Sentencing Council warns against guidance being ‘dictated' by ministers
New guidance for judges to consider a criminal's ethnicity before deciding their punishment prompted Shabana Mahmood to write to the independent body to make clear her 'displeasure' and call for the changes to be reconsidered.
The Sentencing Council published new principles for courts to follow when imposing community and custodial sentences, including whether to suspend jail time, last Wednesday.
The updated guidance, which comes into force from April, says a pre-sentence report would usually be necessary before handing out punishment for someone of an ethnic, cultural or faith minority, alongside other groups such as young adults aged 18 to 25, women and pregnant women.
But Ms Mahmood wrote: 'A pre-sentence report can be instrumental in assisting courts in the determination of their sentence. But the access to one should not be determined by an offender's ethnicity, culture or religion.'
In a letter to Lord Justice William Davis, chairman of the Sentencing Council for England and Wales, Ms Mahmood said she was considering whether policy decisions such as this should be made by the Sentencing Council and what role MPs should play.
But Lord Justice Davis replied that the Sentencing Council preserves the 'critical' position of the independent judiciary in relation to sentencing.
He said: 'I respectfully question whether the inclusion of a list of cohorts in the imposition guideline was a policy decision of any significance.
'However, whatever the import of the decision, it related to an issue of sentencing.'
He further warned: 'In criminal proceedings where the offender is the subject of prosecution by the state, the state should not determine the sentence imposed on an individual offender.
'If sentencing guidelines of whatever kind were to be dictated in any way by ministers of the Crown, this principle would be breached.'
The council's chief said he was taking legal advice on whether the Justice Secretary's power under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 to ask for guidelines to be revised could be applied in this circumstance, and if it could, it will be considered at the body's next meeting.
'This is not a power which ever has been used to ask the council to revise a guideline immediately after it has been published and which has been the subject of detailed consultation with the Lord Chancellor,' Lord Justice Davis said.
Ms Mahmood had said 'no minister' in this Government approved of the guidance or was involved in the consultation.
The previous government was also consulted on the change during the consultation period between November 2023 to February 2024.
Lord Justice Davis said in response that there were 150 responses to the consultation on the new guidance, including from the then-minister for sentencing, with 'no concern expressed about the term now under debate'.
Of the new guidance, the chairman added there is 'good evidence' of a disparity in sentence outcomes between white offenders and those of an ethnic minority for some offences.
'Why this disparity exists remains unclear,' he said.
'The council's view is that providing a sentencer with as much information as possible about the offender is one means by which such disparity might be addressed.
'I do not accept the premise of your objection to the relevant part of the list of cohorts for whom a pre-sentence report will normally be considered necessary.
'I have seen it suggested that the guideline instructs sentencers to impose a more lenient sentence on those from ethnic minorities than white offenders. Plainly that suggestion is completely wrong.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
7 days ago
- The Hill
CIA must pull its weight to free Mahmood Habibi in Afghanistan
For many people, August is a fun time to enjoy summer vacation. But for our family, each Aug. 10 reminds us that another year has passed and my brother, Mahmood Habibi, remains in Taliban custody. My brother is a U.S. citizen who obtained citizenship after working on civil aviation issues in support of the U.S. mission in Afghanistan. After the U.S. left Afghanistan, he returned to work as a contractor for Asia Consultancy Group, which manages the air traffic control system at Kabul's airport and the cell towers in downtown Kabul. Shortly after the July 2022 drone strike that killed al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, my brother was arrested along with 30 other employees of his company. They were taken to the headquarters of the General Directorate of Intelligence, the Taliban's feared secret police, and interrogated about the company's involvement in the strike. It became apparent that the Taliban believed the CIA used cameras atop the company's cell towers to target its strike against Zawahiri. Indeed, the missile they used had to be guided to its target by sight, as it used blades rather than a warhead. Eventually, almost all the 31 people were let go, but not my brother — the only U.S. citizen they have. We have been fighting for three years now to get the Taliban to admit they are holding Mahmood so that he can be traded for. Other Americans — Ryan Corbett, George Glezmann, Faye Hall, and William McKenty — were arrested and released in that time, but the Taliban denies they ever had my brother. This denial comes in the face of overwhelming witness testimonies and technical evidence affirming that they arrested him. The Taliban even claimed that they never heard of him — that they looked in their jails and did not find him. As a result, they asserted that he must be dead. In contrast, people held with my brother by the secret police testified that they saw him. One person detained with my brother later reported: 'Even though we were kept in separate rooms next to each other, I could hear Mahmood's voice when he talked. At one point I personally saw Mahmood and one more [Asia Consultancy Group] employee in this … facility.' Congress has been supportive of our efforts. Parallel House and Senate resolutions are being submitted by Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Sen. Corey Booker (D-N.J.). The State Department and FBI have been incredibly supportive of my family, and their efforts under the Trump administration are so much more effective than under the Biden Administration. Whereas the Biden Administration politely asked for the Taliban's help, the Trump administration is now demanding that they hand my brother over. My family feels like we finally have someone fighting for us. Both the FBI and State Department worked together with us to offer a $5 million reward for my brother under the Rewards for Justice program. The National Security Council has also been working to create the conditions to bring Mahmood home and we are grateful to the Trump Administration for their advocacy. Unfortunately, the CIA has not been doing all it can to bring my brother home. They are the outlier in the U.S. government. Should my brother die in Taliban custody, I will consider his blood to be on their hands. Aside from its apparent inaction now, the CIA's first sin was that it failed to warn ACG to direct my brother, who was in the United Arab Emirates at the time of the drone strike, not to go back to Kabul. If the agency's collaboration with the company got my brother arrested, they had a duty of care to tell the company to warn employees against returning so soon after the strike. The best evidence that my brother had nothing to do with it was the fact that he returned to Kabul so soon afterward. At a time when the U.S. has cut off most of our funding to Afghanistan, we believe the CIA is still providing Title 50 support to its General Directorate for Intelligence — the same entity that arrested my brother and now denies having ever heard of him. We believe that the CIA has not leveraged this counter-terrorism relationship to encourage them to free my brother. We believe the CIA is ignoring an American citizen it could help, and who is only in a horrible situation because of its failure to warn him, in favor of a desire to play whack-a-mole with the Taliban against ISIS fighters in Afghanistan. I'm saying 'we believe' this because the CIA has refused every request we have made for a meeting — through the State Department, through the National Security Council and directly — for the last three years. If the CIA wants to be left alone in its efforts to work with Afghan authorities, we have no objection. We are taxpayers and we hate terrorists too. But the only way either the Taliban or the CIA will get peace from us is if the CIA leverages its relationship to encourage the Taliban to let my brother go. In the meantime, we hope the House and Senate Intelligence committees will look into this issue for us.
Hamilton Spectator
02-08-2025
- Hamilton Spectator
As Canada Post workers reject Crown corporation's final offer, next steps are unclear with both sides urged to return to bargaining
Canada Post workers have voted down the Crown corporation's 'final' contract offer, and labour experts say it's unclear exactly what will happen next in the already bitter dispute. Members of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers' urban unit voted the offer down 68.5 per cent to 31.5, while members of their suburban and rural unit turned it down 69.4 per cent to 30.6. Just under 81 per cent of the 53,000 eligible CUPW members cast their ballot. The voting, ordered by the federal government and monitored by the Canada Industrial Relations Board, opened on July 21 and wrapped up Friday at 5 p.m. In an emailed statement, CUPW urged Canada Post to come back to the bargaining table, and said the federal government should encourage bargaining to continue. 'The Government has stated its support for unions and fair bargaining. It needs to back its words with action by supporting a return to the bargaining table by both parties for meaningful negotiations. The best collective agreements are negotiated at the bargaining table,' CUPW said. 'CUPW is committed to staying at the bargaining table and expects Canada Post to do the same. CUPW's Negotiating Committees stand ready to negotiate good, ratifiable agreements.' The Crown corporation, which has said it lost $10 million per day during June, said it's considering its next steps. 'This result does not lessen the urgent need to modernize and protect this vital national service,' Canada Post said. 'However, it does mean the uncertainty that has been significantly impacting our business — and the many Canadians and Canadian businesses who depend on Canada Post — will continue. We are evaluating our next steps.' Those next steps, said labour relations experts, could include layoffs. But it all depends, said U of T professor Rafael Gomez, on whether the government gives a clear signal of whether it wants the Crown corporation to implement the restructuring recommended by veteran mediator William Kaplan in May. 'The government really needs to signal to both sides what it wants to do with the Kaplan report,' said Gomez, director of U of T's Centre for Industrial Relations and Human Resources. Kaplan's report, combined with rejection of the 'final' offer, means Canada Post management has a more free hand to cut costs than it did, said Gomez. 'What actions can Canada Post take on their own that don't require the government changing its official mandate? They probably now have a mandate to do it if they want to,' said Gomez. The 'final' offer vote, argued Brock University labour studies professor Larry Savage, prolonged the dispute without bringing it any closer to a resolution. 'The vote turned out to be major distraction. It didn't bring the parties any closer to concluding an agreement. And arguably, it only drew them further apart,' said Savage. 'The path to a negotiated settlement is as muddy as ever.' Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu urged the two sides to return to the bargaining table. 'It is now up to the parties to return to the table and come to an agreement that works for both of them,' Hajdu said in a post on X. 'The Government is monitoring this situation closely and expects the parties to reach a resolution as soon as possible.' On May 28, Canada Post made what it called its 'final' contract offer, which included a 13 per cent wage hike spread over four years, as well as a $1,000 signing bonus. Two days later, it asked Hajdu to order a vote on the offer. On June 12, Hajdu ordered the CIRB to organize a vote. The order came roughly a month after a key report from Kaplan, who said the Crown corporation was effectively insolvent. The union has repeatedly criticized the Crown corporation, saying it was trying to avoid a negotiated settlement . The report was done as part of an Industrial Inquiry Commission ordered in December by then-labour minister Steven MacKinnon, ending a month-long strike which began last November. Kaplan also said there's an impasse in bargaining, suggested arbitration wouldn't be a good choice to deal with Canada Post's need for restructuring, and said a 'final' offer would be the third option for an end to the dispute. Kaplan's May 15 report suggested the use of community mailboxes, the elimination of home delivery except for parcels, and getting rid of some post office locations and replacing them with franchises. Kaplan also suggested expanding parcel delivery to seven days a week, with the use of part-time and temporary employees. CUPW members have been in a legal strike position since May 23, but their strike action has so far been limited to a ban on overtime work. CUPW actively encouraged its members to vote against the offer. The Crown corporation has repeatedly insisted that it needs substantial restructuring, and has said it lost $10 million per day in June, calling those losses 'unsustainable.' The association representing Canada's small businesses pleaded with the federal government to extend CUPW's previous contract to avoid another work stoppage. According to the Canadian Federation of Independent Business, small businesses lost between $75 million and $100 million per day during last year's strike. 'This just brings more uncertainty at a time when small businesses are already struggling to plan ahead. We can't keep doing this,' said CFIB president Dan Kelly. A member survey by CFIB last month found that another strike could lead up to two thirds of businesses to ditch Canada Post for good.
New York Post
02-08-2025
- New York Post
Oh, Canada's hypocrisy! ‘Freedom Convoy' protesters face ludicrous prison sentences for mere ‘mischief'
According to Canada's top prosecutors, the only thing worse than tyranny is 'mischief.' And the worst possible 'mischief' is objecting to tyranny. In a sentencing hearing earlier this week, the Canadian government sought a ludicrous eight-year sentence for Chris Barber, one of the leaders of the Covid 'Freedom Convoy' protest that riled Ottawa in early 2022. For another leader, Tamara Lich, the Crown asked for an outlandish seven years. In April, a court ruled that Barbers and Lich were not guilty of obstructing police or intimidation during the demonstrations. But they were convicted of 'mischief' — in part because the truckers in the 40-mile convoy honked their horns to protest some of the most oppressive Covid mandates in the world. Advertisement 4 Canada's truck drivers protested a vaccine mandate in early 2022. REUTERS Crown prosecutor Siobhain Wetscher justified the harsh prison sentences saying 'it's difficult to imagine an offense of mischief with greater impact.' Ironically, that was the same way that many truckers felt about the Canadian government's Covid mandates. And now Canadian prosecutors are hounding the former protestors, pretending that a Canadian judge did not raze their entire legal house of cards a year ago. From the start of the pandemic, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acted as if Covid entitled him to absolute power. Anyone who refused to get the approved Covid vaccines was castigated as a public enemy. Advertisement 4 Tamara Lich was one of the leaders of the 'Freedom Convoy.' REUTERS Trudeau responded to the trucker protest by invoking the Emergencies Act, effectively dropping a legal nuclear bomb on his opponents. Canada's Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland announced that the government was 'broadening the scope of Canada's … terrorist-financing rules so that they cover Crowd Funding Platforms and the payment service providers they use.' The Trudeau government did not formally redefine horn-honking as a terrorist offense but that didn't impede their crackdown. Banks were authorized to freeze the personal accounts of anyone suspected of donating to the truckers. The Covid vaccines were catastrophically failing to prevent infections at the same time Trudeau dropped an iron fist on anti-vax protestors. Almost 90% of Canadian adults had been vaccinated by the start of 2022 as Covid cases were soaring, setting records almost every week. Even though he was vaxxed and boosted, Trudeau himself came down with Covid during the trucker protest. Advertisement 4 At the end of July, Lich attended a sentencing hearing for her role in the protests. The Crown asked that she be sentenced to seven years. REUTERS Trudeau pretended that no Canadian had a right not to get injected because he personally proclaimed that the Covid vaccine was safe. But the rushed approval process ignored potential adverse side effects. (The Food and Drug Administration now requires formal warnings about Covid vaccine risks of pericarditis — stabbing chest pains — and myocarditis.) In January 2024, Canadian federal judge Richard Mosley ruled that Trudeau's use of the Emergencies Act had been unreasonable, illegal and unconstitutional. Trudeau's regulations 'criminalized the attendance of every single person at those protests regardless of their actions.' The judge slammed 'the absence of any objective standard' for freezing bank accounts, but the court decision provided no relief for any of the victims whose bank accounts were unjustifiably seized or whose freedom and privacy was shredded. America saw similar absolute immunity for politicians who fueled fear and fabricated emergencies to seize absolute power, including New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's disastrous decree forcing nursing homes to accept Covid patients, President Joe Biden's illegal vaccine mandate for large private companies and Covid Czar Tony Fauci's presidential pardon for sending U.S. tax dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology that killed 7 million people worldwide. Advertisement 4 The Canadian government sought an 8-year sentence for Chris Barber (center). AP The persecution of trucker protestors is a stark reminder of the two-class system that permeated the pandemic in Canada and the U.S. There were no true 'lockdowns.' Instead, the laptop class and officialdom stayed home and enjoyed full salary, while the comparatively downtrodden delivered their groceries, fancy meals, and endless knick-knacks from Amazon. But all those doorstep deliveries were forgotten when the Canadian political and media elite teamed up to vilify any citizen who didn't submit to official commands. All the judicial precedents established since THE Magna Charta CARTA? were practically expunged by a ruling class that justified even Quebec's idiotic Covid decree prohibiting people from leaving their homes at night Perhaps the best punishment for the two Canadian trucker protest leaders would be to televise them standing in front of a blackboard where they write a hundred times: 'I'm sorry I objected to tyranny.' An even more apt punishment would be to compel all the Canadian politicians and officials who enforced oppressive Covid policies to wear ashes, sackcloth, and a sign: 'I'm sorry for my tyranny.' Is a little 'mischief' the only way to get politicians to heed a Constitution? James Bovard is the author of 11 books, including 'Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty.'
