NGT notice to CPCB, Bihar authorities over rise in lightning deaths due to felling of palm trees
New Delhi, The National Green Tribunal has sought a response from the Central Pollution Control Board and others in a matter related to the large-scale felling of palm trees in Bihar which is reportedly causing an increase in lightning-related deaths. NGT notice to CPCB, Bihar authorities over rise in lightning deaths due to felling of palm trees
The green body was hearing a matter where it had taken suo motu cognisance of a newspaper report on alleged widespread cutting of palm trees that is directly linked to a sharp increase in lightning-related fatalities, with over 2,000 lives lost since 2016 in Bihar.
In an order dated June 5, a bench of NGT's judicial member Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi and expert member A Senthil Vel said, "According to the article, dozens of towering palm trees are being felled, leading to more frequent lightning strikes that result in deaths."
According to the report, after the ban on toddy tapping due to Bihar's prohibition policy, palm trees lost their economic value and have since been widely cut down. This ecological loss appeared to have made rural areas more vulnerable to lightning strikes, with the state recording over 2,000 lightning-related deaths since 2016.
"The article states that the number of lightning deaths began to rise following the rampant felling of palm trees. The worst-affected districts include Aurangabad, Patna, Nalanda, Kaimur, Rohtas, Bhojpur and Buxar. Most lightning-related deaths occur between 12:30 and 4:30 pm, when many people are outside for work," the NGT said, citing the report.
It further noted that the area under palm tree cultivation in the state had decreased by 40 per cent and that plantation of the trees had almost stopped.
"The matter seems to attract the provisions of the Environment Act," it said.
The tribunal impleaded CPCB, Bihar State Pollution Control Board, regional office of the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and Bihar Disaster Management Department as parties or respondents.
"Let notices be issued to the respondents for filing their response/reply," the NGT said, listing the matter for further proceedings on August 7 before the eastern zonal bench in Kolkata.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
NGT stays ‘illegal' concrete plant near SGNP
Mumbai: The Pune bench of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Wednesday issued an order prohibiting J Kumar Infraprojects Ltd from operating its ready mix concrete (RMC) plant in Thane. The plant, located within the eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of the Sanjay Gandhi National Park (SGNP), manufactures girders for various ongoing metro rail projects. NGT stays 'illegal' concrete plant near SGNP The bench of justices Dinesh Kumar Singh and Dr Vijay Kulkarni passed the order on a petition filed by Vanshakti, a Mumbai-based nonprofit, which alleged that the RMC plant was functioning illegally, without due permissions, and its operations were destroying the ecology around the Chene and Bhayander Pada villages. In the petition, Vanshakti claimed that over 27 plots in the two forested villages were affected due to the RMC plant. The top soil had been cleared illegally to set up the plant, cement sludge had been dumped on site, and dust emanated constantly from the casting yard of the plant, directly affecting the ecology of the ESZ contiguous to the SGNP, the petition alleged. Transportation of raw materials and cement using multi-axle vehicles, dumpers and trucks further spread dust in the area and affected various sensitive flora and fauna, it noted. The petition further alleged J Kumar Infraprojects Ltd did not have requisite permissions for the plant as the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) had failed to provide to Vanashakti copies of applications by the company to establish and operate the plant as well as site inspection reports. The nonprofit had sought these documents in June 2024 under the Right to Information (RTI) Act, but in July 2024, the MPCB reverted saying the documents were not available on record. The chief conservator of forests and the director of SGNP told the NGT bench via affidavits that the RMC plant was indeed located in the ESZ of the national park. The SGNP's ESZ monitoring committee had inquired via a letter to J Kumar Infraprojects dated January 30, 2025 if the plant had the relevant permissions, the chief conservator of forests said in his affidavit. The committee was also contemplating action on the company under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the affidavit mentioned. Advocate Zaman Ali, appearing for Vanshakti, sought a prohibitory order from the tribunal against the company. The tribunal, after hearing both sides, issued an interim order restricting the company from operating the RMC plant. It will adjudicate on the alleged illegality of the plant in due course. HT reached out to J Kumar Infraprojects' spokesperson for comments on the development, but there was no response from the company.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Owner's risk no excuse: Punjab and Haryana high court holds railways liable for pilferage losses
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has held the railway department liable for compensating losses due to pilferage of iron consignments even when goods were booked at "owner's risk", clarifying that this classification does not absolve railways of liability if negligence is evident. Citing sections 79, 93, and 94 of the Railways Act, the court has emphasised the duty of the railways to account for consignments once they assume control, even if loaded at private sidings. "The refusal to allow re-weighment, a right under Section 79, was deemed a serious lapse," the court has held. Justice Pankaj Jain passed the order while deciding a 34-year-old matter in the appeals filed by the Steel Authority of India Limited and Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited, challenging the dismissal of their claim petitions by the Railway claims tribunal. The case dates back to the early 1990s, when the steel companies booked consignments of pig iron from Vishakhapatnam to Goraya, Jalandhar. Though the journey was expected to take 6–8 days, the wagons remained in transit for nearly a month. Suspecting pilferage, the consignees requested re-weighment of the goods. However, the request was repeatedly denied by the railway authorities. The companies engaged an independent surveyor, who confirmed significant shortages in the delivered material. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트, 지금 시작하세요 [자세히 보기] 임플란트 더 알아보기 Undo However, the railway tribunal previously rejected their claims on technical grounds, including lack of proper authorisation to file claims and failure to establish service of statutory notices under section 106 of the Railways Act. In its detailed order released last week, Justice Jain held that the railway tribunal erred. The judge held that the regional manager legal, who filed the claim, was duly authorised under a valid board resolution. Further, the court observed that statutory notice was served and backed by affidavit, and no evidence was produced by the railways to refute it. The single bench was also of the view that the denial of re-weighment and failure to counter the surveyor's findings pointed to such negligence. Finally, the court ordered compensation for the claimants for the full extent of the losses suffered, with 7% interest per annum from the date of filing until actual payment. The cause of action arose in the early 1990s, with the case pending before the high court since 1993. MSID:: 121975080 413 |
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Man sentenced for 'rape' with minor wife acquitted
Bhopal: A division bench of the MP High Court acquitted a person sentenced to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment by a POCSO court on charges of 'raping' his wife when she was a minor. Holding marriage with a minor as illegal and a physical relationship with the girl as rape, the trial court sentenced him to 20 years of rigorous imprisonment. Hearing his appeal, the division bench of the MP High Court, however, held that the girl was an adult and set aside the trial court order. The petition filed by the accused, belonging to Khandwa town of MP, said that he had a relationship with the girl in question and they eloped on May 18, 2020. They got married in a temple. The girl's father lodged a report about his missing daughter with the police. When the police recovered the girl, she was pregnant. During the trial against him in the POCSO court, the girl told the court that she was 20 years of age. She further said that her father demanded Rs 5 lakh from her husband to drop the complaint against him, and when he couldn't meet the demand, he lodged a police complaint against him. She further said in the court that she studied up to class V at a school and her age was ascertained from school records. The bench of Justice Vivek Agarwal and Justice Dev Narayan Mishra, after hearing arguments from both sides, said that the father of the girl stated in court that he was 59 years of age and he got married at the age of 22 years. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo His elder sister was born 4 years after the marriage, and the girl in question was born 8 years after the marriage. She was admitted to school without showing a birth certificate, and her date of birth was registered as November 26, 2004. There is no documentary proof to this effect, and the girl says that she is an adult. In this situation, holding the petitioner guilty of rape because the girl was a minor at the time of marriage was not appropriate. With this, the court set aside the trial court order and acquitted the accused.
