logo
Judge rules Newfoundland parishioners must hand over their church to be sold

Judge rules Newfoundland parishioners must hand over their church to be sold

Toronto Star22-05-2025
ST. JOHN'S - A judge has ordered parishioners in southeastern Newfoundland to hand over their church so it can be sold to pay survivors of sexual abuse.
The province's Supreme Court says parishioners of the Holy Rosary Church in Portugal Cove South, N.L., must return control of the building to the Roman Catholic archdiocese in St. John's.
Justice Garrett Handrigan says the group of parishioners took the law into their own hands when they changed the locks on the church's doors last year in an effort to prevent its sale.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Handrigan's written decision says the actions were breaches of the peace, and it grants a permanent injunction against their occupation of the building.
The archdiocese has been selling off its assets in eastern Newfoundland as part of bankruptcy proceedings to compensate survivors of abuse at the former Mount Cashel orphanage in St. John's.
A Supreme Court of Canada decision in 2021 cemented the archdiocese's liability for physical and sexual abuse at the orphanage between the 1940s and the 1960s.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 22, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brazilian police say ex-president Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina
Brazilian police say ex-president Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina

Toronto Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Brazilian police say ex-president Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina

Published Aug 20, 2025 • 2 minute read Brazil's former President Jair Bolsonaro, center, temporarily allowed out of house arrest for medical exams, departs a hospital in Brasília, Brazil, Saturday, Aug. 16, 2025. Photo by Eraldo Peres / AP BRASILIA — Brazil's federal police said that messages found on the telephone of embattled former president Jair Bolsonaro show that at one point he wanted to flee to Argentina and request political asylum, according to documents seen Wednesday by The Associated Press. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Bolsonaro is waiting for a Supreme Court ruling next month about an alleged coup attempt and he might face another case as police formally accused him and one of his sons of obstruction of justice in connection with his pending trial. The AP had access to the police investigation and reviewed the documents, which were sent to Brazil's Supreme Court. The Argentine government did not respond a request for a comment from the AP. Silas Malafaia, an evangelical pastor who is a staunch ally of Bolsonaro's, was also targeted by police. He had his passport seized by investigators but was not formally accused of obstruction of justice. Brazilian federal police investigators said in a 170-page report that Bolsonaro had a draft of a request for political asylum from Argentine President Javier Milei's government dated Feb. 10, 2024. The former president saved the document two days after authorities searched his home and office as part of an investigation into an alleged coup plot. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. In a 33-page letter addressed to Milei, Bolsonaro claimed he was being politically persecuted in Brazil. 'I, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, request political asylum from Your Excellency in the Republic of Argentina, under an urgent regime, as I find myself in a situation of political persecution in Brazil and fear for my life,' the Brazilian leader wrote. On Feb. 12, Bolsonaro reportedly spent two nights at the Hungarian Embassy in Brasilia, fueling speculation among critics that he may have been attempting to avoid arrest. Brazilian federal police investigators also said in their report that Bolsonaro's decision to ignore precautionary measures established for his house arrest and spread content to his allies 'sought to directly hit Brazilian democratic institutions, notably the Supreme Court and even Brazil's Congress.' Read More Columnists Toronto & GTA Editorials Toronto & GTA Ontario

US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC
US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC

Winnipeg Free Press

time6 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

US attorney will no longer bring felony charges against people for carrying rifles or shotguns in DC

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors in the nation's capital will no longer bring felony charges against people for possessing rifles or shotguns in the District of Columbia, according to a new policy adopted by the leader of the nation's largest U.S. attorney's office. That office will continue to pursue charges when someone is accused of using a shotgun or rifle in a violent crime or has a criminal record that makes it illegal to have a firearm. Local authorities in Washington can prosecute people for illegally possessing unregistered rifles and shotguns. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro said in a statement that the change is based on guidance from the Justice Department and the Office of Solicitor General and conforms with two Supreme Court decisions on gun rights. Pirro, a former Fox News host, has been a vocal critic of local officials' crime-fighting efforts since Republican President Donald Trump installed her in office in May. Her policy shift means federal prosecutors will not purse charges under the D.C. law that made it illegal to carry rifles or shotguns, except in limited cases involving permit holders. The change also overlaps with Trump's declaration of a crime emergency in the city, flooding the streets of Washington with patrols of hundreds of federal agents and National Guard members. The White House says 76 firearms have been seized since the crackdown started this month. The new policy also coves large-capacity magazines, but it does not apply to handguns. 'We will continue to seize all illegal and unlicensed firearms, and to vigorously prosecute all crimes connected with them,' Pirro said, adding that she and Trump 'are committed to prosecuting gun crime.' Pirro said a blanket ban on possessing shotguns and rifles violates the Supreme Court's ruling in 2022 that struck down a New York gun law and held that Americans have a right to carry firearms in public for self-defense. She also pointed to the high court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller striking down the city's ban on handguns in the home.

B.C. man gets life sentence for 2015 killing of rival drug dealer
B.C. man gets life sentence for 2015 killing of rival drug dealer

CBC

time7 hours ago

  • CBC

B.C. man gets life sentence for 2015 killing of rival drug dealer

Social Sharing A B.C. man has been sentenced to life in prison for the murder of a rival drug dealer in northern B.C. more than a decade ago, with no chance of parole for 25 years. Darren Sundman, 43, was sentenced this week for the January 2015 killing of Jordan McLeod along a snowy forest service road near Prince George, and leaving his body to be discovered two months later, in March. Sundman was first found guilty of the killing of 2018 but the case faced several delays, including an appeal process that made its way to Canada's highest court, the Supreme Court of Canada, in 2022. Family members of McLeod described the impact the delays had on their lives in victim impact statements delivered in a court room as Sundman listened via video conference. "This tragedy did not just take Jordan from us, it destroyed our family," cousin Natalie Lawrence said Monday, Aug. 18. "My family has been irreparably fractured and none of us will ever be the same." "Mr. Sundman's moral culpability is very high," Justice Marguerite H. Church stated in delivering her sentence, stating that he "brutally murdered Jordan McLeod" while he was confined in a "prolonged and deliberate manner." Sundman will be allowed to apply to have his time without parole reduced after serving 15 years, Church said, but warned it would be a high bar to meet. Nor, she said, would he automatically be allowed to apply for parole after 25 years. Rival drug dealers with 'mutual animosity' According to a previous statement of facts published by the Supreme Court of Canada, Sundman — who was 32 or 33 at the time of the offence — and McLeod, who was 24, were both drug dealers "with a mutual animosity," operating in the Vanderhoof area, west of Prince George. On Jan. 16, 2015, Sundman, along with his brother Kurtis, trapped McLeod in a truck, which was also occupied by Sundman's girlfriend Staci Stevenson and another accomplice, Sebastien Martin. Both the Sundmans had handguns while Martin had a shotgun and McLeod was unarmed. While driving between Prince George and Vanderhoof, the court found, Sundman repeatedly hit McLeod in the head with his handgun while his brother egged him on and drove the truck fast enough that McLeod would not be able to escape. "The appellant [Sundman] was angry with Mr. McLeod for many reasons," the ruling reads. "He suspected that Mr. McLeod was having a relationship with Ms. Stevenson; Mr. McLeod was encroaching on the Sundman brothers' turf by supplying drugs to the Vanderhoof market; the Sundman brothers owed a drug debt to Mr. McLeod and he was pressuring them to repay the debt; and the appellant had seen messages on Mr. McLeod's phone that had upset him." As the truck traveled east of Prince George past Purden Lake, Kurtis Sundman slowed the truck to make a turn and McLeod jumped out, fleeing "through deep snow, across a shallow ditch and barbed wire fence, towards the bush," the 2022 ruling says. Sundman fired his gun at McLeod "at least four times" and hit him three times, before a fatal shot was fired by Martin. The three men then loaded McLeod's body into their truck and drove west of Prince George, where they hid the body in the foliage along Kaykay Forest Service Road, where it would be found later that year by police, with the assistance of Stevenson. In 2018, Kurtin Sundman was found guilty of manslaughter, while both Martin and Darren Sundman were found guilty of second-degree murder. Victim 'forcibly confined' while fleeing: Supreme Court Crown prosecutors initially charged Sundman with first-degree murder, which is typically reserved for cases where a killing is both planned and deliberate, or when it is committed at the same time as another serious offence, which the Crown argued in this case was the forcible confinement of McLeod. However, the initial 2018 ruling found that McLeod's killing was not planned in advance. Additionally, the judge found that because McLeod had managed to escape prior to being killed, he was no longer forcibly confined and the first-degree murder charge did not apply. The Crown appealed the case, arguing that because McLeod was on an isolated forest road with little option for escape when he was shot, he should still be considered confined at the time of the killing. The B.C. Court of Appeal agreed and convicted Sundman of first-degree murder, a decision that was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada. "Even though [McLeod] was not physically restrained outside the truck, he continued to be coercively restrained through violence, fear, and intimidation," Justice Mahmud Jamal wrote in that 2022 decision. Sundman's sentencing was further delayed because of another case currently making its way through the courts. While the minimum sentence for first-degree murder is 25 years in prison with no chance of parole, the constitutionality of the practice of treating all first-degree murderers the same is being challenged. Justice Church said the prolonged nature of the trial had further added to the anguish of McLeod's friends and family, with their pain still "as keenly felt today," as it was more than 10 years ago. Sundman apologizes to family but denies charge Sundman, appearing virtually from where he is being held in the Stony Mountain institution in Manitoba, represented himself during the sentencing, having gone through "at least" four lawyers over the course of the past decade. He accused the judge, prosecutors, past lawyers and others of being biased against him, claiming his conviction had relied on false testimony from his former girlfriend. While he did not deny his role in McLeod's confinement, he said the charge of first-degree murder should not hold because he was not the person who fired the fatal bullet. That, he said, was done by Martin, who is serving a lesser sentence, which McLeod felt was unfair. The decision to charge him with first-degree murder based on the argument that McLeod was confined while fleeing, he said, were a "hail Mary," which proved the legal system had gone to "extreme lengths to single me out," and he demanded either a reduced sentence or a retrial. To that, Justice Church said it was clear McLeod "continues to struggle to understand or accept the findings" of both the provincial and federal courts which had upheld his convictions and that his "outrageous" comments showcased a misunderstanding of the legal system. McLeod entered statements from his mother and son into the record, which were not read allowed, but which he said showed that there were also victims as the result of his imprisonment. He did not, however, deny that he deserved some punishment for what he had done to McLeod. "I hate myself," he said, apologizing to the family.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store