Leadsscraper.io Unveils New Technology to Help Companies Find Verified B2B Leads Faster
New scraping engine aims to accelerate prospecting for sales teams and digital marketers worldwide.
Leadsscraper.io, an emerging leader in lead data extraction and automation, has officially launched its next-generation B2B leads scraper, a powerful web-based tool built to help businesses discover, verify, and organize potential clients at scale. This latest technology release offers a significant upgrade in speed, precision, and usability for professionals involved in sales prospecting and digital outreach.
Designed for sales teams, marketing agencies, and entrepreneurs, the updated platform allows users to gather high-quality leads from public web sources such as Google Maps. Leadsscraper.io enables users to extract vital company information - including business names, websites, phone numbers, and locations - within seconds, eliminating hours of manual research and reducing the risk of outdated or inaccurate data.
The improved tool features a new scraping engine that delivers faster results while supporting more targeted searches through advanced filters such as location, keyword, and business category. The system has been optimized for local lead generation and regional targeting, making it especially effective for businesses looking to expand within specific geographic markets.
In addition to performance upgrades, the platform introduces a more intuitive user experience, including simplified workflows, bulk data export options, and enhanced data formatting. The B2B leads scraper integrates smoothly with CRM systems and sales enablement platforms, enabling seamless transitions from data extraction to outreach.
Leadsscraper.io is committed to responsible data use, relying solely on publicly accessible business information and maintaining a transparent approach to scraping practices. The platform is already being utilized by B2B-focused organizations across Europe and North America who seek a competitive edge in identifying new opportunities.
The release comes at a time when demand for data-driven lead generation continues to rise, with businesses increasingly turning to automation to overcome time constraints and reduce customer acquisition costs.
To learn more about the platform or try the new B2B leads scraper, visit Leadsscraper website.
Media Contact
Media Relations, Leadsscraper.io
Email: [email protected]
Website: https://leadsscraper.io
Source published by Submit Press Release >> Leadsscraper.io Unveils New Technology to Help Companies Find Verified B2B Leads Faster
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
8 hours ago
- Associated Press
Free Classifieds Platform ok.com Launches Globally to Tackle Soaring US Living Costs
08/12/2025, LA, California // KISS PR Brand Story PressWire // With more than half of Americans cutting essential spending due to persistent inflation, the global debut of offers a timely solution. This AI-powered classifieds platform launches across four continents with free listings, directly addressing systemic pain points: the average $500 recruitment fees per hire on legacy job boards, and 12-15% seller commissions on major resale platforms. The platform features the following categories: secondhand trading, job recruitment, housing rentals/sales, vehicles, local services, and community boards. It is now available in nine countries, including the US, UK, and Australia, while 100% free—no listing fees, no agent commissions. 'We built this to make life more convenient and fulfilling for everyone,' states the founding team. Democratizing Recruitment For both employers and job seekers, streamlines connections through fee-free access, direct messaging, and AI matching tools. The platform eliminates pay-to-post barriers, significantly reducing burdens for small businesses—saving them hundreds or even thousands of dollars per hire. Its AI system connects millions of global users across sectors, from warehouse staff to financial analysts, by intelligently matching candidates with employers to streamline the hiring process. also prioritizes direct communication, offering efficient online communication tools between job seekers and recruiters. Multilingual support serves immigrant communities, while GDPR-compliant data protection safeguards privacy. Sustainable Resale Ecosystem 'Secondhand trading should promote resource circulation and affordable living—not extract fees,' emphasizes the team. Unlike competitors charging 12-15% commissions, enables 100% seller proceeds retention, empowering everyone to monetize idle items effortlessly. Users can filter listings by category, location, and price to find everything from kitchen gadgets to rare vintage collectibles near their homes. And of course, transaction safety is guaranteed—its escrow system secures every transaction you make on the platform. Trustworthy Auto Marketplace In the used cars market, helps buyers avoid common pitfalls. The vehicle section integrates third-party history reports for most listings, with a seller verification system that screens dealers and private sellers. 'You avoid the negotiation games traditional dealers play,' notes the website's automotive analyst. uses its AI recommending model to give everyone tailored suggestions based on budget and usage patterns, from affordable commuter cars to family vehicles. Housing Without Hidden Costs Finding a home is often stressful, but eases the process with direct landlord connections, video tours, and extensive listings—making it more affordable, convenient, and faster. Recent graduates hunting studios or relocating families searching for garden homes benefit from diverse inventory. Direct landlord-tenant communication circumvents broker fees (averaging over $2,000 for renters), while video tours enable remote property evaluations across whole America. 'When fees disappear, opportunity democratizes,' states the founding team. ' empowers smarter living by making your daily life more affordable and convenient' Company: Servanan International Contact Person: Roy Email: [email protected] Website: Telephone: (929) 471-8113 City: LA, California. Disclaimer: This press release may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements describe future expectations, plans, results, or strategies (including product offerings, regulatory plans and business plans) and may change without notice. You are cautioned that such statements are subject to a multitude of risks and uncertainties that could cause future circumstances, events, or results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements, including the risks that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Source published by Submit Press Release >> Free Classifieds Platform Launches Globally to Tackle Soaring US Living Costs
Tom's Guide
8 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I've tried out the biggest addition to iOS 26 Maps — here's what I like and what I don't
Anytime Apple rolls out an iOS update, one of the first built-in apps I check is Maps. Apple has put a lof of effort into fine-tuning its mapping app so that a Google Maps vs. Apple Maps comparison is more of a fair fight these days, which usually means an interesting feature or two makes arrives with each major iOS release. With iOS 26, that feature turns out to be Visited Places. This addition to Maps promises to remember where you visit — and it does so automatically and without any intervention on your part. The idea behind Visited Places is that it gives you an easy-to-access list of where you've been so you don't have to struggle to remember that out-of-the-way restaurant you discovered on that trip a few years ago or the location of that store that had a great selection of vintage records. Now that I've downloaded and installed the iOS 26 public beta on a phone that I take with me on my daily perambulations, I've had a chance to try out Visited Place for myself to see if the app delivers on what it promises. Thus far, I've found some things about Visited Places that I really like — and other that explain why Apple has slapped a prominent beta label on the feature. If you haven't checked out Visited Places in iOS 26 Maps yet — either because you're waiting to try out the public beta or you don't plan on upgrading to iOS 26 until the full release comes out in the fall — here's what the feature has to offer. Visited Places is an opt-in feature in iOS 26, and there are reasons you may not want a record of everywhere you've been stored right there on your phone. While everyone has their own comfort level with privacy, all that location data is stored entirely on your phone. Apple says that it can't access stored places, and you're able to remove locations by swiping away individual places or clearing out your entire history with one tap. The first time you launch Maps after installing iOS 26, you'll get a splash screen alerting you to the Visited Places feature. Tap Continue, and on the subsequent screen, you can give your permission to log locations or turn off the feature entirely. You can also set how long you want the app to store your visited places — I've opted for a permanent record, though I imagine that will require me to do some pruning over time. So you've decided to opt in to having the places you visit stored on your iPhone — where can you find them? There's a special section in the Maps app with that log of places, and it requires a moderate amount of tapping to get there. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Start by tapping either on the Places menu or on the picture of your face by the search bar. In this example, I've opted for the second approach, which brings up a pop-up menu that includes a place option. Tap Places and you'll see the Places screen with a Visited Places section accompanied by a Beta label. (If you tapped Places from the get-go, you'll jump directly to that screen.) The Visited Places section itself organizes the locations you've been to by category — shopping, dining and more — and by city. It's a pretty stylish look, I think, and one that serves a purpose as if you're looking for locations in a specific place, you can just tap that particular city. Below those two sections, all your visits will be listed in a column. Tap on the All Visits header to see them displayed on a map. Having spent some time with Visited Places, I think it's a solid addition to Maps, and I can see the value of the feature increasing over time as I visit more places and need to give my memory more of a jog about where I've been. There's a hidden tool in Visited Places to get even more out of the feature as well as a few ways for Apple to tighten things up. Just having a list of places you've visited would be helpful enough, but you can really make that list useful by adding notations to it. For example, there's a hardware store on my list of visited places where a knife sharpening services stops by once a month — it'd be handy to have that information connected with the location, either so I remember when that knife drop-off happens or so that I can recommend it to friends who ask me where I go to get my knives sharpened. Just tap on the More icon — those three dots — to the right of each entry. A pop-up menu will appear with an Add a Note option. Select that, type in what you care to log about that particular site, and it's there connected to the location for as long as you keep that stored in the Maps app. A fair amount of iOS 26 features require Apple Intelligence to work, but Visited Places isn't one of them. All you need is an iOS 26-supported device like the iPhone 12 I've been using for testing. The feature doesn't work everywhere, though. Right now, you can only access Visited Places in Australia, Canada, Malaysia, Switzerland, the UK, and the U.S. Visited Places is a beta feature that relies on location data and sometimes that location data is wrong. For instance, Visited Places originally listed the name of the knife sharpening service as the place I visited and not the hardware store that hosts that roving service. When a location is added to Visited Places, you've got the option to vet the addition and correct it if it's wrong. The More menu also has a Wrong Location option that you can tap to correct things. You'll see a list of nearby businesses that you can select instead. You might notice that South Shore Center keeps popping up on my Visited Places list. That's because it contains my pharmacy, a bank, two grocery stories, my barber and a handful of other business I visit. Visited Places isn't precise enough yet to differentiate one location for another, so it just groups them all under one heading. And it adds that location every time I visit — something I wish the feature was a little bit smarter about. At least you can delete repetitive entries with a leftward swipe. And if you scroll all the way to the bottom of the Visited Places list, there are buttons for controlling how long you keep visits stored (3 months, 1 year or forever) or clearing out your history. The other day, my daughter and I went to San Francisco. We had a lovely lunch at a diner, visited some shops down at Union Square and caught a matine at a local theater company. But none of that appears in Visited Places, and I'm not exactly sure why, apart from the vagaries of beta software. It's a quirk that I hope Apple works on during the iOS 26 beta process as sporadic location logging defeats the purpose of a feature intended to keep a record of where you've been. My best advice to anyone trying out Visited Places is to make use of the feature, but don't expect a flawlessly transcribed list at this point.
Tom's Guide
12 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested Waze vs. Google Maps for a weekend trip — and there's a clear winner
When I was younger, driving anywhere included figuring out the ultimate challenge: who you would trust with the map. This constant issue was soon replaced by the ever faithful, if limited, TomTom. However, with the rise of smartphones, we had a new way to find our way, the map apps. There have been several apps that help you find your way around, but obviously the most well-known is Google Maps. However, while Google might be the most well-known, there are a couple of competitors, including Apple Maps. However, there is a third option, and it's one that I never really considered: Waze. For some reason, I never really bothered with Waze, partially because I am one of those people who never really change my app when I find one that works. I've been using Google Maps to chart my journey for years, but could it be time for a change? I decided to test the two apps to see which is better for me. To do this, I took both apps and had them navigate an hour-long trip for me, to see which offers the best information and the best overall route. I also wanted to see what the difference was in settings and what was unique about each app, even though both are owned by Google. I never really considered 'setting up' to be a part of a map app, but as it turns out, I was wrong when it comes to Waze. The app is full of options and features, including being able to add a variety of voices to relay directions to you. I have to say, having the option to have Halo's Master Chief was certainly novel, although it was odd that Cortana wasn't an option. Not only that, you can create a full profile on Waze, including a user name, that other people can see when on the app. Honestly, this addition is just confusing to me. Why would I want people whom I don't know to know where I am, and what speed I was going? On top of that, I'm not entirely sure why I would need to know that other people are using the app, other than Waze just showing off. Thankfully, you can turn this option off, which is the choice I went with. Google is much simpler, and doesn't really worry about you needing a profile or showing you other drivers.. There are some voice options, but honestly, I usually turn them off as they interrupt whatever you're listening to on Apple Music or Spotify. You can also set your home address, as well as your office and other sites you constantly visit, but that's about it. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The first thing I have to mention is that Waze is entirely about driving, so it doesn't offer directions for taking public transport or even walking. Meanwhile, Google Maps is a lot more comprehensive, even if the London Underground's hectic schedule faults and issues can make it have a digital migraine. With that said, both services claim to offer up-to-date traffic information, although Waze has it constantly visible, which I honestly prefer. This allows for more planning, but it can make the actual screen a bit too cluttered, which led me to worry a bit more about issues that I would never see. Meanwhile, Google makes you aware of certain points of interest in your journey, like speed cameras, but doesn't indicate them outside of your route. Both apps also offer digital speedometers, although neither was all that accurate. I wouldn't recommend telling the police that your map app said you were going 50, no matter how convincing you try to be. One thing Waze does offer is up-to-date parking information and if you've ever tried to park in London, this can be a real lifesaver. However, Google has one advantage in that it offers satellite imagery of the area around you, alongside street view. This can be a big deal when your friend forgets to tell you his address and says, 'It's the red house.' Google Maps can also work offline if you download the specific areas of the map onto your device. It's not ideal, and useless if you're in an emergency in an area you didn't download, but it's a nice option to have. So what was the drive actually like and how did the journey go? Honestly, the actual directions were pretty comparable, although Waze can get a bit confused when it comes to roads with restricted lanes. However, for the most part, they both got me where I needed to go. I will note that Google Maps does tend to take me on strange diversions, especially on longer journeys, which can be a bit of a pain. For instance, it decided I should leave a motorway, to then go straight back on the motorway a second later. It was tedious, and didn't happen nearly as much as on Waze. However, having a colored, detailed map was preferable to me over the stagnant white map that Waze uses. Meanwhile, Waze tended to avoid too much detail when it came to the roads, which is odd considering how much other stuff was rammed on the screen. This not only makes the screen look really cluttered, but it also makes it harder to focus on the route I am meant to be taking, which can be a bit confusing. The good news is that you can limit what you see on the map and I think you really should. However, one thing both do is ask if certain issues are still there, like a camera. I don't know who decided that having that was safe, but you can turn off the option in the settings (although it's on by default.) Thankfully, both apps have been updated to allow you to use your voice. At the end of the day, both Waze and Google will get you from point A to point B. The main difference is in the presentation. Google is more utilitarian and allows you to go far more in-depth with your journey options, picking the best one for you. Meanwhile, Waze offers a lot more personality, including the ability to pick interesting voices while also working to keep you up to date. It's ideal for anyone looking for more personality and color in their apps, especially if you rely on having a voice tell you where to go. Overall, Google Maps' options and the ability to use it offline (with some extra steps) help it earn the win for me. I also find all the added icons with Waze to be so much noise and irrelevant to what I want from a navigation app. A lot of this is down to personal preference, so let me know which app you prefer right in the comments.
