logo
Help pressurise Putin to agree to a ceasefire, Ukraine urges African countries

Help pressurise Putin to agree to a ceasefire, Ukraine urges African countries

Daily Maverick15 hours ago
Under almost constant deadly bombardment by Russia, Ukraine has appealed to African countries to pressure Russia to agree to an unconditional ceasefire in the 40-month-old war.
Ukraine does not ask much from Africa. Mainly just more principled votes at the UN condemning Russia's invasion.
But now, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha has issued the ceasefire appeal through African journalists visiting Ukraine in a brief respite between concerted missile and drone attacks on the capital, Kyiv, and other cities.
He noted that Ukraine had accepted the US proposal for an unconditional, full ceasefire. 'Now we need to pressure Russia to say unconditional yes and to accept a ceasefire… That is why it is also important to support our peace efforts from your countries, from your capitals,' he told the journalists.
Just before we arrived in Kyiv on a study tour, hundreds of projectiles had hit the city on 17 June. A few days later we visited the epicentre of that attack, an apartment building in the Solomianskyi district, which had taken a direct missile hit, collapsing 32 apartments from the ninth floor to the ground floor, killing 23 civilians and injuring 27 more.
Workers were clearing rubble. They were joined by two boys, aged about 11 and wearing hard hats, who had volunteered to help their neighbours. An elderly woman sat on a bench in the grounds, quietly weeping.
Tsiupko Mykola, the deputy head of the local emergency services, said 13 surrounding buildings had also been damaged, including a kindergarten. So far none of the dead seemed to be children, 'but there are several unidentified bodies still', so they didn't know for sure.
Could the Russians have mistakenly hit this civilian target? He rolled his eyes. 'You can see with your own eyes it is a residential building that took a direct hit,' he said, adding that there were no military targets in the vicinity. Five more civilians died elsewhere in Kyiv that night.
Two days after we left Ukraine, Russia launched 352 drones, 11 ballistic and five cruise missiles, killing at least six civilians in Kyiv and one in Bila Tserkva. Then, on Sunday, 29 June, Ukraine suffered its largest Russian attack in a single night, when a barrage of 537 drones and missiles again hit Kyiv and several other cities, including some as distant from the front as Lviv in the far west of the country, which is rarely targeted.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies, a US think tank, said Russia had significantly ramped up its use of drones over the last nine months, 'increasing from approximately 200 launched per week to more than 1,000 per week by March 2025 as part of a sustained pressure campaign'.
The United Nations human rights office reported on Sunday that civilian casualties in Ukraine had increased by 37% from December 2024 to May 2025, compared to the same period the previous year, with 968 civilians killed and 4,807 injured. The majority of these casualties occurred in Ukrainian-controlled areas.
'The war in Ukraine — now in its fourth year — is becoming increasingly deadly for civilians,' said Danielle Bell, the head of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine.
Unacceptable Russian demands
Ukraine's special envoy for the Middle East and Africa, Maksym Subkh, said it had been more than three months since Ukraine had offered an unconditional ceasefire, but Russia had not accepted the offer. In the last two rounds of direct negotiations in Istanbul in May and June, the Russians had put preconditions for negotiations that were completely unacceptable, said Subkh.
Apart from claiming the Ukrainian land they had occupied — and even some land still under Ukrainian control — Russia had insisted that Ukraine should not join Nato; it should not maintain strong and modern armed forces; it should destroy the weapons it had received from its Western partners to counter Russia's aggression; and it must adopt Russian as an official language.
Subkh said these demands showed that Russia was treating Ukraine as a colony, adding that Ukraine was experiencing the hardship and brutality African people had experienced during their colonisation. Meanwhile, Russia was continuing its constant shelling of Ukraine and 'the death toll is rising dramatically'.
He said the conditions that either side had should be discussed after the ceasefire, during negotiations.
He stressed that Ukraine remained determined to join the European Union and Nato, as it saw no other way of getting the security guarantees it needed for its protection.
EU membership
The EU ambassador to Ukraine, Katarina Mathernová, told us that the EU had had to step up its military support because at the start of the war Nato had 'armed Ukraine for defence, not victory', as the US feared a nuclear backlash.
And the EU — or at least almost all of it — remained committed to admitting Ukraine as a member. However, while Ukraine was rapidly fulfilling the many conditions required to join the EU, the EU was not in a position to accept it because one member state, Hungary, was blocking Ukraine's accession.
Mathernová said polls indicated that Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's party might lose elections later this year, and so the objection to Ukraine joining the EU could fall away.
Foreign Minister Sybiha said that in the two rounds of direct peace talks in Istanbul this year, Russia had shown it was not serious by sending low-level delegations. Now it was time 'to engage all instruments of diplomacy … time for full diplomatic mobilisation'.
Apart from putting pressure on Russia to agree to an unconditional ceasefire, it was crucial that African countries should support Ukraine by backing resolutions at the UN General Assembly seeking an end to the war.
Sybiha was clearly referring to Ukraine's past disappointments that so many African countries — including South Africa — had abstained from UN General Assembly resolutions condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine and demanding that it withdraw its forces.
This was often because these countries had historical relations with the Soviet Union, although Subkh pointed out that Ukraine had also been part of the Soviet Union and many African leaders had been educated or received training in Ukraine.
Military support
Sybiha also sent a message to African leaders who had committed themselves to Russia, referring apparently mainly to those African countries which receive military support from the private military company Wagner, or its successor, the Africa Corps.
'Look at facts, first of all, and sooner or later you will get the bill,' said Sybiha.
'So that is why it is always important to diversify your relations with different parties. To diversify your security, to diversify your energy security, your food security.'
Subkh stressed that Ukraine had had good relations with Africa for a long time, and noted that it had intensified relations since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Last year, it opened eight new embassies in Africa.
Mathernová said that after its invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Russia had switched the focus of its disinformation campaign away from Western countries and 'massively invested' in Africa, Asia and Latin America.
The West underestimated the importance of this shift, 'because the imperialist nature of this war, the imperialist desire of Putin, was so obvious in our case.
'And looking at it from different parts of the world, it's not so obvious.
'And I must say that they are so, so, so much better, the Russians, at the game of disinformation, false narratives, coming up with using existing grievances and just multiplying and making them a lot bigger.'
Mathernová said Russia had switched its disinformation campaign to Africa, Asia and Latin America because it knew it would be successful internationally, as 'it's the West against the rest, right?'
Moscow's disinformation includes characterising the Ukraine government as neo-Nazi and accusing it of being a puppet of the West.
'People are exhausted'
In three visits to Ukraine — in November 2023, May 2024 and now June 2025 — I found that the Ukrainian people remained remarkably resilient in the face of unprovoked aggression, death and destruction.
But the growing strain of the war, amid the rising toll of death and destruction, had also become apparent.
Mathernová said the Ukrainian leadership was doing remarkably well.
'But people are exhausted, tired. They don't see a clear end.'
She noted that President Volodymyr Zelensky's popularity had ebbed and flowed, from 98% when the war started, down to about 50% and then to above 70% after US President Donald Trump called him a dictator in the White House earlier this year.
Nonetheless, she said, 'Ukrainians are knowingly by now facing a situation where there is no good and bad option. It's bad and worse options, right?
'I mean, that's the reality.'
She believes the war will end 'with a temporary loss of some territories, but a sovereign and independent Ukraine.'
For that to happen, an unconditional ceasefire is necessary very soon to stop the steady destruction of Ukraine and its people.
Yet we do not hear the South African government using its friendship with Russia to demand that it stop bombarding Ukraine so that peace negotiations may begin. DM
Peter Fabricius was visiting the Czech Republic, Poland and Ukraine on a journalists' study tour sponsored by those three governments.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rwanda exercises command and control over M23 rebels: UN experts
Rwanda exercises command and control over M23 rebels: UN experts

TimesLIVE

timean hour ago

  • TimesLIVE

Rwanda exercises command and control over M23 rebels: UN experts

Armed rebels in violation of embargo, says report By Rwanda has exercised command and control over M23 rebels during their advance in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), gaining political influence and access to mineral-rich territory, according to a confidential report by a group of UN experts. The report obtained by Reuters details training which the experts say Rwanda has provided to M23 recruits and military equipment they say Rwanda has deployed — notably "high-tech systems capable of neutralising air assets" — to give the rebels "a decisive tactical advantage" over DRC's beleaguered army. The report was submitted to the UN Security Council sanctions committee for DRC in early May and is due to be published shortly, said diplomats. M23 has advanced in eastern DRC, seizing the region's two largest cities, Goma and Bukavu in January and February. DRC, the UN and Western powers say Rwanda is supporting M23 by sending troops and arms. Rwanda has long denied helping M23 and says its forces are acting in self-defence against DRC's army and ethnic Hutu militiamen linked to the 1994 Rwandan genocide, including the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). The report by the UN experts said Rwanda's military support for M23 was not "primarily" aimed at addressing threats posed by the FDLR, asserting that Kigali was instead focused on "conquering additional territories". Rwanda's UN mission and a government spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the report. US President Donald Trump's administration is trying to broker a peace deal between Rwanda and DRC that would bring billions of dollars of Western investment to a region rich in tantalum, gold, cobalt, copper, lithium and other minerals. On Friday the Rwandan and DRC foreign ministers signed a peace deal in Washington and met with Trump, who warned of "very severe penalties, financial and otherwise" if the deal is violated. Qatar is hosting a parallel mediation effort with delegations from the Congolese government and M23. The UN report said Rwanda has hosted leaders of a rebel coalition that includes M23 at its Gabiro Training Centre and also used military centres in Nasho and Gako to train M23 recruits. Rwanda also "drastically increased" the number of Rwandan troops in eastern DRC ahead of M23's advance, according to the experts, who offered "a conservative estimate of 6,000" Rwandan troops active in DRC's North and South Kivu provinces. The UN experts also accused Rwanda of "flagrant and systematic violations" of an arms embargo, and said a likely missile attack in January on an armoured personnel carrier carrying U.N. peacekeepers — killing one and injuring four others — appeared to have been fired from a Rwandan military position. An estimated 1,000 to 1,500 Rwandan troops were still active in M23-held territory when the report was drafted, and "several thousand" remained along the border ready to deploy, said the report, which covers investigations conducted up to April 20. M23's military gains earlier this year spurred fears of a wider regional war drawing in DRC's neighbours, and also fuelled anxiety over the fate of President Felix Tshisekedi's government. In March M23 travelled as far west as Walikale, an area rich in minerals including tin, putting the rebels within 400km of Kisangani, DRC's fourth-biggest city. The following month, however, M23 withdrew from Walikale, a decision the experts said was "taken following direct instruction from the Government of Rwanda, once again confirming Rwanda's command and control" over rebel operations. "This included strategic-level decision-making on whether to seize, hold, or relinquish territory, thereby demonstrating overall operational coordination and hierarchical subordination," the report said. The experts also accused DRC of relying on the FDLR and pro-government militia fighters known as Wazalendo, offering them money and logistics in violation of a sanctions regime. A DRC government spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

How can government ensure AI is integrated into the education syllabus?
How can government ensure AI is integrated into the education syllabus?

TimesLIVE

timean hour ago

  • TimesLIVE

How can government ensure AI is integrated into the education syllabus?

In the fast-paced digital age, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into different fields to improve efficiency. The KwaZulu-Natal youth parliament has called for a complete overhaul of the 'outdated' school curriculum to better prepare pupils for future careers. While some schools have started incorporating AI into the syllabus, such as coding, others are left behind. More than 70 delegates representing the MK Party, IFP, ANC, DA, EFF and NFP condemned the syllabus as 'disconnected and obsolete'. They called for the urgent inclusion of AI and digital literacy, entrepreneurship, climate awareness, African history and mental health support, arguing a curriculum stuck in the past cannot prepare pupils for a world that has moved on.

Are diplomats becoming obsolete in the information age?
Are diplomats becoming obsolete in the information age?

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Are diplomats becoming obsolete in the information age?

Revolution or Relic? Dr Vusi Shongwe delves into the future of diplomacy in a today's data-driven world. Image: Ron AI 'If you want to invest in the future, invest in specialists in information management. If you want to take further risks, concentrate your efforts on linguistics. Of course, we will still need computer engineers and graphic designers, but not as key players.' — Jovan Kurbalija THE knowledge explosion and the speed of information transmission have radically transformed society, including diplomacy. Diplomats now operate in an intensely competitive environment where they must continually prove their relevance. In this information-intensive era, the ability to analyse data, distil insights, and convert information into actionable knowledge is critical. Countries engaged in global politics, in particular, must ensure their embassies are staffed with well-informed representatives. As IB Neumann argues in At Home With The Diplomats, diplomats abroad function as knowledge producers, operating within fleeting social dynamics shaped by their perceptions and sociability. At home, however, their work becomes more bureaucratic, often conforming to institutional consensus rather than personal insight. In 1797, the first Ottoman ambassador to London, Yusuf Agah Efendi, was recalled, but not before Britain's King George III praised him for strengthening the 'ancient friendship' between their nations. This historical example underscores the diplomat's timeless role: fostering trust and continuity in state relations. Traditional diplomacy prizes discretion and tact, qualities increasingly challenged by today's media-saturated world. Yet figures such as Talleyrand and Kissinger demonstrate that professional subtlety can endure, even under scrutiny. Harold Nicolson speaks of diplomatic detachment — not from life itself, but from impulsive reactions. Despite these ideals, diplomacy has long been viewed sceptically. Ambrose Bierce cynically defined it as 'the patriotic art of lying for one's country', while Sir Henry Wotton quipped that an ambassador is 'an honest man sent to lie abroad for the good of his country'. Even Trygve Lie, the first UN secretary-general, suggested a good diplomat should 'cut his neighbour's throat without having his neighbour notice'. Edmund Burke, meanwhile, disparaged 'double diplomacy' and 'mendicant diplomacy'. Yet honesty remains the diplomat's cornerstone. Reputation hinges on reliability, not deception. As former French ambassador Hervé Alphand noted, a diplomat must 'tell the truth to any foreign government without offending, and to his own government at the risk of offending.' This principle, rooted in Proverbs, remains diplomacy's bedrock. History shows that personal qualities define diplomatic success. François de Callières, the 17th-century French diplomat, outlined the ideal envoy: observant, disciplined, judicious, and self-controlled — a skilled listener with broad knowledge, resistant to frivolity. Today's diplomats face new challenges. Volker Stanzel identifies four key shifts: Fragmented public spheres, both within and between societies. Digital transformation reshaping diplomatic tools. Rise of non-state actors influencing foreign policy. Demands on diplomats to represent societal diversity, adapt linguistically, and engage digitally. While these changes challenge state diplomacy, they also empower civil society to shape public diplomacy. Bernard du Rosier declared the ambassador's duty was peace, a sacred mission for the common good. Yet as Barbaro noted, this ideal often clashes with loyalty to one's sovereign. Historically, diplomacy emerged as war-weary princes sought alternatives to conflict. Modern diplomats, like Britain's 1960s ambassador to West Germany, often serve as mediators, presenting 'the other side of the story' to reluctant ministers or foreign governments. Anatoly Dobrynin, in *In Confidence*, saw his role as fostering 'a correct and constructive dialogue' between Cold War rivals. Paul Sharp argues that diplomats embody a 'transformative conception of peace', though their profession is often misunderstood. Some dismiss them as cynical or power-hungry; others see them as realists. Sharp contends that diplomacy demands 'intelligence, tact, and a sense of proportion', qualities that steady nations when emotions run high.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store