The golden year half a century ago
The film turned the idea of romance on its head with its focus on an unusual, complex relationship dynamic where a young man falls in love with an older woman, while her daughter gets attracted to his father. Its ambiguous open-endedness notwithstanding, Apoorva Raagangal feels liberal not just for its own times.
The film completes 50 years this August 15, the day that saw the release of one of the most commercially successful Indian films, Ramesh Sippy's Sholay. While this much mythologised film will expectedly be the cause of many celebrations this year, it would be appropriate to also acknowledge the other cinematic saplings born that year that have grown in relevance since.
While 1957 is often called the highpoint in Indian cinema's golden age, 1975 was noteworthy in its own way. If it signalled a turning point in Tamil cinema with the arrival of a new generation of accomplished male stars, to eventually take the baton from Sivaji Ganesan and M G Ramachandran, filmmakers like Balachander and later Bharathiraja made mainstream Tamil cinema soar to new heights in the following years.
In Telugu cinema, 1975 marked the continuation of the domination of N T Rama Rao. However, Dasari Narayan Rao's Balipeetam is a significant pick from the year's crop, exploring the still-relevant issue of tensions in an inter-caste marriage between a Dalit boy and a Brahmin girl.
In Malayalam cinema, the year was one of the most fecund for actor Prem Nazir, with more than a dozen releases. But more important was the arrival of G Aravindan as a force to reckon with in the parallel cinema movement. Though his debut feature Uttarayanam won the national and Kerala state film awards in 1974, its year of release is often attributed as 1975.
Aravindan dealt with the crucial issue of unemployment in the 1970s and how it was driven by conflicting ideologies—varied means geared towards the same end. With experiments with storytelling and form, Aravindan made a strong comment on political opportunism and the corruption seeping into the individual and the system.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Farhan Akhtar's 120 Bahadur rekindles the forgotten bravery of the Battle of Rezang La: The story of PVC awardee Major Shaitan Singh Bhati
Farhan Akhtar Steps Into the Boots of a Legend The Unseen Side of Heroism: 63 Years Later You Might Also Like: Farhan Akhtar could have been Prateik Smita Patil's stepbrother: Actor reveals unknown secret about Shabana Azmi and Javed Akhtar Why This Story Still Matters Farhan Akhtar's 120 Bahadur is not your regular war drama. The teaser reveals a chilling, windswept landscape — Eastern Ladakh, 1962 — where 120 Indian soldiers of the 13 Kumaon Regiment stood their ground against a 3,000-strong Chinese force. What unfolded in the heights of Rezang La during the Sino-Indian war is considered one of the most gallant last stands in modern military to The Battle of Rezang La , the 120 soldiers, largely Ahirs from Haryana, held their position at a crucial mountain pass near Chushul with limited artillery support. Facing human-wave attacks and equipped with basic weaponry, they fought till their last breath — some engaging in hand-to-hand combat when ammunition ran Akhtar returns to the big screen playing the role of Param Vir Chakra awardee Major Shaitan Singh Bhati , the lionhearted commander who led the defence of Rezang La. Despite being grievously wounded during the battle, Major Singh refused evacuation and continued to motivate his men, embodying the spirit of 'do or die.'A report from Bollywood Shaadis reveals how the story's cinematic adaptation is deeply rooted in real-life courage. Major Singh's leadership and martyrdom are immortalised in Indian military lore, and his story will now reach a new generation through Akhtar's by Razneesh Ghai and produced under the Excel Entertainment banner, 120 Bahadur is more than a retelling of history. It is a tribute to sacrifice. The film was shot on location in Ladakh and Rajasthan to retain authenticity, and its November 21, 2025 release will coincide with the 63rd anniversary of the battle.A memorial now stands at Rezang La, honouring the fallen. An inscription on the Rewari memorial echoes their spirit:"How can a man die better, than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his gods."The Battle of Rezang La wasn't just a military event — it was a defining moment of resolve. Despite overwhelming odds, Indian soldiers inflicted heavy casualties on the Chinese — reportedly over 1,300 — and prevented a deeper intrusion into Indian to military archives, the Chinese were so struck by the courage of the Indian soldiers that they respectfully covered the fallen bodies with blankets and placed bayonets over them so that the makeshift covers did not fly off; an uncharacteristic gesture in the midst of war.
Pink Villa
an hour ago
- Pink Villa
Ramayana: Real jewelry used on Indira Krishnan as Kaushalya in Ranbir Kapoor starrer, costumes didn't merge with other characters
Ranbir Kapoor and Yash starrer Ramayana is among the most-anticipated projects of Indian cinema. Indira Krishanan, who is playing Mata Kaushalya, recently talked about the costumes of Ramayana and revealed using real and authentic jewelry in the film. In a recent chat with Galatta India, Indira Krishnan shed light on the costumes of Ramayana. She revealed that Rimple and Harpreet Natula have designed all the costumes of the major characters in the movie. She called her costumes 'Absolute surreal' and said, 'Mere costumes itne heavy aur beautiful hai. Harpreet & Rimple have done a beautiful job on the costumes. They have done costumes for primary characters (in Ramayana).' Further, the Animal actress stated that they have used real and authentic jewelry in the shoot. 'I had a lot of dress trials and they had a lot of color combinations. Hamare Jewelry real the. We used to give a look test exactly jaise aap set pe rahoge. They used to have an entire table for Kaushalya's jewelry and costumes. So they used to mix and match which look perfect,' added Indira Krishnan. Indira Krishnan highlighted that the costume team used to put extra attention on each character so that no one would merge with the other. 'Most importantly, they made sure that wo costumes har ek character ke saath merge na ho. If you are standing in a crowd, toh Kaushalya kaise alag dikhegi,' concluded the actress. For the unversed, Rimple & Harpreet Narula have previously worked with Sanjay Leela Bhansali on Padmaavat and Heeramandi. The costume designers have also worked on Housefull 4's period-era costumes and Bhool Bhulaiyaa 2. As per Indira Krishnan's recent comment, Ramayana will have authentic costumes, which will make the experience much more memorable. The Nitesh Tiwari directorial is hitting the cinemas on Diwali 2026. The two-part epic saga is mounted on a huge budget of around USD 500 million (nearly Rs 4000 crore), as per Producer Namit Malhotra's claims. Stay tuned to Pinkvilla for more updates.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Farhan Akhtar reveals Javed Akhtar and Salim Khan changed the original ending of Sholay due to Emergency: ‘Thakur crushed Gabbar with his own feet'
As India celebrates the 50th anniversary of Sholay this Independence Day, actor and filmmaker Farhan Akhtar has opened up about the film's powerful legacy, its groundbreaking visuals, and the lesser-known truth about its original, much darker ending. Directed by Ramesh Sippy and written by the legendary Salim-Javed duo, Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar , Sholay released on August 15, 1975. It featured an ensemble cast of Amitabh Bachchan, Dharmendra, Hema Malini, Sanjeev Kumar, Amjad Khan, and Jaya Bachchan. The film didn't just define careers, it changed the landscape of Indian cinema. 'Every character in Sholay was unforgettable' Promoting his upcoming war drama 120 Bahadur on Prakhar Gupta's podcast, Farhan recalled the impact of Sholay on his generation. 'The film just leaves a huge impact on you,' he said. 'The way it was mounted and all the characters were fun. It wasn't just Jai and Veeru who were exciting — the jailer, Surma Bhopali, Gabbar, and Basanti were all great characters. It was a massive hit.' He further praised the film's production value and technical brilliance, calling it ahead of its time. 'The direction and shooting were so great… it had never happened before, apart from maybe Mughal-E-Azam. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like NRIs Living In Germany Are Eligible For INR 2 Lakh Monthly Pension. Invest 18K/Month Get Offer Undo You look at the visuals and think, 'How did they shoot this?' Even today, it stands the test of time. People still don't make films like that. Everyone is so dependent on VFX, and that will never look as good as Sholay. ' Farhan Akhtar reveals one issue he had from 'Dil Chahta Hai'| 'Echoes' album| Daughter Akira and more 'Thakur was meant to kill Gabbar' Farhan then revealed that the climax we saw on screen wasn't what Salim-Javed had originally written. According to him, Thakur, the police officer played by Sanjeev Kumar, was originally meant to kill Gabbar Singh with his bare feet in a brutal act of revenge after losing his family and arms to the dacoit. 'In the original ending, he actually kills Gabbar,' Farhan shared. 'That was the emotional core of the film — Thakur plotting his revenge after his hands were cut off. We get lost in the Jai-Veeru friendship, but the real spine was the honest cop going after the dacoit who ruined his life.' 'They joked that only the postman was missing' The change, Farhan revealed, was made under pressure during the Emergency era, which led to a more 'acceptable' ending where the police arrest Gabbar instead. 'They had to change it due to the Emergency, and the original ending is now available. That is actually when he cries — after crushing Gabbar with his own feet.' Describing the frustration of his father Javed Akhtar and writing partner Salim Khan, Farhan added, 'They were wondering about everyone showing up — the villagers, the police, the protagonists — and joked that the only person missing now is a postman. The ending didn't make sense to them, but they had no choice.'
