Calls to change Victoria's 'outdated' burial laws to allow for owners to be laid to rest with their pets
The first time was after she laid Deejay — a pit-bull terrier she likens to a sixth child — to rest at a pet cemetery outside Bacchus Marsh.
She visited his grave several times a year, and even recommended the cemetery to friends mourning their own deceased pets.
Then, without warning, she lost him again. The land was sold to developers — and the cemetery, along with Deejay's remains, was destroyed.
"We went there and it had just been bulldozed. All the concrete slabs were gone. The small headstones and plaques had been thrown away. It's like they never existed," she said.
This statue marks the grave of a pet dog at a grave in Castlemaine. ( ABC News: Danielle Bonica )
Lyn says Deejay's plaque — which she estimates cost up to $1,000 — was never returned, and she has since ordered a replacement to place in the backyard, "just to have something to remember him by".
"We feel like we're going through all the emotions and all the stress of losing him again.
"It's like losing a limb."
It's left her grappling with how this could have happened — and why there isn't a safer option to lay her pets to rest.
Now, advocates are pushing for a change that they say could prevent others from facing the same fate.
An 'impossible' choice
"I broke the law again today. Here's a video of me breaking the law."
That was the text message Deb Tranter sent her local MP, alongside footage of a private ceremony she held for an 86-year-old man laying his dog Molly to rest in the grave beside his late wife.
Deb Tranter has been Chair of the Castlemaine Cemetery Trust since 2018. ( ABC News: Danielle Bonica )
Under Victorian law, burying an animal in a public cemetery — even in an urn — is illegal.
But Ms Tranter, who manages Castlemaine General Cemetery in central west Victoria, says she has "no problem" breaching the Act if it means burying people with their loved ones — human or otherwise.
"Society now recognises pets as family — but in death, the law states that the pets must stay outside of the cemetery gate. And I think that's really, really harsh and unfair," she said.
"So that, to me, is a really bad law, and bad laws need to be exposed and broken to show how ridiculous they are."
Animal Justice Party MP and member for Northern Victoria, Georgie Purcell, says Ms Tranter is among "hundreds" of cemetery managers quietly doing the same.
"They're doing this because they care so deeply about giving people their final wishes and honouring people after their lives end," Ms Purcell said.
"And they're faced with this impossible decision of breaking the law or not letting someone be buried with someone that they love.
"It's just not good enough."
This owner was buried with their pet over a decade ago. ( ABC News: Danielle Bonica )
This owner was buried with their pet over a decade ago. (ABC New: Danielle Bonica) This 'treasured little companion' called Tramp was buried with his owner. ( ABC News: Danielle Bonica )
A plaque marks the resting place of Tramp, a 'treasured little companion'. (ABC News: Danielle Bonica)
Cemetery volunteers could face hefty fines or even lose their positions if they're caught.
"Every single day, these people are going to work, they are operating under a risk that doesn't have to be there," Ms Purcell said.
Ms Tranter said she's "not worried in the slightest".
"We need to normalise burying pets in the family plot. They are family members.
"So we shouldn't have to keep it a secret."
Victoria dragging its feet
Deb Tranter is no stranger to fighting for the rights of animals.
She was the founder of Oscar's Law, a campaign to end puppy farming in Australia, and has worked alongside Georgie Purcell for many years.
The MP said she was horrified when Ms Tranter first brought the law to her attention, describing it as "heartless" and "outdated".
Within days, she raised it in parliament and asked the government to change it.
"They wrote back to me quite positively and said they'd consider it. But it's been almost a year now, and they've just been dragging their feet since that time."
Animal Justice Party MP Georgie Purcell says the government has been "dragging its feet" on cemetery reforms. ( ABC News: Matthew Holmes )
Earlier this year, fellow Animal Justice Party MP Emma Hurst succeeded in pushing for reforms to be legislated in New South Wales — the first of their kind in the country.
"They've shown that this is actually not that difficult. It's very clear that this very simple change is just not something that they care about," Ms Purcell said.
The Victorian Government told the ABC it was aware of community interest in the issue but said it was "not currently a legislative priority".
Ms Tranter called the response "really sad".
"It is such a tiny little amendment to the cemetery act, it could be done tomorrow, and it would mean the world to a huge range of people," she said.
"And it'd bring us into line with community expectations and needs."
Who gets a soul?
Lyn Robinson says she would "of course" pursue co-burial if it were an option.
The only legal way for owners to currently be laid to rest with their pets is to either be buried on private land with the owner's permission, or to be scattered with the ashes of a pet outside the gates of a cemetery.
Dr Hannah Gould, a death studies academic at The University of Melbourne, says the legislation has its roots in 19th-century Christian beliefs.
"In the history of our cemeteries, we see a lot of segregation between different groups … and a lot of the time animals have been excluded from that categorisation of who is important," she said.
Dr Hannah Gould is a lecturer at University of Melbourne and researcher with the DeathTech team. ( ABC News: Simon Tucci )
She says this stems from the traditional belief that animals don't have a soul.
"So there's a lot of religious traditions that only those who have souls … are the ones who have the last rites and are buried properly in a cemetery."
Dr Gould says this belief is not universal across other religions. In Buddhism, she said, humans and animals have a "much more equal footing".
Hundreds of pets are believed to have been buried at the pet cemetery in Rowville before it was sold off and destroyed. ( Supplied: Ashton Grave )
She says the exclusionary law is becoming increasingly out of step with the way Australians view their pets.
"We're seeing a really marked shift, particularly between Gen Z and older generations, in who they consider family. More and more, this includes animals — and with that shift comes the expectation they'll be treated the same way in death."
Recent findings from the Australian Institute of Family Studies backs this up, with over half of participants regarding pets as family rather than as property.
The study also found this bond was more common with women and LGBTQIA+ people.
"What I think we're going to see is more and more people wanting to be buried in groups that don't just reflect their blood ties, but also their kind of found family," Dr Gould says.
"And that's something that our cemeteries are going to have to reflect in the future."
'More and more' pet cemeteries destroyed
The pet cemetery at Bacchus Marsh was just one of several which have met a similar demise in the past decade.
The Pets Memorial Gardens in Rowville had been housing the remains of dead pets and champion racehorses for 52 years before it was sold off and demolished.
Former site of Pets Memorial Gardens in Rowville, December 2018. / Plot of land which was formerly Pets Memorial Gardens in Rowville, February 2025.
Ashton Grave, 76, specialises in exhuming pets for owners across Victoria. He says he recovered the remains of about a dozen animals at the Rowville cemetery.
"Some of the owners I spoke to were quite upset about the fact their animals' remains had an unknown future," Mr Graves said.
Ashton Grave says he recovered at least a dozen animal remains from the Rowville pet cemetery.
"Clearly these places get sold for development … and that's the main reason people want me to exhume — they're worried about them being dug up during construction."
Mr Grave said the push to change Victoria's burial laws was an "absolute no-brainer".
"I can't see any problems whatsoever with including a cremated animal in a human grave," he said.
"It just seems very, very sensible".
Georgie Purcell said these cases are exactly what she warned the government of.
"That land can be sold off, ripped up, demolished at any time," she said.
"By allowing joint burials of humans and pets in government-run cemeteries, we know that there's this protection that they can always be there and they can always lie together."
She warns more resting places could be at risk if the government doesn't act soon.
"There's going to be more and more instances of this as that land becomes more valuable," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Senior lawyer apologises after filing AI-generated submissions in Victorian murder case
A senior lawyer has apologised to a Victorian judge for filing submissions in a murder case that included fake quotes and non-existent case judgements generated by artificial intelligence (AI). Defence lawyer Rishi Nathwani, who holds the title of King's Counsel, took "full responsibility" for filing incorrect information in submissions in the case of a teenager charged with murder, according to court documents seen by The Associated Press on Friday. "We are deeply sorry and embarrassed for what occurred," Mr Nathwani told Justice James Elliott on Wednesday, on behalf of the defence team. The AI-generated errors caused a 24-hour delay in resolving a case that Justice Elliott had hoped to conclude on Wednesday. He later ruled on Thursday that Mr Nathwani's client, who cannot be identified because he is a minor, was not guilty of murder because of mental impairment. "At the risk of understatement, the manner in which these events have unfolded is unsatisfactory," Justice Elliott told lawyers on Thursday. The fake submissions included fabricated quotes from a speech to the state legislature and non-existent case citations purportedly from the Supreme Court. The errors were discovered by the Justice's associates, who couldn't find the cases and requested that defence lawyers provide copies. The lawyers admitted the citations "do not exist" and that the submission contained "fictitious quotes", court documents say. The lawyers explained they checked that the initial citations were accurate and wrongly assumed the others would also be correct. The submissions were also sent to prosecutor Daniel Porceddu, who did not check their accuracy. The judge noted that the Supreme Court released guidelines last year for how lawyers use AI. "It is not acceptable for artificial intelligence to be used unless the product of that use is independently and thoroughly verified," Justice Elliott said. The court documents do not identify the generative AI system used by the lawyers. In a comparable case in the United States in 2023, a federal judge imposed $US5,000 ($7,600) fines on two lawyers and a law firm after ChatGPT was blamed for their submission of fictitious legal research in an aviation injury claim. British High Court Justice Victoria Sharp warned in June that providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the "most egregious cases", perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. AP

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Matt Wright trial: Pilot's alleged spray at boss over stormy weather egg collection request
A young pilot told the Outback Wrangler to 'get f--ked, get vaccinated and go fly his own helicopter' after his boss chewed him out for pulling out of an unsafe mission. Sebastian Robinson on Friday finished giving evidence after being grilled over four days in the trial of Aussie reality television star, Matt Wright. The Apple TV and Netflix star has pleaded not guilty to three counts of attempting to pervert the course of justice during the investigation into a chopper crash that killed his co-star Chris 'Willow' Wilson. It is not alleged Mr Wright is responsible for the crash. On Friday the Northern Territory jury heard about the 'Australia Day incident' where the 28-year-old pilot and Mr Wright had a fight a month before the fatal crash. Mr Robinson said on January 26, he, Mr Wilson and fellow pilot Michael Burbidge were contracted for a crocodile egg collecting mission at the mouth of the Daly River, in the NT. The jury was shown photos of the chopper with an oncoming Wet Season storm looming in the background. Mr Robinson said he radioed Mr Burbidge to say 'it was too dangerous to continue, because the storm was huge', and they mutually agreed to head back into town. He said they went back to the Noonamah Tavern to watch the traditional Australia Day 'ute run' and have a 'beer and a feed'. Mr Robinson said Mr Wright called him 'very hostile and abusive', telling the young pilot 'What the f--k are youse doing back? Egg collecting's not meant to be f—king easy'. 'You sit out there, you f--king ... you wait the weather out. You f--king deal with it,' Mr Wright allegedly said. The jury has previously heard Mr Wright was not able to take part in egg collecting missions in early 2022 because he was an 'anti-vaxxer'. 'I told him to get f--ked, get vaccinated and fly his own helicopter,' Mr Robinson said on Friday. In a group chat with Mr Burbidge and Mr Wilson, the young pilot alleged Mr Wright 'called us all bludgers' for pulling out of the dangerous conditions. The young pilot this contributed to his decision to leave Mr Wright's Helibrook, and he establishing his own company Arnhem Helicopters. Mr Wright sent Mr Robinson a message the next day saying he was 'sorry for blowing up'. The trial continues on Monday.

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Put the f***ing knife down': Shock moment man attacks cops in Melbourne home
Harrowing footage has captured the moment a man attacked two police officers in a Melbourne home, slashing one with a box knife before fleeing the scene in a stolen car, which he later set alight. Newly released footage shows Diesel Jackson, 25, fighting a male and female police officer, neither of whom were equipped with tasers, at a home in Frankston on March 22, 2024. The officers had arrived at the property at 6.30pm that evening, responding to reports of a man with a stolen white Jeep Grand Cherokee. Footage, released by a judge to 7News on Friday, shows Mr Jackson waving a knife in front of the male police officer. 'Put it down! Put it down!' the officer shouted, while pointing a gun at the man. 'Put the f***ing knife down!' At one point, the female officer is heard pleading with the male officer to let Mr Jackson go, after being 'trapped' alone in the room with him. 'No, no, let him go, let him get out … I'm trapped!' she said. During the altercation, Mr Jackson was sprayed with capsicum spray but it had little effect. 'Let him go, not worth it,' the female officer said as Mr Jackson made his way downstairs. Outside, the pair stood and watched as Jackson drove away, only to return moments later. He accelerated toward them as they stood on the pavement. 'Watch out, he's going to ram us!' the female officer shouted. 'Get out of the way!' What followed was a high-speed police pursuit captured by aerial footage over southeast Melbourne, with Jackson allegedly reaching speeds of up to 170km/h. The stolen Jeep was seen mounting kerbs and median strips, continuing on even after hitting police-deployed stop sticks. The chase came to an end when Jackson lost control and spun out on Cranbourne Road. He then set the vehicle alight before fleeing on foot. He was caught shortly afterwards. Both officers were taken to hospital following the incident, which has since renewed pressure on the Victorian Government to accelerate its plan to equip all frontline police with tasers. Wayne Gatt, chief executive of the Police Association Victoria, said tasers would 'definitely have helped in the situation.' Jackson, 25, was later charged with 28 offences, including assaulting an emergency worker on duty, intentionally causing injury, recklessly causing injury, and theft of a motor vehicle. He was convicted of eight offences and three summary offences and sentenced to six years in prison, with a non-parole period of four years. 'Our thoughts remain with the victims and their loved ones,' a Victorian Government spokesperson said in a statement provided to 'We thank all the men and women of Victoria Police who put their lives on the line every day to keep Victorians safe. 'We have delivered $214 million to give Victoria Police next-gen tasers and we continue to introduce a range of tough new laws that back the work of Victoria Police.'