
T Cells Target Cockroach Allergens in Therapy Extracts
They found that immunodominant allergens are preferentially targeted and trigger the strongest modulation regardless of their concentration in treatment extracts.
Alessandro Sette, DrBiolSci
'In general, immunotherapy works to ameliorate allergic disease, but the mechanisms that afford its efficacy are not well understood,' corresponding author Alessandro Sette, DrBiolSci, of the Center for Vaccine Innovation at the La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, told Medscape Medical News.
It is unknown whether T-cell responses to immunodominant allergens are more or less sensitive to modulation and whether the allergen abundance in the immunotherapy extract influences T-cell modulation, the authors noted.
To fill these knowledge gaps, Sette and colleagues evaluated CD4+ T-cell reactivity to cockroach allergens in the double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter CRITICAL (Cockroach Immunotherapy in Children and Adolescents) trial of SCIT (subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy).
Sette added that like rodents, cockroaches produce important allergens, particularly in under-resourced urban settings. Strongly associated with asthma onset, progression, severity, and morbidity, cockroach allergy — particularly to the German cockroach ( Blattella germanica ) — is a significant global health concern.
It affects children and young adults disproportionately, with cockroach allergens detected in 85% of low-income inner-city homes in the U S.
While several studies have identified cockroach allergens based on immunoglobulin E reactivity and correlated sensitization with symptom severity, T-cell responses have been less thoroughly characterized, Sette said. T-cell responses, particularly in those sensitized to cockroach allergens, are typically associated with type 2 T-helper cells (Th2), which play a central role in allergy and asthma, he said.
The study found that down-regulation of Th2 response did not correlate with the abundance of the various allergens in the extract. 'This is important because it suggests that variation in extract content should not impact the downregulation of the detrimental Th2 responses,' Sette said.
'Responses from patients who were highly reactive were downregulated about as well as those from less reactive patients, suggesting that patients can benefit regardless of the strength of their allergic responses.' The findings align with immunotherapy studies of other allergens, he noted.
The results suggest room for a more nuanced approach to cockroach SCIT, incorporating allergen immunodominance, individual patient responses, and abundance-based standardization, which has proven successful for other allergens, said Sette.
Study Details
The results emerged from an evaluation of CD4+ T-cell reactivity specific to the main cockroach allergens in the study extract.
During 2018-2022, young participants, aged 8-17, with mild-to-moderate, well-controlled asthma were recruited from 11 sites in urban and under-resourced neighborhoods in Baltimore; Boston; Chicago; Dallas; Denver; Detroit; New York City; Washington, DC; Cincinnati; and St. Louis. All had positive skin and nasal tests to cockroach allergy.
The children were randomized to receive 12 months of cockroach SCIT injection in 26-step dose escalation (n = 20) or placebo (n = 26). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated at baseline and after 12 months of treatment or placebo. T-cell responses were evaluated for magnitude, cytokine polarization (differentiation), allergen immunodominance, and correlation with allergen content in the cockroach SCIT extract derived from 11 well-defined cockroach allergens.
SCIT modulation was more prominent in participants with the strongest and greatest number of Th2 polarized responses, the study found. Downmodulation was observed against Bla g 5 and Bla g 9, the most dominantly recognized cockroach allergens for the study population. Furthermore, effective modulation was observed independently of the amount of allergen content in the SCIT extract.
Moreover, treatment responsiveness was strongly predicted by baseline immune characteristics, with SCIT modulation more prominent in children with the strongest and most polarized Th2 responses. 'Individual variability in allergen recognition patterns may explain different treatment outcomes,' Sette said.
Marie Cavuoto Petrizzo, MD, MSEd
Offering a nonparticipant's perspective on the study, Allergist/Immunologist Marie Cavuoto Petrizzo, MD, MSEd, associate dean for medical education at the Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, noted that SCIT currently utilizes crude allergen extracts that are not strictly standardized and are highly variable in content. 'Consistent with previous literature, in this study SCIT resulted in modulation of T cells — that is, measurable changes in T-cell quantity and quality — and a shift from Th2 response to allergens to a Th1 response,' she told Medscape Medical News.
'What is novel is the determination that the most significant downmodulation occurred against Bla g 5 and Bla g 9 allergens, which are more frequently recognized by T cells. These allergens are immunodominant but in low abundance in the extracts used during SCIT.'
Since immunodominance varies between individuals, Cavuoto Petrizzo added, 'by identifying immunodominant allergens as key targets for modulation, even at low concentrations, it may be possible to develop more effective immunotherapies that prioritize these components. This targeted approach could lead to improved treatment outcomes in cockroach-allergic asthmatic patients.' And while this study focused on cockroach allergy, the findings may have implications for other allergens as well, she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFL bans smelling salts for 2025, and George Kittle is 'distraught'
The NFL has banned the use of smelling salts and ammonia packets ahead of the 2025 NFL season. For George Kittle, this is very disappointing news. The San Francisco 49ers tight end broke the news on NFL Network Tuesday. He then shared that the ban has left him "distraught." Kittle did so while crashing the set of an NFL Network hit at 49ers training camp during an interview with his teammate Fred Warner. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] "I honestly just came up here to air a grievance," Kittle said after being handed a microphone. "Our team got a memo today that smelling salts and ammonia packets were made illegal in the NFL, and I've been distraught all day." Kittle then joked that he was contemplating extreme measures in response to the rule change. "I considered retirement," he said, with a smile. "We've got to come up with a middle ground here guys. Somebody help me out. Somebody come up with a good idea." So why is Kittle so "distraught?" "I'm an every drive guy," Kittle said regarding his smelling salts use. "I'm an every drive guy." Kittle drew the line on using smelling salts for each play, declaring that's "too much." So why the ban? NFL Network's Mike Garafolo later shared the memo that got Kittle so worked up. It appears that Kittle's use of smelling salts on "every drive" might not be a good idea. Citing a 2024 memo from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the NFL explained its reasoning for banning ammonia inhalants (AIs), an umbrella term that includes smelling salts. From the memo: "The FDA noted potential negative effects from AI use," the memo states. "AIs also have the potential to mask certain neurologic signs and symptoms, including some potential signs of concussion. "As a result, the NFL head, neck and spine committee recommended prohibiting the use of AIs for any purpose during play in the NFL." The memo clarified that the AI category encompasses 'any form of 'smelling salts'' and prohibits any member of a team from administering or providing AIs to players at any point during a game. The FDA memo that the NFL referenced detailed reported adverse effects of using unapproved AIs that include "shortness of breath, seizures, migraines, vomiting, diarrhea, and fainting from consumers after using these types of products, possibly purchased through various websites." Smelling salts are traditionally used to treat fainting victims, but have apparently become popular among athletes — particularly football and hockey players — as a perceived energy boost. This appears to be Kittle's preferred use. The NFL isn't the first sports organization to ban the use of smelling salts. Hockey Quebec, a branch of Hockey Canada that oversees amateur hockey in the province, banned smelling salts in February, citing concern over their use by youth players.


New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
Kennedy Cancels Nearly $500 Million in mRNA Vaccine Contracts
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has canceled nearly $500 million of grants and contracts for developing mRNA vaccines, the Department of Health and Human Services announced on Tuesday. It is the latest blow to research on this technology. In May, the Department of Health and Human Services revoked a nearly $600 million contract to the drugmaker Moderna to develop a vaccine against bird flu. The new cancellations dismayed scientists, many of whom regard mRNA shots as the best option for protecting Americans in a pandemic. 'This is a bad day for science,' said Scott Hensley, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania who has been working to develop an mRNA vaccine against influenza. The health department said in its release that the cancellations affected 22 projects managed by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA. With this move, the department is 'undermining our ability to rapidly counter future biological threats,' said Rick Bright, a flu expert who was ousted as chief of BARDA during the first Trump administration and resigned from a lesser position in protest. 'We're weakening our frontline defense against fast‑moving pathogens — a huge strategic failure that will be measured in lives lost during times of crisis,' he added. First used during the Covid-19 pandemic by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, mRNA shots instruct the body to produce a fragment of a virus, which then sets off the body's immune response. Unlike traditional vaccines, which can take years to develop and test, mRNA shots can be made within months and quickly altered as the virus changes. Mr. Kennedy has been sharply critical of the technology. In a video posted on social media on Tuesday, he claimed incorrectly that mRNA vaccines do not protect against respiratory illnesses like Covid and the flu, that they drive viruses to evolve and that a single mutation in a virus renders the vaccine ineffective. 'As the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract,' he says in the video. 'By issuing this wildly incorrect statement, the secretary is demonstrating his commitment to his long-held goal of sowing doubts about all vaccines,' said Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at the Brown University School of Public Health. 'Had we not used these lifesaving mRNA vaccines to protect against severe illness, we would have had millions of more Covid deaths,' she said. The health department said it will favor other types of shots over those using mRNA, like whole-cell vaccines. That technology is more than 100 years old. The United States has not used a whole-cell vaccine for whooping cough since the 1990s because it was potent but harsh, often setting off high fevers and seizures. Mr. Kennedy himself assailed the leading international vaccine organization, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, for continuing to use the whole-cell vaccine in low-income countries, citing it as the reason he was pulling funding from the organization.


CBS News
29 minutes ago
- CBS News
Older Americans turning to AI-powered chatbots for companionship
Jill Smola is a 75-year-old retiree who understands the power of human connection, having spent her working days as an aide taking care of the elderly. "We would play games, put puzzles together," Smola told CBS News. She said human interaction was important, "so that they had somebody to talk to. That they just weren't sitting in a chair doing nothing." But these days, it's Smola sitting in a chair — a widow with a lung condition who lives alone. She says she doesn't get that human interaction anymore. "I can go weeks on end" without seeing someone, she said. Smola can't drive anymore and rarely leaves her Orlando home. But recently, she did gain a new companion: an AI-powered chatbot. She uses the chatbot, called ElliQ, to "visit" exotic places and play trivia. Smola talks to the chatbot up to five hours a day, and says the connection is truly meaningful. She said that people who might find the situation sad "don't understand." "I'd rather talk to a human being, but that's not possible for me, except if I get on the phone, so I enjoy her," Smola said, jokingly adding: "I enjoy her better than my daughter." Several AI companions have recently hit the market, including ElliQ, which normally costs $59 a month to use. Smola received the chatbot for free with funding from a federal grant. Thalia Porteny, an ethicist at Columbia University who studies seniors and AI used in the medical space, told CBS News that "loneliness is rampant," with one in four older adults saying they feel isolated. But Porteny also said she's concerned about the possibility that reliance on these chatbots could backfire and create even more isolation. "This could really go the wrong way if it's not deployed in an ethical and responsible way," she said. But for now, Smola said ElliQ is "the best thing that happened to me, because I always have somebody around. Even though it may not be a human, it's good enough for me."