Homelessness minister quits over rent hike claims
But she added: 'It is clear that continuing in my role will be a distraction from the ambitious work of the Government.
'I have therefore decided to resign from my ministerial position.'
The Prime Minister thanked Ms Ali for her 'diligent work' at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, saying it would have 'a lasting impact'.
He said: 'I know you will continue to support the Government from the back benches and represent the best interests of your constituents in Bethnal Green and Stepney.'
Ms Ali's resignation follows reports in The i Paper that she had given four tenants at a property she owned in east London four months' notice to leave last November, and then relisted the property with a £700 rent increase within weeks.
Conservative Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake had called for her resignation earlier on Thursday, accusing her of 'staggering hypocrisy'.
Responding to Ms Ali's resignation, shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly said: 'I said that her actions were total hypocrisy and that she should go if the accusations were shown to be true.
'Labour's position is always, 'Do as I say, not do as I do'. They can't get away with that when in government.'
A Liberal Democrat spokesperson said: 'Rushanara Ali fundamentally misunderstood her role. Her job was to tackle homelessness, not to increase it.
'At a time of widespread political disillusionment, her actions were staggeringly irresponsible and only added insult to injury after years of delay for renters' rights reform under the Conservatives.
'The Prime Minister must appoint a new homelessness minister swiftly who will take the need to end homelessness once and for all seriously.'
The reports also drew strong criticism from renters' rights campaigners, given the Government's pledge to clamp down on what it sees as unfair rental practices.
Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, described the allegations as 'shocking and a wake-up call to Government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters'.
He added: 'It is bad enough when any landlord turfs out their tenant to hike up the rent, or tries their luck with unfair claims on the deposit, but the minister responsible for homelessness knows only too well about the harm caused by this behaviour.'
Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, said: 'It's mind-boggling that we have a homelessness minister who has just evicted four people in order to rake in more rent – something that will soon be illegal under the Renters' Rights Bill her own department is bringing through Parliament.'
Under the Bill, landlords who evict tenants in order to sell their property would be banned from relisting it for rent for six months.
Ms Ali's house, rented on a fixed-term contract, was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only relisted as a rental because it had not sold, according to The i Paper.
Her former tenant Laura Jackson told the paper she was one of four tenants who received an email giving four months notice to leave the property for which they collectively paid £3,300 in rent.
Ms Jackson, a self-employed restaurant owner, said she saw the house relisted weeks after she and her fellow tenants had left, but with a rent of around £4,000.
The 33-year-old told The i Paper: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion.'
She also said two letting companies managing the property for Ms Ali had attempted to charge £395 in cleaning fees and £2,000 to repaint the house when they left.
The tenants successfully challenged this as landlords are prohibited from charging tenants for professional cleaning and repainting costs unless serious damage has occurred.
A Labour voter, Ms Jackson suggested it was a 'conflict of interest' for MPs to be landlords, especially in their own constituencies.
Ms Jackson declined to comment further when approached by the PA news agency but confirmed the details of The i Paper's story.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Here's proof that Labour's private school tax raid was never about money
As sure as night follows day, when a new tax is introduced, people will do their very best to avoid it. This is what has happened with Labour's imposition of VAT at 20pc on school fees in January. The Telegraph recently revealed that Britain's top 50 independent schools held £515m in advance fees last year, up from £121m in 2023. This potentially avoids more than £100m in VAT. There are over 2,600 independent schools in the UK, of which 1,423 are members of the Independent Schools Council (ISC). In January, 582,477 pupils attended independent schools in England. The Telegraph figures thus cover just 2pc of all fee-paying establishments.
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Private school parents who paid fees in advance to face fresh tax grab from HMRC
Parents with pupils in private school who pre-paid fees in advance of January's VAT hike are facing a fresh attack from the taxman. HM Revenue and Customs is set to probe so-called advance-fee schemes which swathes of parents used in a bid to avoid larger fees, it has emerged. Advance fee or payment schemes have been in used in private schools for years but they began to surge in popularity as early as December, 2023. They allow parents of students at private schools to pay upfront for tuition fees for future school years, often with a discount. The pre-paid funds act like a deposit and are used to cover most of the fees each year, instead of locking in a price. VAT had never before been charged on private school payments but Labour's manifesto revealed it would scrap the exemption for private schools, which saw them free of the 20 per cent tax. This came into force in January of this year in a bid to bolster the Treasury's dwindling coffers. Droves of families paid advanced fees for future school years before the change in January, hoping to avoid the VAT hike of up to 20 per cent. Parents with pupils at the top 50 private schools in the country pre-paid fees to the tune of £515million last a year – up from £121million the year before. This means that as much as £103million in tax may have been avoided in these top 50 schools alone. However, their efforts may have been in vain as the tax office prepares a fresh assault on these prepayments to ensure all private schools pay their 'fair share'. Official sources said HMRC will now 'carefully scrutinise' prepayments, the Telegraph reports. These fees paid in advance may still be liable for VAT because of the way the schools structured the schemes. The taxman is likely to target schools that use the advance fees like a deposit or those quickly set up such a scheme ahead of the VAT hike. Investigations could take several years to complete. Tax experts have warned VAT applies to the year fees are invoiced so there's a chance the prepayments didn't work in the way parents had hoped. It means parents who used these pre-paid fee schemes to mitigate the impact of the VAT hike could be liable for unpaid VAT. It could also not only spark lengthy legal battles between the tax office and private schools, but also between parents and schools over who is liable for the potential tax bill. Chancellor Rachel Reeves attempted to curb such schemes by applying VAT to pre-paid fees made from July 29 last year. But parents had already funnelled millions of pounds into the schemes to avoid the punitive tax measures. Alex Pugh, financial planner at wealth manager Saltus, said that many parents started to make strategic decisions including advance fee payments back in December 2023. He said: 'However, it seems that the efficacy of these schemes is now in doubt, as VAT may still be due on these prepayments. Two in five parents will make a change to their child's private education before term starts in September. 'As this number may well rise if it transpires that those who thought they'd avoided the VAT through pre-payments are still liable, professional advice is key. 'Should HMRC successfully unravel advance fee schemes, the financial pressures facing all private schools will be exacerbated. 'In an attempt to avoid the VAT liability parents may claim they were misled about the tax benefits of advance schemes, potentially sparking long-running, costly legal battles with schools. 'Such disputes could result in the schools themselves ultimately being liable. The full impact of this tax change cannot be avoided.' A government spokesman said: 'The Office for Budget Responsibility has already factored in the increased use of pre-payment schemes in its revenue forecasts. 'Removing tax breaks for private schools is expected to raise £1.8billion a year by 2029/30. 'This funding will help us recruit 6,500 new teachers and improve standards in state schools, which educate 94 per cent of children.'
The Courier
28 minutes ago
- The Courier
EXCLUSIVE: Dundee council leader admits communication with Raac residents must improve
The leader of Dundee City Council admits communication must improve with Raac residents after a controversial £500,000 pilot scheme began without consultation. Mark Flynn told The Courier that messaging around the project had not been 'ideally' handled after homeowners were hit with unexpected bills nearing £7,000. Menzieshill residents were given only a few days' notice that the scheme would begin on their properties after Dundee City Council sent out letters addressed to 'the owner'. Campaigners believe the pilot scheme itself is flawed as it doesn't remove the defective concrete, instead putting in support structures underneath it. Speaking exclusively to The Courier, Mr Flynn said: 'The pilot scheme wasn't put across, I would say, ideally, that's for sure, and that's been noted. 'I think it's important that we actually make sure we're communicating better going forward. 'I think it's important that we have that dialogue in advance of anything happening. 'Making sure everyone is aware of what's happening and why, and I think that's a really important part of this.' Mr Flynn's comments come amid tensions over a disputed Scottish Government meeting minute which claimed council chief executive Greg Colgan directed his officers not to proactively engage with Raac-affected residents to 'limit liability'. Mr Colgan has emphatically denied that any such approach has been taken. Mr Flynn was not present at the meeting in question and could not comment on the veracity of the minutes. However, the council leader assured Raac residents they could get in touch with himself or other councillors with any concerns or issues they have. 'I've said to my colleagues in the chamber, the 29 of us, that my door is always open,' said the council leader. 'And it's always open to people who have issues like this. 'Whether you talk to the housing convener and deputy convener, or you come straight to myself, I'm more than happy. 'I'm here to represent the people of the city and I'm here to listen as well.' The council leader has recently contacted the Dundee Raac Campaign Group to try and organise a meeting. However, he remains certain that any long-term financial solution to solving the crisis must come from the government. 'I've got in touch recently, in the last few days, with the Raac group, to invite them in to have a conversation about the difficulties they're having but also a solution to what we can achieve and what we can do locally,' said Mr Flynn. 'But the bigger picture is the UK Government and the Scottish Government have got to do this.' Through our Trapped By Raac campaign, The Courier is calling for all levels of government to come together and help find a solution for homeowner and tenants living with the defective concrete.
