logo
One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data

One Tech Tip: How to protect your 23andMe genetic data

Independenta day ago

Remember 23andMe? The company that gave customers saliva-based DNA testing kits to learn about their ancestry?
Founded in 2006, the company also conducted health research and drug development. But it struggled to find a profitable business model and eventually filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection back in March, raising concerns about the safety of customer data.
Well, 27 states and the District of Columbia on Monday filed a lawsuit in bankruptcy court seeking to block the sale of the company's archive of genetic data without customer consent. The lawsuit comes as a biotechnology company seeks court's approval to buy the struggling firm.
If you were a customer of 23andMe, you're probably wondering what is going on with your data. It turns out you do have options if you want to protect your genetic self.
What happened to 23andMe?
23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection back in March. Anne Wojcicki, who co-founded the company nearly two decades ago and served as its CEO stepped down. The San Francisco-based company said that it would look to sell 'substantially all of its assets' through a court-approved reorganization plan.
Wojcicki intends to bid on 23andMe as the company pursues a sale through the bankruptcy process. In a statement on social media, Wojcicki said that she resigned as CEO to be 'in the best position' as an independent bidder.
23andMe said that filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection helps facilitate a sale of the company, meaning that it's seeking new ownership. The company said it wants to pull back on its real estate footprint and has asked the court to reject lease contracts in San Francisco and Sunnyvale, California, and elsewhere to help cut costs. But the company plans to keep operating during the process.
I used the service, is my DNA data safe?
In a post about the Chapter 11 process, 23andMe said its users' privacy and data are important considerations in any transaction and that any buyer will be required to comply with applicable laws when it comes to how it treats customer data.
But experts note that laws have limits. For one, the U.S. has no federal privacy law and only about 20 states do.
There are also security concerns. For instance, the turmoil of bankruptcy and related job cuts could leave fewer employees to protect customers' data against hackers. It wouldn't be the first time — a 2023 data breach exposed the genetic data of nearly 7 million customers at 23andMe, which later agreed to pay $30 million in cash to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to protect customers whose personal information was exposed.
Experts note that DNA data is particularly sensitive — and thus valuable.
'At a fundamental biological level, this is you and only you,' said David Choffnes, a computer science professor at Northeastern University and executive director of its Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute. 'If you have an email address that gets compromised, you can find another email provider and start using a new email address. And you're pretty much able to move on with your life without problem. And you just can't do that with your genetic code.'
23andMe says it does not share information with health insurance companies, employers or public databases without users' consent and with law enforcement only if required by a valid legal process, such as a subpoena. Choffnes said while that's good, it's a fairly narrow set of categories.
'There's still other things that they are allowed to do with that data, including, as they mentioned, provide cross context, behavioral or targeted advertising,' he said. 'So, you know, in a sense, even if they aren't sending your personal data to an advertiser, there's a long line of research that identifies how third parties can re-identify you from de-identified data by looking for patterns in it. And so if they're targeting you with advertisements, for example, based on some information that they have about your genetic data, there's probably a way that other parties could piece together other information they have access to.'
How can I delete my data from 23andMe?
California Attorney General Rob Bonta issued an urgent consumer alert before 23andMe filed for bankruptcy — noting the company's financial distress and reminding people they have the right to have their data deleted.
If you have a 23andMe account, you can delete your data by logging in and going to 'settings' and scrolling to a section called '23andMe Data' at the bottom of the page. Then, click 'View,' download it if you want a copy then go to the 'Delete Data' section and click 'Permanently Delete Data.' 23andMe will email you to confirm and you will need to follow the link in the email to confirm your deletion request.
If you previously asked 23andMe to store your saliva sample and DNA, you can also ask that it be destroyed by going to your account settings and clicking on 'Preferences.' And you can withdraw consent from third-party researchers to use your genetic data and sample under 'Research and Product Consents.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's energy dominance agenda could be ravaged by Section 899
Trump's energy dominance agenda could be ravaged by Section 899

Reuters

time25 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Trump's energy dominance agenda could be ravaged by Section 899

LONDON, June 12 - A proposed U.S. tax targeting foreign investors could hurt European energy giants that operate in America's booming oil and gas sector, undermining what President Donald Trump describes as his energy dominance agenda. Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill under review by the Senate includes an additional tax of up to 20% on foreign investors' income, such as dividends and royalties. The tax, known as Section 899, was devised as a pushback against countries that impose what the bill describes as "unfair foreign taxes" on U.S. companies, such as digital services taxes. Section 899 is believed to be targeting companies headquartered in the European Union and Britain, which both have tax systems considered discriminatory by the Trump administration. The provision is a significant threat to London-listed Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab and BP (BP.L), opens new tab as well as France's TotalEnergies ( opens new tab and Spain's Repsol ( opens new tab, which all have sprawling operations in the United States. Trump, who often used the slogan "drill, baby, drill" in his election campaign, has portrayed himself as pro-fossil fuel, vowing on his first day in office to maximise oil and gas production. But if approved, Section 899 could have the opposite effect. BP last year invested more than $6 billion, about 40% of its capital expenditure, in the United States, where its interests include onshore and offshore oil and gas operations, two refineries, thousands of retail fuel stations and a power trading business. The country is also home to more than a third of BP's global workforce of about 90,000 and accounted for roughly 30% of its 2024 revenue of $189 billion and more than a quarter of its $21 billion net profit. Shell, the biggest European oil major, is also a huge investor in the United States, which accounted for 23% of its 2024 revenue of $284 billion. It invests about 30% of its capital expenditure in the country, where it has oil and gas production facilities, a petrochemicals plant, a vast retail network, liquefied natural gas (LNG) purchasing agreements and major trading operations. The United States became increasingly important to Big Oil companies in recent decades thanks to its stable fiscal and regulatory environment while other regions presented a variety of challenges. Take Russia, for example. Its vast oil and gas resources started attracting investments from many companies in the 1990s after the collapse of the Soviet Union, but the country is now uninvestible owing to western sanctions that followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Similarly, western companies have limited opportunities to invest in the Middle East, where national oil companies dominate. Europe, meanwhile, has limited natural resources and strict environmental regulation. The multinational nature of oil and gas companies means they have plenty of experience dealing with tax uncertainty, but shifting tax policies tend to delay investments. Company boards require long-term confidence to proceed with large, multi-decade capital projects such as oil and gas fields or LNG plants. The industry's confidence in the United States was already shaken under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, who in 2020 revoked a construction permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. The Biden administration also paused approvals for new LNG projects in 2024 because of climate concerns. Trump lifted the pause when he entered the White House. According to Section 899, multinational companies could face a new tax on dividends sent overseas and inter-company loans, potentially reducing profit. The Gulf of Mexico accounted for about 10% of Shell's 2024 free cash flow of $40 billion, it said in a presentation. That means that Section 899 could shave $800 million from its free cash flow per year from Gulf of Mexico operations alone. BP made about $1.5 billion in free cash flow in the United States last year, Reuters calculations show. A 20% dividend tax could translate into a $300 million loss in free cash flow. Faced with the worsening fiscal terms, companies could opt to direct funds away from the United States. Though options for deploying capital elsewhere on a similar scale are limited, companies could choose to spread their investments more widely. Such a scenario could be a boon for countries such as Canada, Brazil, Mozambique and Namibia, which have large untapped natural resources. Another option would be for companies to transfer their headquarters and listings to the United States - a costly and politically complicated option. Shell previously contemplated such a move to boost its share value, though it appears to have abandoned the idea. Ultimately, it is very likely that the Senate would push to modify Section 899 or limit its scope, given the potential far-reaching impact on many sectors. But barring a radical change, Section 899 poses a huge risk for European oil and gas giants that are heavily dependent on the United States. Achieving the Trump administration's energy dominance agenda will almost certainly require more foreign investment, not less, so if the CEOs of European energy companies complain loudly enough, the president may well listen to them. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), opens new tab, your essential new source for global financial commentary. ROI delivers thought-provoking, data-driven analysis. Markets are moving faster than ever. ROI, opens new tab can help you keep up. Follow ROI on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X., opens new tab

iPadOS 26 Beta 1 is Out - What's New
iPadOS 26 Beta 1 is Out - What's New

Geeky Gadgets

time35 minutes ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

iPadOS 26 Beta 1 is Out - What's New

Apple has introduced the first beta of iPadOS 26, offering an early look at the next evolution of its iPad operating system. This initial release showcases a range of new features, performance enhancements, and system refinements aimed at improving the overall user experience. While still in development, iPadOS 26 Beta 1 provides a glimpse into the potential of the final version. In the video below, Zollotech explores the key updates and improvements in detail. Watch this video on YouTube. Key Features in iPadOS 26 The iPadOS 26 Beta brings several significant updates designed to enhance functionality and usability. These features highlight Apple's commitment to making the iPad a more versatile and efficient tool for users: Enhanced Multitasking: New multitasking tools simplify managing multiple apps simultaneously, making workflows more seamless for productivity-focused users. New multitasking tools simplify managing multiple apps simultaneously, making workflows more seamless for productivity-focused users. Home Screen Customization: Expanded customization options allow greater control over app layouts and widgets, allowing users to personalize their home screens to suit their preferences. Expanded customization options allow greater control over app layouts and widgets, allowing users to personalize their home screens to suit their preferences. Apple Pencil Upgrades: Improved precision and responsiveness elevate the drawing and note-taking experience, catering to creative professionals, students, and casual users alike. These updates reflect Apple's ongoing efforts to position the iPad as a device that bridges the gap between work and leisure, making sure it meets the diverse needs of its user base. Performance Enhancements and Bug Fixes Performance optimization is a central focus of iPadOS 26 Beta 1, with Apple implementing several improvements to ensure a smoother and faster experience. Key enhancements include: Faster App Launches: Applications now open more quickly, even when the system is under heavy workloads. Applications now open more quickly, even when the system is under heavy workloads. Smoother Animations: Transitions and interactions feel more fluid, contributing to a polished and responsive interface. Transitions and interactions feel more fluid, contributing to a polished and responsive interface. Reduced Latency: Tasks, particularly in resource-intensive apps, respond more promptly, improving overall efficiency. In addition to these performance upgrades, Apple has addressed various bugs from previous versions. These fixes enhance system stability and app performance, resulting in a more reliable user experience. However, as with any beta software, occasional glitches and imperfections are to be expected, making it important to approach the beta with realistic expectations. System Application Updates Several built-in apps have received updates in iPadOS 26 Beta 1, further refining the iPad's functionality. These changes, while incremental, contribute to a more cohesive and user-friendly operating system: Files App: New organization tools make managing documents and folders more efficient, streamlining workflows for users who rely on the iPad for productivity. New organization tools make managing documents and folders more efficient, streamlining workflows for users who rely on the iPad for productivity. Safari Browser: Enhanced tab management and faster page rendering improve the browsing experience, making it easier to navigate the web efficiently. Enhanced tab management and faster page rendering improve the browsing experience, making it easier to navigate the web efficiently. Notes and Mail: Subtle yet impactful updates enhance usability, aligning with Apple's focus on refining core applications to meet user needs. These updates demonstrate Apple's attention to detail, making sure that even minor changes contribute to a more polished and intuitive user experience. Beta Considerations and Installation Tips As an early-stage release, iPadOS 26 Beta 1 is still undergoing development and refinement. Apple will continue to release updates throughout the beta cycle, addressing user feedback and resolving issues. If you're considering installing the beta, it's essential to take certain precautions: Expect Bugs: Beta software often contains glitches and stability issues, which may impact usability. Beta software often contains glitches and stability issues, which may impact usability. Use a Secondary Device: To avoid disruptions to your daily workflow, install the beta on a secondary iPad rather than your primary device. To avoid disruptions to your daily workflow, install the beta on a secondary iPad rather than your primary device. Enrollment Process: Apple provides a straightforward process for joining the beta program, allowing users to test new features and contribute feedback to improve the final release. By following these guidelines, you can explore the beta's features while minimizing potential disruptions to your routine. Looking Ahead iPadOS 26 Beta 1 offers a compelling preview of Apple's vision for the future of its iPad operating system. With features like enhanced multitasking, Apple Pencil improvements, and expanded home screen customization, alongside performance upgrades and app refinements, this beta sets the stage for a more powerful and versatile iPad experience. While the software is still evolving, it provides valuable insights into what users can expect from the final release. As Apple continues to refine the system throughout the beta cycle, users can anticipate further enhancements that align with the company's high standards for quality and usability. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in iPadOS 26. Source & Image Credit: zollotech Filed Under: Apple iPad, Mobile Phone News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Trump ally to spearhead review that could torpedo Australia's defence plans
Trump ally to spearhead review that could torpedo Australia's defence plans

Daily Mail​

time43 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump ally to spearhead review that could torpedo Australia's defence plans

Long-time Donald Trump ally and China hawk Elbridge 'Bridge' Colby will spearhead a US government review of the AUKUS submarine deal, as speculation mounts that the arrangement will be scrapped. The appointment, confirmed by a US defence official on Thursday, heightened expectations that the Trump administration will end or at least alter the deal under which Australia was to acquire nuclear-powered submarines to replace its current ageing fleet. Defence Minister Richard Marles downplayed the significance of a review, describing it as 'natural' given the policy was introduced by the Biden administration. But Shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor has expressed serious reservations in the face of threatened abandonment. 'If AUKUS falls over, it is Australia that pays the price,' he said. 'We would face a dangerous gap in capability at a time when we lack the capacity to go it alone.' Australia jettisoned a deal to acquire French-made submarines - despite having spent almost $2.5billion - to instead join the deal with the US and UK governments. A collapse of the AUKUS deal would leave Australia to start from scratch in finding its next generation of submarines, with such deals taking many years between commissioning and completion. US Under Secretary of Defence Policy, Mr Colby will be at the helm during the period of review, as first reported by British publication the Financial Times. He has publicly spoken of his doubts about the strategic and cost value of the AUJUS deal. 'AUKUS, in principle, it is a great idea, but I have been very skeptical in practice,' Mr Colby posted on X in August last year. 'I remain skeptical, agnostic, as I put it, but more inclined based on new information I have gleaned. 'It would be crazy to have fewer SSNs Virginia class in the right place and time.' Asked to address this during a Senate hearing in March this year, prior to being approved as under secretary, he doubled down. Mr Colby said repeated that it was a 'great idea' but that the hope for an 'Australian capacity' for US military could not be dragged out over a lengthy time period. However he also referred to Australia as 'perhaps our closest ally in the world', noting that the Australian government has supported the US 'even in our less advisable wars'. 'It is a great idea for (Australia) to have attack submarines,' he told the committee. 'I think it should be the policy of the United States Government to do everything we can to make (AUKUS) work. 'This is getting back to restoring our defense industrial capacity so that we don't have to face these awful choices but rather can be in a position where we can produce not only for ourselves, but for our allies.' As of Thursday, he has not commented on his role overseeing the review of AUKUS but took to X to back the messaging of US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. '(Mr Hegseth's) Shangri-La Dialogue speech highlighted the Department of Defense's commonsense approach in the Indo-Pacific to achieve President Trump's Peace Through Strength and America First agenda.' He also fulfilled the label of 'China hawk' which media companies have given him, highlighting his concerns for the country's expanding influence in the Indo-Pacific region - an issue AUKUS was set up to counter. 'China's actions undermine peace and stability in the region,' he said, referencing its military build up and operations in the South China Sea and near Taiwan. 'These are the reasons driving the United States assessment that China is the most serious and pressing military threat,' he said. But, as a caveat, Mr Colby then quoted Mr Hegseth's recent statement that the US does not seek war or to 'dominate or strangle China'. The messaging is similar to that of the American defence official who confirmed to Daily Mail Australia that there would be a review of the AUKUS pact - and why. 'This review will ensure the initiative meets these common sense, America First criteria,' they said. 'This means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs,' the official said. In the seven-part thread, Mr Colby identified the US as an Indo-Pacific nation, commenting that prosperity and security of Americans is 'vitally linked with those of our allies and partners in the region'. Whatever his view on AUKUS, Mr Colby is not enthusiastic about formalising defence ties with a 'NATO-like' alliance in the region. 'I am not theologically opposed to it, Senator, but I have been skeptical,' he told the March hearing. 'Something may be building up to have more multilateralization in the region, but not the huge ambition of an Asia NATO,' he added. 'Especially because you have got Japan over here, India over here, Australia down here. Their circumstances are quite distinct.' Mr Colby is a long-time loyalist to Donald Trump and the US President's view of the world which is strongly critical of American involvement in overseas conflicts that do not serve US interests. During Trump's first term, he served from 2017 to 2018 as a deputy assistant secretary of defense. The key aim of his role was the reorientation of the defence department to prioritise the threat posed by China towards the US. Between Trump's terms, Mr Colby co-founded think tank The Marathon Initiative in 2019, which focused on preparing the US for an 'era of sustained great power competition'. A statement from the organisation when he was appointed back into the defense department praised Mr Colby's work shifting foreign policy away from the Middle East and Europe, towards China. 'He has worked persistently, persuasively, and intelligently to keep China at the forefront of the U.S. national security debate,' it said in April. 'His consistent message has been that America must prioritize the top threat facing the country—and that doing so will require tradeoffs. 'Bridge has sought to equip the United States with a coherent framework for ensuring its safety and prosperity against the most formidable rival in our history.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store