Comedian dishes on why people are flocking to podcasts for their information
Comedian Kelsey Cook offered her thoughts on why more and more people are flocking to podcasts for their information, as well as what has contributed to the meteoric rise of stand-up comedy in recent years.
Cook has been a stand-up comedian for over 15 years, and her most recent special, "Mark Your Territory," premiered on Hulu and YouTube on Feb. 11.
The main reason she believes people are turning to podcasts over mainstream media boils down to a lack of trust and relatability between the mainstream media and the public.
Comic Aaron Weber Reveals The Secret Behind Comedy's 'Boom' And Why It's 'Never Been Bigger'
"I think people are starting to get more of their political information from podcasts because I think people want to feel like they can trust the interviewer more. And oftentimes, podcasters are people who present as just like, 'I am one of you,'" said Cook. "Especially if it's a comedian, it feels very like, this is a person who's just like us."
She also noted that people have a much easier time relating to comedians and podcasters, who typically present themselves as everyday people, than they would a politician or news anchor.
Read On The Fox News App
"This [podcaster] isn't another politician or maybe a news anchor that we don't necessarily relate to as much. And so I think that's kind of why people have turned more to podcasts for not just feeling like they trust the host more, but also, it's like a very different interview environment," said the comedian. "I think the things that are being talked about are a little more laid back. Feels like potentially a more authentic interview than on a major news source."
Comic Ari Shaffir Urges Americans To Put Down The Phone, Turn Off The News, And 'Find Some Joy' In The World
The 2024 election cycle put this idea of the public trusting podcasters over legacy media into the spotlight, with President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance allocating large portions of their time on the campaign trail to appearing on popular podcasts such as the Joe Rogan Experience and the Tim Dillon Show.
This strategy paid off, with Trump winning the popular vote in 2024 and continuing to see his approval ratings at personal all-time highs after the election.
Cook also touched on comedy becoming a freer medium than it ever has been, with comics having the ability to say whatever they want — whether they're on-stage or in the podcast studio — and find an audience who's interested in what they say. As Cook explained, there are no longer gatekeepers who are able to mediate what comics are able to convey to their audiences.
"I do think that comedy's become a more free medium. I think more than ever, people have been able to find their own fan base, and it doesn't necessarily have to be like, you don't have to be everybody's cup of tea," Cook claimed. "I think it is becoming very free where people can kind of do what they want, say what they want, and their fans will find them."
As far as stand-up comedy, Cook feels that the biggest reason for its recent surge in popularity was the COVID-19 pandemic, which resulted in people paying more attention to social media and streaming services than ever before.
Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture
"I think the thing that's probably helped comedy explode the most was probably the pandemic. You know, everybody was inside on their phones watching TV, watching their phone, and that became a time for comics to make as much content as you could because there was such a demand for it," said Cook.
The end of the pandemic was the beginning of the touring boom for stand-ups, according to Cook. Many people who found their favorite comedians via social media and streaming services during the lockdowns were finally able to see their favorite acts in person.
"I think you saw people finding their new favorite comics over the pandemic, and then once things opened back up and people could start touring again, people were like, 'great, this person's coming to my city, I've been cooped up inside for however long now, I want to go out and do stuff.' And so I think a lot of us saw a big touring boom, especially once people could go out and kind of resume normal life again."
According to Pollstar, revenue from stand-up shows had doubled from 2022 to 2024, with the combined gross revenue among the top 25 comedians during the past year being $582.7 million.Original article source: Comedian dishes on why people are flocking to podcasts for their information
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
8 minutes ago
- CNBC
Ron Insana says Trump's spending bill unlikely to generate the economic boom he promised
As he did in his first term as president, President Donald Trump is once again predicting an economic boom the likes of which the U.S. has never before seen. In reviewing the publicly available economic data since Ronald Reagan, the period in which the U.S. grew the fastest with the most job creation did not occur in Trump's first term and is unlikely to do so in this term, the reasons why to be explained shortly. First, a brief review of recent economic history where the biggest economic boom actually took place. Former President Bill Clinton's eight years in office produced nearly 4% annual growth, over 240,000 jobs added per month and an inflation rate that averaged less than 3%, considered very low for that time. The unemployment rate when Clinton first took office was 7.3% and bottomed at 3.8% by April 2000. By contrast, in Trump's first term, the economy added under 200,000 jobs per month, roughly equal to that of former President Barack Obama, while GDP growth averaged 2.3%, again, roughly equal to Obama's last three years in office, while inflation was less than a quarter percentage point lower than in Obama's second term. (Trump's numbers, of course, were skewed by the Covid crisis, which featured the steepest and shortest recession in U.S. history.) All that leads me to the notion that a boom, the likes of which we have not seen, is unlikely even if the "Big Beautiful Bill" passes through Congress and lands on Trump's desk. And here's why. Nothing new to help growth First, the bill largely extends existing tax rates that were put in place in 2017, without further lowering corporate taxes, as once promised, from 21% to 15%. There are no major additional tax cuts included in the bill. The bill simply makes much of the existing code permanent. No change, no gain. It's true that taxes on tips, overtime and Social Security payments may be eliminated, but that could also lead to employers seeking out ways, in the first two cases anyway, to pay lower wages if tips and overtime go untaxed. Beyond that, there's not much new in the bill that would accelerate economic growth, nor would a failure of the bill's passage lead to a 68% tax increase for everyone in America, as the president has warned . Published analyses have suggested that 68% of Americans could see a 7% increase in their taxes, but not a 68% increase in what they pay. Given the prospects for rising inflation amid recently imposed tariffs, and a subsequent slowing in consumer spending, some of which is already taking place, the economy appears to be downshifting rather than speeding up. Job growth , as we saw on Friday, has moderated for several months in a row and while not reflective of a recession, we're also witnessing a jump in jobless claims, announced layoffs and, according to some published reports, consumers maxing out credit cards to buy the basics. Add to that the reductions in support for the poorest Americans, whether its access to Medicaid or food stamps, and the ingredients for a further slowdown are embedded in the bill, especially for those who can least afford to have government assistance reduced in a meaningful way. Big changes needed The Department of Government Efficiency spending cuts are also affecting government stimulus in so far as key funding in technology, medicine and education are being slashed, threatening the very areas that make the U.S. economy competitive and very much growth-oriented. The bill, by most accounts, also adds from $2.4 trillion to $3.3 trillion to the budget deficit over the next decade. With the current national debt standing at a record $36.2 trillion, higher federal borrowing needs could further push up borrowing costs as investors, especially international ones, now nervous about America's fiscal position could demand higher yields to compensate them for the risk, however unlikely, that the U.S. runs into trouble in paying its bills. During the Clinton administration, tax rates were higher, and yet growth was stronger, 22.7 million jobs were added and the budget deficit turned to surplus by the end of his term. None of those metrics are supported by existing or proposed policy initiatives today. The Clinton boom was second only to that of FDR, whose economy grew strongly as Roosevelt took over, quite literally, at the very bottom of the Great Depression. In modern times, Clinton's economy was stronger than that of any president who came before or after him. None of the policies currently being pursued by this administration offer the same prospects for growth though, even like Clinton, this president has a major technological revolution underway. That big, beautiful bill would require some big, bountiful changes if it hopes to stimulate growth in a way in which all Americans, rather than perhaps a handful of billionaires, will share meaningfully in any future prosperity.


Time Magazine
13 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What the National Guard Crackdown in LA Made Us See
I was wondering at what point the nation that elected President Donald Trump twice would reach a collective breaking point. Could a country that overwhelmingly voted for mass deportations ever feel a moral calling to defend immigrants again? What would it take? It turns out that a growing number of Americans, exemplified by the mass protests in Los Angeles, are slowly starting to see everything the Trump administration doesn't want them to see, as federal agents conduct mass ICE raids across the country: humans, not criminals, being taken away. Faced with ICE raids over the June 7 weekend, hundreds of community members descended upon Los Angeles' downtown, building on a long legacy of civil unrest. This moment of empathy is not only the antidote to dehumanization, but also has the potential to upend the very story that got Trump elected to begin with. After his victory and endless fearmongering, Trump counted on America to welcome his anti-immigrant agenda, underestimating Americans' own capacity to feel compassion for immigrants. Perhaps, Americans also underestimated themselves. Until now. The Trump administration will continue to do everything in its power to feed voters images that are meant to sustain the fear and xenophobia that mobilized millions to support Trump at the ballot box. Over the weekend, the administration deployed the National Guard to respond to L.A. protestors, a show of force intended to reinforce a narrative that subtly casts Trump as the patriotic savior protecting Americans from the unruly masses defending immigrant criminals. It's the classic 'us vs. them' playbook manifested in yet another sinister way, leading Trump to say this Sunday, 'We are not going to let this country be torn apart.' The only problem is that voters are increasingly seeing Trump as the perpetrator of that division. And once you see it, it's hard to look away. Over the last couple of weeks, our social media has been flooded with images of masked ICE agents wearing bulletproof vests snatching undocumented immigrants by traffic stops, inside courthouses, in their workplace, or in parking lots. It's part of the White House's mission to ramp up ICE operations, detain 3,000 migrants a day, and follow through on their campaign promise to protect Americans from the so-called 'migrant invasion.' Yet, as federal immigration agents roam through communities, ordinary bystanders rely on their own eyes—not the administration's manufactured photo-ops portraying migrants as 'gang members'—to judge the scenes. From Nashville to New York City to Phoenix, rolling cameras are capturing fathers kissing their daughters goodbye as they are escorted by agents; 12-year-old boys being left alone on sidewalks after ICE raids; busboys being handcuffed outside local restaurants; neighbors being slammed to the ground, shoved into cars and vanishing. The breaking point happens when ordinary Americans can suddenly see themselves and their loved ones—their kids, parents, coworkers or neighbors—reflected in those images. It's happened before. In 2012, hundreds and thousands of Dreamers put a human face to the children of immigrants as they held mass rallies across the nation, pressuring President Barack Obama to offer many of them relief from deportation. In them, millions of voters started to simply see 'American Dreamers.' In 2018, during the Trump administration's Zero Tolerance policy, the sight and sound of mothers being separated from their children at the southern border haunted American families. In migrant children, even midwestern mothers recognized the sound of their own kids. Today, those viral videos circulating online seem to have hit a new nerve in an America that is constantly searching for its moral compass. In rural Missouri, crowds gathered for Ming Li Hui, a beloved immigrant waitress from Hong Kong. In Worcester, a city in central Massachusetts, hundreds protested to demand 'ICE stop taking mothers.' In a small San Diego street corner, a group of neighbors clashed with ICE agents who had just raided a restaurant. From coast to coast, these small rallies culminated in the mass protests held in Los Angeles over this weekend, marking what feels like the beginning of a new national breaking point. Los Angeles, a majority-minority city with a significant undocumented population, has a unique history of protest. From the 1968 East Los Angeles student walkouts to the 1992 Rodney King Riots to the 2006 'Day Without Immigrants' protests, the city's streets have traditionally been used as a tool to push politicians, shape public discourse, and echo deep-seated anger towards social injustices. Several pundits believe the Trump administration is counting on the L.A. protests to escalate into the type of violence that lays the groundwork for further military force, once again propping Trump as the national strongman hero. At this point, it's unclear how the events will continue to unfold and whether or not Los Angeles will inspire other American cities to mass mobilize. But if history is any indication, then we should also wonder how long Americans will hold onto this moral outrage. Is the breaking point here to stay—or is it fleeting? My guess is that it may be here to stay. But for other reasons than we might think. ICE raids breaking apart immigrant families isn't just awakening a basic sense of humanity among ordinary citizens. It's also allowing many to see something even more profound within those images: the emergence of a militarized America that is starting to feel unrecognizable to the bystander. Because if you zoom into the deluge of rolling videos, it's not the immigrants who do not belong in the frame; it's those masked, armed agents glaring back at us. Maybe, all along, this was the real breaking point America needed. That subtle realization that American democracy is slipping away. It took immigrants to open our eyes. It's important that we not look away.


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
Sunny Hostin insists its 'not illegal' to be undocumented during immigration discussion on 'The View'
"The View" co-host Sunny Hostin declared Monday that it wasn't illegal to be undocumented because it's considered a civil offense. "Sixty percent of the American public, two-thirds of independents, 90% of Republicans and just a little under half of Democrats think the crime is in being undocumented," co-host Sara Haines said of Trump administration deportation efforts. "What I'm saying is, a massive amount of this country actually agrees with, not how he's doing it, but what he's doing." The co-hosts criticized President Donald Trump for sending in the National Guard on Monday to help quell rioting in Los Angeles over the weekend. "There's misinformation out there," Hostin said. "Let's axe that right now, because it is not illegal to be undocumented. It is not a crime to be undocumented. People are not illegal." "We need to put that information out there. It is a civil infraction," Hostin continued. Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin pushed back and said it wasn't a broad misunderstanding, referring back to Haines' argument. "I think that 60% of Americans believe it's a civil offense and that if you come here, and you're undocumented, that you should be deported," she said. Haines told her co-hosts that there was more support for deportations than they realized. Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., has also slammed Trump for sending in the National Guard. "I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command," Newsom wrote on X on Sunday alongside his letter to Trump. "We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty – inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed." Several polls have shown broad support for deporting at least some illegal immigrants. A Pew Research Center poll released in late May found that 32% of U.S. adults say all illegal immigrants should be deported from the country, while 16% say none should be deported. About half of U.S. adults, however, said at least some immigrants living in the country illegally should be deported, although they couldn't reach a consensus on what factor should be grounds for deportation. A Fox News poll from October 2024 found that two-thirds of voters favored Trump's mass deportation plan.