Hong Kong legal bodies right to speak up on issues of significant import
Advertisement
Hong Kong's Bar Association prides itself on speaking up when such issues arise. It is well-placed to make a valuable contribution. Bar Association chairman Jose-Antonio Maurellet recently gave his take on topical legal matters in an exclusive interview with the Post.
He said targeted legislation is needed to combat
AI-generated deepfake pornography . Concerns were raised when a student at the University of Hong Kong created such images. Officials have argued existing laws can be used, but Maurellet said applying legislation intended for other purposes might lead to complications. The government should consider whether current laws are adequate, especially as technology advances. The Bar Association's views lend weight to calls for legal amendments, and Maurellet's suggestion that the Law Reform Commission prepare proposals is sensible.
He also urged the authorities to exercise caution when deciding whether to use new powers to
ban individual lawyers from visiting prisoners. The government can now seek a court warrant prohibiting visits by legal representatives if this threatens to endanger national security, obstruct justice, cause bodily harm or hinder the recovery of crime proceeds.
Maurellet highlighted the importance of access to legal advice. He said there needs to be compelling evidence to justify a ban, warning proceedings might be disrupted if a prisoner needs to switch lawyers.
Advertisement
The Bar Association chairman has expressed views on a variety of issues, from the proposed recognition of same-sex relationships to the importance of the city's independent judiciary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong authorities object as Australia, UK grant asylum to 2 activists
Hong Kong authorities have lambasted the 'harbouring of criminals by countries' as Australia and the United Kingdom granted asylum and residency status respectively to a pair of opposition activists wanted for national security offences. Fugitive former lawmaker Ted Hui Chi-fung, who lives in Adelaide, and activist Tony Chung Hon-lam, based in London, announced separately on their social media accounts this weekend that they had been granted asylum by the governments of Australia and the UK, respectively. In a statement in the early morning on Sunday, the Hong Kong government expressed 'strong disapproval and opposition against the harbouring of criminals in any form by any country,' without naming any country or individual. 'Any country that harbours Hong Kong criminals in any form shows contempt for the rule of law, grossly disrespects Hong Kong's legal systems and barbarically interferes in the affairs of Hong Kong,' its spokesman said. 'Turning a blind eye to the offences committed by the criminals and disregarding the potential security threats posed to the local community and residents, they shall eventually bear the consequences of what they have done.' The spokesman said that a number of absconders wanted under the city's national security laws had continued to engage in acts endangering national security, which he described as 'out-and-out shameful and cowardly acts.'
South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
The Europe-China trade relationship: deficits, disputes and de-risking
When Donald Trump took office as US president for the second time in January 2025, many people anticipated trade ties between the European Union (EU) and China to grow closer. The reality has been more complex. As the world's third-largest economy, the EU navigates choppy waters between the US and China, while facing a widening trade imbalance with China and increasingly assertive Chinese trade measures. The EU seeks to 'de-risk' as trade talks with China remain stiff and trade disputes between the European bloc and China remain unsolved. What are the core issues at stake and where is this vital partnership heading?
South China Morning Post
15 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump-Putin summit: was it a win for Russia or the US?
The highly anticipated US-Russia presidential summit in Alaska had raised hopes for progress on ending the Ukraine war, but instead left more questions than answers Advertisement Still, observers viewed Vladimir Putin's diplomatic return to US soil – his first in a decade – as a symbolic win for Moscow. The nearly three-hour talks, which both Putin and Donald Trump described as 'productive', signalled a potential thaw in the fraught US-Russia relationship despite concluding without a ceasefire agreement, they said. Meanwhile, as China offered a cautious endorsement of the summit, Chinese and Russian analysts warned that Beijing could face a strategic dilemma , wary of how the limited détente might reshape the US-China-Russia power triangle. With Ukraine and Europe notably absent from the discussions, Trump's post-summit remarks about territorial swaps and US security guarantees sparked confusion over whether he had tacitly accepted Russia's retention of occupied territories amid the prolonged war. Advertisement There was a joint press appearance after the meeting, but neither Trump nor Putin announced concrete outcomes or details on what they had agreed on. They also did not take any questions from reporters. Putin, who was the first to speak, described the US and Russia as 'close neighbours'. He said he hoped 'the agreement that we've reached together' would be seen 'constructively' by Kyiv and European capitals and 'they won't throw a wrench in the works'.
