logo
UK SC backs 'biological' definition of woman

UK SC backs 'biological' definition of woman

Express Tribune17-04-2025

Britain's Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the legal definition of a "woman" is based on a person's sex at birth, a landmark decision with far-reaching implications for the bitter debate over trans rights.
In a win for Scottish gender-critical campaigners who brought the case to the UK's highest court, five London judges unanimously ruled that "the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman, and biological sex".
However, the act also "gives transgender people protection" against discrimination in their acquired gender, Justice Patrick Hodge said in handing down the verdict.
The UK government welcomed the ruling for bringing "clarity" to the debate.
It is the culmination of a years-long battle between the Scottish government and the campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) -- which launched an appeal to the Supreme Court after losing pleas in Scottish courts over an obscure legislation aimed at hiring more women in public-sector bodies.
Dozens of FWS and other gender-critical campaigners, who argue that biological sex cannot be changed, cheered the ruling, hugging and crying outside the court.
"This has been a really, really long ride," said Susan Smith, co-director of For Women Scotland.
"Today, the judges have said what we always believed to be the case: that women are protected by their biological sex," she said. "Women can now feel safe that services and spaces designated for women are for women".
The Scottish government said it accepts the verdict and would focus on "protecting the rights of all".
Trans rights activists had raised concerns that a ruling in favour of FWS could risk discrimination against trans people in their chosen gender.
"The court is well aware of the strength of feeling on all sides which lies behind this appeal," Hodge said.
Scottish Greens activist and trans woman Ellie Gomersall, 25, told Sky News the ruling was "yet another attack on the rights of trans people to live our lives in peace".
But "Harry Potter" author JK Rowling, one of the most prominent supporters of gender-critical campaigns, praised the "three tenacious Scottish women with an army behind them" who refused to drop the case.
"In winning, they've protected the rights of women and girls across the UK," Rowling, who has been accused of transphobia and become a target of hate, posted on X.
At the heart of the legal battle were clashing interpretations of the Equality Act.
While the Scottish government argued that the Equality Act gave trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) the same protections as a biological female, FWS disagreed.
In its judgement, the Supreme Court ruled that the devolved Scottish government's "interpretation is not correct" and that the Equality Act was inconsistent with the 2004 Gender Recognition Act that introduced GRC certificates.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which is responsible for enforcing the Equality Act, said it was "pleased" the ruling addressed complicated issues of maintaining single-sex spaces.
Single-sex spaces and services including changing rooms, hostels and medical services "will function properly only if sex is interpreted as biological sex", the judgement said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taxmen get more powers to target unregistered taxpayers
Taxmen get more powers to target unregistered taxpayers

Business Recorder

timean hour ago

  • Business Recorder

Taxmen get more powers to target unregistered taxpayers

ISLAMABAD: The government, through the Finance Bill 2025-26, has proposed to grant extensive discretionary powers to tax officers and Commissioners to restrict the operations of bank accounts or transfer of immovable property for any individual who fails to register under the Federal Sales Tax Act. Arshad Shehzad, advocate of the Supreme Court, explained that the Finance Bill 2025-2026 intends to add new Sections 14AC, 14AD, and 14AE to the Act in order to promote sales tax registration and enhance economic documentation. According to the explanatory notes from the board, these provisions aim to strengthen enforcement measures, including restrictions on bank account operations, the transfer of immovable property, sealing of business premises, property seizure, and the appointment of a receiver to compel compliance from unregistered individuals. While this initiative appears to be directed at strengthening enforcement, it also bestows excessive discretionary powers upon tax officers. Shehzad argues that a comprehensive mechanism already exists under the law for compulsory registration, penal actions, and the recovery of sales tax, including default surcharges, penalties, and other consequences for non-registration. These additional measures would only grant more discretionary authority to tax officials and may lead to unnecessary conflicts. Shehzad emphasises that the implementation and enforcement of existing laws are far more important than introducing harsh, coercive measures repeatedly. Shehzad suggests that the government should focus on building confidence within the business community, utilising the database of unregistered individuals in a pragmatic manner to integrate new taxpayers into the tax system without creating an atmosphere of harassment. Any measure that create a negative perception among businesses could hinder growth and lead to capital flight; therefore, all such measures that threaten the confidence of businesses and trade should be avoided, he concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Sister challenges Mahrang's detention in apex court
Sister challenges Mahrang's detention in apex court

Express Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Sister challenges Mahrang's detention in apex court

A sister of Baloch rights activist Dr Mahrang Baloch has approached the Supreme Court against an order of the Balochistan High Court (BHC) in her sister's detention case. A division bench of the BHC on April 15 dismissed Dr Mahrang's petition against her detention under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance, 1960, stating that an alternative remedy was available to the activist in the shape of a representation. The bench had also converted the petition into a representation and directed its office to present it before the competent authority constituted for the purpose of deciding representations under the MPO. The petitioner, Nadia Baloch, contended that the BHC erred in holding that a petition could be filed before a court only after exhausting the option of filing a representation. The petition argued that the high court in its writ jurisdiction is competent to intervene and directly grant relief to a petitioner by determining the legality of an MPO order without the need of the detained person making a representation. It said that the BHC did not consider Dr Mahrang's right to file habeas corpus petition. "[This is her] high prerogative right and a constitutional remedy for all matters if illegal confinement," the petition said.

Iran executes nine ISIL members over foiled civilian attack plot
Iran executes nine ISIL members over foiled civilian attack plot

Express Tribune

time9 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Iran executes nine ISIL members over foiled civilian attack plot

Listen to article Iran has executed nine members of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), convicted of orchestrating a series of planned attacks targeting civilians, the country's judiciary has confirmed. The executions were carried out following a final ruling by Iran's Supreme Court, according to the judiciary's official Mizan News Agency. The men had been detained in 2018 during an armed confrontation with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) in Iran's volatile western region. Authorities say the group had intended to stage coordinated attacks in both border provinces and major urban centres. Weapons and military equipment were reportedly recovered from the group's hideout at the time of arrest. "The death sentences of nine members of the terrorist group were carried out after confirmation by Iran's Supreme Court," Mizan reported. The individuals were found guilty of 'waging war against God,' terrorism, and illegal possession of military-grade weapons. General Mohammad Pakpour, commander of the IRGC ground forces, stated that the cell planned to infiltrate Iranian territory and conduct simultaneous assaults across multiple cities. During the 2018 operation to neutralise the group, three Iranian soldiers were killed as several ISIL members detonated suicide vests. ISIL, which once held significant territory across Iraq and Syria, has been largely dismantled following a years-long campaign led by a United States-backed coalition. Nonetheless, the group continues to stage sporadic attacks in the region, including within Iran. In January 2024, ISIL claimed responsibility for twin bombings in Kerman that targeted a memorial for slain Iranian commander Qassem Soleimani. The attack left more than 90 people dead and was one of the deadliest in recent Iranian history. In 2017, ISIL gunmen and suicide bombers attacked Iran's parliament and the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, killing at least 18 people. Iran frequently announces arrests of suspected ISIL operatives. Just this week, police reported the apprehension of 13 alleged members in nationwide security raids. Last month, ISIL claimed responsibility for a deadly assault on Syrian government forces, marking its first attack on the Assad regime since losing its territorial strongholds. Iran continues to draw international scrutiny over its use of capital punishment. According to Amnesty International, the Islamic Republic executed at least 972 people in 2024, the second-highest tally globally after China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store