding to the USAID programme – when Musk interjected. 'He's a huge liar', Musk said. 'I know, you've said that already,' Husain replied. The comments they're referring to emerged when Bill Gates, in an interview with the Financial Times on 8 May, accused Elon Musk of 'killing children in the world's poorest countries' by cutting foreign aid under the Trump administration. Gates assailed Musk for the actions he took as head of President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'He could go on to be a great philanthropist,' Gates told the magazine. 'Meantime, he's involved in the deaths of the world's poorest children.' Sticking the blade in a little deeper, he added, 'The picture of the world's richest man killing the world's poorest children is not a pretty one.' Responding to Gates' comments in Qatar, Musk sprung an unexpected gobsmacker on Husain and the audience; 'Who does Bill Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children, given that he has frequented Jeffrey Epstein?', he said. 'Ok, Well…', Husain started to respond, but she was drowned out by applause and cheers from the audience.' When the ovation died down, Musk added, 'I wouldn't trust that guy to babysit my kids.' It's worth noting that, curiously, Jeffrey Epstein 'committed suicide' (by breaking his own neck twice with paper sheets, while the prison cameras were switched off and the guards were fast asleep) during Trump's first term. It's also worth noting that the last remaining, vocal survivor in the Epstein case, Virginia Giuffre – who accused Prince Andrew of raping her when she was 17, a woman who was close to seeing justice served for being sex-trafficked by Epstein to Andrew and other predatory paedophiles – allegedly committed suicide on 6 April this year…during Trump's second term. What's all the more mysterious about her death is the fact that…just a few years earlier, on 11 Dec 2019, she tweeted: 'I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. If something happens to me – for the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.' Here's where it gets dubiously curious. The person who recruited Virginia Giuffre to be Jeffrey Epstein's personal 'masseuse' was Epstein's partner in life and crime, Ghislaine Maxwell (currently serving time for child sex trafficking). Ghislaine is the daughter of (media mogul and alleged ex-Mossad agent) Robert Maxwell. Do you know where Ghislaine Maxwell met and recruited Virginia Giuffre? At a place called Mar-a-Lago. Ring any bells? That's right, Donald Trump's Florida mansion. Where 16-year-old Giuffre was working as a spa attendant at the time. It's been rumoured and reported that Epstein himself was also a Mossad agent, running a 'honey trap' operation for Israeli intelligence. So far, the rumours and accusations by the Democrats of Trump playing golden showers and glass-topped coffee tables with Russian hookers in a swanky Moscow Hotel have proven to be unfounded. But if there is compromising footage of POTUS Donald Trump on Epstein island molesting minors, and that footage is being held by Mossad, it would certainly explain a lot about why Trump has allowed barbaric Bedlam Bibi Netanyahu to steamroll over him…like that bulldozer did to Rachel Corrie. Of course, the whole world and their brother – including me – have dropped everything to weigh in on this Musk-Trump (and Gates) feud. On X and other platforms, people are digging up and dropping videos from the '90s of Donald Trump with Jeffrey Epstein (and Ghislaine Maxwell) surrounded by a bevy of beautiful nubile babes, partying their a**es off at Mar-a-Lago. Others have posted photos of Elon posing alongside Maxwell. Someone posted: 'Elon Musk didn't kill himself.' Another, recommended Musk multiply his security detail immediately. Piers Morgan posted: 'Holy sh*t!' And a string of 'shocked' emojis. Alex Jones posted: 'God Help Us ALL…' Russell Dobular from Due Dissidence said in the duo's commentary video: 'This actually reinforces the idea that Elon is whacked out on drugs, because…this is such a self-destructive move.' 'Going out on a limb here – the Tesla board is going to replace Elon as the CEO by the end of the year,' he added. Tesla shares have slumped by 14% on Wall Street since Thursday's clash of the titan tycoons. Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.


Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
Trump says 'extremely hard' to do deal with Xi as steel tariffs double
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said Wednesday it was "extremely hard" to reach a deal with Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, as he ramped up his global trade war by doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. The comments and higher levies came as OECD ministers gathered to discuss the outlook for the world economy in light of the US hardball approach to trade that has rattled world markets. Trump's sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries have strained ties with trading partners and sparked a flurry of negotiations to avoid the duties. The White House has suggested the president will speak to Xi this week, raising hopes they can soothe tensions and speed up a trade deal between the world's two biggest economies. However, in the early hours of Wednesday, Trump appeared to dampen hopes for a quick deal. "I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" he posted on his Truth Social platform. China was the main target of Trump's 2 April tariff blitz, hit with levies of 145% on its goods and triggering tit-for-tat tariffs of 125% on US goods. Both sides agreed to temporarily de-escalate in May, after the US president delayed most sweeping measures on other countries until 9 July. His latest remarks came hours after his tolls on aluminium and steel were doubled from 25% to 50%, raising temperatures with various partners. The Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a 38-nation grouping of mostly developed countries, cut its global growth forecast on the back of Trump's levies, as ministers of the group held a meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday. Trade, consumption and investment have been affected by the tariffs, OECD chief economist Alvaro Pereira earlier told AFP and warned that the US economy will suffer the most. APPEALS PROCESS While some of Trump's most sweeping levies face legal challenges, they have been allowed to remain in place for now as an appeals process takes place. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic are set to hold talks on the sidelines of the gathering, with the bloc seeking to stave off higher levies ahead of the July 9 deadline. With the latest US tolls on steel and aluminium kicking in, the European Union said it "strongly regrets" the decision to double the levies, cautioning that it "undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution" with the United States and warning it was ready to retaliate. French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin added: "We have to keep our cool and always show that the introduction of these tariffs is in no one's interest." Canada, the largest supplier of the metals to the United States, has called Trump's tariffs "illegal and unjustified". After talks between UK Trade Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and Greer on Tuesday, London said imports from the UK would remain at 25% for now. Both sides needed to work out duties and quotas in line with the terms of a recently signed trade pact. "We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs," a British government spokesperson said. The Group of Seven advanced economies - Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and the United States - is due to hold separate talks on trade Wednesday. "We need to come up with negotiated solutions as quickly as possible, because time is running out," German economy minister Katherina Reiche said Tuesday, on the sidelines of the OECD. Mexico will request an exemption from the higher tariff, Economy Minister Marcelo Ebrard said, arguing that it was unfair because the United States exports more steel to its southern neighbour than it imports. "It makes no sense to put a tariff on a product in which you have a surplus," Ebrard said. Mexico is highly vulnerable to Trump's trade wars because 80% of its exports go to the United States, its main partner. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Tuesday that the Trump administration sent letters to governments pushing for offers by Wednesday as the 9 July deadline approached.

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Markets wobble as Trump-Xi talks offset by Musk row
Donald Trump shakes hands with Elon Musk after the former gifted him with a "key to the White House" during a news conference on May 30. Image: Allison Robbert / AFP Markets stuttered on Friday as optimism from "very positive" talks between presidents Donald Trump and Xi Jinping was wiped out by the stunning public row between the US leader and Elon Musk. The much-anticipated discussions between the heads of the world's biggest economies fuelled hopes for an easing of tensions following Trump's "Liberation Day" global tariff blitz that targeted Beijing particularly hard. However, investors remained wary after an extraordinary social media row between Trump and billionaire former aide Musk that saw the two trade insults and threats and sent Wall Street into the red. Wall Street's three main indexes ended down as Musk's electric vehicle company Tesla tanked more than 14 percent and the president threatened his multibillion-dollar government contracts. Asian equities fluctuated in early business, with some observers suggesting traders were positioning for what could be a volatile start to next week in light of the row and upcoming US jobs data. Hong Kong dropped after three days of strong gains, while Sydney, Wellington, Taipei and Bangkok also retreated. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Mumbai led gainers after the Reserve Bank of India slashed interest rates more than expected. Tokyo and Singapore rose, while Shanghai was also marginally higher. London rose in the morning but Paris and Frankfurt fell. US futures were stronger. Chris Weston at Pepperstone said that while the call with Xi was "seen as a step in the right direction, (it) proved to offer nothing tangible for traders to work with and attention has quickly pushed back to the Trump-Musk war of words". "It's all about US nonfarm payrolls from here and is an obvious risk that Asia-based traders need to consider pre-positioning for," he said. Weston said there was a risk of Trump sparking market-moving headlines over the weekend given that he is "now fired up and the risk of him saying something through the weekend that moves markets on the Monday open is elevated". The US jobs figures, which are due later Friday, will be closely followed after a below-par reading on private hiring this week raised worries about the labour market and the outlook for the world's top economy. They come amid bets that the Federal Reserve is preparing to resume cutting interest rates from September, even as economists warn that Trump's tariffs could reignite inflation. Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management warned that while poor jobs figures could signal further weakness in the economy, a strong reading could deal a blow to the market. "In this upside-down market regime, strength can be weakness. A hotter-than-expected (figure) could force traders to price out Fed cuts. That's the paradox in play -- where good news on Main Street turns into bad news on Wall Street." AFP