Hegseth Calls Japan Indispensable in the Face of Chinese Aggression
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called Japan on Sunday an "indispensable partner" in deterring growing Chinese assertiveness in the region and announced upgrading the US military command in Japan to a new "war-fighting headquarters."
Hegseth, who is on his first Asia trip with Japan as his second stop, also stressed the need for both countries to do more to accelerate the strengthening of their military capability as the region faces China's assertive military actions and a possible Taiwan emergency.
"Japan is our indispensable partner in deterring Communist Chinese military aggression," Hegseth said at the beginning of his talks with Japan's Defense Minister Gen Nakatani in Tokyo. "The US is moving fast, as you know, to reestablish deterrence in this region and around the world."
His comments come as an assurance at a time when Japan has been worried about how US engagement in the region may change under President Donald Trump's "America First" policy, Japanese defense officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity, citing protocol. Trump has also threatened to impose trade tariffs on Japan, a key US ally, sparking more concern.
The two sides agreed to accelerate plans to jointly develop and produce missiles such as Advanced Medium-Range Air to Air Missiles, or MRAAM, and consider producing SM-6 surface-to-air missiles, to help ease a shortage of munitions, Nakatani said. The ministers also agreed to speed up the process involving the maintenance of US warships and warplanes in Japan to strengthen and complement Japanese and US defense industries.
Japan and the US decided in July to upgrade the command and control of the Japanese military as well as US forces in the East Asian country, under the Biden administration, a major structural change aimed at bolstering joint operational and response capabilities. Japan is home to more than 50,000 US troops.
Tokyo last week launched the Japan Joint Operations Command, or JJOC, whose mission is to coordinate Japanese Ground, Maritime and Air Self-Defense Forces, in a significant action to further strengthen capabilities to respond to contingencies and better cooperate with the US.
Hegseth announced Sunday the upgrading of its current command, US Forces Japan, by placing a unified operational commander to function as a joint force headquarters to liaise with its Japanese counterpart to serve as "war-fighting headquarters" to bolster speed and capability of their troops' joint operations.
The Pentagon chief said the reorganization of US troops is a step to better prepare for a possible conflict. America and Japan both work for peace, but "we must be prepared," he said.
The Japanese defense officials say they are not expecting a significant change in their responsibilities or an increase in US troops in Japan.
Hegseth and Nakatani told a joint news conference that they have also agreed on the need to beef up Japan's defense posture on the Southwestern islands, which are in critical locations along the disputed areas in the East China Sea and near Taiwan to further step up deterrence against China.
He stressed the need to have "sustaining, robust, ready and credible deterrence" in the Indo-Pacific, including across the Taiwan Strait, as "Japan would be on the frontlines of any contingency we might face in the western Pacific."
China claims Taiwan as its own territory. The US is obligated under a 1979 law to provide Taiwan with sufficient military hardware and technology to deter invasion, and its arm sales to Taiwan have always drawn strong opposition from Beijing.
On Saturday, he joined the US-Japan joint memorial to honor the war dead in the Battle of Iwo Jima as they marked the 80th anniversary of the end of one of the fiercest battles of World War II, praising the strong alliance between the former enemies.
Before landing in Japan, Hegseth stopped in the Philippines where he also ensured Trump's commitment to step up ties with the Southeast Asian country that faces maritime disputes with Beijing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
Decarbonization at a crossroads
The global race toward decarbonization is accelerating, as more than 140 countries — collectively responsible for nearly 90 percent of global gross domestic product and emissions — have committed to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by mid-century. But the pathways, mechanisms and economic implications of this transformation remain deeply uneven. Nowhere is this asymmetry more visible than in sectors like shipping, aviation and road transport, where the pace of regulatory ambition often surpasses the realities of technological readiness. Shipping, in particular, has become an unlikely but prominent target of international climate policy. Despite being the most carbon-efficient mode of freight transport, the sector finds itself grappling with mounting compliance burdens, volatile market mechanisms and infrastructure gaps. This is a paradox that risks not only penalizing efficiency but also distorting the logic of global trade. Since January 2024, the EU has incorporated maritime emissions into its Emissions Trading System — a monumental shift in regulatory design. Vessels calling at EU ports must now purchase allowances covering 40 percent of their verified carbon dioxide emissions, a share that will rise to 70 percent in 2025 and 100 percent by 2026. With carbon prices hovering around €70 ($79) per tonne, the cost implications are profound. A typical large container ship, emitting approximately 60,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide annually on EU routes, could face annual carbon costs exceeding €5 million by 2026. This is in addition to already elevated fuel prices, retrofitting expenses and evolving port compliance mandates. The intent — to catalyze decarbonization — is valid. But the execution, absent global harmonization, risks regulatory fragmentation and competitive distortions. Meanwhile, the International Maritime Organization has set its own benchmark: net-zero emissions by 2050, with a 40 percent reduction in carbon intensity targeted by 2030. These goals necessitate a seismic shift toward alternative fuels such as green methanol and ammonia. Yet these fuels remain commercially scarce and up to four times more expensive than conventional options. Retrofitting a single vessel can cost between $5 million and $15 million, with uncertain payback periods. Infrastructure for alternative fuels remains embryonic, particularly across the Global South. Other transport sectors face analogous dilemmas. Aviation is constrained by the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation, which seeks to cap emissions at 2019 levels through offsets. Meanwhile, the electric vehicle transition — long hailed as a panacea for road transport emissions — is encountering both technological and geopolitical headwinds. Policymakers in the US, the EU and the UK are quietly scaling back EV adoption targets, deferring internal combustion engine phase-outs and acknowledging the upstream carbon footprint of battery manufacturing. Lithium, cobalt and nickel — key inputs for EV batteries — are extracted through processes that are carbon-intensive and often ethically questionable. The gap between ambition and execution is widening. Global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions reached a record 37.4 billion tonnes in 2023. This raises an uncomfortable question: Are we genuinely decarbonizing or merely engaging in high-cost carbon arbitrage? Data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's International Transport Forum provides a clarifying contrast: maritime shipping emits just 3 to 7 grams of carbon dioxide per tonne-kilometer, compared to 62 grams for road freight and more than 500 grams for air cargo. Maritime shipping is nearly 10 times more carbon-efficient than trucking and 70 times more efficient than aviation. Yet, instead of being recognized for this intrinsic efficiency, the shipping industry is being subjected to regulations that fail to appreciate these comparative advantages. According to the World Shipping Council, maritime transport accounts for just 2.9 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions — far less than road transport (18 percent) but slightly more than aviation (2.5 percent). Approximately 80 percent of global freight by volume is transported by sea, while road transport accounts for about 18 percent of global freight by volume. Given this indispensable role in global trade, burdening shipping with disproportionately stringent regulations could have cascading effects: distorting supply chains, inflating consumer prices and exacerbating inequities in the developing world. The shipping industry is being subjected to regulations that fail to appreciate its comparative advantages Dr. John Sfakianakis Carbon markets, originally designed to promote innovation and cost-efficiency, have devolved into volatile and fragmented systems. Voluntary carbon credit prices range from $1 to $20 per tonne, with wide disparities in quality and credibility. Studies suggest that up to 90 percent of forestry-based credits may not represent genuine emissions reductions. This erodes trust and incentivizes financial engineering over physical decarbonization. Moreover, oil prices — adjusted for inflation — have declined in real terms. Brent crude averaged $73 per barrel in 2024, a far cry from its 2008 peak of $140, which would translate to approximately $210 in 2025 dollars. Yet, despite this relative affordability, shipping costs have surged. McKinsey estimates that environmental compliance alone has pushed shipping costs nearly 30 percent above pre-pandemic levels. This adds pressure on thin operating margins and complicates investment in cleaner technologies. Biofuels offer only a partial remedy. Sustainable aviation fuel can reduce lifecycle emissions by up to 80 percent, but it accounted for just 0.3 percent of global aviation fuel use in 2024. Marine biofuels suffer from similar bottlenecks: limited production, high prices and sustainability concerns over feedstocks. Poorly regulated biofuel mandates could inadvertently aggravate land-use conflicts and food insecurity. The global decarbonization agenda must reconcile environmental ambition with economic realism and technological maturity. Policy frameworks must reward — not penalize — sectors that are already outperforming in carbon efficiency. Maritime transport, while imperfect, remains the most optimized vector for global trade on a per-tonne basis. Overregulating it will not only raise costs but may also displace emissions to less efficient modes of transport. One-size-fits-all policies risk undermining the very goals they aim to achieve. Effective climate governance must be technologically agnostic, geographically equitable and economically rational. Transitioning to a low-carbon economy will require time, capital and compromise. While shipping may not achieve net-zero emissions overnight, it stands as a critical enabler of the broader decarbonization of global commerce. To portray the shipping industry as a climate laggard is to misjudge both its current contributions and its untapped potential for driving long-term decarbonization. At the same time, the industry would benefit from forging a more cohesive voice — ideally through the establishment of a dedicated global institution, strategically situated in Athens, London and Riyadh — to more effectively champion its indispensable role in shaping a sustainable global trade regime. • Dr. John Sfakianakis is Chief Economist at the Gulf Research Center and Chief Global Strategist at the Paratus Group.
Saudi Gazette
3 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump suspends foreign student visas at Harvard
WASHINGTON — Donald Trump has suspended for an initial six months the entry of foreign students seeking to study or participate in exchange programs at Harvard University. The US president issued the proclamation on Wednesday, citing "national security" concerns and declaring it "detrimental" to US interests to continue allowing foreign students at the institution. Harvard has responded by calling the order "retaliatory" and emphasized it would continue to protect its international students, according to Reuters news agency. Trump's announcement is a further escalation of an ongoing legal row with one of the US's most prestigious universities after Harvard refused to yield to a series of White House demands in April. Wednesday's order comes after a judge blocked the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from banning international students at Harvard in a ruling last week. Trump's proclamation accused Harvard of developing "extensive entanglements" with foreign countries and continuing to "flout the civil rights of its students and faculty". "Considering these facts, I have determined that it is necessary to restrict the entry of foreign nationals who seek to enter the United States solely or principally to participate in a course of study at Harvard University," he said. The order also suspends visas for international students seeking exchange programmes and directs the secretary of state to consider revoking existing visas of students currently studying at the university. The suspension can be extended beyond six months. The White House said Harvard had failed to provide sufficient information to the DHS about "foreign students' known illegal or dangerous activities" and reported "deficient data on only three students". Harvard issued a statement calling the order "yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights", Reuters reported. The world's wealthiest university has been embroiled in a legal battle with the Trump administration after it froze billions of dollars of federal funding and accused the institution of failing to root out antisemitism on campus. Last month, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem revoked certification Harvard needed to enrol foreign students on campus, a move that was swiftly blocked by a judge. Another federal judge upheld that decision last Thursday, saying she would issue a longer-term hold that would allow international students to continue their studies at Harvard while the legal battle plays out. However, Wednesday's proclamation once again throws the futures of thousands of international students into limbo. For the 2024-2025 school year, Harvard enrolled nearly 7,000 foreign students, who made up 27% of its population. Last week, a Chinese Harvard student called for unity during the university's graduation ceremony, just days after Trump vowed to "aggressively" revoke visas for Chinese students. In the past few months, the Trump administration has ramped up its crackdown on higher education in the US, accusing universities of failing to tackle antisemitism amid protests against the war in Gaza across campuses. Earlier on Wednesday, the White House threatened to strip Columbia University of its accreditation over claims it violated the civil rights of its Jewish students. — BBC
Saudi Gazette
3 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
How to pre-register for VALORANT Mobile
The ES TIMES — The highly anticipated VALORANT Mobile game is finally nearing launch, and players in select regions can now pre-register for early access. Pre-registration not only keeps you up to date with the latest official updates, but it also increases your chances of being among the first to experience Riot Games' tactical shooter on mobile. Regional Launch and Early Access As with many major mobile game launches, VALORANT Mobile will follow a regional launch strategy. This means that certain regions, starting with China, will receive access first. The first phase of testing has already begun in China, with Tencent-owned Lightspeed Studios handling development there. How to Pre-Register Currently, pre-registration is only available through the official VALORANT Mobile website for China. Players selected for early access will receive an email with download instructions and additional information. For other regions, Riot Games is expected to launch pre-registration via the Google Play Store and Apple App Store in the near future. Although these pages are not yet live, players are advised to follow local stores or Riot's official channels for any updates. Technically, it is possible to access the Chinese version using a VPN or alternative methods, but this is not recommended. Server issues and high ping can lead to a frustrating experience, and the language barrier can hinder understanding important instructions or using some in-game features. Global Release and Rewards After the testing phase in China concludes, access is expected to expand to other regions. As we've become accustomed to Riot Games, pre-registration rewards will be offered, but unlocking them may require completing in-game tasks or reaching certain milestones during the testing periods. As the full release date approaches, players can expect to see the addition of new challenges, missions, and an in-game store filled with exclusive cosmetics and content designed specifically for the mobile platform.
