logo
Trader wrongly jailed for rate-rigging may sue for millions

Trader wrongly jailed for rate-rigging may sue for millions

Yahoo24-07-2025
A former Libor trader jailed for rate-rigging is considering suing for compensation after his conviction was quashed by the Supreme Court.
Tom Hayes, who served five and a half years in prison for fraud, said he would seek legal advice on bringing civil claims after his 2015 conviction was overturned on Wednesday. Possible targets of legal action could include the banks that employed him before he was arrested.
Mr Hayes said: 'Whether I have any civil claims against any parties is yet to be determined. I'm not ruling it out, but I don't have sufficient information yet. I need to take advice.
'I can't at this moment in time know what I'm going to do. All I would say is that everyone in the US who had their convictions overturned, almost to a man, sued their former employer banks and reached settlements.'
Karen Todner, Mr Hayes's lawyer, said he was investigating whether to bring a possible claim against various authorities. She said there was a high probability he would launch a claim.
Lawyers said Mr Hayes could potentially win millions in compensation from various parties involved in the case, including the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), which prosecuted him, and his ex-employers, based on loss of earnings.
Deutsche Bank last July settled a $150m (£111m) lawsuit brought against it by one of its ex-traders, Matthew Connolly, whose conviction for Libor fixing was overturned in 2022.
Mr Hayes was paid more than £1m over the three years he worked at UBS and another £3.5m for the nine months he spent at Citigroup after moving to the bank in 2009.
UBS declined to comment. Citigroup declined to comment.
Mr Hayes was originally found guilty of fixing the Libor rate at UBS and Citigroup between 2006 and 2010. Libor was once used to price more than £270tn of financial products globally, including car loans and mortgages.
The Court of Appeal blocked his case from reaching the Supreme Court five times between 2015 and 2019 despite mounting public concerns about the conviction.
On Wednesday, Mr Hayes ended a 10-year battle to overturn his conviction after the Supreme Court ruled that he was denied a fair trial because of 'misdirection' of the jury in the case.
Missed son's childhood
Following the ruling, Mr Hayes said his wrongful imprisonment had destroyed his family, led to the end of his marriage and meant he missed 'most of my son's childhood'.
Former convicts who have suffered miscarriages of justice can claim compensation from the Government under a statutory scheme, but Mr Hayes said he had little hope of getting any money back.
'I have no confidence the British Government will give me anything because of the way the law's structured, so I'm sort of at peace with that,' he said.
'I would say the bigger focus for me right now is making sure that all the seven people who were convicted have their convictions overturned.
'If I sue the banks and the banks paid me some money, it just moves on. It doesn't mean anything to the bank. It's just the course of business.
'It might make me happy for a while, but I'd rather I left a better criminal appeals system than I got some money from a bank.'
Febrile anti-banking environment
The Libor rigging scandal emerged in the aftermath of the 2008-09 financial crisis amid a febrile anti-banking environment in New York and London.
Authorities pursued several traders for allegedly rigging Libor, or the London interbank offered rate, by submitting false or inaccurate rates to benefit banks.
Mr Hayes was one of nine City traders jailed in Britain related to the practice while 11 others were acquitted.
Convictions have been increasingly called into question after allegations emerged that the Bank of England had pressured banks to artificially lower the rate during the financial crisis.
Carlo Palombo, the former vice-president of euro rates at Barclays bank who was sentenced to four years for Libor fixing in 2019, had his conviction overturned alongside Mr Hayes on Wednesday.
At a press conference on Wednesday, Mr Hayes called for all seven of the remaining convictions to be overturned.
He said his biggest concern was pursuing justice. Mr Hayes said: 'You can't help but revise your view about what is important when you've been stuck in a concrete box for five and a half years. For me, the great joy is being exonerated and being free.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man who burned a Virginia city councilman intended to kill him, police say
Man who burned a Virginia city councilman intended to kill him, police say

San Francisco Chronicle​

time18 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Man who burned a Virginia city councilman intended to kill him, police say

DANVILLE, Va. (AP) — Police say a man who doused a Virginia city councilman in gasoline and set him on fire told investigators he wanted the attack to be fatal, according to charging documents available Thursday. Officials say the motive appears personal and unrelated to Lee Vogler's work as a public official. After Wednesday's attack, the 38-year-old father of two was flown by medical helicopter to a burn unit in North Carolina. The hospital hasn't provided an update on his condition. According to police, witnesses and Vogler himself, Shotsie Michael Buck-Hayes, 29, poured gasoline on the councilman after barging into his workplace at a local magazine. Buck-Hayes chased Vogler outside and ignited the gas, later telling police he intended for the flames to kill him, according to the documents. Buck-Hayes has since been charged with attempted first-degree murder and aggravated malicious wounding. Edward Lavado, an attorney representing him, declined to comment to The Associated Press on Thursday. At the scene, Vogler was able to tell multiple witnesses that Buck-Hayes had burned him, according to the charging documents. The complaint doesn't give details on how Buck-Hayes was taken into custody. The records were first reported by the Danville Register and Bee. Vogler has served on the Danville City Council for more than a decade and is known as a fixture of the small city near the Virginia-North Carolina state line, about 140 miles (230 kilometers) north of Charlotte. The police documents list a Danville address for Buck-Hayes as well. 'The next thing, Lee is running through the office covered in gasoline, yelling for our officemate to call 911,' Brooks said Wednesday.

Ted Cruz Admits Trump's Fever Dream of Obama Treason Charge Is BS
Ted Cruz Admits Trump's Fever Dream of Obama Treason Charge Is BS

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ted Cruz Admits Trump's Fever Dream of Obama Treason Charge Is BS

Sen. Ted Cruz has admitted that Barack Obama is not going to be charged with treason, despite the Trump administration's attempts to smear the former president to deflect from the Jeffrey Epstein saga. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has accused Obama of engaging in a 'treasonous conspiracy' and 'years-long coup' against President Donald Trump over his administration's investigation of Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 election. Trump and his base have eagerly embraced the half-baked conspiracy and called for Obama's arrest, but now the president's own allies have been forced to admit Obama won't be on trial for treason anytime soon. During Cruz's Wednesday appearance on The Ingraham Angle, Fox News host Laura Ingraham pointed out that the Supreme Court has ruled that presidents enjoy immunity for 'official acts.' 'He's not going to be prosecuted for treason,' Ingraham said. 'That's not going to happen.' 'He's not going to be prosecuted, in all likelihood, for treason,' Cruz agreed. The Texas senator then tried to insist, however, that members of the Obama administration could face 'criminal liability' for supposedly lying under oath and 'fabricating evidence.' So far, the administration has not provided any evidence that Obama officials did anything other than request preliminary intelligence assessments about Russia's election-meddling in 2016. Gabbard's supposed smoking guns have not contradicted the massive bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report that concluded in 2020 that Russia had 'engaged in an aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election' in Trump's favor. The director of national intelligence, however, has pointed to the fact that Russian President Vladimir Putin did not successfully hack electronic voting machines as 'evidence' that Russia's election interference was all a 'hoax.' She said she was sending all of her documents to the Department of Justice, implying that indictments could be imminent. Obama hit back at the Trump administration on Wednesday in a rare statement, saying through a spokesman: 'The bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.' The accusations came as Trump was facing his own supporters' fury over the administration's failure to provide new evidence in the Epstein case. When it comes to the disgraced financier, the president's base has accused the administration of over-promising and under-delivering—something that Cruz's comments show could very well happen in the Obama conspiracy as well.

DOJ Bid to Unseal Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Records Hits Roadblock
DOJ Bid to Unseal Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Records Hits Roadblock

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

DOJ Bid to Unseal Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Records Hits Roadblock

President Donald Trump's effort to unseal Jeffrey Epstein-related grand jury transcripts has hit a temporary roadblock. The federal judge overseeing the Trump administration's request to unseal records from Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal case said Tuesday that the DOJ's filing 'does not adequately address' several factors the court must weigh when considering the disclosure of secret grand jury materials. Trump has ordered 'all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' in the Epstein case to be released in an effort to appease his base, which has been up in arms since Attorney General Pam Bondi essentially declared the late child sex offender's case closed in early July. But critics have dismissed Trump's move as smoke and mirrors, noting that the evidence implicating Epstein's purported high-profile associates—including Trump—is unlikely to appear in grand jury testimony. Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for helping Epstein recruit and abuse underage girls as part of his sex-trafficking ring. In his order, District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer said that while he intends to 'resolve' the DOJ's motion to disclose transcripts from Maxwell's case 'expeditiously,' he cannot rule on it 'without additional submissions.' He gave the DOJ until July 29 to further justify its request, including the reasons for seeking disclosure and whether Maxwell objects to the records being unsealed. Under the federal rules of criminal procedure, grand jury proceedings are kept confidential unless the court authorizes disclosure based on a limited set of statutory exceptions. The Obama-appointed judge also asked whether the government had notified victims before filing its motion to unseal the records. He directed victims in the case, as well as Maxwell's legal team, to submit their positions on the potential disclosure by Aug. 5. CNN reported Tuesday that Maxwell—who is urging the Supreme Court to review her case—will oppose the unsealing of the grand jury testimony, citing a person close to her. Bondi on Tuesday announced that she is seeking a meeting with Maxwell in another bid to tamp down the firestorm sparked by her Epstein records fumble. Her department had asked the Supreme Court to turn away Maxwell's appeal just over a week ago. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store