logo
Indiana legislative session 2025 halfway point: A look at bills that advanced, died

Indiana legislative session 2025 halfway point: A look at bills that advanced, died

Yahoo24-02-2025

Bills about the Indiana-Illinois border, Gary paying back casino fees and immigration have advanced, while an early voting bill, abortion bills and a Crown Point food and beverage tax have died — at least for the moment — as the Indiana 2025 legislative session reached the halfway mark.
Both chambers of the legislature met Thursday to give final approval to dozens of bills. Bills that hadn't been heard in committee by Monday won't be able to advance on their own. When the session reconvenes March 3, bills will switch chambers for consideration. On occasion, language from failed bills gets amended to other bills late in the session.
The 2025 legislative session is a budget session. Lawmakers will determine how to spend $44 billion for schools, health care programs, and infrastructure among other state-funded departments and programs.
The House approved, along party lines, a biennial budget Thursday. Republicans praised the budget for being fiscally responsible, while Democrats opposed the budget for falling short of fully funding schools, Medicaid and other services.
'It's opportunity for parents to make the choice for the best place for their children to attend school. It's the opportunity for Hoosiers to live in a state with an extremely bright future. It's opportunity for Hoosiers to be in a state that has a structurally balanced budget with healthy reserves,' said Rep. Jeff Thompson, R-Lizton, who authored the budget, which is in House Bill 1001.
Property tax cuts put pressure on municipal, school budgets
Senate Bill 1, authored by Sen. Travis Holdman, R-Markle, is a massive property tax relief plan that is the Republican supermajority's main priority for this legislative session. The bill, though amended, still takes $1 billion away from local governments and school districts.
'We just think there's a fine line that we have to walk to make sure that we are careful to be responsible to the local units of government and at the same time provide some relief to tax payers,' Holdman said.
Senate Bill 1 changes the percentage cap used to determine the maximum levy growth quotient to 0% in 2026, 1% in 2027 and 2% in 2028; and allows a county fiscal body to establish a property tax payment deferral program, where up to $10,000 can be deferred and the deferment becomes a lien on the property.
Senate Bill 1 offers tax deductions to those 65 years old and older and those who are disabled, establishes a firsttime home buyer tax credit, and allows for local governments to utilize a levy referendum during even-year general elections.
The bill was amended to remove Gov. Mike Braun's property tax relief plan he campaigned on. The bill initially stated a homestead standard deduction amount of 60% of the homestead's assessed value if the value is more than $125,000 or $48,000 plus 60% of the remaining assessed value if the homestead has an assessed value of $125,000 or less.
The fiscal impact of the amended bill would cut $1.4 billion across the state between 2026 and 2028, including $370.9 million from schools, $67 million from libraries, $304.3 million from cities and towns, and $346.6 million from counties.
It is less than the original plan, which would have cut $1.9 billion from schools, $254 million from libraries, $890 million from cities and towns, and $765 million from counties.
Michael Hicks, Director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University, said Senate Bill 1 would cut about $1 billion for local governments at a time when local government is operating 'leaner now than it has been anytime that we've been keeping data, at least since the late 1960s.'
Local governments use property tax funds to pave roads, provide police and fire service, and maintain park and recreation facilities, Hicks said.
Democrats have stated they are pleased Senate Bill 1 was amended, but that it still negatively impacts local governments. Under Senate Bill 1 and Senate Bill 518, authored by Sen. Linda Rogers, R-Granger, funds from a school corporation referendum have to be shared with area charter schools as of May 2025, which would cause public schools to cut their budgets further, Democrats said.
'SB 518 was sold as a way to 'fairly' fund education, but the reality is far different. This bill does not increase funding for schools. It does not improve outcomes for students. It does not invest in the future of Indiana's education system. Instead, it shifts the financial burden of charter school funding away from the state and onto local homeowners — while 90% of Hoosier students continue to attend traditional public schools,' the Indiana Senate Democratic Caucus said in a statement.
Senate Bill 2, authored by Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka, passed and would place restrictions on Medicaid, such as work requirements for moderate-income Hoosiers who are in the Healthy Indiana Plan and are between the ages of 19 to 64. Any changes to the state's Medicaid program would have to be approved by federal officials.
The bill also creates a program cap, which threatens access for hundreds of thousands of Hoosiers. The bill includes 11 exemptions for the work requirement, including volunteering, receiving unemployment, or participating in a substance abuse program.
Mishler called Senate Bill 2 his attempt to 'right-size' Medicaid, which has grown exponentially in the wake of the pandemic. In the last four years, Medicaid costs have grown by $5 billion and participants have nearly doubled — from 390,000 to 750,000.
Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, said the legislators have to reckon with maintaining Medicaid services amid the inaccurate projection by $984 million for its Medicaid expenditure forecast in April 2023. The missed projection was the result of state reversions and unanticipated growth of services for aging and disabled residents.
The bill would end the expansion of Medicaid in Indiana. The bill would take the state back to the initial version of the Healthy Indiana Plan, where through a waiver the state controls who is added to the plan, Qaddoura said.
'We're effectively killing Medicaid expansion in the state of Indiana under the federal law,' Qaddoura said.
Senate Bill 287, authored by Sen. Gary Byrne, R-Byrneville, Sen. Chris Garten, R-Charlestown, and Sen. Blake Doriot, R-Goshen, advanced. It would change the school board election process to that of other elections, requiring candidates to declare a party and a primary and general election.
'I want a person that may have the same ideologies as I do sitting on that board. Currently, there are many citizens that don't know that when they are voting,' Byrne said when the bill was in committee. 'People go down the ballot, and they get to school board, and they don't know who or the ideologies or the beliefs that they have … and they just don't vote. I believe this would increase voter participation.'
Sen. Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, said making school board elections partisan would discourage people from running for school boards. The bill would also go against the Hatch Act, which prohibits state and local government employees from running for partisan political office, she said.
Indiana House Bill 1008, authored by Speaker Todd Huston, is headed to the Senate. It would establish an Indiana-Illinois boundary adjustment commission to research the possibility of adjusting the boundaries between the two states. Though it's unlikely Illinois would ever pass a companion bill, a commission would include five members appointed by the Indiana governor and five members appointed by Illinois.
Huston drafted the bill after he learned that nearly three dozen Illinois counties have voted in recent years to leave the state, he said.
In November, seven Illinois counties — Iroquois, Calhoun, Clinton, Greene, Jersey, Madison and Perry counties — voted to secede from the state. Iroquois County is along the Indiana border, the remaining six counties are closer to Missouri.
To change a state line, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the Indiana legislature, the Illinois legislature and then Congress would have to approve the measure, said Indiana University Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs professor Paul Helmke.
House Bill 1008 begins the conversation of moving the state line, Huston said. Illinois State Rep. Brad Halbrook, R-Shelbyville, has filed a companion bill in Illinois, Huston said.
Rep. Ragen Hatcher, D-Gary, voted in favor of the bill when it was in committee but ultimately voted against it when it was considered by the House. Ahead of her vote, Hatcher addressed the House and asked for the Republican supermajority to be as considerate of Democrats in Indiana as they are to Illinois residents.
'I understand what it means to be overlooked. Time and time again, legislation directly affecting Gary has been introduced and advanced by lawmakers from other areas without input from those of us who actually represent the community,' Hatcher said.
Two immigration bills – House Bill 1531 and House Bill 1393 – advanced to the Senate. House Bill 1531, authored by Rep. J.D. Prescott, R-Union City, ties state funding to the enforcement of federal immigration law by state and local governments, police and businesses.
House Bill 1531 was amended to remove language requiring schools to report undocumented students.
House Bill 1393, authored by State Rep. Garrett Bascom, R-Lawrenceburg, allows police officers who arrest someone for a felony or misdemeanor and has probable cause to believe the person isn't a legal resident should notify the county sheriff. The sheriff will then report the person to Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Sophia Arshad, a Merrillville immigration attorney, said House Bill 1393 allows for racial profiling.
A bill that would require the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission to submit an annual budget to the Lake County Council before Sept. 1 of each year for a nonbinding review advanced to the House.
Senate Bill 40 co-author Sen. Rick Niemeyer, R-Lowell, said the commission oversees a $6 million budget. While the current commissioners have done a good job allocating the funds, Niemeyer said a future makeup of the commission may not be as fiscally responsible.
Dan Repay, the executive director of the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission, previously said the commission understands 'that people want to see what's going on and we don't have an issue with doing that.'
Senate Bill 187, authored by Sen. Dan Dernulc, R-Highland, wants the term of anyone serving on a county property tax assessment board of appeals who isn't an Indiana resident to expire July 1. The fiscal body, which is the council in Lake County, would then be required to appoint a new member to finish out the member's term.
Dernulc said he drafted the bill, which passed the Senate unanimously, after learning about Lake County PTABOA member Samantha Steele, who is also a Cook County Board of Review commissioner and was arrested for driving under the influence in Chicago late last year.
House Bill 1448 — which passed the House — requires the city of Gary to pay more than $12 million to East Chicago and Michigan City.
Ahead of Thursday's vote, author Rep. Hal Slager, R-Schererville, said the bill works to fix 'a misalignment of gaming revenue that was altered for four years through the movement of a gaming license and a hold harmless agreement.'
'We've got to get this straightened out and give the comptroller the authority to get that taken care of. This is a compromise solution,' Slager said.
Northwest Indiana is throwing its hat into the ring – again – to court the Chicago Bears to build a stadium in the region. The courtship, though, is an open one as a new bill — approved by the House and headed to the Senate — aims to attract any sports franchise to Northwest Indiana.
House Bill 1292, authored by Rep. Earl Harris, D-East Chicago, would establish a Northwest Indiana professional sports development commission, which would study plans to attract one or more professional sports franchises.
Harris said the commission would explore attracting professional football, baseball, basketball, hockey or soccer teams.
'The Bears are the big boy, so that has received the most attention. Honestly, I would love it if The Bears moved their location over to Northwest Indiana, but we are open to any sport,' Harris said.
Early in the session. Rep. Julie Olthoff, R-Crown Point, pulled a bill that would create a food and beverage tax for Crown Point after further discussion with the city's chamber of commerce.
Olthoff said chamber of commerce officials raised questions about how much money the tax would generate and a specific plan for spending the funds. As setting the tax and what it can be spent on is negotiable, Olthoff said there wasn't 'a full answer on that.'
The money collected from the tax, an estimated $1.182 million in 2026, would've been used for expansion and improvement of the Crown Point Sportsplex, Bulldog Park and Sauerman Woods Park; repairs and future development of the historic Lake County Courthouse and Lake County Jail; development and expansion of downtown parking capacity and amenities near the square and courthouse; and development and expansion of a multi-use trails.
Senate Bill 284, authored by Byrne, would shorten in-person absentee voting to 7 days. The bill was amended in committee to 14 days from the current 28 days.
Lake County Election and Voter Registration Board director Michelle Fajman testified against the bill because Lake County voters have really started utilizing early in-person voting in recent years.
Fajman said she disagreed with a point the committee discussed that fewer people vote in the first 14 days of early in-person voting. County election officials should have a voice in their early in-person voting setup, she said, because they know the trends of their voters best.
In Lake County, 90,049 voters voted early in-person in the 2024 presidential election, Fajman said. For that many people to vote in two weeks or one week would become hectic, she said.
'We like having the full amount of time. We'd like to do more,' Fajman said. 'Early voting serves a purpose. We're one of the worst in the nation with voter turnout, and here we're trying to limit it.'
The Senate Elections Committee passed the bill 6-3. But, Byrne never called the bill for a vote from the whole Senate.
Senate Bill 201, authored by Sen. Mike Gaskill, R-Indianapolis, would have required voters to choose their political parties in a primary election. It was never heard in committee.
Slager authored House Bill 1110, which would make it a Class A misdemeanor for a person to offer a payment to a public official as a reward for action taken or for a public servant to solicit or accept a payment as a reward for an act taken. The bill was never heard in committee.
Two abortion pill bills — Senate Bill 245 and Senate Bill 171 — were never heard in committee.
Sen. Michael Young, R-Indianapolis, authored Senate Bill 171 which would prohibit someone from knowingly or intentionally prescribing or possessing an abortion-inducing drug or sending an abortion-inducing drug to a person who lives in Indiana.
Senators Tyler Johnson, R-Leo, and Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, authored Senate Bill 245, which would make it a Level 5 felony if someone intentionally gives a pregnant woman Mifepristone or Misoprostol without her consent.
Jennifer Drobac, a professor of law emerita at Indiana University, said the bills prove the legislators don't understand the uses of Mifepristone or Misoprostol, which can be used to terminate a pregnancy but also regulate other conditions. The bills also would've caused harm to the low-income, marginalized women who can't afford to travel out of state to get an abortion, she said.
akukulka@post-trib.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask
Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask

New York Post

time14 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Congress to grill Kathy Hochul on NY sanctuary laws — and local GOP offers spicy advice over what questions they should ask

ALBANY – State Republican lawmakers offered advice to their congressional counterparts ahead of Gov. Kathy Hochul testimony on Thursday over sanctuary policies – outlining a list of questions to fling at the Democrat. The GOP legislators sent a letter to House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer ahead of Hochul's trip to Washington, DC where she'll be grilled by a congressional panel on the Empire State's sanctuary laws. 'Governor Hochul's sanctuary state policies have played a direct role in the ongoing migrant crisis throughout our state, despite bipartisan concern including repeated warnings from New York City Mayor Eric Adams,' Assemblyman Michael Tannousis (R-Staten Island) wrote in the letter, cosigned by various other New York GOP lawmakers. Advertisement 'We believe that Governor Hochul must be held accountable for her failure to reverse the state's sanctuary policies and recklessness with taxpayer dollars,' Tannousis continued. Gov. Kathy Hochul is set to testify on capitol hill Thursday on New York's sanctuary city laws and its handling of the influx of migrants. Hochul is voluntarily appearing before the House committee on Capitol Hill and will testify alongside Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker. The hearing is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. Advertisement In their letter, the Republican state lawmakers ask the House Republicans to ask Hochul to outline: Why New York continued to accept migrants during the height of the crisis The vetting process for migrants and concerns about public safety A shady $432 million no-bid contract awarded to DocGo to help mitigate the crisis Her justification for roughly $4 billion the state has spent dealing with migrants Why some municipalities weren't reimbursed with costs associated with the migrants Tannousis said he wants the House Oversight committee to follow through after Hochul's testimony to deliver 'accountability.' The governor has tried to navigate a vague middle ground when it comes to the state's sanctuary policy, which is still based on a 2017 executive order issued by then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo who is now running for mayor of New York City. Advertisement Assemblyman Michael Tannousis and other Albany Republicans wrote a letter to the House panel suggesting areas where they should hammer Hochul. Michael McWeeney Hochul had promised specifics and clarity over her guidance on how New York would work with federal immigration authorities. Instead, her office only provided a list of four broad categories of situations that would trigger state law enforcement to work with the feds, such as if ICE has a judicial warrant or when relevant to investigating another crime committed in New York. Hochul had previously said she was 'happy to go down' to DC for the hearing. 'I'll tell them our policy in the state of New York is not to use state resources, our state police, to enforce the civil infractions,' Hochul said earlier this year.

Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand
Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand

New York Post

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Democrats are in the polling dumps — fighting America on this key demand

The Democratic Party has never been more unpopular — yet no Democrat seems to understand why. Some say they're not fighting President Donald Trump hard enough. Others say they aren't messaging their agenda well enough. In reality, they're fighting too hard for an agenda that Americans reject, with a central demand of welfare for all. Thirty-two years after President Bill Clinton promised to 'end welfare as we know it,' no idea unifies the Democratic Party more than the belief that welfare should be never-ending. This vision of government dependency spurred their most notable policies of recent years, and explains their intransigent opposition to Republican reforms. While some Democrats show an increasing willingness to compromise on other leftist priorities, such as biological men in women's sports, the party brooks no dissent on welfare — even though Americans want to fix the system's many failures. Consider the ongoing federal budget battle. House Republicans have put together a reconciliation bill that would slow the rate of Medicaid growth — from a projected 59.6% increase to 40% — over the next decade. Democrats oppose even that, including GOP attempts to end waste, fraud and abuse. Yet the latest federal data show that 22% of Medicaid payments and 12% of food-stamp payments went to ineligible recipients. More than 70% of likely voters want to protect taxpayers from fraud and abuse, polls show, yet Democrats essentially deny there's a problem that needs to be solved. In fact, when the Trump administration proposed a rule in March to end $11 billion in improper ObamaCare subsidies — aiming solely to curtail fraud — Democrats immediately opposed it. Democrats are just as adamant when it comes to work requirements for welfare recipients. My organization, the Foundation for Government Accountability, recently found that six in 10 able-bodied adults on Medicaid don't work at all, hoovering up resources that would benefit the truly vulnerable. When voters in purple Wisconsin were asked two years ago if welfare recipients should work as a condition of receiving benefits, nearly 80% said yes — but national Democrats now say no. They also reject Republican attempts to block Medicaid payments for illegal immigrants, which would save billions of dollars over the next decade. More than 70% of voters don't want illegal immigrants to receive government benefits, yet Democrats bizarrely disagree. But it's not just Congress; Democrats are striking the same strange tune in state capitols. Over the past 10 years, virtually all Republican-led states have taken steps to purge waste, fraud and abuse from welfare programs. By contrast, Democrat-run states have expanded illegal immigrants' access to Medicaid and pushed able-bodied adults onto welfare programs. In recent months, Democratic governors in Kansas and Arizona have vetoed Republican bills that would ban food-stamp purchases of soda and junk food — a reform that could lower state and federal Medicaid spending and encourage healthier choices. Democrats have a long history of supporting restrictions on consumers' options, but as soon as welfare enters the picture, they oppose it. Apparently limiting freedom is fine by them, but limiting federal welfare is unthinkable. The left's unwillingness to support even modest welfare reforms reflects the reality that government dependency is the biggest thing Democrats now offer Americans — even beyond limitless immigration and the Green New Deal. The Affordable Care Act, the central achievement of Barack Obama's presidency, dramatically expanded Medicaid while creating a new welfare system for the individual health-insurance market. Joe Biden enacted a work-destroying child tax credit and sought perpetual expansions of Medicaid and food stamps under the guise of pandemic relief. A slew of Biden regulations made it easier for people to abuse the taxpayer's generosity, from Medicaid to food stamps to free school lunches for rich kids. Democrats' end goal is clear: Get every American on the dole. Yet insisting that government dependency is always the answer means Democrats can't publicly admit that seemingly infinite welfare has any shortcomings. In fact, the left's agenda of welfare-for-all is profoundly harmful, and voters know it. Democrats have built a welfare system that taxpayers can't afford while pushing millions of people out of the workforce — a dual assault on the economic growth. They've left fewer resources for disabled children and the elderly by prioritizing able-bodied adults and illegal immigrants. And they're corrupting the foundational American belief that welfare is temporary assistance whose recipients should work to get back on their feet. No wonder Democrats are so unpopular: They're fleecing taxpayers, crippling the economy, hurting the truly needy and giving handouts to those who don't deserve them — none of which has Americans' support. The first Democrat who wakes up on welfare will be the hero their party desperately needs. Hayden Dublois is data and analytics director at the Foundation for Government Accountability.

Kathy Hochul's gutless silence on assisted suicide is a betrayal: Rep. Stefanik
Kathy Hochul's gutless silence on assisted suicide is a betrayal: Rep. Stefanik

New York Post

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Kathy Hochul's gutless silence on assisted suicide is a betrayal: Rep. Stefanik

Last month, Gov. Kathy Hochul attacked Republicans for their budget bill that aims to rein in wasteful and fraudulent federal spending. 'I believe that we should try to prevent our constituents from dying,' she declared. Now, just two weeks later, New Yorkers have proof that these words from Hochul's lips are a cruel lie. My heart shatters for our state: Hochul's gutless silence on the so-called assisted suicide bill passed by Albany's far-left Democrats isn't just cowardice; it's a betrayal of every New Yorker clinging to hope, a dagger in the backs of the vulnerable she swore to protect. In the last days of this year's legislative session, New York state Senate Democrats forced through a despicable measure, in a 35-27 vote, empowering doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to the terminally ill. This isn't 'dignity' or 'choice,' but a death sentence cloaked in deception, telling our elderly, our disabled and our sick that their lives aren't worth fighting for. The bill now sits on Hochul's desk, and where is she? Hiding. Silent. Dodging with a spineless 'she'll review the legislation' statement from her team. All while families of all political and spiritual backgrounds, all across New York, weep at the thought of our state allowing companies to profit off death. Hochul's hypocrisy knows no bounds. New York ranks dead last in access to palliative care, a compassionate lifeline that eases suffering and restores dignity for the terminally ill. Palliative care envelops patients in holistic support to manage pain and address emotional and spiritual needs, and it helps families navigate the unthinkable. It's doctors and nurses sitting bedside, listening to fears and crafting plans that honor life. It's the hand squeezed during a sleepless night, the reassurance that no one faces the end alone. Yet in Hochul's New York, only a fraction of those who need palliative services can access them — leaving the suffering to beg for comfort while leftist Democrats under her watch push a culture of death and despair. This failure compounds a broader crisis caused by Kathy Hochul's worthless leadership. One in five New Yorkers battles mental illness yearly, and hundreds of thousands go untreated. Those who live with disabilities are crushed by a cruel bureaucratic maze, worsened by Hochul's heartless overhaul of the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program, which put the desires of politically connected contractors over the needs of suffering families and caregivers. Again and again, her policies destroy hope for those in need — and yet she stands mute and inept as her party peddles a bill that whispers 'Give up' to a depressed veteran, tells a grandmother with cancer 'You're a burden' and screams to a disabled New Yorker, 'Your life isn't worth saving.' It's anti-human, it's anti-American, and it's a betrayal of the values that bind us as New Yorkers. Hochul's silence here speaks volumes, and it isn't indecision but complicity, trading vulnerable lives for political points with her far-left Democrat base. New Yorkers are heartbroken and furious. Under Hochul's catastrophic reign, crime surges, costs crush families, corruption festers — and now the sanctity of life itself is under assault. People are fleeing to Florida and other states, driven out by the worst governor in America who fails them at every turn. Hochul has the power to veto this moral travesty. She could champion life by investing in palliative care that wraps the suffering in dignity and love. Instead, her silence screams surrender. I won't stay silent. My heart burns for the mother praying for one more day with her child, for the disabled New Yorker fighting for respect, for every soul this bill would discard. New York needs real leadership — robust palliative-care programs, accessible mental-health services and dignified support for the disabled — not a state-encouraged push toward the grave. In 2026, New Yorkers will reject this failed governor at the ballot box and restore principled leadership that cherishes every life. Kathy Hochul, the clock is ticking. Veto this bill or you'll be remembered as the governor who truly let hope die. New Yorkers are watching — and we won't forget. Republican Elise Stefanik represents New York's 21st District in Congress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store