‘We'll keep fighting' — Pontypridd family's plea after brother's death in Benidorm
Father-of-four Nathan Osman, 30, was found dead at the base of a remote cliff less than 24 hours after arriving in Benidorm last September.
His family, from Pontypridd, told S4C's Y Byd ar Bedwar programme that they 'didn't get the support' they expected from the Foreign Office, and are now campaigning for a change in the law.
Within hours of finding Nathan's body, police initially concluded that the cause of death was suicide – something which the family refutes.
Alannah Hughes, Nathan's sister, said: 'We knew straight away that there was something untoward behind this story and behind Nathan's death.
'I received a phone call off a Spanish number... they said 'your brother has been found dead at the bottom of a cliff'... and that was it."
As a result, the family travelled to Benidorm to gather their own evidence to present to the National Police – which Nathan's brother, Lee Evans, described as 'instinctive'.
This evidence included proof of attempts to use Nathan's bank card in the hours after he died on 28 September.
Their dossier also included a list of properties with CCTV which hadn't been collected by local police.
Lee said: 'We've had to fight for evidence and for answers, but there is still so much we don't know.'
After the family presented the evidence, the National Police in Benidorm reopened Nathan's case as a homicide investigation.
Despite this development, the family feels that there was a lack of support throughout.
Alannah said: 'We reached out to the police here in Benidorm... We had no help. No support from any authority'.
Now, they're calling for a change of law to provide more help for families of British nationals who have been murdered abroad – with the backing of their local MP, Labour's Alex Davies-Jones.
This would include a statutory framework to provide consistent communication in English to bereaved families, as well as a named point of contact.
Lee told Y Byd ar Bedwar that this framework should extend to increased financial support – something which would have helped them pay the £7,000 needed to get Nathan's body back to the UK.
In response, a spokesperson for the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said: 'Our staff stand ready to support British nationals around the world. In any given year, we support around 20,000 British nationals and their families.
"In cases of British nationals who die abroad, we can provide personalised support including practical information regarding processes in different countries.'
For Alannah, she feels these changes are necessary.
She said the family have 'been through hell' and that they 'want families in the future, if they lose loved ones abroad, to have a structure that we didn't have".
'We're exhausted but we'll keep fighting," Alannah said.
Lee added: 'We can look at the family, to Nathan's children and tell them we've tried everything and done everything to get answers."
We contacted the National Police in Benidorm to respond to the family's claims about the way they've handled Nathan's case, but they said they cannot comment or share information as the investigation is still ongoing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Nine students trapped in Gaza will get help to take up places at UK universities
Nine students in Gaza with full scholarships to study at British universities have been told the UK government is working to facilitate their evacuation. The students – who have all been awarded Chevening scholarships, funded by the Foreign Office in recognition of their potential as future leaders – welcomed the development on Wednesday, but dozens more Palestinians in Gaza with university places are still awaiting news. The breakthrough follows months of advocacy and campaigning by more than 100 MPs, university leaders and other civil society organisations. More than 80 Palestinian students in total have offers at UK universities, including 40 who have secured full scholarships. Dr Nora Parr, a researcher at the University of Birmingham who has been coordinating efforts to support the students, said: 'We received news of the government plans with mixed emotions. On the one hand, relief that indeed there is a shared sense of the importance and urgency of the students' situation – and on the other our hearts sank. What about the rest? We must believe that this is only a start.' Khulud, 28, who has a place at University College London to study for a master's degree in dental health, said: 'Receiving the news about the evacuation today was overwhelming.' The students have been unable to travel and begin their studies because of a Home Office requirement for biometric data for a visa application. The UK-authorised biometrics registration centre in Gaza closed in October 2023 and it has been impossible for them to travel to other centres in neighbouring countries. Other countries, including Italy, Ireland and France, have already evacuated students. It is understood the British government is considering requests for support from other Palestinian students with places at UK universities. 'Through all these struggles, our voices are finally being heard,' said Khulud. 'Nothing we have endured has been in vain. I hope these steps are completed smoothly so that we can join our studies on time.' Of her fellow students who are still waiting, she said: 'I hope their determination is recognised, and that they too receive the support they deserve to continue their studies and achieve their dreams.' Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion A government spokesperson said: 'We are working urgently to support Chevening scholars in Gaza who have offers from British universities to leave and take up their places in the UK. 'We are doing everything we can to support their safe exit and onward travel to the UK but the situation on the ground in Gaza makes this extremely challenging.'
Leader Live
2 hours ago
- Leader Live
Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
The ruling on Wednesday by Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A US justice department spokesperson declined to comment. Judge Berman said the information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.' According to his ruling, no victims gave evidence before the Epstein grand jury. The only witness, the judge wrote, was an FBI agent 'who had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay'. The agent gave evidence over two days, on June 18 and July 2 2019. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow shown during the June 18 session and a call log shown during the July 2 session, which ended with grand jurors voting to indict Epstein. Both of those will also remain sealed, Judge Berman ruled. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the justice department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of US President Donald Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, Trump administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. 'The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein file,' Judge Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the justice department's refusal to release additional records on its own while simultaneously moving to unseal grand jury transcripts. 'By comparison,' he added, 'the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by US deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, and the house oversight committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter Maxwell's lawyers, representative James Comer, the committee chairman, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Mr Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Judge denies justice department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
The ruling on Wednesday by Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her conviction on sex trafficking charges for helping Epstein sexually abuse girls and young women. Epstein died in jail awaiting trial. A US justice department spokesperson declined to comment. Judge Berman said the information contained in the Epstein grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice.' According to his ruling, no victims gave evidence before the Epstein grand jury. The only witness, the judge wrote, was an FBI agent 'who had no direct knowledge of the facts of the case and whose testimony was mostly hearsay'. The agent gave evidence over two days, on June 18 and July 2 2019. The rest of the grand jury presentation consisted of a PowerPoint slideshow shown during the June 18 session and a call log shown during the July 2 session, which ended with grand jurors voting to indict Epstein. Both of those will also remain sealed, Judge Berman ruled. Maxwell's case has been the subject of heightened public focus since an outcry over the justice department's statement last month saying that it would not be releasing any additional documents from the Epstein sex trafficking investigation. The decision infuriated online sleuths, conspiracy theorists and elements of US President Donald Trump's base who had hoped to see proof of a government cover-up. Since then, Trump administration officials have tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case, including by requesting from courts the unsealing of grand jury transcripts. 'The government is the logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein file,' Judge Berman wrote in an apparent reference to the justice department's refusal to release additional records on its own while simultaneously moving to unseal grand jury transcripts. 'By comparison,' he added, 'the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breadth and scope of the Epstein files in the government's possession. The grand jury testimony is merely a hearsay snippet of Jeffrey Epstein's alleged conduct.' Meanwhile, Maxwell was interviewed at a Florida courthouse weeks ago by US deputy attorney general Todd Blanche, and the house oversight committee had also said that it wanted to speak with Maxwell. Her lawyers said they would be open to an interview but only if the panel were to ensure immunity from prosecution. In a letter Maxwell's lawyers, representative James Comer, the committee chairman, wrote that the committee was willing to delay the deposition until after the resolution of Maxwell's appeal to the Supreme Court. That appeal is expected to be resolved in late September. Mr Comer wrote that while Maxwell's testimony was 'vital' to the Republican-led investigation into Epstein, the committee would not provide immunity or any questions in advance of her testimony, as was requested by her team.
