logo
The Cops Thrashed Him. Madonna, Spike Lee and Toni Morrison Took Notice.

The Cops Thrashed Him. Madonna, Spike Lee and Toni Morrison Took Notice.

New York Times10-03-2025
In the early hours of Sept. 15, 1983, a 25-year-old Black man named Michael Stewart was arrested for allegedly tagging a subway wall with a marker. According to the arresting officer, Stewart attempted to escape up the stairs, where the officer caught him, pinning him to the ground with a nightstick. Outside the precinct headquarters on Union Square, he allegedly tried to run off again, only to be piled on by multiple officers. College students in a building overlooking the square saw the officers kicking and beating the handcuffed Stewart (who weighed only 143 pounds) as he lay facedown on the sidewalk, screaming for help. One witness saw an officer slide a club under Stewart's neck and yank it upward. After Stewart stopped moving he was thrown, hogtied, into a paddy wagon, and driven to Bellevue Hospital. There, after 13 days in a coma, he died. No one was ever held accountable.
Elon Green's grimly vivid telling of this story and its aftermath in 'The Man Nobody Killed' is part elegy for Stewart himself, part portrait of the city that failed him. It avoids drawing explicit parallels with our own time, but then it hardly needs to.
An aspiring artist, Stewart was just beginning to make his presence felt in New York's downtown scene. He'd bussed at the Pyramid Club (until he was fired for being insufficiently aggressive), modeled for Dianne Brill (Warhol's 'Queen of the Night'), dated Jean-Michel Basquiat's sometime girlfriend Suzanne Mallouk, partied at Danceteria and appeared in Madonna's debut music video at Paradise Garage.
His own art, executed at a dilapidated studio above the Anderson Theater on the Bowery (no running water — fishbowls for toilets), was still at a formative stage: 'small, resonantly colored abstract paintings,' the New Yorker art critic Peter Schjeldahl wrote, that conveyed 'a serious aspiration.' He was seriously ambitious too: 'He wanted to do giant murals across the country,' a tagger buddy tells Green.
But it was his unlucky fate to enter posterity as the subject of other people's art and protest rather than the creator of his own. A remarkable number of the luminaries of that watchful, jittery era were shocked into action by Stewart's killing. The artist David Wojnarowicz designed a flier for a rally at Union Square while Stewart was still on life support. Basquiat, profoundly shaken by the incident ('It could have been me,' he observed), painted a spontaneous memorial on his friend Keith Haring's studio wall. Haring, who had been arrested four times for graffiti but — as he acknowledged — was spared mistreatment because he was white, later fashioned an anguished tribute of his own. Andy Warhol, Toni Morrison and Spike Lee all drew on the event in various ways, while political reaction ranged from demonstrations to two separate bombings, one of which blew up the bathroom in the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association building, injuring two maintenance workers.
New York at that time was in the throes of multiple crises: AIDS, crack, rampant violence, near bankruptcy. Its institutions were in disarray. The transit police closed ranks long before any serious attempt was made to investigate the assault. Backed by the P.B.A., they pursued a strategy of witness-smearing and victim-blaming. 'Michael Stewart is dead,' a police lawyer brazenly asserted, 'because of what he did to himself.' The medical examiner, whom Green presents as a study in craven evasiveness that would be funny if this were fiction, wouldn't give a precise cause of death, making it almost impossible for prosecutors to bring charges.
The district attorney, Robert Morgenthau, did finally get a grand jury to indict three officers, but a rogue juror's investigative efforts (on Stewart's behalf, ironically) shipwrecked the proceedings and Morgenthau had to start over. Even with the most serious charges downgraded from manslaughter to criminally negligent homicide, jurors acquitted all three defendants. By then the public's ambivalence over such matters had already been demonstrated in the case of Bernhard Goetz, who shot and injured four young Black men on the subway in 1984 after one of them asked him for $5. Goetz was convicted of nothing more than unlawful gun possession.
In 2019 the Guggenheim exhibited Basquiat's painting, cut from Haring's wall, along with Haring's own tribute and some of Stewart's work. With Black Lives Matter and other social justice movements then on the rise, the relevance of the decades-old incident was self-evident, and the fact that New York could no longer plead '80s levels of chaos and underfunding made the contemporary echoes of Stewart's killing all the more appalling. But if the subdued reaction to the recent acquittal of Daniel Penny in the death of Jordan Neely is anything to go by, there's a renewed tolerance for lethal violence against Black men perceived as trouble. The events recounted in Green's swift, unsparing book are as timely as ever; one can only hope they still have the power to shock.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Washington is unsafe, but the data tells a more nuanced story
Trump says Washington is unsafe, but the data tells a more nuanced story

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says Washington is unsafe, but the data tells a more nuanced story

President Donald Trump is sending the National Guard to Washington to combat what he called 'bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' But crime data paints a much more nuanced picture of what's going on in the nation's capital. Among major cities in the United States, Washington does have high rates of violent crime and murder. But it has a much lower rate of violent crime than some cities Trump hasn't spotlighted, such as Memphis, Tennessee. In the District of Columbia, different types of crime tend to be concentrated in different parts of the city, and crime overall has been on a downward trend in recent years. The murder rate is far below its historic peak. More: Think it's hard working for Trump? Try running the DEA and the DC police Thaddeus Johnson, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Council on Criminal Justice and a former police officer, said the capital is 'on par' with other big cities. He explained that – like many of its counterparts – the district saw crime increase during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic and the years that followed, but it's now experiencing a decrease. 'It's not perfect,' Johnson said. 'It's a lot of work to do.' Here's what to know. Washington recently saw murders spike, then drop The Metropolitan Police Department reported a 35% drop in violent crime and a 15% decrease in overall crime from 2023 to 2024. Matthew M. Graves, former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia who also served as the city's local prosecutor, cited these stats in January as a testament to his prosecutorial strategy. Between 2023 and 2024, crime categories fell between 2% (theft not related to cars) and 64% (arson). But 2023 also saw 274 homicides reported, higher than any year since 2005, according to the Metropolitan Police Department. 'We have to be mindful that we had almost historic peaks in these crimes, and so we're going to have to get back to par first,' Johnson said, pointing to lower pre-pandemic crime levels in 2018 and 2019. 'And we're still working that way, and we're coming closer.' Violent crime has been down in 2025 Violent crime in Washington through Aug. 8, 2025, dropped 26% compared with the same period in 2024, according to data from the Metropolitan Police Department. That includes a 50% decrease in sexual abuse. Overall crime is down 7% so far. Motor vehicle theft is level, and burglary is down 20%. Johnson said 200 or so people tend to be responsible for much of the crime in a city like Washington. The crimes tend to be concentrated in Black and brown communities and happen between people who know one another, he said. Violent crime and property crime are concentrated Violent crime in Washington is highest in Ward 8, the southeastern corner of the city, which includes the low-income Anacostia area, according to an interactive map on the city government's website. It's followed by Wards 7 and 5 in the eastern part of the city. Violent crime is lowest in Ward 3 in the affluent northwest part of the city, bordering Maryland and across the Potomac River from Virginia. Property crime is highest in Ward 2, a tourist-heavy area that includes the National Mall, the White House and other landmarks, and Ward 5, an area in the northeast part of the city that borders Maryland. Washington has a comparatively high murder rate Washington's rate of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter was 25.5 per 100,000 people in 2024, according to a USA TODAY analysis of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program data. That places Washington at No. 5 among more than 30 cities with more than 500,000 people. The FBI categorizes crimes differently from the Metropolitan Police Department, so the rate will differ slightly from the police department's data. But the categorization is consistent across the country, and the FBI is the best source for comparing local crime data nationally. Here is the ranking: Memphis, Tennessee: 40.6 Baltimore: 34.8 Detroit: 31.2 Kansas City, Missouri: 27.6 Washington: 25.5 Washington has 10th-highest violent crime rate among major U.S. cities When other violent crime is factored in, Washington ranks lower among large cities. The city's violent crime rate is 926 per 100,000 residents, according to USA TODAY's analysis of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program data. Violent crime includes murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, rape, robbery and aggravated assault. Here is the ranking: Memphis, Tennessee: 2,501 Detroit: 1,781 Baltimore: 1,606 Kansas City, Missouri: 1,547 Milwaukee: 1,431 Albuquerque, New Mexico: 1,182 Houston: 1,148 Nashville: 1,124 Denver: 993 Washington: 926 Crime in DC used to be much higher A generation ago, crime in Washington was so high that the city earned the moniker the "murder capital." The number of homicides increased steadily from 148 in 1985 to a peak 482 in 1991, according to a report by the Criminal Justice Research Center. Violent crime, especially murder, dropped dramatically between then and the COVID-19 pandemic. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Is DC unsafe, as Trump claims? What the crime data shows Solve the daily Crossword

BuzzFeed apologizes for offensive post about ‘Love Island USA's' Chelley Bissainthe
BuzzFeed apologizes for offensive post about ‘Love Island USA's' Chelley Bissainthe

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BuzzFeed apologizes for offensive post about ‘Love Island USA's' Chelley Bissainthe

The post included an apology to the 'Love Island USA' star, along with a listicle of how workplaces should correct their offensive behavior. The digital media outlet BuzzFeed has apologized for a post it made about 'Love Island USA' contestant Michelle 'Chelley' Bissainthe. BuzzFeed and its food vertical 'Tasty,' made a since-deleted Instagram post in early July listing the different 'Love Island USA' season seven contestants and what they would make them for breakfast. The idea comes from an element of the show, that films the islanders almost every day and shows them eating breakfast in the morning. As a small act of chivalry, the male contestants usually make food for the female contestants. The post was supposed to make light-hearted suggestions for each islander, but for Bissainthe's breakfast, Tasty said it would make her 'a bowl of fruit, Goldfish, and a knuckle sandwich.' The post received backlash immediately, with many fans questioning why the brand would imply that one of the main Black female contestants on the show deserved to be punched in the face. The contestants from the show tend to face public opinion, scrutiny, and hate for the duration of the season and long after, and brands try to join in on the spectacle. But for many, Tasty's random attack on Bissainthe took it too far. Bissainthe's social media team responded to the post with a statement on her Instagram story, calling it 'disturbing, disgusting, and unacceptable.' 'It is the harsh reality that implicit biases can be rooted in antiblackness, misogyny, prejudice, violence, etc,' the statement said. 'We will not accept a narrative in which Chelley deserves violence.' BuzzFeed had already taken down the post following the recation, but yesterday, the outlet issued an apology, written by two Black staffers. The post was not only for Bissainthe. In true BuzzFeed listicle form, the post outlined 11 steps on how a company addresses its offensive behavior. It is embellished with GIFs and has anonymous quotes from employees. 'This mistake deeply hurt members of the Black community, both internally and in our audience,' the post said. 'But instead of ignoring the issue or sweeping it under the rug, we want to use it as a case study of what any workplace or community must face when it falls short and show what it looks like to try, sincerely, to do better.' The first step of the instructions was to 'take time to listen to your audience and employees about how it impacted them.' Some employees were quoted anonymously in the post. One said, 'As a Black woman at the company, I was mostly disappointed and confused. It made me think about all the experiences that I have to go through on the daily basis. Darker skin is automatically seen as aggressive. No matter what you do, what you say or how you say it.' Another said, 'My trust in my company has faltered, and my safe haven now has a crack.' The post's 11 points discuss taking responsibility and making 'genuine apologies,' working on 'covering Black people in a positive light,' and creating 'inclusive and safe spaces.' It also acknowledged that it would take more than 11 steps to 'fight against existential discrimination.' 'Through these steps and our work we are aiming every day to promote Black joy, to protect Black women, and to help steer a much larger and whiter organization in a direction that's inclusive for us and all others,' the post said. More must-reads: Potential PBS replacement network says slavery was 'no big deal' in video Appeals court agrees NFL can be put on trial over claims Black coaches face discrimination Abby Phillip confronts Jillian Michaels after she downplays U.S. slavery on CNN Solve the daily Crossword

‘We're not going to back down': Leaders condemn Trump's attacks on Oakland
‘We're not going to back down': Leaders condemn Trump's attacks on Oakland

San Francisco Chronicle​

time35 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

‘We're not going to back down': Leaders condemn Trump's attacks on Oakland

A group of Oakland elected officials and community leaders rallied Thursday to condemn recent remarks made by President Donald Trump portraying the city as poorly run and crime-ridden, and to pledge a steadfast response to any effort to deploy federal troops there. In a series of speeches at Oakland City Hall, Mayor Barbara Lee, City Council members and others said Trump's characterization of the city was a fear-mongering tactic to target U.S. cities with majority-Black populations or those led by Black mayors. On Monday, President Trump sent National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., a Black-led city, and named Oakland as one of several cities where he might do the same. In June, Trump deployed more than 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against immigration raids in Southern California. Critics said Trump's rhetoric evoked a historic pattern in which politicians have painted predominantly or historically Black cities as crime-plagued. Crime nationwide is down in the first half of the year, according to a report by the Council on Criminal Justice. 'We have other cities also that are bad. Very bad,' Trump said during a White House news conference Monday, singling out Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, Baltimore and Oakland. Oakland leaders pointed to the city's notable drop in violent crime during the first half of the year, and the work they said officials were doing to revitalize the city. 'President Trump's characterization of Oakland is down-right wrong,' Lee said. 'We're not going to back down.' At Thursday's press conference, faith and community leaders joined city officials in denouncing Trump's attacks, saying Oakland's residents are resilient. 'We believe that Oakland is not on the decline, but on the rise,' said Pastor LJ Jennings of the Kingdom Builders Christian Fellowship in East Oakland. Council Member Carol Fife, who represents District Three, criticized Trump for being a convicted felon attempting to tarnish the city. Fife said the city has made progress on bringing down crime while acknowledging there was more work to do. 'If you care about law and order, you would know that the safest cities have the most resources, and those resources come in the tune of affordable housing,' Fife said. 'It comes from protecting our seniors, it comes from investing in education.' Danielle Motley-Lewis, president of the Oakland and Berkeley chapter of the Black Women Organized for Political Action group, encouraged people to share stories of the city's progress, unity and transformation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store