Government working on contingency plans after ruling on Epping migrant hotel
Security minister Dan Jarvis told Times Radio on Wednesday: 'We're looking at a range of different contingency options following from a legal ruling that took place yesterday, and we'll look closely at what we're able to do.'
Asked whether other migrant hotels have the proper planning permission, Mr Jarvis said: 'Well, we'll see over the next few days and weeks.
'Other local authorities will be considering whether they wish to act in the same way that Epping (Forest) District Council have.
A STATEMENT FROM NIGEL FARAGE
This is a victory for the parents and concerned residents of Epping. They do not want their young women being assaulted on the streets.
This community stood up bravely, despite being slandered as far right, and have won. They represent the vast…
— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) August 19, 2025
'I think the important point to make is that nobody really thinks that hotels are a sustainable location to accommodate asylum seekers.
'That's precisely why the Government has made a commitment that, by the end of this Parliament, we would have phased out the use of them.'
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has indicated that councils run by his party will consider their own legal challenges.
However, a number of these councils do not have responsibility for planning permission, which may limit their ability to launch legal challenges.
Mr Farage also called for peaceful protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers to put pressure on local authorities to take the same route as Epping Forest.
Writing in The Telegraph, he said: 'Now the good people of Epping must inspire similar protests around Britain.
'Wherever people are concerned about the threat posed by young undocumented males living in local hotels and who are free to walk their streets, they should follow the example of the town in Essex.
'Let's hold peaceful protests outside the migrant hotels, and put pressure on local councils to go to court to try and get the illegal immigrants out; we now know that together we can win.'
On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12.
Epping Forest District Council had asked a judge to issue an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated there.
The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.
Our work with international partners is vital to stopping small boat crossings to the UK.
A joint intelligence unit involving the @NCA_UK and French counterparts has helped dismantle at least 52 organised immigration crime gangs operating in France.
— Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) August 17, 2025
The Home Office had warned the judge that an injunction could 'interfere' with the department's legal obligations, and lawyers representing the hotel's owner argued it would set a 'precedent'.
Now, Conservative-run Broxbourne Council in Hertfordshire has said it was taking legal advice 'as a matter of urgency' about whether it could take similar action to Epping Forest District Council, which is also run by the Tories.
The latest Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March.
This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier.
New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June.
Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
7 minutes ago
- Spectator
Dirty tricks have gone too far
Last week, John Power reported on Labour's alleged 'dark arts' strategy: a cynical ploy to damage Nigel Farage and his allies not through debate, but through reputational sabotage. As a target of such smears for many years, I was not hugely surprised to see my name mentioned in the piece. I can attest to the venom of the attacks on Reform – in stark contrast to the 'kinder, gentler politics' once promised from Labour. We should expect robust debate where ideas clash, but instead what we often encounter is a reliance on smears and innuendo. In this week's Spectator, James Heale notes that my lawyers have written to Labour. Downing Street sources have reportedly denied the existence of any new 'attack team' in No. 10 with the remit of challenging Reform. But key questions remain unanswered. In recent weeks, anonymous online accounts and attack blogs have engaged in a sophisticated and targeted disinformation campaign against me. Following the allegations in The Spectator last week, some of these soon vanished. Who was behind them? Where did the money come from to fund various X accounts? And what, exactly, are the limits of Labour's 'opposition research' – better known as the 'dark arts'? The emergence and subsequent disappearance of these accounts come just as Labour ramped up its attacks on Reform UK. Over the weekend, Nigel Farage has been subject to an unrelenting barrage of slime from the Labour party's official X account, stating that he would 'put women and girls at risk' because of his position against the Online Safety Act. Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, previously suggested that Farage was on the side of Jimmy Savile. Just how low is Labour prepared to go? My association with Nigel Farage, exacerbated by my family's financial support of Reform UK, has painted a bullseye on my back – and theirs. The assaults are manifold: in 2016, at the Republican National Convention supporting Donald Trump, I was arrested on allegations of a money-laundering conspiracy from my finance days, when I was 20. The tabloids had a field day, transforming it into a sensational saga of intrigue and excess prompting scurrilous claims of Russian interference. There were farcical allegations of illicit political financing in Montenegro, where I have lived for years, and lurid tales of investigations and arrests, along with whispers of shadowy business dealings with gangsters and despots. These tales disintegrate under scrutiny – but they were never intended to be proven. They are designed to depict me as a Bond-esque rogue. What's changed is how these attacks are amplified. Anonymous social media accounts use generative AI tools like ChatGPT and X's Grok to spread misinformation. By feeding these models with attack blogs and unreliable sources – often of their own creation – they generate misleading responses, auto-translate them, and inject them into the feeds of British journalists. This manipulation plays on well-known vulnerabilities of large language models, which can reflect the assumptions of their prompts and dream up plausible-sounding falsehoods. It is digital defamation at scale. The personal toll is profound. They imperil my petition for a US presidential pardon, following my 2017 plea deal, and have necessitated a 24-hour security team and an army of libel lawyers and investigators amid intimidation that endangers my family's safety and privacy. At the heart of this campaign lies a concerted effort to discredit me and Geostrategy, my global polling and strategy consultancy. Critics brand it a 'shady' vehicle for 'dark money', claims which are not just inaccurate, but malicious. Our polls, which align with other respected outfits, showing, for instance, majority US support for a free Ukraine, are conducted to the highest standards, belying claims of pro-Russia bias. Yet activist groups, colluding with the press, push such narratives without evidence. This approach, reminiscent of efforts against figures such as Trump, risks undermining liberal democracy by failing to accommodate dissenting voices within the system, potentially leading to greater instability. If we aim to restore faith in our institutions, we must return politics to its proper form: a competition of visions and ideas, rather than a battle of character assassination. Our democracy deserves civility, integrity and the courage to engage in open debate.
Glasgow Times
32 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin met senior US defence officials alongside other European military chiefs in Washington DC on Wednesday to discuss military options to secure peace in Ukraine. He later attended a virtual meeting of Nato's military committee, described by its chairman Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone as 'candid'. On Tuesday evening, Admiral Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, had dined with his US counterpart General Dan Caine. Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, travelled to Washington for talks with US military leaders (Andrew Matthews/PA) The meetings come amid renewed planning for a 'coalition of the willing', led by the UK and France, that would guarantee Kyiv's security in the event of a ceasefire. Earlier in the week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron co-chaired a meeting of the coalition, in which members of the group also discussed the possibility of further sanctions on Russia. Western security guarantees, strongly resisted by Moscow, are one of the central issues for any peace deal for Ukraine, which fears Russia could otherwise use a ceasefire to regroup and launch a renewed invasion. So far, only the UK and France have indicated they could commit troops to a peacekeeping force in Ukraine. In an interview on Tuesday Donald Trump ruled out an American ground contribution but suggested the US could be willing to provide some form of air support. Sir Keir Starmer joined European leaders in a show of support for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as he met Donald Trump at the White House (Aaron Schwartz/PA) His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, had earlier suggested the US could offer Ukraine a mutual defence agreement similar to Nato's Article 5, without Kyiv formally joining the alliance. Renewed talks among the 'coalition of the willing' follow last week's summit between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska as the US president continued to push for an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office. Those talks appeared to result in little progress towards a deal, but sparked concern among some in Europe that Mr Trump could seek to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into accepting a deal without sufficient security guarantees. On Monday, Sir Keir and Mr Macron joined other European leaders in travelling to Washington in a show of support for Mr Zelensky during a meeting with Mr Trump. Meanwhile, the UK and Russia traded sanctions as London sought to increase the pressure on Moscow to end its invasion. Europe minister Stephen Doughty unveiled sanctions on a series of organisations linked to Kyrgyzstan's financial services sector, saying they had been involved in Kremlin attempts to 'soften the blow of our sanctions by laundering transactions through dodgy crypto networks'. Russia in turn sanctioned 21 individuals, including former Labour MP Denis MacShane, several journalists, and the Government-appointed independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall.
North Wales Chronicle
39 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK military chief meets US counterparts for Ukraine talks
Admiral Sir Tony Radakin met senior US defence officials alongside other European military chiefs in Washington DC on Wednesday to discuss military options to secure peace in Ukraine. He later attended a virtual meeting of Nato's military committee, described by its chairman Italian Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone as 'candid'. On Tuesday evening, Admiral Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, had dined with his US counterpart General Dan Caine. The meetings come amid renewed planning for a 'coalition of the willing', led by the UK and France, that would guarantee Kyiv's security in the event of a ceasefire. Earlier in the week, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron co-chaired a meeting of the coalition, in which members of the group also discussed the possibility of further sanctions on Russia. Western security guarantees, strongly resisted by Moscow, are one of the central issues for any peace deal for Ukraine, which fears Russia could otherwise use a ceasefire to regroup and launch a renewed invasion. So far, only the UK and France have indicated they could commit troops to a peacekeeping force in Ukraine. In an interview on Tuesday Donald Trump ruled out an American ground contribution but suggested the US could be willing to provide some form of air support. His special envoy, Steve Witkoff, had earlier suggested the US could offer Ukraine a mutual defence agreement similar to Nato's Article 5, without Kyiv formally joining the alliance. Renewed talks among the 'coalition of the willing' follow last week's summit between Mr Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska as the US president continued to push for an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office. Those talks appeared to result in little progress towards a deal, but sparked concern among some in Europe that Mr Trump could seek to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into accepting a deal without sufficient security guarantees. On Monday, Sir Keir and Mr Macron joined other European leaders in travelling to Washington in a show of support for Mr Zelensky during a meeting with Mr Trump. Meanwhile, the UK and Russia traded sanctions as London sought to increase the pressure on Moscow to end its invasion. Europe minister Stephen Doughty unveiled sanctions on a series of organisations linked to Kyrgyzstan's financial services sector, saying they had been involved in Kremlin attempts to 'soften the blow of our sanctions by laundering transactions through dodgy crypto networks'. Russia in turn sanctioned 21 individuals, including former Labour MP Denis MacShane, several journalists, and the Government-appointed independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall.
